Creative thinking has been around for quite a long time. Today it has become one of the highest topics of discussion. Many times it is praised and encouraged, and it is rarely discouraged. People often ignore the fact that creative thinking can also have a negative impact. This paper will first discuss what two theories the creative process consists of. After, it will go over some of the positive aspects of creativity, and why it has been so often encouraged. Once the positive aspects have been discussed, it will then go on to discuss the negative effect that creativity can bring. Creative thinkers tend to be more dishonest, this dishonesty increases the chance that creative thinkers are more likely to be unethical. Creativity can lead to
Employers tend to motivate workers to think outside the box. It is one of two topics that are extremely important to employers, the other being ethics. However, no one has ever questioned the negative effects creative thinking can have. Ethics being one of the two extremely important topics today, it is shocking more people have not researched the dark side of creativity. While creative thinking can be insightful, it can also be destructive. This paper will discuss the negativity that creative thinking can bring. Creative thinking is encouraging of unethical behavior, and has even been linked with mental illness. Creative thinkers are likely to be excellent liars, dishonest, and damaging. Before the above is discussed; however, there will be a discussion over the creative process and then the popularity of creativity. Why exactly creativity is often promoted and encouraged will be debated.
The Creative
The process states that creativity requires the dual application of convergence and divergence. Creativity without a doubt requires divergent thinking. However, creativity is most effective when divergent thinking and convergent thinking are paired (Wong & Siu, 2012, p. 441 ). These two mental states are important in creating successful creative ideas. In the creative process the idea generation is pertinent to divergent thinking, the evaluation, which is associated with convergent thinking, is developed as a part of ideation (Wong & Siu, 2012, p. 441). When an individual can conquer both types of creative thinking they are able to reach the highest level of creativity. Divergent thinking and convergent thinking are interchangeable to highly creative
DEVELOPMENT. In developing the PCA, test author used 2 kinds of creativeness, one depending on J. P. Guilford's idea of divergent (versus.convergent) thinking along with the other depending on Teresa Amabile's inclusion of social and atmosphere factors in creativeness. Following Guilford, test author defines divergent production as 'the generation of options to satisfy specified broad requirements' (examiner's manual, p. 2). Both divergent-thinking subtests apply Guilford's concept by getting students to (a) complete eight pictures depending on incomplete figures, and (b) on two separate exercises of 20 geometric figures, identify just as much groups of three or higher figures as possible depending on some common feature. The eight completed sketches are each acquired for four from six divergent techniques recognized by Guilford (sensitivity to problems, originality, redef...
Shaughnessy, M. F., & Wakefield, J. F. (2003). Creativity: Assessment. In N. Piotrowski & T. Irons-Georges (Eds.), Magill's encyclopedia of social science:Psychology (pp. 459-463). Pasadena, CA: Salem Press.
Richard Florida also goes on to say that creativity is energy-absorbing, tiring work. To come to think of it, it can be very laborious. My husband likes to design clothing, and sometimes he stares into space for hours daydreaming. Suddenly, he’d sprint into the bedroom, grab his notebook and start drawing. He could eat up a whole pencil, eraser and all, for that one drawing. Beads of sweat would form on his brow, and the nerve in the middle of his forehead would protrude. And I’d know to keep our daughter away and leave him at peace. You see, I think my husband is creative. He’s got a great sense of humor, and he’s an artist.
In this notable Ted Talk video "Do schools kill creativity?", Sir Ken Robinson discusses how public education systems demolish creativity because they believe it is essential to the academic growth and success of students. Robinson created a broad arrange of arguments to persuade the viewers to take action on this highly ignored issue, and he primarily focuses on how important creativity is. There are classes within schools that help utilize creativity, but they are not taken seriously by adults in society. Therefore, the value of creative knowledge decreases. Robinson uses an unusual combination of pathos and ethos to make an enjoyable dispute for implementing an education system that nurtures rather than eats away at creativity.
In their article, “The Creativity Crisis”, authors Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman explore the urgency of the downfall in the public’s “creativity quotient.” Bronson and Merryman emphasize the necessity for young children to be imaginative. Through an IBM poll, they verify that with the decrease of creativity in our society comes an array of consequences seen in the work field. The authors remind readers of another reason for the importance of creativity; they argue that creative ideas can solve national matters. Hence, Branson and Merryman believe that original ideas are key for a better world. Though I concede that creativity is a vital key to the solution of many national problems, I still insist that teaching creativity,
Gardner describes the creative individual as follows: “The creative individual is a person who regularly solves problems, fashions products, or defines new questions in a domain in a way that is initially considered novel but that ultimately becomes accepted in a particular cultural setting” (Gardner, 1993, p. 35). As I understand this, a creative individual is one who seeks out problems and states or solves them in a way that no one else has previously. Such inno...
Many believe that people are born with an innate level of creativity that is later on influenced by the environment in which they are raised. Schools are one of the most influential environments in which people spend an average of eight hours a day. Whether it be a public, private, or home school environment, these early surroundings that children are exposed to shape their creativity. As students, parents, and even teachers we don't realize the effects that the education system can have on ones creativity. The public education system is defined by two main ideas, what are the most useful subjects for work and ones academic ability. So, where does this leave creativity? Due to the ideals of the education system, creativity can be seen as unvalued or even stigmatized. Understanding the correlation between the educational environment and creativity can help positively influences the progress of the individual as well as their society.
There is a magnitude of research put behind trying to find the link between creativity and...
In conclusion to some up this essay the term ‘creativity’ will always cause a debate in the educational system as. There will always be difficulty defining it as many use the term too loosely to have a definitive meaning. It requires risk taking, it is difficult to portray creativity when schools are so obsessed with right or wrong answers for ways of doing things. Society teaches us the risks are bad because the government and its policies interfere with our own choices and decisions.
Nolley , S. (1999). A piagetian perspective on the dialectic process of creativity. Taylor &
Design thinking is a process for practical, creative resolution of problems or issues that looks for an improved future result. It is the essential ability to combine empathy, creativity and rationality to meet user needs and drive business success. Unlike analytical thinking, design thinking is a creative process based around the building up of ideas. There are no judgments early on the design thinking (Simon, 1969, p. 55). Design thinking includes imagination and reason, a combination of convergent and divergent thought, and creativity. Design thinking might be thought of as dialectic, or conversation. It involves design wisdom, judgment, and knowledge. Lastly, design thinking is skill (Hegeman, 2008).
This is one of the types of thinking styles. Creative thinking involves creating something new or original. It involves the skills of flexibility, originality, fluency, elaboration, brainstorming, modification, imagery, associative thinking, attribute listing, metaphorical thinking, and forced relationships. The aim of creative thinking is to stimulate curiosity and promote divergence. When an individual learns to expand their way of thinking to incorporate metaphorical ideas, they will spark the creative thinking process...
However, design thinking is present in each stage of journey from the brief until the finished work. Furthermore, different solutions can also be produced for any given brief and these can differ widely in the levels of creativity,
Some creative ideas are amazing, simple and others complex. Creativity is a process, and it improves when a person continually work hard and come out with new ideas. Harris (1998)
Creativity is a key part in the entrepreneurial process. It is the ability to invent something new or change something (Webster, 1976). According to (Cromie, 2000), Creative people show some particular characteristics. They find problems very interesting and are not afraid of obstacles; rather, they try to find out the solution of those problems.