Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The important of philosophy in human life
The importance of philosophy
The important of philosophy in human life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The important of philosophy in human life
Nussbaum’s main point is that philosophy should not only be used by elite philosophers, but should be made available to the general public. Philosophy has many more uses than just “intellectual/academic exercise” (Soccio). Philosophy is not just exercise, but a way of life where you can incorporate both reason and emotion. Nussbaum alludes to the fact that philosophy’s unique skills are meant to help us express our experiences, situations, or emotions in a way that releases some of the unhappiness we obtain from them thereby guiding us towards better lives (Soccio). Along with it being used to guide one to a better life, it can also be used to provide a way to free one’s mind or emotions, while being reasonable. In many ways I do the opposite of what Nussbaum is recommending. I tend to look at philosophy as mainly academic or reason and tend to look at emotions separately. This is much like my view of the world sometimes. If one were to look at the world with both reason and emotion it would make more sense; much like philosophy. Nussbaum believes that you should not have one without the other. I think mainly because you would not get the full picture. The type of changes Nussbaum would have me make to both my beliefs and how I love, would be to not look at philosophy as just reason or just emotion, but to look at philosophy with a combined view of both. By doing this it could improve my beliefs, improve my way of thinking, and improve how I live.
If we look at philosophy the way Nussbaum suggests, with both emotion and reason, we can improve our beliefs. With both reason and emotion in mind, philosophy can amplify our thoughtfulness for universal moral values and encourage our willingness to stand up for the moralities of fairne...
... middle of paper ...
...ecome very dull and there would be no beliefs. Our emotions are constructed as a result of our judgments and beliefs, and our judgments and beliefs are created through our way of thinking which in turn is impacted by philosophy of some sort.
Although I do not think I have done justice to the importance of Nussbaum’s view of philosophy or all the ways it has/ will change my life, I have discussed three ways that it has impacted me by helping me to improve my beliefs, improve my way of thinking, and improve how I live. I have even indirectly discussed how philosophy itself can be improved with Nussbaum’s view of philosophy. I am not a perfectly ethical person, I am critical by nature, a few of my beliefs could be improved, and my way of thinking is not always clear. With Nussbaum’s view of philosophy and philosophy itself, I have been inspired to change these things.
8. Paul Arthur Schilpp, as noted in Steven J. Bartlett's ``Philosophy as Ideology'', Metaphilosophy, Vol. 17, No. 1, Jan. 1986, pp. 1ff. This article is a penetrating critique of the closed-mindedness of philosophers.
This paper will examine Robert C. Solomon's Emotions and Choices article, to best identify what anger is, and to what extent a rational human being is responsible for their anger. Firstly, Solomon's argument must be described. A quick summation of Solomon's argument can be found in the following four points: Emotions are judgements, emotions are chosen, emotions serve a purpose, and emotions are rational.1 To quote Solomon, he explains that “Emotions are not occurrences, and do not happen to us. They ... may be chosen like an action.”2
“The ordinary man needs philosophy because the claims of pleasure tempt him to become a self-deceiver and to argue sophistically against what appear to be the harsh demands of morality. This gives rise to what Kant calls a natural dialectic—a tendency to indulge in plausible arguments which contradict one another, and in this way to undermine the claims of duty. This may be disastrous to morality in practice, so disastrous that in the end ordinary human reason is to be found only in philosophy, and in particular in a critique of practical reason, which will trace our moral principle to its source in reason itself.”
1. Conflicting views improve one’s moral reasoning, critical thinking, and mental dexterity, but difficult to accept because of their context and one’s cognitive dissonance (Dalton, Week 5).
On one side of the disagreement are the disgust advocates. These people maintain that disgust is an essential tool in human moral psychology. They argue that disgust reactions are sufficient to make moral judgments. The view that advocates appeal to about the nature of disgust most often is the Deep Wisdom Theory. This theory argues that disgust trumps reason’s ability to articulate and discern certain properties or boundaries that, ethically speaking, should not be crossed. Disgust advocates, argue that disgust has important role in morality, and that the Deep Wisdom Theory...
David Hume sought out to express his opinion on ethics in which sentiment is seen as the grounding basis for morality. These theories can be seen as a response to the theories proposed by philosophers where they believed reason is considered to be the basis for morality. In this following essay I will show how Hume provides an argument in favor of sentiment being the foundation of our morality, rather than reason. To do this, I will begin to outline Hume’s ethical theories, highlighting his main ideas for grounding morality on sentiment and bring up some possible counterarguments that might potentially weaken this argument.
Philosophy, the study of knowledge, reality, and existence, influences an understanding of what we owe to each other by prompting questions of how one should live. In particular, moral ethics, the principles on which one 's judgments of right and wrong are based, most directly influence understanding of the framework question. For example, in The Republic, Plato elucidates the nature of justice though associations in the human soul and social structures in the city. Through pontification, Plato evaluates the ways in which one should live in order to have a just and moral life, offering readers a guide to live better. By engaging in the academic study of philosophy such as reading Plato, people gain exposure to different moral philosophies, like the study of ethics, and learn how one should live by the concepts of what is right and wrong. From my personal experience in studying nursing ethics, I learned about the moral philosophy of nursing, why nursing exists and the ethical responsibilities of a nurse. Assuming that ethics can be interpreted in a similar way, the study of philosophy must allow some insight into the moral capabilities and responsibilitie...
In Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant argues that human beings inherently have capability to make purely rational decisions that are not based on inclinations and such rational decisions prevent people from interfering with freedom of another. Kant’s view of inherent ability to reason brings different perspective to ways which human beings can pursue morality thus it requires a close analytical examination.
(6) Rhetoric. 1378a20. "The emotions are all those feelings that so change men as to affect their judgements, and that are also attended by pain or pleasure. Such are anger, pity, fear and the like with their opposites."
"A system of morality which is based on relative emotional values is a mere illusion, a thoroughly vulgar conception which has nothing sound in it and nothing true" this quote was said by Socrates who was a Greek philosopher ,Basically, Socrates advocates the use of logic and sense over emotions concerning morality. That makes sense to me, but certainly emotions have their place as well; To leave emotions strictly out of every sort of moral decision, seems inhuman or sort of robotic. Humanity's ability to be emotional is one of our best, endearing qualities, allowing us to make informed decisions based on circumstantial evidence at times. In this essay I'm going to discuss the importance of both reason and emotions when it to comes to justifying moral actions, and I'm going to talk about the problems that arise from them and lastly give example of each and try to connect it to one the areas of knowledge.
Only when this element is fleshed out can the individual be comprehended with respect to the collective conscience. One, out of many, possibilities is the often-overlooked influence of emotions. What is the connection between social functions and emotions? Perhaps emotions reify social solidarity by means of a collective conscience. Durkheim posits the notion that society shares a bilateral relationship with emotional experiences, for the emotions of collective effervescence derive from society but also produce and maintain the social construct.
All people worldwide go through the process of moral reasoning, which has been defined as "a cognitive process by which individuals make decisions about moral issues and justify these decisions, regardless of the context of the issue" (Gardiner, 1998, p.176). But not all of these people come to the s...
In Appendix I., Concerning Moral Sentiment, David Hume looks to find a place in morality for reason, and sentiment. Through, five principles he ultimately concludes that reason has no place within the concept of morality, but rather is something that can only assist sentiment in matters concerning morality. And while reason can be true or false, those truths or falsities apply to facts, not to morality. He then argues morals are the direct result of sentiment, or the inner feeling within a human being. These sentiments are what intrinsically drive and thus create morality within a being. Sentiments such as beauty, revenge, pleasure, pain, create moral motivation, and action, and are immune to falsity and truth. They are the foundation for which morals are built, and exist themselves apart from any reasoning. Thesis: In moral motivation, the role of sentiment is to drive an intrinsically instilled presence within us to examine what we would deem a moral act or an immoral act, and act accordingly, and accurately upon the sentiments that apply. These sentiments may be assisted by reasons, but the reason alone does not drive us to do what we would feel necessary. They can only guide us towards the final result of moral motivation which (by now it’s painfully clear) is sentiment.
Appiah, Kwame A. "Moral Disagreement." Green, Stuart and April Lidinsky. From Inquiry to Academic Writing. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin's, 2012. 656-666. Print.
I strongly believe philosophy can help me live a better life; I think the knowledge I gain from philosophy benefits me into seeing my life differently. Not only I know how I feel but also understand different points of views and learn the act of being open minded into diverse opinions and personalities. Through my twenty-one years of age I have been in situations where I have to think twice about the choices I was going to make. Every single time I was faced with a struggle I would go back to my heritage and what my father thought me. My father who was the one who raised me made a huge emphasis on a set of ideas about how to do something or how to live every single day of my life; he always told me that nothing was going to buy my happiness and peace within myself. I was raised with certain concepts that have determined who I am, and different codes that decide my actions towards different parts of my life. Philosophy has made my existence in this planet a more meaningful and peaceful one.