Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Kantianism v utilitarianism
Kantianism v utilitarianism
Essays on sweatshop
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Kantianism v utilitarianism
Should Nike be held responsible for working conditions in foreign factories that it does not own but where subcontractors make products for Nike? In many ways, it seems obvious to me that Nike should be held responsible for working conditions in foreign companies where products for Nike are made. In my opinion a company is not only responsible for itsʼ own employees but also for the employees that produce for them even though theyʼre not in their own company. I think that every part of the supply chain is partially responsible for the entire supply chain. As Nike is the most visible and wealthiest part of the supply chain, it carries the biggest responsibility. In this way, I oppose Friedmansʼ view that the only social responsibility a company has is to increase itsʼ profits. The utalitarian approach dictates that a business decision (f.e. to subcontract to a foreign company) should only have more good consequences than bad ones to be executed. I disagree on this view. In my opinion the company should look at the big picture and make sure that every one benefits from the decision. This means I am agreeing with the difference principle which states that inequalites between employees can be justified if at least the least-advantaged benefits. Another approach I can relate to is the Kantian approach. People are not machines and should not be treated as such. This means Nike should treat every one who is involved with its products as a human being. Therefore the company should give everybody at least the wage they require to have a normal, good life. They should also give them working condititions work living in. It is however wrong to give them full responsibility. The subcontractor has a big deal of the responsibility as w... ... middle of paper ... ...his criticism is justified, a more independent group should examine it. If sweatshops are a global problem, what might be a global solution to this problem? In my opinion a global solution to this problem would exist in developing a universal code of conduct which should be accepted by all businesses in all countries. In this code they should say that every company must at least meet with minimum wages that give a good life and that working conditions should have a minimum standard. Also for child labor they should work out agreements. A second part should be that this must be reinforced severely. Any business that does not meet up with this, must do something about it or will face consequences. This may sound hard to do and a little naive but If we want to make the world a better place for every one on earth, this would be a first step along the way.
Corporations in the United States have proved time and time again that they are all about profit and not about what is good for America. One example of this is the fact that many corporations have factories in other countries, or buy from other corporations that do. Nike (an athletic shoe and clothing company) produces most of their shoes and apparel in factories in other countries, including Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, China, Vietnam and Malaysia. According to Nike’s factory disclosure list released May 2011, only 49 of it’s over 700 factories are located in the U.S. (Nike, Inc.) This means that thousands of jobs that could be filled by needy Americans are instead being filled by workers in other countries. This reason that Nike and other corporations outsource is very simple, it is very cheap to do so. In an excerpt from Jeffrey St. Clair's book “Born Under a Bad Sky” the author describes the vast differences between Nike’s production costs and retail prices. “In Vietnam, it costs Nike only $1.50 to manufactu...
Large corporations such as Nike, Gap, and Reebok and many others from the United States have moved their factories to undeveloped nations; barely pay their employees enough to live on. Countries such as China, Indonesia, and Haiti have readily abundant cheap labor. There should be labor laws or an obligation of respecting workers to provide decent working conditions, fair wages, and safety standards.
Many people in our society today are constantly asking, "Why do sweatshops exist?" The answer to this question is that companies like Nike and Wal-Mart use sweatshops to produce their goods for a much cheaper rate, to reduce the cost of their products. The problem with sweatshops is that the workers are subject to hard work in often times poor conditions for minimal pay. But although many people may condemn sweatshops, there are some advantages that many people overlook when arguing against sweatshops and their practices.
Nike, as many other companies do, facilitates production in other countries to help grow sales in those particular regions. The main difference between Nike and some of the other companies is that other companies do not support the exploitation of labourers or human rights. Not to suggest that Nike promotes labour exploitation, but they are less strict about these rules than other companies in foreign markets. Impacts on health and safety are a major factor for employees in sweatshops. However, physical and sexual abuse is another serious concern of many of the sweatshop workers. Most of the sweatshops run by Nike contractors are factories located in relatively small spaces to save on real estate costs. They are often soiled with dirt and kept unheated to save on expenses. Broken glass and dangerous equipment is left on the floors causing potential dangers to any people scattered within the factory. Employees are subject to harassment and violent punishments if work is not being completed as thoroughly and efficiently as the contractors would like. Workers slave under unfavourable conditions for up to 14-hour days often with no breaks. These employees are paid less than $100 US and work on average over 250 hours per month. "Substandard wages keep factory workers in poverty and force them to work excessi...
Nike’s sweatshop manufacturing practices which can be seen through media have shown people that this company goes under the good guys images, these images which are displayed in their commercials show people that their employees are treated well and their happy in their working environment.
... ethics? Well, the honest answer would be to eliminate the sweatshops completely. This is unlikely because it would be very difficult for a company with such a broad reach in the corporate world to shut down its factories overseas. Companies will always continue to exploit lower wages as long as the opportunity is present. A possible way would be to improve their employee surroundings. Since Nike is benefiting from low wages, they should at least provide a safer working environment for its employees. No employee should ever be put at risk due to a lack of environmental awareness. Nike should also pay attention to wage laws that govern the area that they manufacture in. With all the profits Nike earns, it couldn’t possibly hurt them to pay their employees no less than minimum wage. Otherwise, any company that possesses such blatant greed will not last in the long run.
Nike has been accused of using child labor in the production of its soccer balls and shoes for Nike in Pakistan. While Pakistan has laws against child labor, the government has taken very little action to terminate it. It is said that only a boycott by the United States and other nations will have any impact on child-based industries. In addition, the U.S constitution states that child labor is an illegal and inhumane practice and any U.S. company found guilty practicing and encouraging it will be prosecuted. The World Trade Organization (WTO) prohibits member nations, like the United States, from discriminating against the importation of goods made by children.
The Nike corporation wrote up a contract stating that all factory workers would be moved to an apartment for housing in a clean and sanitary environment. They also, stated that all passports would be given back to the factory workers. Nike would fly anyone that wanted to move back home free of charge. Nike also stated that wages Would be increased significantly. Nike corporation also created a Code of Conduct for all factory workers.
Nike does not merely sell products these days. They spend billions of dollars for advertising contracts with famous athletes like Tiger Woods to increase the value of the brand by associating the factor of lifestyle to their products. The company's image has been damaged many times by press releases as well as a variety of NGOs who have long pointed out the inhumane working conditions in the production facilities of sporting goods manufacturers. This leads to the question whether should Nike orientate the regulations of the suppliers to the labor standards in their respective countries or those in the United States? The labor conditions are so inhumane that Nike at least should try to converse to the US standard to improve the situation. The following analysis of an abstract of Nikes’ Responsibility Concept, including SHAPE and their Code of Conduct, should give an insight into the difficulties of the Sweatshops.
Phil Knight started his shoe company by selling shoes from the back of his car. As he became more successful in 1972 he branded the name Nike. In the 1980’s Nike Corporation quickly grew and established itself as a world leader in manufacturing and distributing athletic footwear and sports' attire. The Nike manufacturing model has followed is to outsource its manufacturing to developing nations in the Asia Pacific, Africa, South and Latin Americas; where labor is inexpensive. It quickly became known for its iconic “swoosh” and “Just do it” advertisements and products. Its highly successful advertising campaigns and brand developed its strong market share and consumer base. But, the road has not always been easy for Nike; in the late 1990’s they went through some challenging times when their brand become synonymous with slave wages and child labor abuses. During this period, Nike learned that it paramount that the company understands its stakeholders’ opinions and ensures their values are congruent with their stakeholders. Nike learned that their stakeholders were concerned with more than buying low cost products; their customers were also concerned with ethical and fair treatment of their workers. Because Nike was unwilling to face the ethical treatment of its employees, the company lost its loyal customers and damaged its reputation. Nike has bounced back since the late 1990’s and revived its reputation by focusing on its internal shortfalls and attacking its issues head on. Nike nearly collapsed from its missteps in the late 1990’s. They have learned from their mistakes and taken steps to quickly identify ethical issues before they become a crisis through ethics audits. This paper is based on the case study of Nike: From Sweatsh...
After reading about the Nike Controversy and the “in Praise of Sweatshops” article of individuals personal stories of work conditions at sweatshops in third world countries, it made me sick. It’s rather unfortunate that most people do not know about how their favourite brand shoes, clothing’s are produced and also the work conditions of people who manufacture them. If only people had an idea about these workers and how they are striped off their rights and paid so little for doing so much; for example most Nikes consumers were not aware about the poor working conditions of those 300 workers who were killed in the building that collapsed in Bangladesh due to the negligence of their employers. And this is a practice that is happening in most
This product will be a great attribute to the company and bring a lot of revenue if these guidelines are set in
American companies manufacturing at cheaper costs in foreign companies is not a new practice. Companies have been using overseas factories to produce goods for years due mainly to cheaper manufacturing costs. Not only are labor and material costs less expensive, foreign countries often do not have as strict of labor laws as the ones enforced in America. They also do not have a sense of responsibility to the community. Companies can come into a remote area in another country and provide substandard pay and working conditions to underprivileged workers who typically do not have many opportunities for work. In such cases, there is usually no local regulation enforced and global companies like Nike can take advantage of impecunious workers while increasing their profits.
With the increasing awareness and publicity of poor working conditions in subcontracted factories in East Asia, Nike has stimulated an uprising of activist and watchdog groups working toward seeing these conditions changed. With Nike in the negative spotlight, various organizations have revolved around generating a negative outlook on Nike’s practices of social irresponsibility. Certain campaigns such as the “National Days of Consciousness” and “International Day of Protest” were organized to educate people on the deplorable working conditions in Nike’s Asian manufacturing plants, and were designed to get more people involved in global employment issues.
Also I think the writer is trying to get the consumer to write to the companies and tell them, to remind them, what their subcontractors is not right or fair. " The workers are lucky - One senior Nike employee told researchers: I don't think the workers in our factories are treated badly… Working conditions are