Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should cloning be legalised
Cloning human ethical issues
The moral questions of cloning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should cloning be legalised
Which of you has a right to live?
Imagine at birth you are given a second you, a “twin” per se. But instead of the doctors and scientists calling it your twin, it is called your clone. Human cloning is the creation of a genetically identical copy of a human. The purpose of that clone is to be there for spare parts to its original. Essentially, it is simply there for you to harvest its’ organs, blood, bone marrow, and other necessities because they are a guaranteed genetic match and you need it. If this clone is an exact living copy of you, and you are a living human being with the right to your own life, why doesn’t your copy have the same rights to their body and life as well? Say you get in a car accident and your kidney is failing. Meanwhile,
…show more content…
In the novel Anna the main character by age thirteen, has undergone countless surgeries, transfusions, and shots so that Kate, her older sister, can fight the leukemia by using what was taken from Anna. In the book you find out that Anna was genetically altered as an embryo to be Kate's perfect match for anything she needed. But Anna ends up refusing any more medical procedures for Kate, taking her parents to court because her life matters too. Although this character was not a clone per se she was still used as one would be. Someone may say that this has nothing to do with the subject matter. That if “Kate” had a clone she would have never had to use “Anna’s” body parts. She would have her own set of fixtures in her double. That this in a real life situation would help tremendously so you don't need to find a donor because you have copies of what you need right …show more content…
What if it is you who is the clone, wouldn't you want the right to live? The right to grow old and have children to truly live. That is what every person roaming the earth has a right to. Imposing another's health issues and obligations on you would be inhumane. If you are told that your original needs your heart, that's is you no longer get to live like everyone else. Maybe your clone needs new lungs because they smoked and ruined there's. Now you have to give up your life due to someone not taking care of their body. By putting the shoe on the other foot people would see how cruel and unfair a life of a clone would be. The possibility of the clone and original both claiming to be one or the other may come up leaving someone to choose which one of you gets to live and who gets to die. Therefore, I so no reason the idea of human cloning would ever be allowed let alone
If a random individual were asked twenty years ago if he/she believed that science could clone an animal, most would have given a weird look and responded, “Are you kidding me?” However, that once crazy idea has now become a reality, and with this reality, has come debate after debate about the ethics and morality of cloning. Yet technology has not stopped with just the cloning of animals, but now many scientists are contemplating and are trying to find successful ways to clone human individuals. This idea of human cloning has fueled debate not just in the United States, but also with countries all over the world. I believe that it is not morally and ethically right to clone humans. Even though technology is constantly advancing, it is not reasonable to believe that human cloning is morally and ethically correct, due to the killing of human embryos, the unsafe process of cloning, and the resulting consequences of having deformed clones.
Although it would be pretty cool to have someone look exactly like you, and maybe even act exactly as you do, but it could be frightening not knowing what is going on in the mind of a clone. I don’t think it would be safe to have clones living amongst us. Also in order for clones to be born, a human is needed to give birth to the clone which would also be dangerous for the woman giving birth to the clone due to the fact that 95% of experiments dealing with cloning mammals are unsuccessful.
successful clones often have problems with their body and are subject to a short lifespan ridden with health problems. This hurts the person or animal cloned rather than to help them, making cloning an immoral
In the book, “My Sister’s Keeper” by Jodi Picoult, Anna Fitzgerald was conceived with a purpose. Scientists helped Anna’s parents to conceive her because she would be a perfect bone marrow match for her sister, Kate, who was afflicted with leukemia. At a young age, Anna was aware of her role. Anna says, “See, unlike the rest of the free world, I didn’t get here by accident. And if your parents have you for a reason then that reason better exist. Because once it’s gone, so are you” (Picoult). Genetically engineering a child for the benefit of another, as in “My Sister’s Keeper”, may produce good results for the sick child but bad results for the other. This happens when the endeavor to keep the sick child healthy conflicts with the best interests of the healthy child. With scientific advancements, this sort of breeding for a purpose may become a serious issue in the future. The Catholic Church endorses genetic therapy for the purpose of saving lives but does not endorse genetic enhancement for the purpose of creating a different person than what God intended (ncregister.com).
In “Never Let Me Go” by Kazuo Ishiguro we see cloned human beings that are raised in a boarding school so that they can grow up and become organ donors. The main purpose of these kids was growing up and donating their organs one by one till they finally die at an early age. These kids were not treated as human beings. They were created in a test tube just to be a donor. The main character who was also a donor is the narrator of this story. Life should be controlled by the person that owns it and that person should make decisions how to live and where to live, clones are still human beings with soul and flesh there for they deserve human right. If they cannot get the right they deserve then cloning should be illegal unless there is understandable reason. These kids are raised in a place called hailsham, where they are taken care of so that they can stay healthy but they were not allowed to leave the school and socialize with the world till they turn eighteen and graduate.
Imagine a world where everyone looked like you and was related to you as a sibling, cousin, or any form of relation, wouldn’t that be freaky? Although cloning is not an important issue presently, it could potentially replace sexual reproduction as our method of producing children. Cloning is a dangerous possibility because it could lead to an over-emphasis on the importance of the genotype, no guaranteed live births, and present risks to both the cloned child and surrogate mother. It also violates the biological parent-child relationship and can cause the destruction of the normal structure of a family. The cloning of the deceased is another problem with cloning because it displays the inability of the parents to accept the child’s death and does not ensure a successful procedure. Along with the risks, there are benefits to Human Reproductive Cloning. It allows couples who cannot have a baby otherwise to enjoy parenthood and have a child who is directly related to them. It also limits the risk of transmitting genetic diseases to the cloned child and the risk of genetic defects in the cloned child. Although the government has banned Human Reproductive Cloning, the issue will eventually come to the surface and force us to consider the 1st commandment of God, all men are equal in the eyes of god, but does this also include clones? That is the question that we must answer in the near future in order to resolve a controversy that has plagued us for many years.
Imagine this, it is a beautiful sunny afternoon so you decide to go for a walk, as you are walking, you see a woman holding the hand of her small daughter, but there seems to be something odd about the child. She’s a miniature version of her mother. You wonder how that could be, how can a child turn out to be just the same as her mother? The simple answer, you have just seen a clone. According to the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association, cloning is defined as, “the production of genetically identical organisms via somatic cell nuclear transfer.” This, in simpler terms, means that cloning is the creation of identical organisms by taking the nucleus of an existing cell and placing it into another cell, one in which the nucleus has been removed. According to Dr. Elizabeth Mitchell, scientists are currently cloning human embryos and using them to conduct tests and research, and eventually end up killing the embryo (answeresingenesis.org). This act of cloning humans is unethical and should not be done, for a variety of reasons.
Many people say that everyone in the world has a twin. Today, science and technology has the ability to make this myth reality through the process of cloning. I am strongly against cloning for many reasons. People should not utilize cloning because it would destroy individuality and uniqueness, cause overpopulation, animal cruelty, it is against morals and ethics, and it violates many religious beliefs.
The clone project hides a kind of greed, and humans taking away cloned organs without wishful thinking is an attack on their dignity and a lack of respect for life. E: The main characters, Cathy, Tommy and Ruth, grow up in the completely enclosed School, where their lives are completely under control, but they want to be free and independent. Cathy's quest for love and friendship, Tommy's quest for art, and Ruth's feeling of self-worth display the emotions and ideals of the clones as individuals. As a quote from the novel says, “It's something they can dream about, a little fantasy. What's the harm?”
As the movie starts, Anna explains how she came into being, how she was not an accident. She was planned to be on this Earth to save her sister’s life. Sara and Brian are left with a tough decision when the doctor tells them that there is no donor for their daughter Kate. The doctor then mentions that there is always the option of genetically producing a child that would be a genetic match donor for Kate. Sara and Brian decide to follow through and make a “designer baby,” Anna. In the weeks following Anna's birth, she was used to serve Kate’s medical needs. Whenever Kate needed a donor, her parents did not hesitate to use Anna’s body. The ethical issue seen here is the underlying reason why Anna was brought into this world and the decision made by her parents to do so. The decisions made by Sara and Brain to genetically make a baby were ethically wrong in the sense that they were solely making a baby to cater Kate’s needs. It is understandable that they were doing everything...
Imagine a world in which a clone is created only for its organs to be transplanted into a sick person’s body. Human cloning has many possible benefits, but it comes with concerns. Over the past few decades, researchers have made several significant discoveries involving the cloning of human cells (ProQuest Staff). These discoveries have led to beneficial medical technologies to help treat disease (Aldridge). The idea of cloning an entire human body could possibly revolutionize the medical world (Aldridge). However, many people are concerned that these advancements would degrade self-worth and dignity (Hyde and Setaro 89). Even though human cloning brings about questions of bioethics, it has the potential to save and recreate the lives of humans and to cure various diseases without the use of medication (Aldridge, Hyde and Setaro).
Human cloning is dangerous. It is estimated that between 95 and 98 percent of cloning experiments have failed (Genetics and Society). These downfalls to cloning are in the form of miscarriages and stillbirths (Genetics and Society). Cloned human beings also run the risk of having severe genetic abnormalities. Children cloned from adult DNA would, in a sense, already have “old” genes. These children’s main problem would be developing and growing old too quickly. This includes arthritis, appearance, and organ function. Since the chance of having a child with mental and physical problems is so much higher than that of a normally conceived child, cloning should be illegal.
In My Sister’s Keeper, a thirteen year old girl, Anna, fights against her parents for “Medical Emancipation” so they can’t perform anymore operations on her without her consent. Anna was conceived to save her sister Kate’s life, because neither her parents nor her brother Jesse were a match when Kate needed a bone marrow transplant. Anna is raised donating to her sister against her will. When Anna reaches the age of thirteen and her sister Kate needs a Kidney to survive, her parents prepare to have Anna donate her Kidney, but without their knowlege, Kate has asked Anna to become Medically Emancipated because she’d rather die than continue to put her sister and her family though even more stress. Anna contacts a local lawyer who agrees to take her case although she is a minor.
The film Never Let Me Go portrays a dystopian world where medicine has advanced to extend the average human lifespan to over a 100 years. However, this is done so by the creation of human clones that live to be mere organ donors for the ones who’ve fallen ill in society. As the film follows the tragic lives of clones named Kathy H, Tommy, and Ruth, it artistically poses a number of ethical questions that we currently wrestle with today. Questions around stem cell research and cloning will never have neat answers and the film doesn’t attempt to provide solutions as well. It rather aims to deliver to its audience a number of themes to walk away with and to fuel a start of a discussion.
My Sister's Keeper was one of the most emotional movies I've seen this year. It had anger and sadness and happiness in just the right mix to level everything out. Like the scene where they're all sitting at the dinner table, and everyone is confused and filled with emotion, but then they drive to the firehouse, where Anna is happy with everyone else there. They are so confused at the table because they don't think that Anna is old enough to make her own decisions, but I think a kid is only as smart as you make them. I mean, how would anyone else solve this problem if they were in it.