Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of peer pressure
Negative effects of peer pressure
Negative effects of peer pressure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative effects of peer pressure
Introduction Throughout my 10 years teaching, I have had the opportunities to teach in several different schools, subjects, grades, and achievement levels. I have had experiences that were amazing, and some that really made me look within myself to discover how to improve the situation for my students and myself. I feel like as an educator, I must always observe situations around me, ask questions, and when I disagree, speak a voice of concern. I believe far too often in education, we get comfortable, things get easy, and we get complacent. However, I believe our students deserve much more. In my current teaching situation, I am teaching 8th grade English at a fabulous Arts Academy, filled with good moral teachers and students who come every day ready to learn. However, after observing my teaching situation for the past 3 years, I think we are doing something wrong. It began with just a gut feeling in the pit of my stomach, but it has now blossomed to a full blown critical analysis of this topic. The issue at hand is we are grouping our students in English based on ability. We have bilingual classes, which are considered the highest achieving, and then there are the advanced classes, then lastly the …show more content…
In general, they have concluded that ability grouping is associated with an unequal distribution of school resources across students by ability, including teachers ' talent, curriculum differentiation, academic role models, and the behavior of peers. Furthermore, they point to ability grouping as a device that creates an academic and social hierarchy within a grade or class that enhances the stature of high-ability students but handicaps those with lower
Ability grouping is the division of students by their achievement level either part of the day or all. Larry Daniel suggests their placement is based around the students’ IQ, teacher or past educators’ judgement and/or their achievement measurements (n.p.). There are many different ways ability grouping is done. One common type is within-class grouping. Within-class grouping is when the class is heterogeneous and small groups are formed based on ability. Within-class grouping is most widely used in the elementary levels, usually in reading or mathematics groups. Between-class grouping is when different classes or subjects are grouped by ability. Robert Slavin report there are many different types of between-class grouping including The Joplin Plan, regrouping, nongrading instruction, departmentalization, gifted programs and special education (72). The Joplin Plan and nongrading instruction are very similar practices. According to Slavin in his “Synthesis of Research on Grouping”, The Joplin plan is grouping s...
I know that as I grow and learn as a teacher my theory on education will change and grow with me. I know that the best thing that I can bring to the table when it comes to being a teacher is the willingness to learn along with my students on what works best for us in our classroom, what is important to us when it comes to learning, and to change what needs to be change in order to have a positive learning environment for my student. The most important thing as a teacher I will bring with me into my classroom is the unwavering desire to help to guide, shape, and above all foster a love of learning in my
Many of the arguments against ability grouping is the concern for the psychological and social well being of the children involved, especially children placed in the lower-achieving ability groups. At a young age, children become more and more aware of differentiating characteristics, especially those children who are labeled as the “slower” groups, while others are labeled as the “gifted” or “accelerated” groups. Being labeled can leave children feeling discouraged. For example, if teachers are focusing more of their time and energy on the “gifted students” or the “slower students” the groups will not be getting the guided instructions that is needed for learning the content. Burns and Mason (1998) suggest that ability grouping may inadvertently create unequal learning opportunities for students. Even at the elementary level, this practice may give some students opportunities for more effective teachers, class composition, and instruction; thus giving a better chance at higher achievement. Since, students are getting the appropriate amount of time with the instructor, it has the possibility of leading to feelings of segregation. This can be difficult for young students to manage, thus causing unnecessary arguments, or a negative self-esteem, for those who are considered the “non gifted” students. Another disadvantage of ability grouping is that some believe that students will be treated differently and the teacher’s expectations will decrease for those who are put in the lower groups. Teachers may find themselves being more positive, patient with and respectful to students in higher ability groups that they are able to teach with less effort. Even if teachers do so unconsciously, they may treat students in the different groups as superior of inferior based on their groupings, leading to the perception by the students
instruction received by students in lower ability groups is inferior to instruction provided to children in higher ability groups (Calfee & Brown, 1979; Hiebert, 1983; Moody, Vaughn, & Schumm, 1997). In Australian schools, teachers usually work with groups of children who are placed together according to their abilities. However, it has raised several issues with regards to policy and practice. At the rate it is going, it seems that the widespread practice of ability grouping has been the default policy.
Research on the social and cognitive effects of grouping students in mixed-abilities versus same-abilities classrooms is gaining increasing interest among practitioners and researchers. In hopes of attaining higher scores, many schools have adopted homogeneous ability grouping. Unlike them, our school has adopted the policy of mixed ability classes where students of different academic abilities study together in the same class. Indeed, there is a lot of research in favor of heterogeneous ability grouping, but is this beneficial to us?
...child needs and deserves a secure, caring, and inspiring environment in which to blossom and flourish emotionally, intellectually, socially, and physically. It is my desire as an educator to provide my students with the learning environment necessary to motivate and inspire each and every one of them to become to their fullest potential. For myself, teaching is about giving; giving the students support and security, giving them respect and dignity, giving them opportunities to succeed and a quality education, and not only giving them my time and effort but also giving myself. Our society requires its children to not only receive a solid education, but that they are taught by a highly qualified educator who is sensitive to their individual needs and deeply committed to their success. I am such a person and will always strive to do the very best by my students.
All in all, teachers need to be viewed as professionals and not as simply pay babysitters because most do care about the students. Teachers tolerate the low wages, long hours and repetitive disrespect because they desired to place attention on student success. Teachers should not enter that career for the money, but for the devotion they will place on the students. Luckily there are ways to make teachers more valuable in society. Teachers should be given the right equipment to teach the subject that corresponds to them, the two-year skill evaluation should be more precise and by surprise, so no one knows. Also, students should be allowed to evaluate the teachers to provide feedback. Also, teachers should be aware of the surrounding cultures. In conclusion, teachers should motivate students to reach levels they themselves never thought they could attain.
Education is a very important aspect of our lives. It is our education that makes us who we are and determines what we become. Therefore, education is not something to be taken lightly. As a teacher, my goal will be to provide the best possible education for my students. Every student is unique. I must see students for who they are individually and respect their ideas and opinions. Each student has a different learning style. I must take this into consideration because I want to provide a constructive learning opportunity for every student. I believe that every student has the potential to learn.
A good education has always been drilled into my head ever since I was a little girl. Boy did I hate that, all I wanted to do was goof off and have fun with my friends. But as the years went on I started to realize how important it was to have a good education. Not that that made me like school anymore than I did; but I was realizing the different ways I was learning and how different people taught. I remember saying one day, when I was a freshman in high school, that if I was teaching this class I would have never taught it that way. Unfortunately, my teacher overheard me and I was forced to go to the front of the room and explain to the class the way it should be taught since I knew so much about teaching. Needless to say I did an awful job of it. That is when I started thinking about becoming a teacher. I know that does not make sense because I did such an awful job and was humiliated doing it. I did not like the way that man taught and I was determined to take his job. However, the reason I am here today is not that I want to take a teacher’s job; it is because I have the desire to make a difference in the lives of many students. I hope I will be a good teacher so that I will never have to hear a student say something bad about my teaching.
This being my first year of teaching I feel there are so many things that I have learned, and have helped me too become a good teacher. Yet I have so much more to learn, I still believe that students have the ability to learn and as a teacher it is my job to find ways to help them to become the best person they can be. Through being a reflective teacher, using professionalism, respecting diversity and having collaboration and community connecting this can be accomplished. When I am having fun teaching the student will have learning that material, this will help them to be relaxed and engaged in that lesson. I feel it is important to connect what they are learning to things that they have experienced in the real-world.
I do not know how true these statements are across the board, but I do know that I have felt like I am fighting a losing battle in my classroom trying to improve my students’ work ethic and teach them from bell to bell. I have felt alone in my efforts to hold students to high academic standards. Furthermore, I do not think that it is the rigor and quantity of work that is lacking at THS but also the quality of teaching. Does every teacher at our school teach in a way that is conducive to our students learning? Can we say for certain that our students are learning and retaining what they are being taught? Are our students performing well? When I ask these questions to myself, I am compelled to act on my conclusions. There is always more work to be done or some way to get better. I want to be clear that I am not speaking to a particular style of teaching or running a classroom but rather just to the overall quality of that style. During my first year when I was worried about my performance, several teachers told me, “You’re fine. They know who is doing their job.” And that was comforting; I knew I was working as hard as I possibly could. However, I became disheartened when I saw that there was seemingly no accountability for those teachers who were not providing a good education to our
Being a teacher is not an easy task as many people could think. To be a teacher does not only imply to know the subject to be taught, it also includes being willing to constantly improve oneself integrally, as much as updating the resources and materials one uses in teaching. Reflecting and analyzing over and over again the best way to teach to learn and how to make students to extend what has been learned. The many hours spend in the classroom will never be enough to plan lessons, prepare materials, review pupils tasks and exams, as well, all the administrative requirements one has to cover for whatever institution we work. Besides all this a good teacher, a professional one, will have to find the time to keep preparing to improve oneself.
When students are grouped based on their ability in an educational setting there can be positive and negative outcomes. Nowadays, especially in an urban area, majority of the students are placed by their cognitive abilities into 2 groups: traditional and slow functioning students. Standardized testing, behaviors or grades usually determines the placement of the student. These students who are the high achievers in the classroom due to higher standardized scoring do not need assistance with the course material. Between ability grouping is a form of isolation because they are not interacting with others that have a variety of abilities. Whereas, students that are low functioning need more assistance from the teacher will not have a chance to
An assumption according to the oxford dictionary is defined as ‘A thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof.’ According to Brookfield ‘Hegemonic assumptions are assumptions that we think are in our own best interests but that actually work against us in the long term.’ (Stephen D. Brookfield, 1995). Unfortunately, for teachers there are a lot of hegemonic assumptions out there regarding the best strategies to deal with classroom management, student – teacher relationship, disciplinary actions etc. but for this report I am going to discuss the one which was most evident in my experience during School Placement. Reflecting on my teaching practice one key hegemonic assumption that stands out to me as I had some problems relating to this topic is the relationship between a student and the teacher – the best approach to take heading into a classroom is a friendly relaxed one. Many other problems can stem from the relationship built such as classroom management problems and authority problems. I will look through all four of Brookfield’s lenses to back up my theory that having a too relaxed and friendly relationship with your students is in fact more detrimental to your teaching. These four lenses include:
First, I realized that, teachers carry a lot of weight on their shoulders and have great responsibilities. They have to balance the curriculum, students, parents, lesson plans, common core, and upper management and still maintain a professional demeanor. Second, educators must follow a strong code of ethics. They must be professional at all times with students and colleagues, keep confidentiality, not have or show any prejudice or bias, maintain safe and positive learning environments, help students with problems, and hand out disciplines accordingly. Lastly, I found that when you’re a teacher, your education never stops. Teachers are always trying to improve their own education and professional growth, both for the benefit of their students and for the benefit of themselves.