Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Odyssey and the hero's journey
Odysseus's journey paper
Odyssey and the hero's journey
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Odyssey and the hero's journey
The Creation (pg 3-5): (1) The character of the creator almost appears nonchalant as it allowed for Nature, the less kindlier supernatural force, to reign over the “shapelessness chaos” for a seemingly long time until he steps in and confines everything to order, such as “settling arguments.” This shows that he could’ve “shaped” the universe long ago, but chose to let chaos reign for an unknown amount of time. (2) The speaker seems to have no doubt that what he is saying is, in fact, the truth, however, he doesn’t have any sort of emotion given in his exposé, leading me to believe that he’s indifferent, rather than confident, in this revelation. (3) When you remove the creator from the story, you also remove any divine sort of connotation …show more content…
that comes with using “creator.” The emphasis falls onto “physis,” or the natural order of everything, rather than “nomos,” or law and order/rationalism. By removing the idea of an all-powerful creator, Ovid has indirectly forced the reader to imagine a creator-less world, one created out of natural phenomena instead of by an almighty deity. (4) Humankind’s origin is that people were created in possibly God’s image, as finer beings, or Gods of living clay and running water who, unlike all other animals, can raise their face toward Heaven. (5) This origin story makes “mythological sense,” because it is not necessarily backed up with facts or statistics, but more solely accepted by one’s faith and may have been widely believed at one time. (6) Ovid himself may not entirely believe that mankind was created in God’s image, but rather sees it as speculation. (7) Despite all his talk of a creator, Ovid has shown his indifference toward the subject, and seems rather hell-bent on showing the autonomy of humans. The Four Ages (5-9): (1) I would place Adam and Eve and their expulsion from paradise in the Iron Age because this age “let loose all evil: modesty and truth and righteousness fled the earth.” This coincides with Adam and Eve’s story since their expulsion meant the creation of original sin and once created, their paradise was over. (2) Ovid’s Four Ages do not represent the “Cradle of Civilization” at all. In fact, Ovid is giving us a moral evolution in reverse. By giving us a reverse evolution, Ovid is saying that as time goes on, humans will become more morally backwards, rather than the opposite. The diet of the human beings during the Golden Age seemed to be exclusively herbivorous, as it only mentions berries, cherries (blackcaps), and edible acorns. This could signify that when humans refrain eating meat, they will stay morally pure and will not war amongst each other. Lycaon (9-11): (1) Lycanthropy is the supernatural transformation of a person into a wolf.
(2) As seen in The Odyssey, Athena uses the power of transformation to help Telemachus and Odysseus. Her transformations are those of a kind nature, of her true nature, whereas Lycaon is of a wicked nature, as wolves are commonly associated with fear when wandering the woods, for example. (3) I believe Ovid is suggesting that the savage rapacious nature of wolves stems from human beings. Wolves and humans share negative traits such as lust for power and domination. Western culture often demonizes wolves for that characteristic, but most people don’t realize that we also share that trait. Because humans and wolves are headstrong and dominant creatures, it is not surprising that their instincts clash. (4) The mythological significance of lycanthropy is that there is an instinctual mindset within every animal, whether they be beast or …show more content…
man. The Flood and Deucalion and Pyrrha (11-16): (1) The bones of the great mother are rocks. (2) This riddle explains that humans come from the bones of the great mother, that they are naturally from the earth. Only by redeeming earth can humankind be redeemed. Apollo and Daphne (16-21): (1) Ovid’s portrayal of Apollo could not be described as reverent, as Apollo seemed haughty and lustful throughout this short story. He gave Daphne all of his unrequited “burning,” and in an attempt to woo her, began to list off all of his skills and accomplishments. (2) By miraculously turning into a tree, Daphne was to be safe from Apollo, and yet he still loved her, and demanded praise for her from Roman victors. (3) Humphries and Mandelbaum both place this story as the cover of their distinct books to be ironic, since Apollo still has not changed throughout “Apollo and Daphne,” and yet the book is about metamorphosis. (4) From reading this story, I have a few “burning” questions. Were women expected to consent to any man, no matter the man? Does being a female virgin make you a pariah back then? Whose body is it: the woman’s or the man’s? Jove and Io (21-27): (1) Jove had fallen in love with Io. Io, who at first rejected Jove’s advances, later sought out Jove after having been driven into the fields of Lerna. But Juno, all too familiar with her husband’s infidelity, came to investigate. Jove, fearing his wife’s wrath, disguised himself as a cloud and Io as a heifer; to avoid suspicion, Jove reluctantly gave Juno the heifer when she requested it. Juno then promptly gave the heifer to be watched by Argus, a many-eyed giant, who was later slain by Mercury, under the discretion of Jove. Knowing their love could not last, Jove returned Io back to her mortal form and sent her back to her father. Final Questions: (1) Book One’s moral is that you can’t escape change. Transformations occur in nature, and there’s no denying that. (2) Sometimes metamorphosis doesn’t always reflect a physical change, and even if it does, you may need to revert back to your old self, such as in Jove and Io, with Io returning to mortal form, rather than remaining as a heifer. (3) The view of the world displayed in Metamorphoses is solely based on random altercations in nature. Divine forces control the outcome of creatures on earth and represent nature and it’s unpredictability. Phaethon (28-40): (1) The Sun God is more experienced in life as a whole, whereas Phaethon is just a naive young man.
(2) Young people want to experience new things, get a grasp for the world. Older people would rather stick with the same routine that they’ve gotten used to. (3) Phaethon disregards his father’s warning because of his urgent desire to prove to the disbelievers that his father is the Sun God. (4) In this story, Ovid acknowledges that the Sun revolves around the earth and is “pulled” by a force, in this instance, a chariot rather than gravity. We see the Sun laggardly inching its way across the Earth. Furthermore, evaporation of water, deforestation, and atmosphere depletion are all recognized in this story. (5) Flying horses are typically known as pegasuses. The sun’s stallions could be considered similar to Santa’s reindeer, since they’re both creatures that do not actually fly in reality, they have been given names, and can only be controlled by one figure. (6) If not for the Greek era, then we might’ve imagined cross species animals in the Renaissance, as it brings about a second Greek era, and atone for the ideas not yet created. (7) Ovid is saying that oftentimes, humans tend to bite off more than they can chew. As for leadership, Ovid acknowledges that some youths may be overzealous in their ambitions to rise through the ranks and take off impossible responsibility. (8) Ovid is not using horses in the same metaphorical fashion as Socrates. The horses in
the story of Phaethon are already as wild as they should be without the use of a provocative gadfly. (9) The American perspective is that anything, such as a book, is only as good as the author (or controller) and the effort they put into it. This can also be true with a civilization and the level of cooperation with its citizens. (10) Mother Earth is still silenced with humankind’s pollution and evisceration of its surface. (11) We further ruin the earth by dramatically changing it to suit our trivial needs. (12) Some claim to communicate through the Earth by meditation, but there is no surefire way. (13) Phaethon’s Epitaph suggests that the boy’s choice was bold, yet foolish, even if he failed. (14) Phaethon’s sisters become poplar trees. (15) Ovid is saying that trees, like us humans, can mourn and should belong in the human community.
Furthermore, Ovid illustrates fate as a concept that not only supports the powers of the Gods, but also challenges it. The readers view many cases in which mortals suffer horrible fates due to the passion of the Gods. Thus, they pray to the Gods to escape or go opposite of their already destined fates quite similar to how Frodo did when he was given the opportunity to destroy the One Ring (the “Mount Doom” scene in the film), but could not. This sort of opposition to fate due to uncontrollable forces can be seen with the mythological roles of Hercules, as well as Orpheus in the sense of how either one of them are recognized for their accomplishments and success.
The passage to be analysed comes from Book 11 of Ovid’s Metamorphoses (lines 399-538) (A.Melville, 1986) it is the story of Callisto translated meaning the Moon which is a fitting transition as it starts with the ending of the story of the Sun. Ovid uses the destruction caused by Phaethon after using this fathers chariot and winged horses to prove his paternal parentage.
Clearly, there is a distinction between the world of the Roman gods and the world that everyday people live in. Man, according to Ovid, has experienced a gold, sil...
Throughout many ancient Greek texts, there are aspects of nature playing important roles in the main plot. Sometimes they assist the thesis through a metaphor or simile which better visualizes the author's true meaning. Lions have many different personality traits which make them extremely diverse creatures. This also promotes various applications to characters in literary works. In two works, the Oresteia by Aeschylus and Euripides' Bacchae, we see a continuing line of examples of lion imagery. Alongside this literary aspect, the analysis of characters' gender roles is possible. When observing these two concepts both individually and in conjunction with each other, the reader is better able to grasp the true meaning of the authors' intended point.
The Odyssey is a tale that has changed literature and storytelling. In this tale Odysseus is a Soldier from the battle of Troy trying to get home to his island of Ithaca, where he is king. His wife and son must wait ten years while he is trying to make his way home. In Odysseus’s absence wooer’s, or better known as suitors, learn of his absence and travel to Ithaca to win his wife’s hand in marriage. These men come every day feasting on Odysseus’s food and wine, and give his servant’s orders. His son Telemachus, does his best to keep the suitors from ruining his fathers house but he is only a boy, and doesn’t receive the respect of an adult. Telemachus then has a visit from the god Athena, whom Odysseus is friends with, who advises him to travel to find out about his father. In his travels he hears that Odysseus may still be alive. Meanwhile Odysseus goes through a series of adventures and hardships that prove his wisdom. It is interesting in contrast of the Iliad, even though Achilles was much stronger and a better warrior, Odysseus was portrayed as a greater hero due to his wisdom. He uses this wisdom to escape from the Cyclops.
Homer’s The Odyssey chronicles Odysseus’s return home from the Trojan War to reunite with his wife, kingdom, and son. However, Odysseus has been encountering serious difficulties that have prevented him from reaching home for nearly twenty years. These difficulties include various different types of monsters, each of which seems to embody undesirable traits such as laziness or savagery. The Greeks portray creatures with these traits as monsters as an example of the Greeks’ “better” traits and subsequent superiority.
Character development is an art, one that requires careful manipulation of aspects of literature in order to craft the being an author intends, yet with translation views and meanings can change, creating, hopefully similar, but potentially different characters. “Goddess of song, teach me the story of a hero. This was the man of wide-ranging spirit who had sacked the sacred town of Troy and who wandered afterwards long and far” (Shewring 1). This introduction from Shewring immediately sets an idea in the reader’s mind as to what kind of person Odysseus is: a hero. The further explanation of his wide-ranging spirit implies that Odysseus is one to travel, particularly because of his wandering after sacking the city of Troy. “Sing in me, Muse, and through me tell the story / of that
Mowat uses the rhetorical strategy of Logos to try and convince the reader of his claim `that wolves aren’t savage killers by giving the reader evidence that is possible and without emotion. At the beginning of the book, Mowat goes into the “Lupine Project” with the mindset that the wolves are savage killers with no emotion. Mowat later realized when he finally made contact with the wolves that they were conservative and cared for each other. In the text Mowat describes an occasion in which he witnessed when “Angeline would nuzzle her mate... bumping him affectionately with her shoulders”(172). This shows that
In many ways, judging and comparing Vigil’s Aeneid and Ovid’s Metamorphoses is inevitable because each of the writers lived at roughly the same time in history, both sought to create a historical work that would endure long past their mortal existences, and while each man was ultimately successful in their endeavors, they achieved their desired goals in vastly different ways. That being said, the epic poem by Ovid is superior because unlike Virgil, whose epic poem utilized a character centered narrative steeped in historical inferences and a theme that celebrated the moral virtues of Greek and Roman society, Ovid defied tradition by creating an intricate narrative that looked
This anti-epic certainly does not follow the adventurous theme of the epic. There is no protagonist hero to focus on unless you visualize the god's prey as the hero in his/her escape. The assembled writings seem to be more of a recording of the misdeeds of the gods. It appears that Ovid wanted to write about the desires of gods and people instead of a great adventure.
The greatest realization faced by a character is that of Oedipus who for many years has come to terms with his situation. The Prophet Apollo’s predictions that he will kill his father and have sex with his mother. The course of his life is shaped by this prophecy. What Oedipus has been told from the beginning of his life shaped his thinking, this also allows the reader to grasp that this myth is relevant to their lives. The physical actions of Oedipus are the results of a man with high principles and probing intelligence. The story can be separated into points where Oedipus gathers more information about himself. The “ignorance” that Oedipus faces is the foundation he was brought up by. He has believed that he lived with his birth mother and father and therefore when he learns of Apollo’s prophecy he leaves home so that it cannot come true. Slowly as the story progresses Oedipus discovers bits and pieces of his true-life story, as Oedipus learns that he killed Laius by the story of the shepherd. He continues on his journey to discovering the truth. When he pieces together what he has done he cannot face himself. The chorus best shows his true emotions
There are consistent parallels created through descriptions of Ovid’s political status. Due to his ostracism, he is separated both from outside elements of society and ideals that exist in his own mind. In the opening paragraphs, Ovid describes his natural surroundings and the characteristics of the landscape, and ends with the statement:
In contrast, Ovid conceived a different purpose for his epic. He wrote fifteen books, compared to Virgil's twelve, with many of his stories originating from Greek and Roman myth, concerned with the transformations of shapes, from the creation of the world to Julius Caesar's death and deification. He focuses on entertaining the reader in a humorous fashion, and rather than establishing Rome's origins in history, he is more concerned with establishing his own fame, for the future ages. These different backgrounds of the two authors illustrate that they each had contrasting agendas for their books. Thus, the portrayal of the gods differs greatly-Virgil's are austere and purposeful, whereas, Ovid's are humorous, reflecting his neoteric style, and intentionally different from the Virgilian gods.
When God created the world “by faith is we understand that the world were framed by the word of God, so that the things which we see how did not come into being out of things which had previously appeared” (Athanasius...
“The Odyssey” is an epic poem that tells the story of Odysseus and the story of his many travels and adventures. The Odyssey tells the main character’s tale of his journey home to the island of Ithaca after spending ten years fighting in the Trojan War, and his adventures when he returns home and he is reunited with his family and close friends. This literary analysis will examine the story and its characters, relationships, major events, symbols and motifs, and literary devices.