Native Americans, Bradbury and the Scorn of the FBI

In the twenty-first century, schools all over the country teach that Native Americans were here before what are now considered “Americans.” These new Americans arrived by boats, bringing with them disease and manifest destiny, conquering the land that was once called home by thousands of tribes. Nevertheless, through extortionist deals, mass murder and small pox, the land was evetually vacated, leaving the new Americans to take their place and flourish. While schools teach the same basic story of the first thanksgiving and Squanto, what is not remembered is any semblance of the culture. Feather headdresses, bows and arrows, and war calls while playing a game of “Cowboys and Indians” are the images many Americans associate with of what once had dominance over the entirety of the North American continent for centuries (if not millenia). In his collection of short stories The Martian Chronicles, Ray Bradbury expressed unheard of sympathy towards Native American and Communists alike with a radical position that in which he used an fictitious species as an allegory for the struggles of millions. Even though he contradicts himself in the delivery of parts of his core message, Bradbury’s radical viewpoints and pessimistic views of the future serve as both an apology and a warning for the extermination of civilizations. Written and published in the 1950s, the book radically discredited American expansionist tendencies in post war America when such sympathies and opinions were not tolerated. As a warning for the future, Ray Bradbury possessed foresight as conquest of cultures plagues American foreign policy even today.

After the first two expeditions failed due to unknown circumstances, in “April 2000: The Third Expedition,” a new crew o...

... middle of paper ...

...spects, as manifest destiny attitudes could spur conflict. Similar to the conflicts of instating leaders into other countries, adoption of American and Western culture has become a mandate for any country seeking further economic progress. France has recently had issues with the banning of wearing a full face veil, religious headwear for women in Islam, while on in public (Erlanger 1). While in the West there are outcries of sexism and discrimination, for the women wearing the hijab, it is an essential part of their religion and taking it away from them diminishes their chances of an afterlife. While the institution of Islam may be sexist, that should be left to the followers. With the tools to make the decision for themselves, removing the hijab can be a possibility, as long as the Western World does not try to make them “see” when so blind to the culture of Islam.