Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on crime statistics
Essays on crime statistics
Source and limitations of crime statistics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on crime statistics
Crime Statistics; the ways they are collected, collated, used and their effectiveness
Crime statistics are collected, collated and used in many different ways, all the various types of statistics have strengths and weaknesses through their methods though. How might these weaknesses be overcome?
Police recorded crimes, Crime Victim surveys, self report surveys (also know as crime victimisation surveys) , police arrest data, court data and also accident and emergency data are sources of information for the statistics collected. Each different way of collecting data has its own strengths and weaknesses as well as levels of reliability due to it being an official report or an unofficial report. Official reports are things such as Police reports;
…show more content…
It is useful in relation to the bigger crimes that happen on a lesser level such as homicide where it can show the trend In what age group is committing the crime more so then others and also which sex it tends to be more, however, the information can be affected by evidence and whether the police are intending on and actually do charge a person with the crime, also it does not depict lesser crimes statistically as it can for larger crimes.
(Weatherburn)
Self reports are anonymous surveys that can be produced by the police or government to inquire about crimes that people commit but do not report, it is especially useful for drug crimes, creating different trends of crimes that aren’t reported, finding out which crimes are becoming increasingly larger, however, it is can be greatly effected by people not saying anything at all or by inputting false data into there response of the survey.
…show more content…
Court Data is useful in providing which crimes have a higher re-offending rate then others on a basis of whether a person that was convicted re-offends more then a person that wasn’t convicted. The data however, provides a bad indication of crime and does not provide any useful data towards the crime rates and the current trends of crimes being committed. (Weatherburn)
It is similar to the Police charge data as it is official data that is collected and used.
Accident and Emergency Data provides a good indication on crimes that are resolving in injuries, at what rate these are happening and which crime it is that has resolved in an injury or fatality. This data alone is not able to depict trends in crime but in correlation to other types of data that is collected such as police recorded data it is able to show trends and different things that are happening. (Weatherburn)
The data collected is similar to Police Charge Data and Court Data as it comes from official reports that are
Crime data is a resource being used to help understand who the victims are, their age, race, what type of crime they have committed. The more information someone has about crime the more prepared they can be to deal with the victim, evaluate programs that help prevent crime. There are several official sources used UCR, NCVS, NIBRS that are used. There are pros and cons to each source and the following information will include some of the positive and some of the negatives points of each report. This is not inclusive by any means, there are many different various pros and cons of each report.
The National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) is information that is gathered by the U.S Census Bureau. Unlike UCR this information is not given by law enforcement officials, but by a household survey that is conducted about twice a year. When the survey is being commenced they place the crimes into two different categories; person crimes and property crimes. NCVS has four objectives when obtaining information; “(1) to develop detailed information about the victims and consequences of crime, (2) to estimate the number and types of crimes not reported to the police, (3) to provide uniform measures of selected typed of crimes, and (4) to permit comparisons over time and types of areas.” (NACJD)
344. The. Australian Institute of Criminology, [Online]. Available at: http://www.aic.gov.au/documents/0/C/5/%7B0C5DFDDF-7A72-43F9-80A1-CA6D51B635B6%7Dtandi344.pdf, [Accessed 14 April 2011].
As Nils Christie argued, crime is a property of the state (2004). As such, it can be defined by the same systems of ideals which influence the state. Crime statistics, which refer to a category of human acts that society view as deviant, can consequently be argued to be without objectivity (Dorling and Simpson, 1999). The statistics they provide are thus arguably not exact. To a certain extent one could infer they are reflections of society, of those who present the data and most importantly of those who accumulate it. The facts themselves become a socially constructed foundation for social knowledge, which inevitably become subjective. This essay aims to discuss how ideological biases within the Police and to a certain extent the media are reflected in the crime statistics.
Weatherburn, D. (2011) ‘Uses and abuses of crime statistics’, Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice, 153: 1-16
CompStat is not the quick fix to solving crimes but rather a process of organized problem solving that, when the CompStat meetings are conducted properly, new crime strategies are announced, established and shared. This process unifies all members and unites of the department towards a common goal decrease crime rates. In the Compstat process it is vital for Crime Analysis to ensure all data is input correctly because such particular flaws and weaknesses might contaminate later analyses. Data integrity is very vital when establishing a report because without reliable data, there cannot be any reliable analytical reports.
The general public of Australia has a common aspect when associated with their sources of knowledge of crime. Many would agree the media, especially newspapers and television, are their most frequent and well known source of crime activity. The media updates society with data about the extent, frequency and types of crimes committed (Moston and Coventry, 2011, p.53). Studies highlight our grasp of crime is majorly derived from the media, with a lack of exposure to police statistics or victimisation surveys. There is a concern in correlation to this fact since the media has inconsistency and inaccuracy in reporting crime. Due to this, the media can misrepresent victims and perpetrators, downsizing them to recognisable stereotypes (Moston and
In general, official statistics of crime recorded by the police and surveys of the public such as victim surveys and self-report studies are the three main measures of the extent of crime in Britain. The oldest method is to rely on official data collected by criminal justice agencies, such as data on arrests or convictions. The other two rely on social surveys. In one case, individuals are asked if they have been victims of crime; in the other, they are asked to self-report their own criminal activity. (Terence P. Thornberry and Marvin D. Krohn) Although these are a main secondary source of quantitative data, each of them may contain some drawbacks. Thus, this essay will introduce these three methods and demonstrates their disadvantages, such as the police crime statistics exclude the unreported and unrecorded crime;
The 2002 crime figures for England and Wales comprised of two separate reports, brought together for the first time: (i) Crime statistics recorded by constabularies and (ii) The British Crime Survey (BCS), based on 33,000 interviews. The BCS is regarded as a more reliable measure of actual levels of crime because it includes experiences of crime that go unreported. The British crime survey of 2002 revealed:
Maguire, M., Morgan, R., and Reiner, R. (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. 5th ed. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Due to the fact that the Uniform Crime Report is released every year, allows for it to be readily available and updated for the media, researchers, students, and government organizations (Rosen, 1995). This is advantages to society because this information is readily available to the public which can be used for statistics or research.
According to Rachel Boba, “Crime analysis is a law enforcement function that involves systematic analysis for identifying and analyzing patterns and trends in crime and disorder” (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime analysis).The information on these patterns can assist law enforcement agencies in the deployment of resources in a more effective manner; it can also help detectives to identify and catch suspects. Crime analysis also plays a role in improvising solutions to crime problems, and developing crime prevention strategies. There are various types of technology that is used in crime analysis. Crime analysis relies heavily on computer technology, and over the past fifteen years there has been a significant improvement in computer hardware and software that has led to tremendous developments in this field. One form of hardware that is used by Crime analysts to complete most of their work is Desktop personal computers, laptop computers are also used by crime analysts for fieldwork and presentations. Other forms of hardware that are used include color laser printers that can produce high-quality documents quickly, plotters which are printers that can produce large poster size color maps, scanners, and digital cameras, these specific types of hardware is mostly used by police departments when analyzing crime.
For decades now, including the years 1994 and 1995, the time of the O.J. Simpson murder trial, American law enforcement has used two major data sources to measure crime. First, there is the Uniform Crime Report or UCR. The UCR is compiled data from reported crimes, it is a very accurate system used for murder and those crimes that cannot go unnoticed. Next, we have The National Crime Victim Survey or NCVS which is a unanimous survey, better at accounting for the crimes that may not get reported, crimes such as rape or assault.
Davis, R. C., Lurigio, A. J., & Skogan, W. G. (1997). Victims of crime (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Morgan, R., Maguire, M. And Reiner, R. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.