Native Americans have always been interpreted as “savage beast”. We are told the stories of the Europeans coming to America and their encounter with the Native by teachers, movies, and history books. When looking at the art of people “interpreting” the Native American the idea is still quite similar. Horatio Greenough work, Rescue, shows the common idea seen by most.
In the image there is a Native American woman cradling her baby. Her focus is only on the child. Her body language suggest a protective nature; as if the child was almost harmed and had the thought of no seeing the child ever again. Greenough is saying that the Natives are extremely protective of their own kind.
Center in the image is a struggle between two men. One of the men being White, while the other is Native America. The White male has subdue the Native in a restraint. The Native has an ax in one hand and the other is covered in cloth. He is wear minimal clothing, while the White male is fully clothed. The idea that I’m getting from Horatio’s work is that the Native American male had intentions on hurting the Native America woman and child. That is what the ax was for. The White
…show more content…
male is the “Rescuer” that the title is referring to. He was able to stop the Native from hurt the woman and child of his own kind. Also in the image we have a dog. Dogs are seen as loyal and protective. He is showing that Greenough view this action okay. It also gives me the idea that Horatio saw the White men as stronger than the Natives. By having the dog just standing there is shows that the man does not need any help. In art there are key this we are told to focus on, one being spacing.
Spacing incorporates the sizes of objects and placing. This image gives us three focal points. Each one is presented at a different level than the next. The center focus point has the Native partially down on one knee, looking up at the other man. The male hold the Native is larger than all the other figures. It almost seems like there is no struggle on his part. The woman to the left is crouching down; making herself look smaller. The way Greenough set this piece up was to show his view of strength. The figure with the most strength would be the male holding the Native. The male Native is show as small and lacking muscles, which shows that Horatio thinks they are weaker. The woman is portrayed as weak and scared; most likely reflecting
Horatio’s Like most people Horatio Greenough interpreted the Native Americans to be savage, weak, and fearful. By having an imagine which most likely shows an attempt of a Native on Native attack; Greenough presents the savage idea. The fact that the man is able contain the Native male without the use of a weapon show that the Native is weak. The woman huddled up to the side not helping her kind shows fear.
In George E. Tinker’s book, American Indian Liberation: A Theology of Sovereignty, the atrocities endured by many of the first peoples, Native American tribes, come into full view. Tinker argues that the colonization of these groups had and continues to have lasting effects on their culture and thus their theology. There is a delicate balance to their culture and their spiritual selves within their tightly knit communities prior to contact from the first European explorers. In fact, their culture and spiritual aspects are so intertwined that it is conceptually impossible to separate the two, as so many Euro-American analysts attempted. Tinker points to the differences between the European and the Native American cultures and mind sets as ultimately
In Thomas King’s novel, The Inconvenient Indian, the story of North America’s history is discussed from his original viewpoint and perspective. In his first chapter, “Forgetting Columbus,” he voices his opinion about how he feel towards the way white people have told America’s history and portraying it as an adventurous tale of triumph, strength and freedom. King hunts down the evidence needed to reveal more facts on the controversial relationship between the whites and natives and how it has affected the culture of Americans. Mainly untangling the confusion between the idea of Native Americans being savages and whites constantly reigning in glory. He exposes the truth about how Native Americans were treated and how their actual stories were
Louise Erdrich’s short story “American horse” is a literary piece written by an author whose works emphasize the American experience for a multitude of different people from a plethora of various ethnic backgrounds. While Erdrich utilizes a full arsenal of literary elements to better convey this particular story to the reader, perhaps the two most prominent are theme and point of view. At first glance this story seems to portray the struggle of a mother who has her son ripped from her arms by government authorities; however, if the reader simply steps back to analyze the larger picture, the theme becomes clear. It is important to understand the backgrounds of both the protagonist and antagonists when analyzing theme of this short story. Albetrine, who is the short story’s protagonist, is a Native American woman who characterizes her son Buddy as “the best thing that has ever happened to me”. The antagonist, are westerners who work on behalf of the United States Government. Given this dynamic, the stage is set for a clash between the two forces. The struggle between these two can be viewed as a microcosm for what has occurred throughout history between Native Americans and Caucasians. With all this in mind, the reader can see that the theme of this piece is the battle of Native Americans to maintain their culture and way of life as their homeland is invaded by Caucasians. In addition to the theme, Erdrich’s usage of the third person limited point of view helps the reader understand the short story from several different perspectives while allowing the story to maintain the ambiguity and mysteriousness that was felt by many Natives Americans as they endured similar struggles. These two literary elements help set an underlying atmos...
Alexie's poem "How To Write the Great American Indian Novel" blends several dilemmas at once. Underlying to the poem and the act of writing the `Great American Indian Novel' is the awareness in all Colored people of a catch-22: that they are seen solely as a reflection of how White America views them. In the case of the Native American they are either seen as a less-than-articulate `Noble Savage'/ mystic, a caricature who greets white men with a monosyllabic `How', or a brute savage/ reservation drunkard. Likewise, the Native American is expected to feel shame for the stereotypes that have been thrust upon him; regardless of whether individuals of the dominating culture take stock in the accepted stereotypes or not, the Native American still feels critical eyes on him always, and senses the act of be labeled. If he tries to configure himself into the dominating culture, and comply with the set standards of Whites he is then seen as a `a credit to the race', an `apple Indian`, and a `sellout`, poorly imitating White culture without truly fitting in. Similarly, any Native American who does not try to comply with the standards of White culture is at risk of playing into the brutish, reserv...
When reading Benjamin Franklin’s essay “Remarks Concerning the Savages of North America,” it was interesting to see the similarities and differences of perceptions between the Indians and the white English in America. Franklin takes an outside look on the perceptions of the Indians by analyzing various observations he’s made or witnessed and comparing them to the norms of the white English society. Clearly the two are very different in their cultural beliefs, and this essay helps bring these differences to light while making the point that Indians are anything but “savages.”
The nineteenth-century, a period of expansion in the eyes of the Americans; fostered an increase in preexisting feelings of superiority over the indigenous peoples of America. They were referred to as “Indians” or “savages.” The Euro-American belief of distinction between the “civilized” and “savages” were accentuated in the universal law of progress, and law of vices and virtues, leading to the emergence of the famed myth, the “vanishing” Indian, which enforced the Euro-American notion of the Native American population dwindling into nothingness (Ferdinando). The eighteen-hundreds marked the rise in naturalistic literature integrating the myth of the vanishing Indian into popular culture.
Many school children celebrate a cliché Thanksgiving tradition in class where they play Indians and Pilgrims, and some children engage in the play of Cowboys vs. Indians. It is known that some died when colonization occurred, that some fought the United States government, and that they can be boiled down to just another school mascot. This is what many people understand of the original inhabitants of America. Historical knowledge of these people has been shallow and stereotyped. The past 150 years has given birth to a literate people now able to record their past, present, and future. Native American literature, as it evolves, defines the Native American culture and its status in the world, as an evolving people, more so than any historical account can.
During the journey to the New World, many Europeans explored this unknown place and viewed the Native Americans as savages, but the Natives were much more different than they thought. In each text, La Relacion, Plymouth Plantation and Iroquois Constitution, they had significant views of the Native Americans during their journeys in the New World. Not only did they have different views in their stories, but they also connect in certain aspects. In early Native American literature, Native Americans are portrayed as being peacemakers, resist violence and avoid being enemies, helpful, helps the ones in need, and compassionate, feels sorrow and sympathy to the ones who goes through the most pain.
Although Francis and Cedar are far from the being a native, they earn the scepter of narration trough their connection through language, view of history and inner struggle. On the other hand, since the Gordian Knot of native identity is so complex that even the most skilled ethnographer would fail to define what does it mean to be a “true” native american. Therefore, claiming that there is only one reliable native perspective not only seems oversimplistic and exclusionary. As in the Case of and Francis, the interaction with a native culture not only provides sufficient authority to share the story but also provides the reader with a revolutionary perspective. A perspective that shines a new light on the jewels of the literary treasure box, and helps to value and appreciate the native culture from a different viewpoint. It helps the rather realizes, that “native perspective” not necessarily have to be nationalized or politicised. That true native works of literature, authentic treasure boxes, can be valuable in
Alexie Sherman is a Native American novelist born on the Spokane Indian Reservation in Wellpinit, Washington. In his short story, The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven, Alexie Sherman uses a character born in the same Reservation in Washington. This makes the author an authoritive figure and gives him more credibility for the arguments he makes in this short story. The title is allegorical, symbolizing white and Native Americans and their identities. The main argument that the author makes is the way Native Americans are or have been treated in our country, by our government, and its people. The typical stereo types that they have faced, how they are portrayed by most people. This essay touches on a lot of these issues. Flashback is
Overall, Pauline Turner’s critique on both films reveal that many of the same concepts people have about Native Americans are still present today. It outlines contradictions and it shares way to try and overcome such
When I first hear the word Indian or Native American I am instantly transported to the past where the whispery echo of pain filled cries and the shouts of angry men seem to weave in and out of time. Groups of Native Americans were forced away from their homes; their homes reduced to hot ashes and black smoke or more commonly taken over by European settlers. The Indians were pushed out of European society and were involuntary made to walk on the mixture of sharp stone and dusty paths that eventually ended in disease and was quickly followed by death. The thirteenth century to the nineteenth century were the hardest years in history for the Indian tribes with exploitation, foreign diseases, wars, forced displacements, famines, and mass massacres of the Indian tribes. This is where a lot of us think it ends and all the Native Americans now live on reservations, get tons of money from the government, and happily live their life surrounded by narcotic substances while drowning themselves in alcohol to better communicate with Grandmother Willow. I hope that this paper will show us how the Native Americans are very real and still existing in America today. I hope to break down the stereotypes set down by the American
Over the past week we have seen how Native Americans face the never-ending barrage of racial stereotypes and misconceptions. As well we have seen their cultures and traditions used and misinterpreted by people outside of their culture in an attempt to make a profit from these unique practices. Native Americans have been persecuted ever since White men stepped on to their land. As we will see in this paper Native Americans have been misconstrued as a savage group of feather wearing and horse riding Indians. In the end this paper will look into how Native American culture and identity have been taken advantage of by whites and transformed the many different tribes and their uniqueness into one large group full of many different stereotypes. It is through the false replication of art and artifacts as well as how Indians have been portrayed in
In the short story “This is What It Means to Say Phoenix, Arizona” by Sherman Alexie Native Americans are accurately depicted due to the author’s Native American heritage and his upbringing in the Spokane-Coeur d’Alene Tribe. In the story, the character Victor needed help to retrieve his father’s remains, and his childhood acquaintance Thomas acting out of tradition says that he will lend him money (Alexie 245). The role of a Native American should be played or depicted by a Native American author or director, and that non-Natives should have extensive knowledge of the Native American culture before attempting to portray them.
The history of Native Americans or American Indians are unique, tragic and at the same time full of optimism. It is unique because the Indians were the original inhabitants of the Americas and experienced all the stages of its colonization by Europeans, since the first colony in the seventeenth century and ending with the completion of the development of the western borders by the end of the nineteenth century. It is tragic, because the conflict between Indians and whites is a repetition of the experience of other nations of the world, the tradition which came into conflict with the expanding industrialized society. The story at the same time full of optimism, because the Native Americans although they are deprived of the nineteenth century much of their ancestral lands survived they were able to establish themselves in their political and economic rights, they have maintained their national identity and culture in spite of the invasion of modern civilization. That’s why their history, lifestyle and beliefs should not be forgotten!