More handpicked essays just for you.
Motivational interviewing and reflection
Motivational interviewing case study paper
Motivational interviewing case study paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Motivational interviewing and reflection
Motivational interviewing is a great way to get clients involved. In the healthcare setting, it is a way to empower clients and help them help themselves. As shown in the BMJ learning module, motivational interviewing accepts the changes that occur in the human life which is very important for the process of change. This allows the healthcare provider and client to work together and make necessary changes along the way to reach the overall goal. It also gives the client support, autonomy, and a sense of efficacy on reaching their goal.
A disadvantage of motivational interviewing is that it requires the healthcare provider and client to build a relationship. There must be a certain level of trust so client can freely share any concerns, questions,
Still, the previous advantages discussed should influence the nurse to improve in identifying patient vulnerability. This is evident by this patient where I utilized my interpersonal skills to communicate to this patient so that he/she is aware that he/she is not alone in this journey. Nurses need to utilize models and theories to guide nursing practice. For instance, McCormack’s framework focuses on patient-centered care which influences nurses to understand the patient as a whole and their values (Abley, 2012, p. 42). Being able to identify values will give nurses and myself a better comprehension about the patients resulting in worthiness and belonging expressed. As a result, informing nurses about patient’s subjective vulnerability because a trust and understanding relationship is established. This is supported in a clinical experience where a patient “felt understood and opened up for further interactions based on trust” through an honest, supportive relationship with a nurse (Gjengedal, 2013, p. 134). Nurses should provide patient-focused provision of service, and assist this patient in overcoming his/her obstacle as a way of encouragement. Furthermore, Sellman (2005) explains how encouragement may compromise human flourish (p. 7), it is dependent on the situation and it cannot be assumed all encouragement will lead to harm. This informs nurses to be aware of the consequences that prevent the
Coronary heart disease is a common term for the build-up of plaque in the heart’s arteries that could lead to heart attack (Coronary Heart Disease, 2017). Furthermore, there are many known coronary heart disease factors that can be controlled. These are high blood cholesterol, high blood pressure, diabetes and pre-diabetes, obesity, smoking, lack of physical activity, unhealthy diet and stress (Coronary Heart Disease Factors, n.d). The techniques of motivational interviewing are more persuasive than coercive and more supportive than argumentative. The motivational interviewer must advance with a firm sense of purpose, clear methods and skills for seeking that purpose, and a sense of timing to mediate in specific ways at quick brief periods of time (Miller and Rollnick, 1991). The clinician uses motivational interviewing on account of four general principles in mind. The key principles are to express empathy, avoid argument, roll with resistance and support self-efficacy (Treatment, C. for S. A.,
As facilitators, we used motivational interviewing skills such as open-ended questions so that participants could engage in the discussion and share their experiences. Reflective listening and summary were used to recap some of the points discussed by the participants after each question. The group plan was very helpful in helping us keep up with the time. Many of the group members were able to point out these strengths as well. Also, we had a good icebreaker activity so that participants could get more comfortable in the group. The participants found the topic for discussion relatable as health care professionals as this added to their knowledge of the importance of Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy in assisting patients to achieve a behavioural change. We showed appreciation to the participants for sharing their experiences. In addition to the above strengths, our instructor pointed out that we had a good closure at the end of the
The Motivational Interviewing film was very informative. I was able to get a clear understanding of what is to be expected by the therapist during a session. The film explained the therapist should engage in reflective listening, develop a growing discrepancy, avoid arguing with clients, roll with resistance and support self-advocacy. Miller believed that this approach was far more effective than traditional methods, where the therapist pushed for change. In contrast, Miller explained that motivational interviewing focused on empowerment and helping clients to become motivationally driven to change. Also, Miller stressed the importance of working alongside clients, a term he referred to as dancing. The process in which the client leads
233). From this, clients should want to change as well as believe in their capacity for change. For Jim, he can benefit from motivational interviewing since it can be used to help him overcome ambivalence to change. A collaborative, and nonconfrontational relationship are part of motivational interviewing. This is important for the client Jim in order to respect and encourage his self-determination. Motivational interviewing gives clients like Jim the opportunity to discover their own reasons for making change. One of the principles for motivational interviewing is expressing empathy where it gives clients the chance to freely explore their values, perceptions, goals and the implications of their present situation without being judged. The counsellor who is working with Jim can use active listening skills for expressing empathy in order for Jim to feel like he is being heard. The second principle is developing
Rebecca Kreman, Bernice C. Yates, Sangeeta Agrawal, Kathryn Fiandt, Wayne Briner, Scott Shurmur, The effects of motivational interviewing on physiological outcomes, Applied Nursing Research, Volume 19, Issue 3, August 2006, Pages 167-170, ISSN 0897-1897, DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.10.004.
What is Motivational Interviewing? Motivational interviewing (MI) is a patient-centered method for enhancing intrinsic motivation to change health behavior by exploring and resolving ambivalence. What will be discussed is how can organizations help the patients change negative behavior to a positive behavioral change, diminishing the lack of motivational behavior. (Miller & Rollnick, 2002) states that we have to help clients overcome their ambivalence or lack of motivation toward changing their behavior in positive way. Also, figuring out a solution on how to overcome this negative behavioral challenge of lack of intrinsic motivation to change. How will we overcome it? by focusing on the MI (Motivational Interviewing) approach, and finding
Motivational interviewing (MI) was developed in 1983 from a personal experience of one of the therapist, and it has been used since then. The definition of MI changed over the years. Currently, it is an evidence-based practice in the treatment of substance abuse users. This method focuses on establishing a collaborative guideline, based on patient’s values, to motivate the person for internal exploring of the issue and resolving it (MI, n.d)
The most important aspect of motivational interviewing is collaboration. The collaboration approach is when the counselor listens to the patient and determine how motivated they are to change their behavior. Most times the counselor chooses to agree with the patient’s choice because they believe that they will realize that they are making the wrong decisions eventually. There are a few ingredients that makes up the spirit of motivational interviewing and they are collaboration, evocation, and autonomy. Ambivalence is the biggest hurdle that patients must get over. This causes many problems such as being uncomfortable, and being uncomfortable causes up to stop doing the things you know you is
A helping interview is a conversation between a health care professional and a person in need of medical care and is a common tool of communication in any health care setting. Three components of the helping interview are 1) the orientation of the professional and the client to each other, 2) the identification of the client’s problem, 3) the resolution of the client’s problem (Tamparo & Lindh).
This paper will discuss what motivational interviewing is , who developed motivational interviewing and why it was developed. In addition, the most important aspects of motivational interviewing will be covered. Furthermore, the paper will discuss how I hope to use motivational interviewing in the future. At the conclusion of the paper the reader should have a better understanding of motivational interviewing.
Motivational interviewing is an important technique and counseling style that was created by William Miller and Stephen Rollnick in the 1980’s. The brief definition of motivational interviewing (MI) that is provided by Miller and Rollnick in their influential text is “a collaborative conversation style for strengthening a person’s own motivation and commitment to change” (Miller & Rollnick, 2013). Motivational interviewing is considered to be a style that evolved from client-centered therapy. The style is considered to be empathic but requires the counselor to consciously directive so that they may help their client resolve the ambivalence they are experiencing and direct them towards change. The important thing to note is that client autonomy is key to the process (Hettema, Steele, & Miller, 2005). However, despite being able to currently give a definition of MI, one that could be considered a working definition, motivational interviewing is “a living, evolving method” (Miller & Rollnick, 2009). It will continue to evolve as times change and it is implemented in use with other maladaptive behaviors. MI is a relatively new style that it still has the ability to undergo changes to adapt to what purpose it is serving (Miller & Rollnick, 2009).
The intake interview assists in establishing and diagnosing any problems the client may have. The therapist may then explain to the client what to expect during the interview, including the time duration. A good assessment/ or intake will focus on the individual situation, strength and coping mechanism. The intake form is for the client, it gives the therapist more information and an idea of who you are. The intake process that is considered of a series of questions and consent form that the client has to sign and agree to. A professional relationship between a counselor and a client begins with an intake interview.
The one recommendation geared to the theory is describing what is considered motivational. The skill of Motivational interviewing is a counseling style not subjected to being used loosely with practitioners attempting to motivate his/her client in health promotion without the proper use of the theories steps.
“A public health nurse is a nurse who works to promote and protect the health of an entire population” (Allender, Rector, & Warner, 2010, p. 839) the public health nurse I chose to interview was Barbara, she currently works for the Health department and has been there for three years. During the interview Barbara discussed the requirements for a public health nurse. The individual must have the ability to exercise independent judgment, planning and able to administer safe effective public nursing care. In addition be able to work effectively with individuals and families to assist them in the satisfactory solution of health problems, by recognizing and respecting of different cultural, ethnic and difference on health care practices. The nurse is also required to know disease prevention such as, different techniques on teaching, counseling, interviewing and resources available. Barbara stated that the most important part of being a public health nurse is being able to care. Barbara acknowledged that there are numerous individuals that she assists everyday that just want someone to exhibit that they care and understand. The education a public health nurse should obtain is a bachelor’s degree in nursing, which Barbara posses. “Public health nurses working with specific populations or in administration position should hold a master’s degree” ( Allender et al., 2010, p.839). Barbara discussed that before becoming a public health nurse she worked at St. Francis Hospital as med-surge nurse for five years, after that it was imperative that she change working environment. Barbara confirmed that working as a nurse in the hospital was extremely diverse then working as public health nurse. “Comparing public health nurse and general nurse, public health nursing is population based, focuses on the greater good, health promotion and disease prevention, and utilizes community resources. The general nursing is individual based, focuses on individual good, restoration of health and function, and manage resources at hand” (Minnesota Department of Health, 2007). In the beginning Barbara thought that public health nursing would be a difficult job to gain knowledge of however, she established that it was exceptionally effortless and gratifying career to posses. Barbara stated that she did not realize how much assistance was out there for the public until; she worked as public health nurse. Barbara spends 95% of her day going from place to place by doing home visits, investigating different cases, assisting with screening programs and enormous amount of paper work.