Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mass media effects on culture
Mass media effects on culture
Significant role of media in globalization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mass media effects on culture
In the current global order, people are bombarded with foreign media, from television programs, news, films, and music among others. The massive media conglomerates that operate across the world are changing perceptions and promoting foreign culture at the global stage. Until recently, the western media, with big media houses such as the Cable News Network (CNN), British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), and Reuters among other Europe-based media houses dominating the world scene, dominated the world (Chalaby 37). With the rise of the Qatar based Aljazeera Network and Chinese CCCTV, the global audience can now sample different tastes. Perhaps due to its long dominance, the Western media still commands the largest audience across the world. This …show more content…
According to Doyle, the global domination by mainly western media companies has contributed to the weakening of local cultures, retardation of development as well as promotion of capitalist values (Doyle 143). In essence, the concept of medial imperialism in the world today is the root cause of homogenization of culture in the sense that the western media has largely promoted the democratic hybridization of various cultures. In other words, the values of the imported media have played a significant role in countering the traditional models of media imperialism. While a number of people and ethnic societies underestimate the key aspects of medial imperialism, especially with regard to western media, they fail to understand the obvious long-term implications of the media on the local audiences. Essentially, what the local audiences interpret or perceive after watching foreign media end up influencing their political, social, and economic …show more content…
While the western media may indeed have influenced many cultures, there is little doubt that some cultures are bent on retaining their identity. In order words, some western societies such as the Chinese and the Arabs cultures have relatively retained their cultural identities in the wake of growing western influence. Notably, they have retained their cultural identities amid the changing forces affecting many parts of the word. In essence, the concept of media imperialism may not necessarily erode cultural
Over the centuries, the media has played a significant role in the shaping of societies across the globe. This is especially true of developed nations where media access is readily available to the average citizen. The media has contributed to the creation of ideologies and ideals within a society. The media has such an effect on social life, that a simple as a news story has the power to shake a nation. Because of this, governments around the world have made it their duty to be active in the regulation and control of media access in their countries. The media however, has quickly become dominated by major mega companies who own numerous television, radio and movie companies both nationally and internationally. The aim of these companies is to generate revenue and in order to do this they create and air shows that cater to popular demand. In doing so, they sometimes compromise on the quality of their content. This is where public broadcasters come into perspective.
Starting with a historical background of the development of the Cultural imperialism expression Rauschenberger (2003) discusses some theories in order to define the Cultural imperialism. These theories saw the light in the 1960’s and counted as important theories in the 1970’s. After the Second World War Cultural imperialism definition gained several new terms such as; neo-colonialism, economic- imperialism and, soft-imperialism. Later on and over the times it has also gained more and more terms like Media Imperialism. John Tomlinson (1991), in his book, Cultural Imperialism: A critical introduction, defines the term as "the use of political and economic power to exalt and spread the
The media, including television programming, cartoons, film, the news, as well as literature and magazines, is a very powerful and pervasive medium for expression. It can reach a large number of people and convey ideas, cultural norms, stereotypic roles, power relationships, ethics, and values. Through these messages, the mass media may have a strong influence on individual behavior, views, and values, as well as in shaping national character and culture. Although there is a great potential for the media to have a positive and affirming effect on the public and society at large, there may be important negative consequences when the messages conveyed are harmful, destructive, or violent.
One of the greatest exports of American culture is American media. American media is one of the most widely distributed and consumed cultural forms from the United States. This means that not only do Americans consume large quantities of their own media, but many other countries in the world consume American media, too. People in other countries will not interpret or understand the media in precisely the same ways that Americans will and do, nonetheless, many aspects of American culture and American reality are communicated to numerous viewers as part of the content in the media. The media is an important tool in the discussion of race, class, and gender in America. It takes a savvy viewer to discriminate between and understand what media accurately represents reality, what media does not, or which aspects of experience are fictionalized, and which elements ...
The ideas put forth in Marshall McLuhan's Media Hot and Cold, present many theories regarding the effects of media on the world. What qualifies as media, in essence, is any experience or information, imparted on the awareness of an individual and/or societies. These can be physical or nonphysical influences. TV and radio are examples of physical media. Their effects and evolution can be easily observed. However, and perhaps more importantly, McLuhan examines those nonphysical influences which can be observed in the individual and society. It is not enough to merely identify these mediums as such. What is more crucial is the perpetual waxing and waning of influence of such ineffable phenomena, whose identity and existence rely upon their interdependency
Kerry Manderback. “Hegemony, Cultural Hegemony, and The Americanization of Imported Media.” Accessed November 28, 2013. http://www.academia.edu/2942539/Hegemony_Cultural_Hegemony_and_The_Americanization_of_Imported_Media.
One of the fundamental roles of the media in a liberal democracy is to critically scrutinise governmental affairs: that is to act as a watchdog of government to ensure that the government can be held accountable by the public. However, the systematic deregulation of media systems worldwide is diminishing the ability of citizens to meaningfully participate in policymaking process governing the media (McChesney, 2003, p. 126). The relaxation of ownership rules and control, has resulted in a move away from diversity of production to a situation where media ownership is becoming increasing concentrated by just a few predominantly western global conglomerates (M...
Media has always had the power to transform ideas through what it represents. Most of the media we experience today is part of a global message which we absorb into our everyday lives; our customs, cultural coding, religious views and political standings. Due to satellite televesion, nations everywhere are able to tune into the world on a larger scale putting each nation under a single umbrella of opinions and views e...
When Al Jazeera began in 1996, there were few broadcast news presentations in the Middle East that were not state-run. Cable options were limited to CNN, which was already taken on an American slant, and the BBC World Service, which was having trouble keeping its Middle East bureaus running because of censorship. The time was ripe for Al Jazeera to fill a gap in the market for regional and international news free from the ruling-party propaganda of countries like Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia, and Iraq. Over the years, by maintaining their fierce editorial independence while reporting on some of the most repressive regimes in the world, Al Jazeera has made many enemies. At no time, however, was their position more at risk than when the Bush administration began its campaign of intimidation, censorship, and perception management in the days soon after September 11th and in the lead up to the Iraq war. Of the many dictatorial regimes Al Jazeera had faced, the democratic US proved to be their most formidable opponent.
The mass media has become a very significant player in the politics of US foreign policy. There are two major reasons for this. First Americans society and the global environment have grown in complexity and in importance in affecting the lives of Americans; people have developed a greater need for information about national and international affairs. Second during the 20th century a media revolution occurred that makes it possible for the mass media to rapidly communicate information anywhere on the planet. The result of this is much of the information, knowledge, and images that individuals have of the world, come from the mass media
Having grown up in the United States during the twenty- first century, media has constantly influenced a large part of my life through film, fashion, and journalism. By using todays Media Platforms to my advantage, I have personally seen and experienced the global effects that media has, and been part of this transformative process. I have also considered media to be a fascinating subject, while its always changing, and constantly shaping different cultures whether that’s through film, social media platforms, journalism, or broadcasting. I would love to deepen my knowledge of media studies not only educationally but internationally as well, it would be a privilege to globally enhance my understanding of the subject as media is perceived differently
According to our class discussion culture is a shared way of life with material land non-material components that are shared through customs and behavior. Culture is not static people shape and change culture. A culture can change through many ways but this paper is going to focus on two three specific ways global businesses, immigration and media. The term globalization can be worrisome for many as they fear the changes the country is making. Nevertheless globalization does not have to be detrimental to our culture in fact I argue that in some way globalization improves American culture.
Media imperialism is a specific way of discussing cultural imperialism and in order to define media imperialism we must understand cultural imperialism. Essentially, it’s described as a theory based upon over-concentration of mass media, from larger nations as an important variable which affects smaller nations in negative way. These nations have lessened because of media control from Western countries. As media imperialism is a sub-category under the broader of heading of cultural imperialism the dependency raised due to the global media system, which results in what is known as media imperialism– which is a highly debated concept amongst sociologists. There are two known models of media imperialism, the 'Schiller one ' which is focused on the media dominance by the UK, France, and U.S. And the alternative model; which is the 'generic model ' initially developed in Europe stating the great influence of media expansion of media powers, and unlike Schiller It recognises the multidimensionality of media forms (Thussu, International Communication: A Reader, 2010)
Cultural Alienation: The mass media reflect inequalities. In many countries, like Nigeria, the large number of languages used makes it difficult to produce programmes for all linguistic groups hence depriving some people from sharing in information source and entertainment. In most places, particularly in developing countries, possession of a television set is a privilege of urban dwellers. But even if programmes reach outside the main production centers, the audience is often culturally disadvantaged as the media content may be completely alien to the spectator’s background. Furthermore, even though communication media have proliferated in recent decades and brought the external world to millions of people previously living in isolated communities,
India has the largest democracy in the world and media has a powerful presence in the country. In recent times, Indian media has been subject to a lot of criticism for the manner in which they have disregarded their social responsibility. Dangerous business practices in the field of media have affected the fabric of Indian democracy. Big industrial conglomerates in the business of media have threatened the existence of pluralistic viewpoints. Post liberalisation, transnational media organisations have spread their wings in the Indian market with their own global interests. This has happened at the cost of an Indian media which was initially thought to be an agent of ushering in social change through developmental programs directed at the non-privileged and marginalised sections of the society. Though media has at times successfully played the role of a watchdog of the government functionaries and has also aided in participatory