Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Freedom of speech of students
Freedom of speech on campus
Freedom of speech on campus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Freedom of speech of students
Even though monitoring student social media could be beneficial, it is an invasion of student privacy. As a start, it is almost as equal as stalking. It can be considered a violation and an intrusion on the students’ lives outside of school. This program monitors at school, but is would monitor at home and everywhere off campus in addition. Next, the program destroys the students’ freedom of speech. They would be punished by the school for things they say and do outside of school. Also, it doesn’t only take what happens on campus throughout the school day, but it gathers information from outside of school as well. The students would always have to watch what they are saying about school related topics. Consequently, in some districts, this
In “Youthful Indiscretions: Should Colleges Protect Social Network Users from Themselves and Others?” Dana Fleming presents an essay concerning the safety of social networking sites and how Universities can deal and prevent problems. This article is targeted towards school administrators, faculty, and a social networking user audience who will either agree or disagree with her statement. I believe Fleming presents an excellent, substantial case for why she reasons the way she does. Fleming gives a sound, logical argument according to Toulmin’s Schema. This essay has an evident enthymeme, which has a claim and reasons why she believes in that way. Toulmin refers to this as “grounds."
Higher education law attorney Dana L. Fleming voices her controversial opinion in favor of institutionalized involvement in social network protection in her article “Youthful Indiscretions: Should Colleges Protect Social Network Users from Themselves and Others?” (Fleming). Posted in the New England Journal of Higher Education, winter of 2008 issue, Fleming poses the question of responsibility in monitoring students’ online social networking activities. With a growing population of students registering on social networks like Facebook and MySpace, she introduces the concern of safety by saying, “like lawmakers, college administrators have not yet determined how to handle the unique issues posed by the public display of their students’ indiscretions.” However, while Dana Fleming emphasizes the horror stories of social networking gone-bad, she neglects the many positive aspects of these websites and suggests school involvement in monitoring these sites when the role of monitoring should lie with parents or the adult user.
Why do schools NOT notify the police when a violent disturbance occurs? One would assume that when there is an assault or threat upon a student, the police would be the first people to be notified. When there is violence, or threats of violence against students in an academic setting, information about the threats and the troublesome student should be shared with the police. But Universities usually do not provide this information to the police. Lynn Daggett, a Professor at the Gonzaga University School of Law, states, “Schools struggle with whether, when, and how to involve police, both when students appear to present a threat to others, as in high profile cases, and also when the school suspects a student of criminal behavior” (Daggett). Although police are available and willing to be involved in school disturbances, schools do not involve the police more often than they should and cannot or will not give certain records about their students to the police.
FERPA, the Family Education Rights and Privacy Act, is a Federal law meant to protect the privacy of students personal, educational, and health information. The initial wording of FERPA implies it provides a extremely high level of personal privacy in our education. However, as you dig deeper into the law it becomes glaringly obvious how little protection this law actually provides. With multiple “loops-holes” built into its protection, FERPA has become nothing more than an illusion of privacy protection.
According to the article “When Student Become Patients Privacy Suffers" the author said that” Yale health's website informs parents that they cannot access their children's health information without a signed consent form", and I agree with this statement. As we know FERPA and HIPAA in order the law that provides privacy protection, and patients have right to limit to their information unless they don't want to share. For example, Andrea was suffering from anxiety and depression, after her bad condition, the university notifies her parents without her permission, even they know her relationship with her family. The condition became worst when her parents did not allow her to see psychiatric after she returned home. Personally, I know sometimes,
Over the last few decades, FERPA ( Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act) has given students the right to officially keep their academic performance and mental health from their parents. According to the article ‘’ College Kids Have Too Much Privacy ‘’ , parents no longer have the right to obtain their student’s information without a wavier. Which in my opinon, it has lead to no good. colleges and universitys think that students who barley graduated out of high school are ready to be responsible for their own decisions, when in reality they are still teens who need to be under their parents wing. you cant expect a teenager to be held responsible from one day to another. has hard as it is students
In a majority of states, they provide some schools with unlimited authority to put up surveillance on students’ online activity whenever the student is in use of that electronic. Which gives no boundaries for the schools, and allows the schools to use the web cameras to watch the students at all times. That is overstepping many privacy boundaries such as, watching them at home, what if they are getting dressed? The whole school system could see it through the web camera, or if they were at the mall on their cellphones and the school is allowed to tap their every move. It 's an invasion of privacy that goes beyond the limits of the school grounds. Some of these schools are allowed to do it even when there is no suspicion of cyberbullying at all. Cyberbullying can be a dangerous thing, but allowing schools to look at your child 's every move can also become a dangerous thing, allowing the students to have no privacy whatsoever. For example, “in July 2014, Jackson County School District in North Carolina announced that it is paying a private company, Social Sentinel, $9,500 for one year to monitor the social media postings of all students in one of its high schools in order to uncover cyberbullying and other threats. The school district’s position is that when it comes to those kinds of threats, students have “no expectation of privacy” (Suski 68). Allowing the school district to uncover the
Lastly, students who use social networking applications very little or do not use them at all can be positively affected because they have a lot more time to complete homework, study, sleep, and practice good eating habits. These same students can be negatively affected because they usually don’t receive information pertaining to global issues and pop culture without the direct access to social media.
As a teenager and being involved with technology comes with social networks. Social media illuminates the most important thing for teenagers which is school; they are busy trying to keep up with the newest trend. They tend to put homework and studying aside to try to be up to date with any social media they have. Teenagers think that social networks are the only way to fit in school. All students talk about is did you see what this
First of all, schools should keep students focused during classes. By giving students access to social media for anything in the class, that starts leading to these issues. “All universities have been struggling to balance freedom of speech and the right to express an opinion, with reasonable
It might lead to less social interaction and negatively affect students academic if people waste too much time and use it without any controls. Technology is developing every day with smart phone, smart TV, etc. Therefore, when we use these smart technology, we need to be a smart user also in order not to depend on those things to fulfill our demand. Social networking will be a great tool for this modern society if we use it wisely and essentially. For our generation today and especially for children, parents should spend more time for their kids to have a face-to-face communication and listen to what they want to share instead of let them interact with electronic devices too
As with just about everything, social media should be used in moderation. Studies have shown that adolescents and even college students who are on Facebook too much have lower grades (Rosen, 2011). References: Carroll, J. A. & Co., Inc. Kirkpatrick, R.L. & Kirkpatrick, R.L. (2011). The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'.
...teacher allow the first or last five minutes of class to check for update on twitter or Facebook this would reduce the temptation while in class. Indeed, consequence could also be put in place if student are caught abusing these site while in class.
Facebook and other social media is not to be used during school hours. Failure to comply will result in an administrative consequence.
Social media has always been a great outlet for meeting new people, and expressing one’s own opinion, but students have taken this opportunity too far. Social networking sites are websites created to keep one in touch with friends, and family. They allow students to post statuses, check in at locations, and post pictures. Students can make their own profile special to them by identifying their interests, and personalizing other features. Social media addiction can come in many different shapes and forms. By filling a lonely void in a student’s heart, and providing a feeling of comfort, social media leads students to becoming too dependent on it.