Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should the government spend money on space
Benefits of space research
Benefits of space research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should the government spend money on space
To fund, or not to fund; That is the question. When it comes to funding by the government, NASA gets the short end of the stick. Without this funding and support from the government, the search for discoveries that could further help the world and finding out more about space itself would be put to a halt. The question isn’t whether NASA should get more money, the question is what the company would do with it once the budget is increased. According to Leonard Richards, Laura Riggan, and Preston Martin, “it’s alright to fund NASA as long as the company is doing something worthwhile with the money.” Going to the moon and Mars is excellent, but that’s already been done. Time for something else. If NASA’s budget was increased, it could be With more funding, NASA can build a manned base on the moon while finding a way to Mars. In going along with this plan, there will be more demand for scientists and engineers alike. Engineers will build the manned bases and vessels, while scientists occupy them and gather data to benefit the world. In this way, NASA will be able to see if it is possible to make Mars the next “Earth”, making plans to help make that reality if this does happen. “Through space exploration and innovative thinking, NASA has injected science and inspiration into our culture and projected us into the future” would have to end up working with the Russians. “With our relations shaky with Russia, I don’t think that’d be the best idea” (Martin). There’s no telling how well Russian and American astronauts would get along together, not to mention what would have to be paid to Russia just to go into space. In reality there’s no point in paying Russia for what could be done by NASA itself. Plus, there’s no telling how the U.S. will know that Russia won’t take all the credit for any new discoveries made by American astronauts and scientists.To keep things easy and hasslefree, the government should fund NASA more and to keep interest alive in its programs alive. Besides, the government still would be shelling out money anyways, perhaps not as much, but what would be the point when NASA can do it with government help? Think about NASA and all it's done for the better of humanity. Without it being funded, there is hardly anything to fuel any future interest in the space program nor would our world learn anymore about itself. NASA needs this funding to stay alive, to answer the world’s questions, and show everyone how it important it is to keep NASA
By increasing funds it would support cutting edge aeronautics and space technology innovations, education, and development that will help fuel the nation’s economy for years to come. In conclusion, NASA does not drain nearly as much money from the economy as it contributes, so the funding that goes to NASA is not all lost and should be seen as an investment.
This is because if we let them, another country can one-up us which in the end can lead to major problems for the U.S. The NASA program also gives us a whole new insight to how we see things and how we live our lives daily. For example Google Maps, which is used by many people, uses satellite that we get from having this program. However, some of the money used for this category can be taken and put into another category such as the FBI. “The FBI is the Federal Bureau of Investigation which operates field offices in 58 cities to combat terrorism and crime” (Document E).
Bill Nye, the “Science Guy,” asserts, “NASA is an engine of innovation and inspiration as well as the world's premier space exploration agency, and we are well served by politicians working to keep it that way, instead of turning it into a mere jobs program, or worse, cutting its budget.” The United States of America’s government is currently in an economic debt encompassing billions of US dollars. Unfortunately, the government has attempted to balance finances by cutting the funding for most programs, including NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA, in over half a century, has brought the most economic, technological, and social benefits than any other program held here in the USA, as well as any other extraterrestrial program in the world. The last thing this nation needs is the cutting of NASA finances. NASA should be receiving more funding because the Earth will not last forever and humans will need a place to live, there’s a curiosity within humans about the vast universe they live in, there is evidence to suggest life on other planets, the USA’s superpower status will be improved, and the economical income NASA brings is more efficient than any other governmental or educational program.
According to Space.com the Federal Government approved a budget of $16.6 billion for NASA in 2014. Approximately 1/3 of that will be spent on space exploration.
Again, I’ll agree that the budget is a large amount, but Michael Griffin, former NASA administrator said it best during a presentation to aerospace leaders in 2009; “What we do is huge, and we do it for chump change – less than the annual market for pizza,” the pizza market at the time being $27 billion (Spires). Space exploration benefits everyone. I’ll leave you with this to consider the next time you’re waiting for your GPS app to load on your phone, (brought to you by NASA technology). The moon is an abundant source of Helium-3. Helium-3 produces a clean nuclear reaction – no toxic waste. Why would you want to reduce funding to an organization researching this?
This administration is taking money from NASA for science programs. The Obama Administration cuts make it really difficult to keep track of NASA’s programs that take astronauts to the moon and mars. So while NASA is wasting time and money on space travel privatization, more attention should be focused on space exploration. If space is not studied more that can lead to other problems. It can lead to problems like black holes, life in space that can put our lives in jeopardy, and do other harmful things. According to Lamar Smith, “The Obama administration has consistently tried to cut NASA’s space exploration budgets in order to fund increases for earth science programs”( par. 2). Since the Obama Administration is taking away money from more exploration. NASA should put the privatized space travel aside because more important things should be focused
The article then explains various examples of tasks that will be done by humans on Mars. The human colonization of Mars can benefit scientific research financially, because research can be done on Mars by humans without spending millions of dollars on a robot to go to and from Mars. While some may say that it is worth spending the money on robots instead of putting a human life in danger, this is really not true. To begin, some people are very willing to go to another planet like Mars, and will die for science. Along with that, there are tasks like critical inspections and drillings that only humans can do.
The National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA, is a key aspect to the United States and the world in so many more ways than people realize. They help protect the us with satellites to monitor the Earth and what is going on with it that we can not see, they help out our country as well as the rest of the world and the everyday lives of the people, and they help inspire and grow the minds of the youth in our world today. They do this all and much more with a miniscule budget, think of what they could accomplish if given double or triple their current budget. This may seem a little overkill and it may be argued that they would never use this and the budget should even be lowered, but that is not the case at all. Currently NASA's budget
...fe, with the inventions they have produced and by learning what they have done I think the budget should be increased. I am a firm believer in that science holds the answers to our problems in the world. If NASA and other scientific organization continue their research I think issues and problems in the world will fix themselves. For example, if NASA or another organization finds a way to effectively convert salt contaminated water to fresh drinkable water, our problem regarding water shortage will subside. Maybe NASA found a way to have cars or some other found of transportation run on soil, sand, or grass (very unlikely but it is possible). NASA would need workers to build these devices, which would create many low education jobs across the country. Continued funding for NASA and other scientific organizations will fix the social injustice problems of the world.
Going to a Mars is an idea that is heavily debated in society and whether it is worth all of the government dollars to pursue a mission like this. The concept that will be explained is the idea of colonizing mars, as well as the various effects that it would bring upon humanity. This will includes issues such as Mars’ weather, how we plan on getting there, and what the cost to travel there will be. Past endeavors when it comes to space travel will also be discussed The benefits to humanity will also be discussed, and how having people on Mars may protect the human race if a global catastrophe were to occur.
The main argument against space travel is that the money used could be better put on other matters. This is, in fact, very untrue. Looking at NASA’s 2015 budget of $17.5 billion, it may seem like a lot, until you realize that the US military budget for 2014 was $581 billion (5). Furthermore, it was estimated that each dollar in NASA’s budget was equivalent to 8 – 10 dollars of economic benefit (6). If an organization can bring about economic value at 10 folds the original budget, it would be logical to continue funding it, if not increasing the funds.
From 2012 the budget was sitting dry at $17.8 billion dollars, as of October 2017 the budget will be announced at $19.5 billion dollars. Its definitely not the $109 billion dollars we wish to see for NASA but any addition is a great one. “The extra money means NASA has a better chance of pulling off its primary missions on schedule”(Verge 2016). The new budget also lead to a big jump for astronauts, considering how much money goes to Russian Soyuz rockets to send them into space. Roughly $80 million dollars per seat, but new budget means US rockets once again, “NASA scores a big win for its commercial crew program” (Verge 2016). Increasing budgets has also lead to great celebration due to the planned launch dates for rockets. On occasion rocket launches would move forward and eventually fall off the calendar due to constant delay, eventually leading a rocket to never make the build. NASA administrator Charles Bolden has argued frequently, “The first launches would ultimately slip into 2018 without enough money”(Verge 2016). Good news is NASA’s other major projects get big boosts as well. The Space Launch System (SLS) the expandable rocket NASA is constructing to take astronauts into interstellar space and on to Mars, it will be receiving “$2 billion, which is $300 million more than the program received for 2015”(Verge 2015). As NASA described this all “Its mostly good news all around”, Another great leap is the legislation set aside $175 million for a mission beyond Mars. Jupiters icy moon Europa would be the next stop in the solar system, “leading candidate for finding extraterrestrial life”(Verge 2016). The best part about this all, the bill directs NASA to do this all no later than
Should Money be spent on Space Exploration? National Aeronautics Space Administration (NASA) has made remarkable progress in understanding the unknown and increasing our pre-existing knowledge about space. NASA has discovered a number of planets within and out of our galaxy NASA has also made many theories towards understanding our place within the Universe and with their main focus being the betterment of humanity in general and they do this through creating new inventions for space travel that when watered down help the development of planes. NASA has made leaps and bounds in creating inventions for the betterment of humanity. NASA should get more funding because with their knowledge they will be able to continue to make inventions benefit humanity.
Frank Douglas Professor Chase Hart ENG 121 8 November 2016 Is Mars or Earth’s Moon the place to start space colonization? Colonizing Mars is not just an idea, it’s something we should consider. Stephen Hawking said, “If the human race is to continue for another million years, we will have to boldly go where no one has gone before.” The survival of our species depends on space colonization. Say for instance, 66 million years ago an asteroid hit Mexico which wiped out the dinosaurs and its not a matter of if it will happen again, it’s a matter of when another global extinction type of asteroid will hit Earth.
Most people think that the costly downside to funding space exploration is a reason to avoid spending money on sciences and instead spend it on problems here on earth, but such funding for space exploration actually promotes economical as well as scientific benefits. Space exploration is an important expenditure for the high cost because of the potential for numerous benefits such as the possibility to find useful resources to cultivate, space exploration and satellites produce many thousands of jobs in our economy, and it creates and discovers newer and better technologies through research and development.