Nonprofit Board Of Directors Summary

965 Words2 Pages

The purpose of this paper is to explain the generally accepted functional responsibilities of the nonprofit board of directors. Specifically, it will provide an overview of three guiding theories for these governing bodies as presented in the article, “Understanding the Behavior of Nonprofit Boards of Directors: A Theory-Based Approach.” Next, the paper will identify biblical principles that further clarify the functions and theories. Finally, conclusions will be presented for understanding the function and applying the theories.
Functional Responsibilities of the Nonprofit Board of Directors Nonprofit boards of directors are governed by federal and state law, with the primary standards originating in Internal Revenue Service (IRS) policy …show more content…

As open systems, nonprofit organizations are dependent on the external environment; and those that are most dependent on external resources are most vulnerable to goal displacement (Worth, 2017) and lack of vital organizational resources (Malatesta & Smith, 2014). Hence, the boards are charged with reducing the risk of decreased resources and increasing opportunity risk through strategic partnerships (Miller-Millesen, 2003). Thus, they should develop relationships that enable agility, protect information while sharing appropriate information, and increase resource flow while decreasing dependencies (Miller-Millesen, 2003). Finally, in application, according to this theory a board might add specific members to affect resource dependency and expand connections between the organization and its environment (Miller-Millesen, …show more content…

Specifically, institutional isomorphism, where like organizations become similar in culture and practices, results due to three types of pressures (Dolnicar, Irvine, & Lazarevski, 2008). These pressures include: coercive, resulting from regulatory requirements; mimetic, or replicating the culture or practices of successful organizations; and normative processes, or pressure to become more business-like to increase legitimacy (Miller-Millesen, 2003). In fact, Miller-Millesen (2003) noted that those in a given category that do not conform often lose influence to gain resources and may fail (Miller-Millesen, 2003). In practice, a board may change in make up to align better with like organizations or emerging mandates to ensure resource stability (Miller-Millesen,

Open Document