Moliere's Desire To Join The Aristocrats In The 17th Century

869 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Forces influencing Renaissance and Reformation

The film Moliere exhibits the 17th century events where by Moliere an actor had his debts cleared off by M. Jourdain thus gaining his freedom from prison. However, Jourdain freed Moliere to ensure that he would help him in taking acting lessons. Moreover, Jourdain was focused on undertaking acting lessons to ensure he won the heart of Celimene a widow. Amazingly, Moliere ends up falling in love with one of Jourdain’s unwanted wife. Additionally, within the movie Jourdain ends up exclaiming, what a pleasure painting that was. Therefore, this essay entails the discussion on Jourdain’s position between two worlds, his desire to join the aristocrats in the 17th century versus the reaction in the 18th century. A comprehensive analysis of the …show more content…

Moreover, aristocrats are depicted to have changed as this painting represents radical political reforms (Neo-Classicism, n.p). With this in mind, a close analysis of the picture shows the use of the neo-classicism style. Neo-classicism style represents the similarities in the classical world that contain political themes in this case the radical reforms (Marshrabiyya, n.p). On the other hand, David’s painting represents political reform as the main subject as it shows a setting that involves an individual being condemned to death as his followers watch. Moreover, this picture may be applicable for the general public to look at and it passes the message on the ills of political oppression. Overall, it is worth arguing that the Toilette of Venus and Death of Socrates provides insight on the world that Jordan wants to join. Additionally, it is evident that Jourdain wants to the aristocrats in the 17th century world and this is evidenced by the theme of love as the main subject matter. In connection to this, Boucher’s paintings and David’s involves the uses the Rococo and Neo-classicism styles respectively. These styles depict some of the critical styles in the two

Show More
Related

  • Theme Of Power In Tartuffe

    487 Words  | 1 Pages

    Moliere’s Tartuffe assumed set of social conventions were shaped by all the characters within the play, however the authoritative figure was established depicted by the father, Oregon. Oregon’s character assumed the role of king or lord of his household. He believed that as the head of household, he had the right to rule over his kingdom as he saw fit. His kingdom had to run smoothly in order for it to be effective. No matter how harsh, unfair and painful it was for his, wife daughter or servants. In the social arena there is always a central powerful family, or first family that everyone in the community aspires to be, or in more recent term “keeping up with the Jones”, “or the one with swag”. The title, position and authority was so entrenched in their social community, that it came down to even choosing one’s mate through arranged marriages. We see in Moliere’s Tartuffe, that authoritative power was as precious as gold, in the realms or patriarchal power that was prevalent in the 17th Century, political and economic power, and also religious power (in which Oregon) wanted association

    Read More

  • Comparing Oath Of The Horatii And Goya's Third Of May

    405 Words  | 1 Pages

    However, in David’s painting the three brothers pledging themselves to their country are seen as heroic. Whereas, in Goya’s painting symbolic language is seen through the ordinary non-heroic man who is viewed similar to Christ during his crucifixion. David’s artwork is detailed with particular brushwork and depicts the thought of war in a traditional sense. Dissimilarity, Goya’s somber artwork separates away from the customs of Christian art and traditional paintings of war, along with the use of visible loose brush

    Read More

  • Neoclassic vs Baroque

    530 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Neoclassical art, the emphasis is on form, simplicity, proportion and restrained emotion. The aesthetic attitudes and principles were based on the culture, art and literature of ancient Greece and Rome in antiquity. It invokes characteristics such as harmony, clarity, restraint, universality and idealism. The artists of this period concerned themselves with human affairs ruled by reason, the outgrowth of the Enlightenment. There was a regard for tradition and reverence for the classics, with an...

    Read More

  • Extreme and Moderate Characters in Moliére’s Tartuffe

    525 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Moliére’s Tartuffe (Moiré 1664), the reader is able to see a great contrast of Extreme and Moderate characters. Extreme characters being those who are seen as over the top, or very passionate people, and the moderate characters having a more calm and subtle approach to ideas. The extreme characters in this case would be Madam Pernelle, Orgon, Tartuffe, and Dorine. The moderate characters are seen as Cleante and Elmire.

    Read More

  • The Flawed Characters of Moliere's Tartuffe

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Flawed Characters of Tartuffe To be perfect is to be inhuman. Human nature is complete with many flaws and imperfections, one of which is represented in the play "Tartuffe", by Moliere. “Tartuffe” was written specifically to show the reader a basic flaw in human nature. This flaw is shown through two characters, Madame Pernelle and Orgon.

    Read More

  • Moliere's Play, Tartuffe

    1153 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Tartuffe, Moliere creates a play that is interesting in so many ways. His comedy reflects a lot on the role of men and women within a family. During this time, it was common for the man to be the head of the household and women to be submissive to the men. Men held the power in the family and made all the decisions. In this play, a man's point of view is the only view that matters. All else do not serve an importance. His lack of trust and awareness for other people's feelings and needs has caused great conflict in his family. The actions taken by Orgon and his family members express how this play views marriage and relations between men and women. It is a extremely different view (in some cases) of marriage today in average American family.

    Read More

  • The Renaissance Period in Europe

    689 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Renaissance Period is widely known for the abundance of amazing portraiture that circulated around Europe. During the Renaissance, Albrecht Dürer, a German artist painted a self-portrait in 1500 that had qualities that differed from the usual style of artist in that time (Chauhan). Jean Clouet also painted a portrait for the King of France and became the official court painter. Both artists had a talent for portraiture, while their styles were quite different. King Francis I wanted to be seen as a powerful man, and appointed Clouet to paint him in a classically renaissance way that highlights his wealth and authority. Dürer, described as a cocky, self-centered man, painted himself in a light that is unique and puts him on a ‘holy’ pedestal (Stokstad 356). In this essay I will show how although both paintings have clear differences with their style, both men in the compositions are conveyed in a great and very powerful sense.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Little Red Riding Hood

    1135 Words  | 3 Pages

    After reading, Charles Perrault, version of “Little Red Riding Hood” a story told in the 17th century of France from that time era the 17th century. The audience of Charles writing were for kings, and young women and the royal courts. The purpose of his writing is developed a seriousness of why rich noble age women should be worried about predators. The rhetorical appeals that he displayed was pathos he expressed work of art that stirs up emotions of pity for Little Red Riding, and the Grandmother. So, the audience would feel sympathy and sorrow. By using pathos appeals he made an important persuasion in arguments of different emotions. After, I read upon H.R. Trevor- Roper’s journal article who is known for studies in 17th century history and European history he written an article called The General Crisis of the 17th Century. Roper’s article said that. “The middle of the 17th century was a period of revolutions in Europe: seem to rise out of particular, and local causes.” (Roper). Which informed me on a lot of what was happening in that time era from the many different wars and the revolution in the country. From

    Read More

  • Francois Rabelais’ Satire of Medieval and Renaissance Learning In Gargantua and Pantagruel

    2310 Words  | 5 Pages

    In his book Gargantua and Pantagruel, Francois Rabelais uses satire to address the dislocation felt by Renaissance Humanists. By providing an exaggerated fable, comical in nature, Rabelais poses a serious introspection into the extremes of both the Medieval and the Renaissance man. More importantly, however, he brings into question his own ideals of Humanism. Through an analysis of Rabelais’ satirical technique and by examining his social parody of the Medieval and the Renaissance man, we are able to better understand Rabelais’ introspection into the ideals of his own generation and to accept his argument that learning is transitory and often a necessary, yet futile, attempt to understand our world.

    Read More

  • The Complex Alceste of Moliere's Misanthrope

    1415 Words  | 3 Pages

    "I cannot improve on it, and assuredly never shall," said Molière of his satire The Misanthrope, {1} and the critic Nicholas Boileau-Despréaux concurred by accounting it one of Molière's best plays.{2} But the French public did not like it much, preferring the dramatist's more farcical The Doctor in Spite of Himself--a play that, according to tradition, was written two months after The Misanthrope's premiere to make up for the latter's lack of success.{3} In fact, The Misanthrope horrified Rousseau, who thought that its aim was, in Donald Frame's words, "to make virtue ridiculous by pandering to the shallow and vicious tastes of the man of the world."{4} Both he and Goethe after him regarded Alceste, the protagonist, as a tragic figure rather than a comic one.{5}

    Read More

  • Comparing Sir Tryamour and Amis and Amiloun

    831 Words  | 2 Pages

    The medieval romances seem particularly in danger of being misinterpreted in the manner suggested, possibly because the word 'romance' itself inevitably calls to the mind the general vague term 'romance* or the adjective 'romantic*.However, real meaning of medieval romance are stories of adventure in which the chief parts are played by knights, famous kings, or distressed ladies, acting most often under the impulse of love, religious faith, or in many, mere desire for adventure. Though, if we think in terms of medieval romance, I shall confine myself to what we still call 'romances of chivalry', particularly in a way how it is revealed in Sir Tryamour and Amis and Amiloun. Rejecting the fact that these two works of art were written with interval of a century, they have quite a lot of similar themes and motifs. Sir Tryamour was written by unknown author at the end of fourteen century and one hundred years before Amis and Amiloun appeared in publication. The most common motifs of these two works are the treachery of stewards, a tournament involving protagonists, a support of loyal friend, mistaken identity and family discord. Both romances have a main character, who is reunited with their family after a long separation, passes through checking his chivalric abilities involving the testing and assert his honor at the end of romance. Nevertheless, in most romances there are minor characters (stewards) who try to mislead main heroes by deception such as Marrok in Sir Tryamour and the duke’s “loyal” steward in Amis and Amiloun. Moreover, further paragraphs of the essay will examine how these two themes are revealed.

    Read More

  • Comedy's Effectiveness in Coveying Morals to an Audience

    722 Words  | 2 Pages

    W.D Howarth, and Ron W. Tobin. "Molière: A Playwright and His Audience." The French Review: 1-2. JSTOR. Web. 7 Nov. 2013. .

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Oath Of The Horatii

    522 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Oath of the Horatii by Jacques-Louis David (1748, oil on canvas) is a painting in the Neo-Classical style. It is hailed as tribute to ancient Classic ideals. David believed that subject matter in a work of art should have a moral (p.635). Indeed, in this piece he provides an image that is essence of pre-republican Rome. The Oath of the Horatii represents David's individuality, an individuality that would lead him to contradict the French Academy in order to pursue his own understanding of the art of painting, an understanding that was based on past and modern ideologies (classic Greek and Roman) and which represented a synthesis that would be soon adopted by supporters of the French Revolution.

    Read More

  • The French Revolution & Art

    2050 Words  | 5 Pages

    Additionally, the styles changed; from Rococo, which was meant to represent the aristocratic power and the “style that (…) and ignored the lower classes” (Cullen), to Neoclassicism, which had a special emphasis on the Roman civilization’s virtues, and also to Romanticism, which performs a celebration of the individual and of freedom. Obviously, also the subject matter that inspired the paintings has changed as wel...

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Romanticism And Neoclassicism

    470 Words  | 1 Pages

    Neoclassicism is an artistic style influenced by the Greek and Roman that students observed the first antique art works and reproduced them. Their inspiration came from the Greek mythology and used it as the resource. The definition of the Neoclassicism is that they emphasized on the historic subject matter, and moreover, the solemnity of composition. The Neoclassical style usually showing order and rational illusion in the works. The color usage is clam and the brushstroke is often being visible. Numbers of outstanding painters in this era, but the best-known painter is Jacques-Louis David. His famous painting is The Death of Socrates, which reveals a rational, solemn scene. In contrast, Romanticism expresses on emotion and imagination more than the Neoclassicism. Painters focus on the nature, violence, and legends of their paintings. In addition, emotional exploration had extended into the animal world that they will used animals as the metaphor of human behavior. Because of the influence of the Baroque eras, Romanticism is usually produces dramatic art

    Read More

More about Moliere's Desire To Join The Aristocrats In The 17th Century

Open Document