Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Socioeconomic status and academic achievement
Social class impacts on students
A nation at risk under the No Child Left Behind Act
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Socioeconomic status and academic achievement
Even though all students have an equal opportunity and access to the same information, is there a trend in who gets more assistants based on your socioeconomic status? Many students are being bused from low income neighborhoods to higher income neighborhoods to help schools get federal grant money. Teachers are not as qualified as they should be to comply with the national standard. While NCLBA can be beneficial, parents should request the board of education to review the impact of grades and retention to show a year to year improvement. Because students in the middle class seem to be falling through the holes of this program by not getting assistance that they need because of financial classification.
First, Federal government has programs for low income students to help with academics but nothing for the upper and middle class students who are falling behind. Middle class students who have a support system at home; financial backing to not rely on state aid should not be penalized in what they are able to qualify for school assistance. The intent of the Act is that schools should be a common place or in other words promote competition among schools to increase grades and help the education system. “The idea of a common school developed with the theory that all children regardless of race, social class or religious beliefs should have a right to education” (Aske, 2013). The law was proposed by congress to make the schools more accountable and give the parent’s more choices in their child’s education. Since the law was passed it has received both praise and criticism. While it would be easy for the government to only look at year over year results to see that transferring kids from low income schools to a higher in...
... middle of paper ...
...the right to have an education and have the opportunity to be successful no matter what their socioeconomic background is.
References:
Aske, David; Connolly, Laura; Corman, Rhonda: ACCESSIBILITY OR ACCOUNTABILITY? THE RHETORIC AND REALITY OF NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND. Journal of Economics & Economic Education Research. 2013, Vol. 14 Issue 3, p107-118. 12p.
Orr, A. J. (2003). Black-White differences in achievement: The importance of wealth. Sociology of Education, 76, 281-304.
"Is No Child Left Behind Effective For All Students?" Parents Don't Think So, Randolph, Kelli; Wilson-Younger, Dylinda,Online Submission 6 pp. 2012
State Implementation of Supplemental Educational Services under the No Child Left Behind Act. From the Capital to the Classroom: Year 5 of the No Child Left Behind Act Series, Minnici, Angela; Bartley, Alice P., P13, 2007-Mar-1
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001’s main purpose was to enhance the education system and hold schools accountable in its attempt to bring equality in the fight against poverty for poor and minority groups. Once this Act was signed into law the American public expected an overhaul of the education system with only good outcomes. The public assumed our children would be receiving the best education available and the economic issues that plagued schools would no longer be a problem. In the beginning of its implementation No Child Left Behind was expected to bring America up to standards with other nations, this was something that America has struggled to do for many years. Our children were now being put first according to Act and the public and many political figures were ecstatic over the possibilities.
The implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act applied a market approach to school reform as a way of improving the school system. This new law promised an era of high standards, testing, and accountability in
Neill, Monty. "The No Child Left Behind Act Is Not Improving Education." Education: Opposing Viewpoints. New York: Greenhaven, 2005. 162-68. Print.
Hallinan, Maureen T.. "Sociological Perspectives on Black-White Inequalities in American Schooling." Handbook of the sociology of education. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2000. 50-70. Print.
birth right for citizens born in this country. This right is taken for granted by many and is
The achievement gap is defined as the disparity between the performance groups of students, especially groups defined by gender, race/ethnicity, ability and socio-economic status. The achievement gap can be observed through a variety of measures including standardized test scores, grade point averages, drop out rates, college enrollment and completion rates. The Black-White achievement gap is a critical issue in modern society’s education system. Although data surrounding the issue clearly indicates that the racial performance gap exists in areas of standardized tests, graduation rates, dropout rates, and enrollment in continuing education, the causative reasons for the gap are ambiguous—therefore presenting a significant challenge in regard to the most effective way to close the gap. The gap appears before children enter kindergarten and it persists into adulthood (Jencks 1998). Since 1970, the gap has decreased about 40 percent, but has steadily grown since. Theories suggest the Black-White achievement gap is created by a multitude of social, cultural, and economic factors as well as educational opportunities and/or learning experiences. Factors such as biased testing, discrimination by teachers, test anxiety among black students, disparities between blacks and whites in income or family structure, and genetic and cultural differences between blacks and whites have all been evaluated as explanations for the Black-White achievement gap (Farkas 2004). The research that follows will elaborate on these factors as they affect the decline in academic performance of black males—particularly the literacy achievement of black males.
The problem is that there are not enough high quality schools in all areas especially the ones that have low income families. The NCLB did get more kids in school, but it does not mean that they actually received a quality education or even graduated for that matter. Although, there are great teachers working at public schools; there are also too many bad ones. They are the kind of teachers who do not actually care if their students learn the material they are teaching, and are only really there for the paycheck. As for the NCLB act it was more of a never ending failing cycle. First off the act states that people are able to choose what school they want to go to when that clearly is not the case because each city has district lines. Then the act claims that all schools have to do is apply for grants and ask for money from the government or they can get money based off of the schools’ test scores. When these schools in bad neighborhoods have no money to implement programs to help students do better in school, and in turn they cannot get any money because they are not meeting the state’s standards. That is how this act becomes a failing cycle, and is only able to actually work for the nice public schools because they are the ones meeting the state’s standards which meaning they are more likely to receive any money or grants from the government. Yes, we are
Rudalevige, A. (2003). The politics of No Child Left Behind. EducationNext, 3(4), 63-69. Retrieved from EducationNext: http://educationnext.org/the-politics-of-no-child-left-behind/
The achievement gap is greatly evident and impacts the low-income, minority students the most. Although the federal government attempted to resolve this problem with No Child Left Behind, the social problem is still evident. As there is still much pressure on standardized tests and annual reports, reformation is needed. No Child Left Behind has proven to be inadequate and rather highlights the urgency for education reform. Although the act is called “No Child Left Behind,” an appropriate title would have been “Education Left Behind.” More than focusing on test scores, education should prepare students in how to contribute to
Lee, Oliver. "Does No Child Left Behind Deserve a Passing Grade?" TakePart. N.p., 6 June 2012. Web. 15 Mar. 2014.
Richmond, Paulette Natasha. "Wealth and Achievement Gaps: An Examination of Virginia Middle Schools." Ph.D. Old Dominion University, 2007. Print. United States – Virginia.
As Rodney Paige, former Secretary of Education, said, “We have an educational emergency in the United States of America” (Hursh, 2007). The American ideal of egalitarianism essentially states that individuals should have an equal opportunity to pursue their dreams, and an important part of being able to achieve this is attaining a quality education. Students of differing racial, cultural, socioeconomic, and ability levels should all have the same opportunities in receiving a high-quality education. Unfortunately, this is not the case. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is seeking to change this. The NCLB is the current authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) (Houston, 2007), which was passed during President Lyndon B. Johnson’s administration. Every five years the ESEA is renewed. It is currently due for renewal in 2014.
Fusarelli, L. (2004). Educational Policy: The Potential Impact of the No Child Left Behind Act
Some states want to have separation when it comes to the income of these schools. States argue that high class, wealthy, school districts should have more money than the lower class districts, because of the tax payers wants or because there are better opportunities for students to grow in the wealthier areas. According to the U.S. Department of Education, more than 50 percent of lower end schools are not receiving the amount of money they should get from the state funds (U.S. Department of Education). This is what is preventing school districts in these areas from helping students with their education. The schools are forced to cut back on programs such as extracurricular activities that are suppose to encourage students to be active, or they would have to cut back on supplies where in some cases there are not enough textbooks for each student to have his or her own. The U.S. Department of Education also stated that teachers that are less paid and have less years teaching are often the ones dealing with the students in poverty. (U.S. Department of Education). This only prolongs the problem with children receiving the proper education. If they are taught by teachers who don’t know what they are teaching or those who don’t have enough experience, then the students are not going to learn the correct information or any information at all. While there are some schools
Reflections on reform: A former teacher looks at school change and the factors that shape it. Teachers College Record, Retrieved from http://qualitylearning.net/community/brownsville/research/Reflections%20on%20Reform%20-%20A%20Teacher%20Looks%20at%20School%20Change.pdf Stump, J., Kelly, J., (November 6, 2006). Public school accountability under the No Child Left Behind Act. Columbus: Ohio Legislative Service Commission Staff, 126, 13, 1-15. Talgam, I. (2009).