Counterinsurgency Galula and Trinquier Theories

1399 Words3 Pages

Thinking historically while conducting counterinsurgency in the 21st century poses questions regarding how to develop political and strategic plans. This bibliographic essay will examine the political and military aspect of fighting counterinsurgent warfare by 20th century theorists Galula’s, “Counterinsurgency Warfare Theory and Practice” and Trinquier’s, “Counterinsurgency Warfare Theory and Practice”. Strategy in fighting guerilla wars will be discussed by comparing conflicts in battles and ideologies from the past to current day. Moreover, ways to avoid the one size fits all war mentality when combating modern day insurgents will be recommended.
David Galula and Roger Trinquier have common roots, they were French citizens and both lived in the 20th century when the study of counterinsurgency theory was coming into focus. Each of these men experienced bitter conflicts of war. Galula fought in North Africa, Italy, and France. In addition, Galula fought in irregular wars located in China, Greece, Indochina, and Algeria. Galula was a lieutenant colonel when he decided to author his now classic book. Whereas, Trinquier an officer in the colonial infantry defended the French concession in Shanghai and later in Indochina under the Japanese occupation where he was held prisoner of war in a Japanese internment camp. After Trinquier’s release from prison, he continued to serve in Indochina and additionally in Algeria. Both men wrote from first-hand experience and published their accounts in 1964 while the Cold War waged. Communism ideology vs. the free world theorists collided across the face of the globe in a race for domination. Counterinsurgency has been an American strategy since the 1960s ebbing and flowing in strategic signi...

... middle of paper ...

...as much information as possible from the people to obtain an intelligence action service. Trinquier wanted his police action to be actual operational warfare that would methodically purse the enemy organization until it has been entirely annihilated.
Controlling the population to aid counterinsurgency actions were seen by both men as essential. They both agreed that creating a census card to control the population would be very useful. The purpose of the census is to cut off, or at least reduce significantly, the contact between the population and the guerrillas. By watching the population’s activities after a while, the counterinsurgent personnel will be familiar with the population and easily spot unusual behavior patterns. Society could be kept in a somewhat organized mode to feel psychologically safe and thus help with the political mindset of the populous.

Open Document