Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pacifism and nonviolence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pacifism and nonviolence
In today’s society, everything is open for interpretation. Many things are taken into consideration when an action is being judged. Intent and reason are two of the many factors. I think an individual defines aggression and violence. Yes, major acts of violence are universally agreed on. But subtle things like tone of voice and attitude are up for interpretation. Some people may say sarcasm is a form of violent speech and others may not. But to identity sarcasm and consciously process ones tone isn’t something many of us do. Being conscious of ones actions and words is a very hard task. We go about our day habitually and unconsciously. This assignment took a lot of brainpower, focusing on the little habitually actions is something I would never …show more content…
usually do. There were certain steps I had to take to achieve the goal of this assignment; define nonviolence, identify if my behavior changed, identity the costs and benefits of behaving nonviolently, and see if people noticed my change in behavior. Nonviolence is a vast spectrum that is open for interpretation and discussion.
There are physical, verbal, and even nonverbal acts of nonviolence. I chose to tackle all three acts in my experiment. From the time I woke up, I was at peace with myself. I had no negative thoughts nor did I look for something to complain about. I was content with who I was and what my life was like. This attitude determined my verbal and physical acts of nonviolence. If I was mentally peaceful, I will also become physically and emotionally peaceful. When my attitude is gloomy, my mood becomes gloomy. But because I consciously chose to be peaceful and content, I became happy and in a great mood. This attitude led to a nonaggressive attitude. I let go of trying to control my surrounds and let life take its course. Although this was great for me, letting go of all phoniness and conforming behavior can make other people uncomfortable. I tend to smile and laugh at things, even when I do not find them funny or amusing. But I do it because it is what society tells me to do. I stopped laughing at things I didn’t find funny just to make the other person feel comfortable. And this made them extremely awkward, to the point where my newfound attitude was coming off as rude. When in fact, I was being genuine with them and …show more content…
myself. The moment I let go of trying to control my life, I felt peaceful.
This peace spilled into the different avenues in my life. I was nonviolent with my friends and family, and even myself. I was happier and in a better mood than I usually am. I suffered with clinical depression for a while; I had no control over my emotions. I would struggle with my depression by trying to fight it and take control. In the end, the depression won. Going through this for months, led to me fearing the idea of letting go and take life take its course. I was afraid I would fall into my depressive state if I didn’t take charge. But this type of “letting go” was different. I did it with the intention of being happy, peaceful, and nonviolent. This mentality made it easier for me to let
go. There are pros and cons in everything we do. Sometimes one outweighs the other. Some costs I had to face were vulnerability. In the beginning of letting go, I had a fear that I was opening myself up to rejection and judgment. But in fact, people embraced my peaceful attitude. They thought I was in a great mood and talked to me more, I didn’t fight with friends or family. Which in turn, made me happy. I overall had a really good day. The costs only lasted the very beginning of the experiment, but the benefits lasted throughout the whole day. Feeling happy and peaceful outweighs the initial vulnerability I felt in the beginning of the day. My friends and family usually always pick up on how I am feeling certain days. I am the type of person to display my emotions upfront. If I am not in a good mood, everyone could tell. As soon as my friends and family started talking to me, they noticed how happy and peaceful I was. Consciously acting nonviolent is a very hard task for most people. But once you master it, you become peaceful and content with your surroundings. I encourage other to remember that aggressive behavior is trying to take control of your surroundings. Once you let go, is when you will experience true nonviolence.
Nowadays, this concept of using nonviolence is hard to achieve. This is because people think that peaceful protest aren’t effective compared to taking action with their hands. One example is the Blacks Lives Matter Movement. Although there are peaceful protest, there are times when people turn violent against police. This can be counterintuitive since watching these harsh actions by protestors, people start forming negative views about the organization. This leads to people not supporting the cause anymore. Without the support of the public, an organization can’t
...able to showcase the great power that nonviolence could have on the world and how by using methods such as that one would be more successful than if one used violence. As Mahatma Gandhi once said “Non-violence is the greatest force at the disposal of mankind. It is mightier than the mightiest weapon of destruction devised by the ingenuity of man.”
Imagine the peace if everyone allowed themselves to feel gratitude for everything and allowed their hearts to be warmed by the day to day.
Gandhi once said “An eye for an eye and the whole world is blind.” This is true in most circumstances but there are exceptions. By comparing acts of nonviolent civil disobedience with acts of violent civil disobedience it is apparent that force or violence is only necessary to combat violence but never if it effects the lives of the innocent. A recurrent theme in each of these examples is that there is a genuine desire to achieve equality and liberty. However, one cannot take away the liberties of others in order to gain their own. Martin Luther King Jr. believed that political change would come faster through nonviolent methods and one can not argue his results as many of the Jim Crow laws were repealed. Similarly, through nonviolent resistance Gandhi was able to eventually free India from the rule of Britain. It is true that sometimes the only way to fight violence is through violence, but as is apparent, much can be said of peaceful demonstrations in order to enact change. Thus, it is the responsibility of we as individuals to understand that nonviolence is often a more viable means to an end than violence.
In Chavez's argument, he explained the importance of nonviolence during the Civil Rights Movement. He used Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s movement as an example of successful protest using nonviolence. Although Dr. King's example proved to be effective, after he died, several members of the movement resorted to violence which caused the death of thousands of Americans. Chavez argued nonviolence is the only way to protest violence in order to attract support for his cause: the farm workers' movement. Chavez's rhetorical choices, through his tone and allusion to history, effectively influenced farmers to protest without violence.
Having a non-violent way to approach civil engagement helps people rise from the dark. In the article, “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” by King Jr., he writes, “So the purpose of the direct action is to create a situation so crises-packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation”(236). King Jr. suggests that the only way for Americans to see the need to change is through direct actions and that could possibly get them to negotiate. It related to the article, “from Non-Violent Resistance,” by Gandhi because through a non-violent action, people see the value of actually wanting to create justice. He points out, “Non-violence is the supreme dharma is the proof of this power of love. Non-violence is a dormant state”(Gandhi 316). He refers to all people that if someone gives a person pain, the person receiving the pain should not act back in a harsh attitude, but he/she will win if they show love. However, King Jr. also explains one’s right to express verbally. He writes, “If his repressed emotions do not come out in these nonviolent ways, they will come out in ominous expressions of violence. This is not a threat; it is a fact of history”(MLK 242). It is within the first amendment that all people have the right to free speech in any way, and if people express their emotions in an intimidating way, it is not a threat. Approaching all injustices social issues in
The purpose of the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 60s was for blacks to achieve rights equal to those of whites. While this was the common goal, there were differences in the methods used to achieve them—the nonviolent and violent approach. People such as Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. advocated for the use of nonviolence. On the other hand, people such as Stokely Carmichael supported the use of violence to achieve these aforementioned goals. While the ideas behind Carmichael’s interpretation of Black Power—such as unity and self-pride—are essential, Martin Luther King, Jr.’s nonviolent approach is most effective for the task.
When making note of the Civil Rights movement, one can’t help but think of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr; as a civil rights activist, King is known for practicing nonviolence, especially in the fight for freedom. On the tenth anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Cesar Chavez published an essay that makes note of the significance of the practice of nonviolence resistance. When addressing the audience- members of a religious organization devoted to helping those in need- Chavez develops a serious and profound argument through the use of various complex rhetorical strategies.
Mohandas K. Gandhi, a great Indian philosopher, wrote the essay “My Faith in Nonviolence”. His essay focuses on the use of nonviolence means on overthrowing the British rule of India. Gandhi’s main claim on this essay is that love is the higher law of life and that “every problem lends itself to solution” (p. 203) , if we followed that law.
What is peace exactly? Why does everyone want peace? What is so special about this word peace? The words you hear on a pageant “I want world peace.” But why? What is so special? Peace- freedom from or the cessation of war or violence, something we all want. Will we ever get that or shall we just continue to dream of it? The famous words of Martin Luther King, "I have come to the conclusion that the potential destructiveness of modern weapons of war totally rules out the possibility of war ever serving again as a negative good. If we assume that mankind has a right to survive then we must find an alternative to war and destruction. In a day when sputniks dash
There is a considerable debate about the precise meaning of nonviolence. Some people believe that nonviolence is a philosophy and strategy for social change that rejects the use of violence. In other words, nonviolence is a method for resolving a conflict without the use of physical power nor enmity towards opponents. Instead, it emphasizes you to look beyond convictions and one’s urge for victory, it is the motto behind the saying “hate the sin and not the sinner”. For others it is a way of living and an essential part of their values and norms, for those people, nonviolence is the road which will lead them towards attaining inner piece and moral satisfaction. “Learn and teach nonviolence as a way of life; reflect it in attitude, speech and action” say’s Gerber in his article The Road to Nonviolence. Thus making nonviolence the ultimate behavior towards achieving truthful, spiritual, loving life. Mahatma Gandhi, the nonviolence guru, defines nonviolence as “a power which can be wielded equally by all-children, young men and women or grown-up people, provided they have a living faith in the God of Love and have therefore equal love for all mankind”. (mkgandhi.org) Therefore we understand that nonviolence has some terms and conditions to be met; living faith in God, truthfulness, humility, tolerance, loving kindness, honesty and the willingness to sacrifice. ...
seldom used nonviolence to address issues at hand. Pacifism is a tricky subject to deal with
Martin Luther King once said, “Nonviolence means avoiding not only external physical violence but also internal violence of spirit. You not only refuse to shoot a man, but you refuse to hate him”. Throughout history, people have committed numerous acts of crime from stealing to fighting, to war. These acts of violence had never done any good to mankind but had continuously harmed mankind. Mahatma Gandhi was a leader who had promoted and inspired people across the world to continue the acts of Ahimsa. Gandhi spread his acts of Ahimsa inspiring the American Civil Rights Movement, Nelson Mandela, and Harper Lee showing that Gandhi’s beliefs of non violence should be continued.
Other non-violent methods can also preserve morality. These methods negate the use of physical force or verbal threats by encouraging the use of peaceful methods to foster lasting, positive political and social change. Pacifists also realize the negative repercussions of retaliating to violence with violence. The nature of the majority of humans compels them to engage in counter-violence aimed at instigators of preceding violent acts. This pe...