Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The giver analysis
Analysis of the giver
Analysis of the given book
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The giver analysis
Throughout time their has been many attempts to create an utopian society. A utopian society is a society where all things are good. Although, there has never has been a society that has successfully completed this idea. One example would be New Harmony, Indiana. Another example would be the community in The Giver. Throughout the course of this paper one will find out the history, the similarities and differences, and the reasons for their failures of New Harmony and the community in The Giver.
Located in southwestern Indiana New Harmony was founded by the Harmonies or Rappites. Designed by Robert Owen, New harmony was an attempt at a perfect society through free education, social classes, and personal wealth. With help from his partner
…show more content…
Robert Owen was able to introduce the social reforms to America. Later on, the society ran into some issues that caused the downfall of its perfectness. Another utopian society would be the community in The Giver. The society has eliminated pain and strife by converting to "Sameness," a plan that has also terminated all signs of feelings, or emotions from their lives. The community lacks any color, memory, climate and terrain, all in an effort to have the people feel like there is an order to the community. Although, the two communities may seem very different there are still similarities. With having such as contrasting history between the two societies, this leads to many differences between them. One example would be the rules in the community. A difference between the rules of New Harmony and the community is that New Harmony would allow education. Quoting the official site of the New Harmony Town Government, “Robert Owen's ambition was to create a perfect society through free education and the abolition of social classes and personal wealth” (http://www.newharmony-in.gov/about_new_harmony.php). This here clearly states that New Harmony was intentionally trying to educate the people by having free education. Although, it clearly states in The Giver, “The books in the giver’s dwelling had been the only books Jonas had ever seen ” (Lowry 74). This also shows that community is not intentionally trying to educate the people. Yet, there are still similarities between the rules of the two communities. A rule that is similar between the two communities is that both communities did not have everything be based off a certain religion. New Harmony and the community both had leaders, but these leaders both felt that it would not be necessary to have the rules be based off a certain religion. Unfortunately, there is no such thing as a perfect society, this is due to many factors.
Both communities had a time when they were no longer considered “perfect.” For New Harmony this is because there was no commitment from the people, the people were doubtful, and poor leadership. The community in The Giver had a downfall just because one person within the community. This one person finally realized that this society was not actually perfect. Causing them to make a decision for themselves. Overall there is no way that a society can become perfect. That is based of all the reasons previously mentioned and many others. Humans cannot create something because they are not perfect themselves, so they cannot even imagine perfection.
Based on reading this paper, one can see that their is no such thing as a perfect society. Even though there have been many attempts to create an utopian society, it has yet to be successfully completed because of the reasons that were previously mentioned. Also, with reading this paper one has seen the history, the similarities and differences of the societies, and the reasons for their failures. Eventually there is hope that humans will be able to create a perfect society. This may be because of the fact that the human themselves are
perfect.
Utopia seems like a wonderful idea where everything is perfect and no one suffers. Three stories address this topic and show how even the best ideas have their downside. The Giver tells of a society where everything is the same and no one has to worry about making a wrong decision. Fahrenheit 451 tells of a society that bans book in the interest of preventing unhappiness. The society in Logan's Run is full of pleasure but only for 30 years. In practice though, these utopias present each of the protagonists with a problem where they question how perfect their perfect worlds really is.
The authors therefor saw the ‘utopian’ societies to be a trap for weak minded publics, and that once in place, such systems would be able to perpetuate indefinitely due to the efficiency at which they protect and propagate themselves. Through fear, diversion and sedation the utopia can maintain a strong grip on the people it encompasses before anyone realizes the sacrifices made. The popularity of these books does rule out the possibility of such a society coming into existence in the future, however. The state of people is not about to change, and their ignorance will continue regardless of the harshness of the wake up calls issued.
It is not worth living in a perfect world. From The Giver we gather much knowledge of
A utopian society is very hard to come across these days. People tend to start a utopian society in order to better the life’s of others. Bronson Alcott of the Fruitland Community tries to find a utopian society that will last and be productive. The Fruitland’s goal is to abstain from worldly activity and integrate systems of trade and labor in order to find spirituality.
In order to preserve the structure of humanity, people must have freedom of expression, free will, and equality. Any attempt to create an utopia must respect, honor, and nourish these human needs; for without them the society will eventually become a dystopia. An analysis of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury and The Giver by Lois Lowry, proves that any social structure that hopes to achieve utopia must insure that the citizens have their basic needs met, opportunities to pursue personal goals and dreams, and freedom to be unique.
The story in The Giver by Lois Lowry takes place in a community that is not normal. People cannot see color, it is an offense for somebody to touch others, and the community assigns people jobs and children. This unnamed community shown through Jonas’ eye, the main character in this novel, is a perfect society. There is no war, crime, and hunger. Most readers might take it for granted that the community in The Giver differs from the real society. However, there are several affinities between the society in present day and that in this fiction: estrangement of elderly people, suffering of surrogate mothers, and wanting of euthanasia.
Utopian societies are often thought to be impractical based upon the human idea that no one person or thing can ever be completely perfect. Because this idea of perfection is practically impossible to achieve, various controlled techniques need to be used in order to create a utopia. Aldous Huxley states in his foreword to Brave New World that the creation of a perfect utopia is quite possible if we as humans “refrain from blowing ourselves to smithereens” in attempts at creating social stability (xiv). Huxley’s Brave New World “depicts a World State where there is absolute social stability made possible by government-controlled research in biology and psychology” (Woiak 4). While the existence of this utopian
This serene society greatly contradicts the one we live in. Our society is furnished with hatred and warfare, yet in return, we are given freedom and the privilege of having distinctive characters. Given the nature of human beings, our society is more idealistic to live in. Utopia is an imaginary state, which consists of people who believe they are more capable of living in a group than alone. In such a community, the welfare of the group is the primary interest compared to the comfort of individuals.
The book The Giver is a Dystopia because the people in their community have no choices, release and because the people don't know or understand what life is. The world in the beginning of the book seems like a utopia because how smoothly it runs but it actually is a dystopia because no world or place ever is perfect. This place or the givers world still has many flaws.
To begin, “It is not to be expected that human nature will change in a day,” said Frank Kellogg, an American politician. No one can change their ways in a day, especially not a humanity as a whole. Each human being has imperfections within themselves, which leads to mistakes. How can one live in a utopia, if their actions are not up to code? They can’t. Near perfection is not possible within an imperfect society. If one person decided to change their ways, everyone else would have to follow in the same direction, in order to continue the “status quo”. Therefore, how can there be a faultless society, because within that society you do not have flawless
We gained control of many things. But we had to let go of others” (97). In the book The Giver by Lois Lowry, no one has seen a rainbow after a storm, no one knew what colors were; what choosing was; what it meant to be an individual. Everyone lived in complete Sameness, and never learned what it meant to be an individual. By eliminating as much self expression as possible in Sameness and society, Jonas's community has rejected the individuality of a society where people are free to move society forward. In The Giver individuality is represented by colors, memories, and pale eyes.
Our fascination with utopias stems from our attraction to and pursuit of progress within our own society. We study utopias with the hope that our society will someday evolve into one. But what often goes unnoticed is that if our society improves enough to become utopian, it won't be able to improve any longer. Hence, it will be rigid and unchanging, the complete opposite of what it was as it evolved to its elevated state. This is an awful truth for us because we place value and virtue in the ideas of desire and progress. Our reason tells us: once in an ideal land, desire cannot simply cease to be, because desire is part of our human nature. And our reason is right. An ideal society should accentuate our human nature, not suppress it. As we desire a perfect society we know that a perfect could not exist without our desire. And as long as we desire, we hope for progress. The idea that an utopia wouldn't allow such progress to occur is enough to make us stop believing in utop...
In the nineteenth century, man believed in the perfectibility of mankind and in the real possibility of an ultimate utopia, a time when man could all live together in peace. However, the events of the twentieth century have weakened that belief. Both cold and hot wars have followed each other in succession. Revolutions and civil wars have taken place and totalitarianism has become a fact that can hardly be ignored. Therefore, the modern age has become a time in which more anti-utopias have been envisioned than ever before.
Despite the fact that (want to escape the perfect world? 9 ‘utopias that really exist)’s ideas that the pursuit of perfection is possible deserves some merit, it is clearly not true that perfection is not remotely
The achievement of these goals will lead to a healthier and more fulfilling existence, further emphasizing the importance of the ideal society. Although individuals grouped together create the idea of society, it is solely the interactions of people, how they care for each other, and how well individuals adapt to different systems which will eventually dictate the overall success of an ideal society. Even though a perfect society is far from being achieved, stable and effective systems may be implemented until such a thing happens.