Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Movie my sister's keeper analysis
Movie my sister's keeper analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Movie my sister's keeper analysis
My Sister's Keeper was one of the most emotional movies I've seen this year. It had anger and sadness and happiness in just the right mix to level everything out. Like the scene where they're all sitting at the dinner table, and everyone is confused and filled with emotion, but then they drive to the firehouse, where Anna is happy with everyone else there. They are so confused at the table because they don't think that Anna is old enough to make her own decisions, but I think a kid is only as smart as you make them. I mean, how would anyone else solve this problem if they were in it. Oh yeah, your probably wondering what the plot is, maybe I should have started with that. The story is about a family, where the oldest daughter Kate has cancer, and the parents Brian and Sarah genetically create a perfect match daughter to donate body parts. Anna the perfect match suddenly wants to stop and have her own freedom. …show more content…
It has the parents, Jesse the only son, there aunt Kelly, and of course Anna. It does not have that much talking but shows a lot of body language. This scene is very important to the movie because it shows how commanding the mom is and how determined Anna is. It also shows the splitting of the mother and daughter until they can resolve their differences. The scene pretty much just shows Sarah asking Anna questions and Anna answering them, while everyone else watches them argue. The director Nick Cassavetes did a great job using the location and actors to tell the story and show what they were thinking. He worked on the Notebook another great dramatic movie, where there were some similarities in how they acted. They were both great movies and very well made. The actors also play a great roll in the making of the movie, the movie would be impossible to make with out the main character Anna, she has been in a lot of movies and is now a very talented
The movie is, most likely, done well enough to intrigue its intended audience. It captured the theme and story line of the book. It falls short, though, when compared to the beautiful, sensitive and contemplative prose of Natalie Babbitt. One could only hope that a viewing of the film will lead the watcher to try the book and be delighted all the more.
The book and the movie were both very good. The book took time to explain things like setting, people’s emotions, people’s traits, and important background information. There was no time for these explanations the movie. The book, however, had parts in the beginning where some readers could become flustered.
Baz Luhrmann has done this film in a unique and brilliant way, with help of the above, and of course a great loved story as a base.
The film had a great choice of music and it seemed very well designed with authentic wardrobes and scenic views of their journey. I really enjoyed the test of faith that LaForgue had in the movie especially towards the end when he decided to enter the Huron village alone like in the dream that Chomina had, this showed character development on his part and his willingness to accept other
film all can relate to and understand. Luhrmann turned a historical tragedy into an up-beat action packed. love story. Luhrmann had enormous potential for the movie he was to create, and also had confidence in making a success of it. He chose the cast for the film wisely, with handsome leading man Leonardo Di.
This movie begins with David (Toby Maguire) he stays more to himself and his sister Jennifer (Reese Witherspoon) is more outgoing they both live different high school lives. David is a big fan of a 1950s black and white TV show called “Pleasantville” and he wants to watch a full marathon. However, Jennifer wants to watch her own show and they begin to argue over who gets the TV remote and due to the force the remote breaks into pieces. Suddenly a strange television repair man (Don Knotts) shows up and gives them an unusual remote control. When using the remote, they are somehow transported into world of “Pleasantville” and they now play the roles of Bud Parker and Mary Sue Parker brother and sister on the show and their perfect town would
High emotions. Superb special effects. Outstanding score. Great casting and acting. Rave reviews.
The cast has great chemistry and the screenplay seems like a natural progression of events. However, it is worth noting the things that were off in the film based on what history tells us. For starters, Frank Hamer was portrayed much differently from we know about the actual Frank Hamer. In fact, the real Frank Hamer’s widow and son actually sued Warner Brothers in 1968 for defamation because she did not approve of his character in the film. They pressed the issue so much that they were eventually awarded an out-of-court settlement in 1971 from the movie producers so that they both would stop pursuing the
...movie that I fell in love with. But most of all I love how the story line is a great overlap into the cinematically engaging movie. There is a great use of camera, timing, shots and story line that are portrayed in this movie without being too overwhelming. This allows the audience to relax during the movie and just take in the scenes as a story from reality. To this day, and even still doing this paper I still come to find different aspects of the movie that I missed the previous times I have watched it.
The plot of “The Little Match Girl” is simple, yet very complicated at the same time.
The screenplay, in particular, is impressive just because of how authentic it feels. It’s clear that Nanjiani and Gordon dramatized some aspects of their relationship, as they had to in order to make a movie, but for the most part this feels incredibly true and raw. It has a feeling of a true story about it in a way that isn’t maudlin. It just seems
I thought this film was spectacular because it shows both sides of the story and with some movies you are left wondering what is the other person thinking, and in this movie it answers that. There was one scene where Bryce it about to kiss Juli and you are wondering what Juli thinks about that, and you get to find out. I was impressed by the way people can relate to the characters, and how you feel like you’re a part of the story. When I was watching it I felt
The director of the movie took notable characteristics of each person in the book, and gave it to the perfect actor. The casting of Edward Norton for the narrator was perfect in every since. He has a hardcore side to his acting, as seen in American History X, but he also has an socially awkward side to his acting which matched well with the main character. With Brad Pitt, I was a little hesitant to watch him play out his role. He normally plays romantic characters in the movies I have seen, but in this movie he really brings out the “Tyler Durden” aspect.
The realistic future that isn’t Sci - fi and the special effects are what makes the movie great. Anyone can make up a futuristic movie but it takes real effort to create a film that can possibly be real within the near future. The script and acting create an emotional connection to the viewer and the visuals of the film for a film created in 2006 rivals those of today's films. The gore, emotions, and adventure throughout the film make it interesting while retaining its speculative fiction view. The acting in the film is very realistic such as the people in the coffee shop that were in tears after the youngest human possible had died.
This movie really made me thing that if I was going to peruse my career in film then these are the kind of people I want to work with and create movies that are different, something that someone can only watch once but that once is enough. Movies that make the viewer wishing for more at the end. This movie had me feeling that way, it felt like as if I was starting to picture myself going into the line of work in which I would have a lot of options. There are motifs in the movie such as Alicia having an uncle as this man that can take her to her father which refers to the title which I found to be very cleaver and honestly I think that this movie was something different that has been missing from the multiplex and that’s why it has become my favourite film until another great takes it spot, for that I guess I just have to