Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of crime in the urban areas
Crime statistics comparison between cities
Effect of high crime rate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of crime in the urban areas
Between the closest cities to New York, the city of new York falls on the highest city with crime rate, followed by New Jersey with a crime rate of 331.1. Cliffside park has the least crime rate with 83.2.
The full time law enforcements in New York City are measured by 100,000 residents. The lowest year given in the article is 2003 with 42,128 full time working officers. In 2006, New York City had 53,473 full time working officers and in 2012 the full time working officers went down to 49,283. During the year 2,000, the murder rate was about 8.7 per 1000,000 people; however, in 2006 the rate went down to 7.3. As expected, in 2,012 the murder rate also went down to 5.1 Although the crime rate was supposed to go down throughout the years, the rape data did not follow our expectations. In the year 2,000, the rape data showed the rate to be 21.0, in 2006 the rate went down to 13.1 and in 2012,
…show more content…
The crime rate for assaults followed the same path. In the year 2,000 and 2,006 the rate went down but in 2,012 the rate went up again. The crime rate and causation can be affected by many things. One of those things is the economical condition of the residents. If the community improves to higher jobs and higher education, they will have a more stable economical status, meaning that they do not need to steal in order to obtain something. A high population and population density can also affect crime. If the population goes up, the crime rate will also go up. If the population goes down, so will the crime rate. An area like New York City has a lot of commercial and business districts, this mean that the crime rate will be higher because there is more chances of having business crimes such as shoplifting, larceny and burglary. The broken windows
New Orleans has always been a hotspot for crimes, historically having one of the highest murder rates in the country. New Orleans prolific crimes can be traced back to the 19th century, when New Orleans was expanding its ports and commerce; groups fought for power to control the revenue streams. Ultimately, organized crime groups and mafia families fought for control - of ports, types of commerce and groups of workers they could control. These fights led to assassinations, murder, and other crimes that continue to this day. The police lost control - they would not step in to interfere with the illegal activities because either they were paid off by the criminals or feared they would be killed by the mafia. The lack of police intervention caused private citizens to step in, creating lynch mobs to tackle crime and take out criminals.
Throughout the essay the authors analyzed and interpreted data collected on the many possible factors that may have contributed to the crime drop. However, all the factors were dismissed as being a reasonable factor apart from abortion. Although Levitt and Dubner’s argument is extremely factual and convincing, many readers will disagree, because they cannot get past the emotion and their personal beliefs. The authors believe that the decline in crime was a result of Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion in the United States. “Between 1988 and 1994, violent crime in the early-legalizing
In the 1990s crime was at an all time high, but suddenly it dropped to an all time low. Experts investigated and found that numerous ideas could have been affecting the decline in crimes. A strong economy, prisons, gun laws, and population to name a few. Levitt and Dubner ask the question, why has crime risen so high in the first place? A strong economy would often be linked to lesser crimes, but studies have shown there is no relation. The biggest link to this is during the 60’s when there was a ton of crime and the economy was high as well. Another false idea of why crimes dropped in the 90s, is the justice system. Criminals were now being convicted for longer sentences. Criminals who would have originally got off the hook for doing drugs were now in prison; many other sentences got increased as well. This lead to more than two million people in prison (Levitt and Dubner, 2009). The increase of punishment for criminals quadrupled between the 80s and 90s (Levitt and Dubner, 2009). The first flaw the authors speak of is that executions are long and drawn out. Death row now only has a 2% execution rate while getting killed by a gang is 7% chance. (Levitt and Dubner, 2009). The second flaw is that capital punishment is more obvious. One criminal getting executed means seven fewer homicides (Levitt and Dubner,
Cohen, L. E. & Felson, M. (1979). “Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach,” American Sociological Review 44:588-608.
rise in crime for both eras show a strong relationship. There is also a tendency for an
In order to find out what caused crime rates to rise; one must first determine whether or not crime actually rose during the time period. Manuel Eisner in his Long-Term Historical Trends in Violent Crime claims that by using homicides as an indicator one can opt that crime actually showed a downward trend during the second industrial revolution (Eisner 85). But Eisner fault lies in the fact that his work only looks at violent crime. David Philips claims this may appear to be because of lack of “full-time paid uniformed police forces” thus the inaccurate, “uncoordinated” system, “contained apparent contradictions” (O'Brien and Quinault 156). Philips goes on to plot an upward trend in crime using committals and not just violent crime like Eisner; Philips plot shows a “very clear and rapid increase” in crime, one that was larger that could be accounted for by population increase alone (O'Brien and Quinault 158). Phi...
Kelling and Bratton believe the police played an important role due to a number of ideas that were implemented within the police force in the early 1990s. The appointment of Bratton to police commissioner and Jack Maple to deputy commissioner and that of Rudolph Giuliani to Mayor of New York saw their idea of order maintence policing being implemented. They had an idea of policing that had been applied to the New York subway system and they had seen it work to lower crime rate in the subway (Kelling, Bratton, 1998). Bratton had also being exploring ways of improving policing through leadership, management and administration and had some changes to make when he took over the New York Police Department (NYPD) in 1994 (Kelling, Bratton, 1998). He had also tried and tested these organisational methods with the transport police department.
In the article “Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach”, Cohen and Felson use an ecological theory perspective to explain the increase in crime rates in the United States of America (USA). They gathered data from the USA Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) from the years 1960 to 1975, in the period they witnessed a growth in crime rate trends. Cohen and Felson (1979) present a theory known as Routine Activity Theory and the three elements required for a crime to occur, while refuting the point of crime causation due to poverty. Rather, in their article they focus on the social change in American society, which ties into Sacco and Kennedy’s (2011) Criminal Event.
Crime Statistics; the ways they are collected, collated, used and their effectiveness Crime statistics are collected, collated and used in many different ways, all the various types of statistics have strengths and weaknesses through their methods though. How might these weaknesses be overcome? Police recorded crimes, Crime Victim surveys, self report surveys (also know as crime victimisation surveys) , police arrest data, court data and also accident and emergency data are sources of information for the statistics collected. Each different way of collecting data has its own strengths and weaknesses as well as levels of reliability due to it being an official report or an unofficial report.
Jacobs, James B. and Alex Hortis, “New York City As Organized Crime Fighter,” New York Law School Law Review, Volume XLII, Numbers 3 & 4, 1998.
A violent crime occurs every 23.5 seconds in the United States of America. Even though crime has been at a low during the past decade, violence is still prevalent in today’s society. Most of these crimes happen in places that are socio-economically disadvantaged. There then is the debate of whether violent crime is associated with environments struck with poverty. There is a correlation between violent crimes and poverty because of the unemployment rates in major cities, the culture of poor areas, and drugs.
Especially crimes which are less commonly reported like sexual assault offences. As demonstrated through crime surveys taken from May 1994 to April 1995, 606800 victims of robbery, assault and sexual assault were discovered. Whereas, only 227000 cases were actually reported to the police. Research suggests the main reasons to the lack of reporting of assault cases is correlated with; the victim’s assumptions of the criminal justice system, perspective on how serious the crime is, the frequency of abuse, the relationship between the offender and victim and the possibility of permanent resolution. In 1994, only 32.1% of assault cases were reported to the police in comparison to 78.5% of home invasion cases recorded. Studies suggest the outstanding reason for 34.6% of non-reported cases of assault, was due to the victim’s presumption their matter would be too insignificant for police to be interested in (Dr. Adam
If we looked at crime rates statistically, it's not accurate. Because what's posted is only recordings from the police departments, and not everything is recorded. An interesting example, is when someone who has higher authority is fighting against a
Reports to prove their hypothesis, that “economic deprivation is positively associated with homicide rates” (Eitle, D’Alessio, and Stolzenber 2006). The authors included three theories of why they believe that economic deprivations are related to homicides rate and the theories are, absolute deprivation, relative deprivation and concentrated deprivation/disadvantage. Absolute deprivation is associated with economic disadvantage, while relative deprivation is associated with
The U.S. Department of Labor (2011) reported the national average of unemployment for 2008 was 5.8 percent. The rate dramatically increased in 2009 with an average of 9.3 percent and 9.6 percent for 2010. While unemployment rates have increased, the FBI’s preliminary reports for 2010 show that law enforcement agencies across the U.S. have reported a decrease of 6.2 percent in the number of violent crimes for the first 6 months of 2010 when compared to figures reported for the same time in 2009. The violent crime category includes rape, murder, robbery, and aggravated result. The number of property crimes also decreased 2.8 percent when compared to the same time last year. Property crimes include burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft. Arson decreased 14.6 percent when compared to the same time periods of 2009 (FBI, 2011).