Imagine being inside a room with nothing inside. Afterwards, you proceed to empty your room and try to duplicate that room you were inside before. You stay inside your now emptied room. Does it feel like the same? Think of this activity as reproducing art. Art inside a museum and art projected from a computer screen are different (Berger 31). The interpretations between original and reproduced works are different as well. Berger describes in his book the bias of seeing what we only want to see. What a person sees is highly dependent on what that person knows (8). In relation to this, Berger also criticizes the originality and reproduction of art in the aspect of we only see art on what we know about it (31, 33). He started off taking into study the painting of Frans Hals about the "The Governors and The Governesses of an Alms House". Art historians interpret the art according to Hals' context of "public charity". …show more content…
Is it of different level from a reproduced one? Have the earlier example of art inside a museum and art projected from a computer screen. Inside the museum, one could see the exact details of how the artist painted it (Berger 31). It could not be exactly interpreted by the artist himself but it could be interpreted better because the interpreter has the complete picture of the painting. How about the one projected from a computer screen? One could still interpret it, but it would be totally different from the one inside the museum. The photographer of the art could have chosen an angle of the painting to make it look more beautiful; however, every angle, even the slightest difference, is not similar to the others. Even the brightness and contrast of the photo could make the interpretation different. Even adding text next to the artwork would make one's interpretation different (Berger 28). It could appeal to logic, context, or
are depicted with the same degree of variation. To understand such a diverse set of paintings –
Many might have been working on Good Friday, but many others were enjoying The Frist Museum of Visual Arts. A museum visitor visited this exhibit on April 14, 2017 early in the morning. The time that was spent at the art museum was approximately two hours and a half. The first impression that one received was that this place was a place of peace and also a place to expand the viewer’s imagination to understand what artists were expressing to the viewers. The viewer was very interested in all the art that was seen ,but there is so much one can absorb. The lighting in the museum was very low and some of the lighting was by direction LED lights. The artwork was spaciously
People can have many different opinions depending on a topic, but what is truly difficult is getting a complete level of understanding from every opinion, or understanding the point of view of each opinion. Even accepting the points of view can be difficult for some people, who believe that their opinions are right. Luckily, people can learn about the other person’s frame of reference, and at the very least understand the topic or the person a little better. This particular topic is art, which is known for its multiple possible perceptions or its many different messages that it can send a person or group of people. In this way, people can learn more about the thought processes and feelings of others. Unfortunately, with differing opinions,
The Metropolitan Museum of Art came about as an idea from Jon Jay in Paris, France in 1866 with the idea of “national institution gallery of art” within the United States. Once this idea was proposed, it was immediately moved forward with his return to the United States. With the help of the Union League Club in NY they began to acquire civic leaders, businessmen, artists, and collectors who aided in the creation of the museum. For over 140 years, the visitors who go here have received everything the mission of the institution states.
where people decided to reproduce art as a picture of what was going on. Instead, this artistic
Though most works of art have some underlying, deeper meaning attached to them, our first impression of their significance comes through our initial visual interpretation. When we first view a painting or a statue or other piece of art, we notice first the visual details – its size, its medium, its color, and its condition, for example – before we begin to ponder its greater significance. Indeed, these visual clues are just as important as any other interpretation or meaning of a work, for they allow us to understand just what that deeper meaning is. The expression on a statue’s face tells us the emotion and message that the artist is trying to convey. Its color, too, can provide clues: darker or lighter colors can play a role in how we judge a piece of art. The type of lines used in a piece can send different messages. A sculpture, for example, may have been carved with hard, rough lines or it may have been carved with smoother, more flowing lines that portray a kind of gentleness.
Items displayed in museums hold historical significance and are representative of society’s culture. Preserving valuable collections for education and enjoyment is a primary role of museums. While fulfilling this role, the architecture of the museum is also an important factor. Historical buildings are converted into museums and architects must consider the use of the space and the museum’s purpose during their initial design. Other museums are built with a clear purpose in mind. As museums are designed, many characteristics are determined. Display and storage spaces as well as visitor services impacts museum’s functionality. Based on the function of a museum, architectural requirements are different.
It is said that art is like a mirror to the soul, a way to see what
From the creation of art to its modern understanding, artists have strived to perform and perfect a photo realistic painting with the use of complex lines, blend of colors, and captivating subjects. This is not the case anymore due to the invention of the camera in 1827, since it will always be the ultimate form of realism. Due to this, artists had the opportunities to branch away from the classical formation of realism, and venture into new forms such as what is known today as modern art. In the examination of two well known artists, Pablo Picasso and Jackson Pollock, we can see that the artist doesn’t only intend for the painting to be just a painting, but more of a form of telling a scene through challenging thoughts, and expressing of the artists emotion in their creation.
According to Webster’s Dictionary, art is “human expression of objects by painting, etc” (10). The words “human experience” adds meaning to art. Artists reveal their inner thoughts and feelings through their work. When we study a painting by Salvador Dali, the strange objects and the surrealist background portrays the eccentricity of the painter. Some ideas cannot be explained verbally. They can only be shown via a medium. We can get across what is in our minds or our hearts by a stroke of a brush, a drop of paint, a row of words, or something else. But to express ourselves, we do not need to limit what we call art.
Georges Didi-Huberman is critical of the conventional approaches towards the study of art history. Didi-Huberman takes the view that art history is grounded in the primacy of knowledge, particularly in the vein of Kant, or what he calls a ‘spontaneous philosophy’. While art historians claim to be looking at images across the sweep of time, what they actually do might be described as a sort of forensics process, one in which they analyze, decode and deconstruct works of art in attempt to better understand the artist and purpose or expression. This paper will examine Didi-Huberman’s key claims in his book Confronting Images and apply his methodology to a still life painting by Juan Sánchez Cotán.
Art has a unique property. If you gave a hundred different people the same work of art and asked them all to interpret it, you would likely get a hundred different responses. All of which would likely be different from what the artist intended. But none of which would be any righter or truer than any other. Because of this, any particular piece of artwork is solely defined by what others think of it.
Visual Analysis Critique My recent visit at The Modern Art Museum of Fort Worth, Texas, I saw many intriguing and stunning works by well renowned artists such as Glenn Kaino (currently showcasing his FOCUS exhibition), Robert Motherwell, Josef Albers, Richard Diebenkorn, Nancy Graves, Philip Guston, Gerhard Richter, a couple of Andy Warhol works, and many more. All of the works presented at The Modern are international developments in post-World War II art in all media, from paintings, objects, and independent films. Every single piece at the Modern were all fascinating and unique in their own way and left me enthralled through the whole visit.
Paintings, like many forms of art, are very subjective—what one may find intriguing another may completely disagree. “Art is physical material that affects a physical eye and conscious brain” (Solso, 13). To glance at art, we must go through a process of interpretation in order to understand what it is we are looking at. Solso describes the neurological, perceptual, and cognitive sequence that occurs when we view art, and the often inexpressible effect that a work of art has on us. He shows that there are two aspects to viewing art: nativistic perception—the synchronicity of eye and brain that transforms electromagnetic energy into neuro-chemical codes—which is "hard-wired" into the sensory-cognitive system; and directed perception, which incorporates personal history—the entire set of our expectations and past experiences—and knowledge (Solso, preface)
Conversely, upon investigating the artwork’s factual information such as the painting’s context, the artist’s background, the genre and the school or movement associated with the painting, it is possible to obtain knowledge that combines objective information and subjective opinion, confirming that some degree of objectivity, albeit with our ‘cultural imprint’, is possible as an art observer.