Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Native american activism essay
Native american activism essay
Native american activism essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Native american activism essay
Native American activism has certainly become extremely popular in the 21st century. Native Americans are standing up for their beliefs and their rights.Tthe formation of AIM and the Bureau of Indian Affairs are two important examples of Native American activism. The two documentaries that I viewed were; "In Whose Honor", and "LaDonna Harris: Indian 101". Both documentaries showed women, who took an active role in standing up for Indian rights. For the purposes of this assignment, I will analyze the contributions of contemporary Native American activism, as shown through the two documentaries I viewed, and whether their efforts were successful or not. "Money talks", if you don't have money, then often time you will be overlooked. The previously …show more content…
Charlene was born Indian, and she was raised on traditional Indian beliefs; beliefs that she was now trying to instill in her children. The reason Charlene fought for the removal of Chief Illiniwek was due to the fact that she felt it was a great insult to the Native American people. "What the Indians have now, is because of their ancestors; that is what I am trying to protect". This quote was taken from Charlene Teters. Charlene's belief stems from events like Wounded Knee; the Native Americans were trying to hang on to a part of their culture, and they were murdered for it. The purpose of Charlene's activism is to provide a safe, racism-free environment for her children, where they are not afraid to be who they are. Her children should be proud of their Indian heritage, not ashamed of it. To Charlene, this is exactly what Chief Illiniwek does; the chief is a form of racism. "Team mascots are a mask for racism", a magazine article talked about this during the documentary, "In Whose Honor?". Charlene started off on her own, however, she was later joined by members of AIM and other Native American Activist groups. She …show more content…
Like Charlene, LaDonna was a native American, however, she was from the Comanche tribe whereas the documentary doesn't state which tribe Charlene belonged to. LaDonna's grandparents were victims of the Indian boarding schools, and their attempts to "civilize" the Indians. One of the things LaDonna was able to do, was to form a group for Indian children, who attended school in Oklahoma. Under this group, teachers of the Indian boarding schools became the students, and the students became the teachers. Up until this point, the teachers of the schools had no idea that they were treating the Indian children so poorly. Similar to Charlene's kid's situation, these kids were being oppressed by white people, and they were looked down on because they were a minority. LaDonna's methods involved informing people from all walks of life about the Indian movement. LaDonna would hold tea parties where she would invite the "higher-ups" of the government, and even the lowest people on the "social totem pole". One thing that the documentary mentioned, was the fact that most people didn't realize that Native Americans still existed; much less need help. The purpose of LaDonna's tea parties was to educate people about Native Americans and help them to realize that there are still Indians
Native Americans have been fighting till this day for freedom. Millions of Native Americans have lost their lives fighting for freedoms and their lands. So far, not much have been done to the Native Americans and they have not achieved everything they had hoped for. Most Native Americans are still living on reservations and government are doing little to help them. A book titled “Lakota Women” by Mary Crow Dog takes us into the lives of the Native Americans, her childhood, adulthood, and her experiences of being an Indian woman.
When you open up a book and read about the Lewis and Clark expedition, it is likely that you are going to read about a woman named Sacagawea. But who exactly is Sacagawea? In about 1788, Sacagawea was born in the Lemhi-River Valley in present day Idaho. For the following twelve years, she grew up as a Shoshone child. Although everyone got along with each other, every person in the community had a responsibility. Children were expected to work hard and taught from a very young age to be hospitable. They catered to absolutely everyone, and this was a well-known trait for most of the Shoshones. Most woman grew up and had children by the time they reached the age of twenty- such was the expectation of most Shoshone woman. However, at the age of twelve, Sacagawea, along with her brother, sister and mother were captured by the Hidatsa tribe. This tribe had the opposite reputation as the Shoshones, being known as cold people. The way Sacagawea, as well as many other young girls, does prove the accusation. Sacagawea became isolated in her new tribe, mainly due to her dreams of becoming more than just a mother.
Talking Back to Civilization: Indian Voices from the Progressive Era edited by Frederick E. Hoxie is a book which begins with an introduction into the life of Charles Eastman and a brief overview of the history of Native Americans and their fight for justice and equal rights, it then continues by describing the different ways and avenues of speaking for Indian rights and what the activists did. This leads logically into the primary sources which “talk back” to the society which had overrun their own. The primary sources immerse the reader into another way of thinking and cause them to realize what our societal growth and even foundation has caused to those who were the true natives. The primary sources also expand on the main themes of the book which are outlines in the introduction. They are first and most importantly talking back to the “pale faces”, Indian education, religion, American Indian policy, the image of the Indians presented in America. The other chapters in the book further expanded on these ideas. These themes will be further discussed in the following chapters along with a review of this
Within Lakota Woman, by Mary Crow Dog, a Lakota woman speaks of her story about growing up in the 60s and 70s and shares the details of the difficulties she and many other Native Americans had to face throughout this time period. Although Native Americans encountered numerous challenges throughout the mid twentieth century, they were not the only ethnic group which was discriminated against; African Americans and other minority groups also had to endure similar calamities. In order to try to gain equality and eliminate the discrimination they faced, such groups differed with their inclusion or exclusion of violence.
Throughout history the attacks on Native American sovereignty proved to be too much and eventually tribes had to submit. The problems Native American tribes faced when fighting for and dealing with sovereignty in the 18th century are identical to the problems they are facing today. These
Lakota Woman Essay In Lakota Woman, Mary Crow Dog argues that in the 1970’s, the American Indian Movement used protests and militancy to improve their visibility in mainstream Anglo American society in an effort to secure sovereignty for all "full blood" American Indians in spite of generational gender, power, and financial conflicts on the reservations. When reading this book, one can see that this is indeed the case. The struggles these people underwent in their daily lives on the reservation eventually became too much, and the American Indian Movement was born. AIM, as we will see through several examples, made their case known to the people of the United States, and militancy ultimately became necessary in order to do so.
The removal of Indian tribes was one of the tragic times in America’s history. Native Americans endured hard times when immigrants came to the New World. Their land was stolen, people were treated poorly, tricked, harassed, bullied, and much more. The mistreatment was caused mostly by the white settlers, who wanted the Indians land. The Indians removal was pushed to benefit the settlers, which in turn, caused the Indians to be treated as less than a person and pushed off of their lands. MOREEE
As a result, both films represent Native Americans from the point of view of non-Native directors. Despite the fact that they made use of the fabricated stereotypes in their illustrations of the indigenous people, their portrayal was revolutionary in its own times. Each of the films adds in their own way a new approach to the representation of indigenous people, their stories unfolding in a different way. These differences make one look at the indigenous not only as one dimensional beings but as multifaceted beings, as Dunbar says, “they are just like us.” This is finally a sense of fairness and respect by the non-native populations to the Native Indians.
Feminism and Indigenous women activism is two separate topics although they sound very similar. In indigenous women’s eyes feminism is bashing men, although Indigenous women respect their men and do not want to be a part of a women’s culture who bring their men down. Feminism is defined as “The advocacy of women 's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.” In theory feminism sounds delightful despite the approaches most feminists use such as wrong-full speaking of the opposite gender. Supposedly, feminism is not needed as a result of Indigenous women being treated with respect prior to colonization. Thus, any Native woman who calls herself a feminist is often condemned as being “white”. This essay argues that Indigenous women may
Ward Churchill is Creek-Cherokee, a member of Keetoowah Band Cherokee, and was born on October 2, 1947. In addition to being a professor of ethnic studies of American Indian studies at the University of Colorado, Churchill serves as a co-director of the Colorado chapter of AIM and vice chairman of the American Indian Anti-Defamation Council. Not only was Churchill a past national spokesperson for the Leonard Peltier Defense Committee, he is also a prolific writer on issues affecting indigenous people and has written numerous articles and books including Indians Are Us?, Since Predator Came, Marxism and Native Americans and From A Native Son.
Two-hundred years ago, there was a scientific study on the brains of Native Americans called the craniology and phrenology. The Europeans examined only indigenous people’s heads and were forbidden to use any European’s brains. The Europeans did three experiments, such as decapitating the tops of the heads and filling them with sand to see if their brains were smaller than blacks. The Europeans also looked at the bones and said that if the bones were in a certain way (such as natives cheek bones being up higher) the person was thought to be stupid. The last experiment the Europeans did to American Indians was that they had a small devise that they would put on the head and it would slice the brain open. There would be an award for retrieving a male’s brain that was five cents. By retrieving a woman’s brain the price would be three cents, and lastly a child’s brain which would be two cents. This is when the term redskin was invented (Poupart, 2014).
The growing pan-Indian activism that was becoming increasingly strong in regions of the United States helped develop the American Indian Movement. Educated young urban Indians were becoming involved in rights issues and insisted on self-determination in the 1960s era of prote...
Native American Relations During the numerous years of colonization, the relationship between the English settlers and the Native Americans of the area was usually the same. Native Americans would initially consider the settlers to be allies, then as time passed, they would be engaged in wars with them in a struggle for control of the land. This process of friendship to enemies seemed to be the basic pattern in the majority of the colonies. When the English landed in Jamestown in 1607, the dominant tribe of the area was the Powhatan (which the English settlers named after the leader of the tribe, Powhatan).
Her mother Betty is of Jewish and European Ancestry. When LaDuke was five, her parents divorced and at the time her mother took a position as an art professor at the Southern Oregon University in Ashland, Oregon, a small logging town. In high school, she was on the debate team that placed 3rd in the Oregon State Championships. She eventually attended Harvard where she took part in the Indian activist group. At the age of eighteen, she involved herself in Native American Environmental Issues when she met Cherokee Activist Jimmy Durham at Harvard. She graduated in 1982 with a degree in native economic development. After she graduated from Harvard, she moved to the White Earth Reservation without knowing the Ojibwe language. Because of this, she was not accepted at first. She worked as a principal of a high school in the reservation. During this time, she was doing research for her master’s thesis on the reservations subsistence economy and became involved in local issues. She founded the White Earth Land Recovery Project. With that, she used the organization to reclaim Anishinaabeg lands that have been stolen and parceled by the U.S. government due to the logging industry. Eventually, she completed her Masters in Community Economic Development at
Winona LaDuke grew up in Los Angeles, California. She is a member of the Anishinaabe band of White Earth Indian Reservation, which is located in Northern Minnesota. She began making a political name for herself as an activist at a young age. She was 18 when she addressed the United Nations on Indian Issues.