Moving Outside Of Gallery

2043 Words5 Pages

In what ways have artists moved outside of the gallery space to make and/or exhibit their work?

The term ‘Gallery’ describes a place where artists can exhibit and display their work. However, the type of gallery can be described as either public or private. Public galleries are generally publicly owned and free to visit, whereas private galleries usually sell work and often require an arranged viewing or entrance fee. Over the course of this essay, I will address the ideas and explanations behind artist’s moving outside of the gallery space to make/ exhibit their work. There are many reasons why an artist may choose to make this kind of move, for example a piece of their work may have strong relations with the outdoor environment …show more content…

However, when exhibiting elsewhere, the artist can embrace the freedom of the outdoor space to create large pieces. As an example, Chinese artist Ai Weiwei constructed a sizeable installation of interconnecting bicycle frames, located inside the courtyard of Palazzo Franchetti, during the Venice Architecture Biennale in 2014. The use of scale is something which can be fully appreciated when work is placed outside in the open space in comparison to the compact feeling it may inhibit inside a gallery …show more content…

Inside the Gallery, artwork is protected by high security, either in the form of guards themselves or sensitive alarm systems, both put in place to prevent work being damaged or stolen.
When you altar the form of exhibiting the work and instead put it elsewhere, the work becomes more vulnerable. In Peter Stuyvesant’s 1972 ‘City Sculpture Project’, 16 individual sculptures were produced and placed at various sites then left for 6 months, the idea was that the locals would adjust and accept the new objects before they were acquired by authorities. However, at some of the sites the sculptures were rejected, “in the event only one or two were acquired and the rest refused. Some were very badly vandalised” (Büchler, P. and Harding, D, 1997). It is unfortunate that incidents like this occur, as restoring work is costly and in order to prevent destruction of the work happening again, art sometimes is shielded- which detracts from the idea of the artists original sense of freedom they had when producing their

Open Document