Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Classical hollywood cinema influences
Classical hollywood cinema influences
Classical hollywood cinema influences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Classical hollywood cinema influences
Art has a unique property. If you gave a hundred different people the same work of art and asked them all to interpret it, you would likely get a hundred different responses. All of which would likely be different from what the artist intended. But none of which would be any righter or truer than any other. Because of this, any particular piece of artwork is solely defined by what others think of it. In her essay, Halberstam discusses the idea that things can have multiple forms of being. This is to say that everything exists slightly differently for different people, depending on their interpretation. Her critiques with animated films are that regardless of how the creators of a film intend their movies to come across, they often can be perceived …show more content…
Many of the unintentional themes present in films, television, and books can give the audience an idea of what was going on during the time and place in which that piece of work was created. Take, for example, the early 1990s. A period that I didn’t live through, but is recent enough that it still feels very tangible. What could we learn about the popular movies of that period that would give us a better idea of the culture and societal issues at the time? Using Halberstam’s idea of multiple forms of being to critically look at a set of films released within the same time frame we can get a feel for social issues of the time. The movies we will be looking at are the three top grossing films of the 1992 holiday season: "Aladdin," "Home Alone 2" and "A Few Good Men." Popular movies almost always reflect the cultural currents of their times, if only unintentionally. While these three films may seem to have little in common, they share common themes that helped them strike a chord with the audiences of the time. Some of the themes that I will identify throughout these films are the dysfunctional or absent family, the search for a father, and the beginning of the Clinton …show more content…
Her talk show was the first of it’s kind and sparked a wave of imitators, from the civil (Dr. Phil) to the not-so-civil (Jerry Springer). This is highlighted in a number of 1990s movies, in everything from "The Prince of Tides" to "The Addams Family." Though the subject is depicted humorously in "Home Alone 2," there has to be something terribly wrong with a family that abandons a child at Christmastime, not once, but twice. As noted before, the film is a metaphor for a larger cultural reality: In an era in which both parents tend to work and far more children grow up in single-parent households, a lot more children were abandoned in the 1990s, both literally and figuratively, than in just a generation earlier. As for "Aladdin," the princess grows up in a single-parent home which obviously isn't functioning quite right. Aladdin, like Kevin McAllister, is home alone, or better yet, homeless alone. And "A Few Good Men"? Well, it may be a stretch, but many have compared the military to a surrogate family. How would you like to come home to that group of Marines every
In the end, what Halberstam is doing in her essay “Animating Revolt and Revolting Animation”, is providing a new way of thinking. Not just about the animated films she discusses, but also about humanity as a whole. Films such as Toy Story, Over the Hedge, and even Finding Nemo are used to represent a new utopia for children where they can escape the troubles of reality that are created by those that they are surrounded with. And other films such as March of the Penguins , that are used to rework humanity. Altogether,
Kerner, Aaron M.. “Irreconcilable Realities.” Film Analysis: A Norton Reader. Eds. Jeffrey Geiger and R.L. Rutsky. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2nd edition, 2013. 462-83.
Kerner, Aaron M.. “Irreconcilable Realities.” Film Analysis: A Norton Reader. Eds. Jeffrey Geiger and R.L. Rutsky. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 2nd edition, 2013. 462-83.
One could easily dismiss movies as superficial, unnecessarily violent spectacles, although such a viewpoint is distressingly pessimistic and myopic. In a given year, several films are released which have long-lasting effects on large numbers of individuals. These pictures speak
During the mid and late 1970’s, the mood of American films shifted sharply. People needed to get away from such negative memories as the Vietnam War, long gas lines, the resignation of President Nixon, and ...
movies also focused on many social issues in society during the 90’s. Movies such as
People can have many different opinions depending on a topic, but what is truly difficult is getting a complete level of understanding from every opinion, or understanding the point of view of each opinion. Even accepting the points of view can be difficult for some people, who believe that their opinions are right. Luckily, people can learn about the other person’s frame of reference, and at the very least understand the topic or the person a little better. This particular topic is art, which is known for its multiple possible perceptions or its many different messages that it can send a person or group of people. In this way, people can learn more about the thought processes and feelings of others. Unfortunately, with differing opinions,
...er vision they choose to without worrying about perfection. The person viewing these paintings is free to see whatever they choose to as well. For example, many critics have viewed Women I as a demented, evil creature that must be feared. However, when I look at that painting, I see a strong, dominant woman who is able to stand up to others and face anything, without fear of ridicule or judgment. I see that this woman prevailed against all odds and continues to be confident in her own skin. Other people might look at this painting and just see an ugly or crazy person on the canvas or not have any strong opinion about it at all, while I, on the other hand, view a beautiful, independent woman. Each person viewing abstract art can have his or her own creative opinion regarding the work, which is why art such as Women I during this period is so appealing to me.
American commercial cinema currently fuels many aspects of society. In the twenty-first century it has become available, active force in the perception of gender relations in the United States. In the earlier part of this century filmmakers, as well as the public, did not necessarily view the female“media image” as an infrastructure of sex inequality. Today, contemporary audiences and critics have become preoccupied with the role the cinema plays in shaping social values, institutions, and attitudes. American cinema has become narrowly focused on images of violent women, female sexuality, the portrayal of the “weaker sex” and subversively portraying women negatively in film. “Double Indemnity can be read in two ways. It is either a misogynist film about a terrifying, destroying woman, or it is a film that liberates the female character from the restrictive and oppressed melodramatic situation that render her helpless” (Kolker 124). There are arguably two extreme portrayals of the character of Phyllis Dietrichson in Double Indemnity; neither one is an accurate or fare portrayal.
Of all the 1980’s films, that can be described as “Eighties Teen Movies” (Thorburn, 1998) or “High School Movies” (Messner, 1998), those written and (with the exception of “Pretty In Pink” (1986) and “Some Kind of Wonderful”(1987)) directed by John Hughes were often seen to define the genre, even leading to the tag “John Hughes rites de passage movies” as a genre definition used in 1990s popular culture (such as in “Wayne’s World 2” (1994 dir. Stephen Surjik)). This term refers to the half dozen films made between 1984 and 1987; chronologically, “Sixteen Candles” (1984), “The Breakfast Club” (1985), “Weird Science” (1985), “Ferris Bueller's Day Off” (1986), “Pretty In Pink” (1986) and “Some Kind Of Wonderful” (1987) (the latter two being directed by Howard Deutch). For the purpose of this study, “Weird Science” and “Some Kind of Wonderful” shall be excluded; “Weird Science” since, unlike the other films, it is grounded in science fiction rather than reality and “Some Kind of Wonderful” as its characters are fractionally older and have lost the “innocence” key to the previous movies: as Bernstein states “the youthful naivete was missing and the diamond earring motif [a significant gift within the film] was no substitute” (Bernstein, 1997, p.89). Bernstein suggests that the decadent 1980s were like the 1950s, “an AIDS-free adventure playground with the promise of prosperity around every corner … our last age of innocence” (Bernstein, 1997, p.1). The films were very much a product of the time in terms of their production (“suddenly adolescent spending power dictated that Hollywood direct all its energies to fleshing out the fantasies of our friend, Mr. Dumb Horny 14 Year Old” Bernstein, 1997, p.4), their repetition (with the growth of video cassette recorders, cable and satellite with time to fill, and also the likes of MTV promoting the film’s soundtracks) and their ideologies.
Every film can be related back to socially significant issues that occurred during the time it was released. It’s a snapshot of the issues during that time period. Film is not created in a vacuum. As described in our textbook, film “Conveys “the temper of an age of a nation” as well as that of the artists who produces it” (Belton 22). Films tend to reflect current society, country ideals or beliefs in order for the audience to relate. Some of those techniques used include, the American dream, family, corruption, divorce, and crime. If a director decides not include current social issues than it becomes harder for an audience to relate to the film because they will not be able to connect to the characters and get into their shoes. One film that encompasses all of these current social issues is American Hustle (David O. Russell, 2013). This film is a melodrama because of the context and social issues this film deals with. American Hustle has a social significance to today’s current culture, society, beliefs and social issues through the use of the American dream, corruption, divorce, crime and family.
On the other hand, art leaves the interpretation to the individual without directly stating a biased. Instead of going into a conversation closed minded we could be open to different opinions. In doing that we could allow discussion to be more peaceful, respectful and
Throughout this essay I will be focusing on the effects of post-modernity in mainstream animated works, most predominately those within popular film and television. In a setting as rigid and conformist as Hollywood, due to their need to appeal to mass audiences in order to create revenue, there is little room for the experimentation and individuality that post-modernism encourages. Although independent art house animations are...
Art can be defined in many ways by an individual. One can say that any creative output by a person is considered art. Others contend that art must conform to a societal standard and the basis of the creation should be understood by most intellectual people. For example, some contend that computer-generated images, such as fractals, are not art due to the large role played by a computer. E.O. Wilson states “the exclusive role of the arts is to intensify aesthetic and emotional response. Works of art communicate feeling directly from mind to mind, with no intent to explain why the impact occurs” (218). A simple definition may be that art is the physical expression of the ideals formed by the mind.
Art has evolved and regenerated itself many times during our human existence. These differences are defined through changes in styles under various theories. During the nineteenth and early twentieth century, a style known as Expressionism became popular. During this movement the artists were trying to use their artwork as a tool of expression toward life. It was mainly dominant in the nonrepresentational arts, such as abstract visual arts and music. It also was probably one of the most difficult movements to understand because the whole point of the piece lay within the artist. Not only was it a movement, it defined the act of art as a whole. From the beginning of time, each work of art, excluding replicas, show a way of expressing one's self. Every artist puts a piece of his or herself into their artwork. Who really is to determine what that work of art was meant to express?