Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature of conflicts after cold war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nature of conflicts after cold war
The era of old wars has been succeeded by a new kind of war consisting of the new wars. Basically, the phenomena of new wars is one that is described by civil or international wars that engage in low grade conflicts entailing innumerable transnational and multinational connections such that differences between local and global relationships, internal and external, and violence and oppression emanating from the war are intricate to sustain (Clausewitz, 2007, p. 13). In principle, new wars are synonymous to conventional warfare in which the contemporary conventional military armament and combat tactics are no longer utilized in open confrontation between interstate conflicts (Duffield, 2005, p. 25).
Many theorists have considered what used to define war and the contemporary worldviews on new wars. One of such thinkers is Mary Kaldor, who explicated the effects of globalization to war with three associated major changes including the need to claim identity, aversion from using battlefield tactics, and the change of war into an international crime, which has faltered the mechanics of funding wars (Kaldor, 2013, p. 4). In addition to Kaldor’s intuitions on war, Martin van Creveld from Israel among other theories supports the claims of new wars and the underlying changes from the traditional wars (Kaldor, 2005, p. 33). In his arguments, Martin van Creveld purports that it is a fact that there is a low-grade intensity on conflicts which characterize wars in the contemporary society (van Creveld, 2002, p. 4; Kaldor, 2013, p. 15). This intuition is becoming obsolete considering the thoughts brought forth by Kaldor, which assert that the Clausewitz understanding of today’s wars including the militarized conflicts are outdated.
Fundamental...
... middle of paper ...
...M. 2013. In Defence of New Wars, Stability 2 (1/4), pp.1-16.
Kinross, S. 2004. Clausewitz and Low-Intensity Conflicts. Journal of Strategic Studies, 27 (1), pp. 35-58.
Mansdorf, I. and Kedar, M. 2008. The Psychological Asymmetry of Islamist Warfare. Middle East Quarterly, 15 (2), pp. 37-44.
Nicolson, A. 2005. Men of Honor: Trafalgar and the making of the English Hero. New York: HarperCollins.
Thornton, R. 2007. Asymmetric Warfare: Threat and Response in the 21st Century. New York: Wiley.
Tomes, R., Natter, W., and Brister, P. 2011. Hybrid Warfare and Transnational Threats: Perspectives for an Era of Persistent Conflict. New York: CENSA. van Creveld, M. 2002. The Transformation of War Revisited. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 13 (2), pp. 3-15.
William, C. 2011. New Battlefields, Old Laws: Critical Debates on Asymmetric Warfare. Washington DC: Columbia University Press.
Von Clausewitz, Carl. Translated and edited by Sir Michael Howard and Peter Paret. On War. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.
War is the means to many ends. The ends of ruthless dictators, of land disputes, and lives – each play its part in the reasoning for war. War is controllable. It can be avoided; however, once it begins, the bat...
Clausewitz emphasizes that “war is a branch of political activity, that it is in no sense autonomous” (Clausewitz, 605). This principle is especially applicable to the post-war period of World War II. The political struggle between the ideologies of democracy and communism would entail global focus for the next 50 years, and the events that brought about the defeat of Germany shaped the landscape of this political struggle.
The world’s history is majorly shaped by mega wars that happen both inside and outside the boundaries of individual nations. Almost every sovereign state in the world had to forcefully liberate itself from its colonizers and oppressors mainly through warfare. For instance, America had to fight a long and exhausting revolutionary war against the British before it could attain its independence in 1783, likewise is the fate of many other nations. It is important to understand the two distinct types of wars that exist and their implications. Guerrilla warfare and the conventional military warfare are two types of war that are very different in their execution and military approach. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the similarities and differences existing between the American war in Vietnam and the American Revolution (Vetter, 1997).
David Galula and Roger Trinquier have common roots, they were French citizens and both lived in the 20th century when the study of counterinsurgency theory was coming into focus. Each of these men experienced bitter conflicts of war. Galula fought in North Africa, Italy, and France. In addition, Galula fought in irregular wars located in China, Greece, Indochina, and Algeria. Galula was a lieutenant colonel when he decided to author his now classic book. Whereas, Trinquier an officer in the colonial infantry defended the French concession in Shanghai and later in Indochina under the Japanese occupation where he was held prisoner of war in a Japanese internment camp. After Trinquier’s release from prison, he continued to serve in Indochina and additionally in Algeria. Both men wrote from first-hand experience and published their accounts in 1964 while the Cold War waged. Communism ideology vs. the free world theorists collided across the face of the globe in a race for domination. Counterinsurgency has been an American strategy since the 1960s ebbing and flowing in strategic signi...
The purpose of this essay is to inform on the similarities and differences between systemic and domestic causes of war. According to World Politics by Jeffry Frieden, David Lake, and Kenneth Schultz, systemic causes deal with states that are unitary actors and their interactions with one another. It can deal with a state’s position within international organizations and also their relationships with other states. In contract, domestic causes of war pertain specifically to what goes on internally and factors within a state that may lead to war. Wars that occur between two or more states due to systemic and domestic causes are referred to as interstate wars.
McDonald. “Just War Theory.” Humanities. Boston University. College of General Studies, Boston. 24 February 2014. Lecture.
Relations between countries are similar to interpersonal relations. When the conflicts between countries escalates to some extent, any resolutions become unrealistic except violence, and wars then occur. Although wars already include death and pain, moralists suggest that there should still be some moral restrictions on them, including the target toward whom the attack in a war should be performed, and the manner in which it is to be done. A philosopher named Thomas Nagel presents his opinion and develops his argument on such topic in the article “War and Massacre”. In this essay, I will describe and explain his main argument, try to propose my own objection to it, and then discuss how he would respond to my objection.
The war strategies of Carl von Clausewitz and Antoine Henri de Jomini are not mutually exclusive philosophies. Clausewitz’s “Trinity of War”, “war as an extension of politics”, and the “unpredictability of war” speak more so to the upper, strategic and political ranges of war. Jomini addresses the operational and tactical levels in the lower ranges of war with his definition of strategy and his “Fundamental Principle of War”. So if one views their work collectively rather than as competitors, the two philosophies complement each other by addressing different segments of the spectrum of war.
Irregular warfare is not a new tactic and has been referenced by some of the great strategists, such as, Jomini and Clausewitz. The titles may have evolved from guerrilla warfare, to insurgents, to terrorists, to the simple phase of unconventional forces; however, they are all representative of violence used to counter the conventional military forces of a nation-state. Conventional or traditional war is “waged by forces designed, trained, and equipped for major combat operations against a similar, peer enemy.” Conventional warfare, in its purest form, is a “violent struggle for domination between nation-states or coalitions and alliances of nation-states.” Irregular warfare supports indirect and asymmetric approaches and “refers to all unconventional methods of violence used to counter the traditional capabilities of a nation-state’s military forces; and to undermine the authority of a local government or in...
Current military leadership should comprehend the nature of war in which they are engaged within a given political frame in order to develop plans that are coherent with the desired political end state. According to Clausewitz, war is an act of politics that forces an enemy to comply with certain conditions or to destroy him through the use of violence. A nation determines its vital interests, which drives national strategy to obtain or protect those interests. A country achieves those goals though the execution of one of the four elements of power, which are diplomatic, informational, military and economical means. The use of military force...
Advances in technology and the expansion of trade have, without a doubt, improved the standard of living dramatically for peoples around the world. Globalization brings respect for law and human rights and the democratization of politics, education, and finance to developing societies, but is usually slow in doing so. It is no easy transition or permanent solution to conflict, as some overly zealous proponents would argue. In The Great Illusion, Norman Angell sees globalization as a force which results from and feeds back into the progressive change of human behavior from using physical force toward using rational, peaceful methods in order to achieve economic security and prosperity. He believes that nations will no longer wage war against one another because trade, not force, yields profit in the new global economy, and he argues that “military power is socially and economically futile” because “political and military power can in reality do nothing for trade.” While the economic interdependence of nations should prove to be a deterrent from warfare, globalization is not now, and was not a century ago, a prescription for world peace. At the turn of the twentieth century, formal colonialism was still profitable in some regions, universal free trade was not a reality, nationalism was not completely defunct, military force was necessary to protect economic investments in developing locations, and the arms race of the previous century had created the potential for an explosive war if any small spark should set the major powers off against one another. The major flaw in Angell’s argument is his refusal to acknowledge the economic advantages that colonizing powers, even after globalization has started to take shape, can actuall...
a comprehensive research service. Retrieved May 2, 2004, from Terrorist Attack by Al Qaeda: http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/033104.pdf. Gunaratna, R. (2005, September). Retrieved September 2005, from http://strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/parameters/articles/05spring/henzel.pdf. Gunaratna, R. (n.d.).
When comparing and contrasting U. S. military operations and capabilities with regard to regular versus irregular warfare it is important to understand the definition of irregular and the spectrum of conflict. In recent history, the term “irregular warfare” has been used interchangeably with or alongside insurgency and counterinsurgency warfare. This usage and comparison is too narrow. ...
All living things need the resources provided by our natural world to live, leading to them adapting to specific environments. Animals in particular are mobile creatures that move from place to place searching for the best environments for their survival. The most intelligent creatures in our animal world are human beings and like other animals, they moved from place to place while organized into races in search of the elusive desirable environments. However, there is always the likelihood of finding fellow humanity already thriving in that environment. This resulted to conflict as competition for the inadequate resources arose. Consequently, human beings formed nations, allegiance to the national system meant loyalty to the governance, and regions and they formed military groups to defend their resources. However, the military warfare has changed with international understanding, though the idea still rests heavily on fight for resources. Further, international politics illustrates the causes and effects of modern military war have changed due to chan...