Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Explain the stages of development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Explain the stages of development
Linear Stages of Development and Structural Changes
Two prominent models of economic development that came about in the 20th century are Rostow's linear stages of growth and Lewis' structural changes model. Each model has its own unique characteristics, limitations and certain similarities with the other.
Overview of Each Model
The core principle underlying Rostow's model is the mobilization of savings, both foreign and domestic, in order to produce sufficient capital which can then be reinvested in different sectors to accelerate economic growth. The linear stages of growth model consists of five consecutive phases which all nations are required to progress through to reach a fully developed economic system. The Harrod- Domar model describes the mechanism by which more investment leads to more growth and states that the rate of growth of a country's gross national product is determined by the national savings ratio and the national capital-output ratio. Ethiopia and Somalia are in the first phase of development, the Philippines is currently in the second phase, Vietnam and
…show more content…
This theory is based on shifting the emphasis that's put on traditional subsistence agriculture towards a more urbanized economy with industrially diverse manufacturing. The two major forms of structural-change theory are Lewis's and Chenery's models. According to Lewis' model an underdeveloped economy consists of an overpopulated rural sector (classified by Lewis as labour surplus since its withdrawal will not affect the sector's output) and an urban industrial sector into which labour is being gradually transferred to from the rural sector. Chenery examined different patterns of development for multiple developing countries and holds that different countries become wealthy via different trajectories depending on their size, resources, its current income level and other
Economic growth focuses on encouraging firms to invest or encouraging people to save, which in turn creates funds for firms to invest. It runs hand-in-hand with the goal of high employment because in order for firms to be comfortable investing in assets such as plants and equipment, unemployment must be low. Hereby, the people and resources will be available to spur economic growth.
While growth rates of GDP per capita vary, it is not always the poorest countries that seem to see the highest growth rates. The differences in GDP per capita are greater today than any other time in the world’s history. These differences were relatively small before the early nineteenth century when the gap became more divergent during the Industrial Revolution (Parker, 2013). Living standards in many of the poorer countries are from prolonged but small changes. “The Mystery of Economic Growth” starts by showing the divergence of countries by show casing growth rates and living standards differences in courtliness during the post-World War II era. The book presents the Solow (1956, 1957) model to introduce the insights of the effects of growth of capital accumulation. The results from this lead to the question of “what are the forces of divergence in the world economy” (Helpman, 2010: 15). One can predict from the Solow model is economies will converge. For this model to hold and be true this must be true in every situation. The world economies accelerated growth rate cannot be explained by the forces of accumulation described by the Solow model which would predict a convergence and a declining growth rate. The limitation of this model is that it assumes that all countries have the same technological progress. To help expand the model with the concept of accelerated growth, technical innovation must
Compare and contrast the Solow Growth Model with one Endogenous Growth Model In order to compare two models of economic growth, I will look at the primary model of exogenous growth, the Solow model, and ArrowÂ’s endogenous growth theory, based on research and development generated within the system. I will define the models and identify their similarities and differences. The Solow model, or Neoclassical growth model as it is sometimes known, is an example of exogenous growth models. This is to say that the level of economic growth depends on externally determined rates of growth in certain variables.
Rostow, W.W. 1960. “The Five Stages of Growth.” Pp. 4-16 in The Stages of Economic Growth, a Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge, Mass: Cambridge University Press.
...an overabundance of information all applicable to the topic. My feeling was that such an overwhelming load of facts and systems directed me away from the most important facts of the chapter. Its imperative that the student understands the small scale relationship to economic development. Therefore my attempt was to highlight the main topics of the chapter and relate them to the reader to provoke intrest and thought towards many of these important life changing situations that occur everyday. If one can see past all the theories primarily and see the cause and effects behind them, they’re appreciation for the ideas stated in the theories.
Rostow's five stages of economic growth begin with the traditional society. As described by Rostow, the underdevelopment is naturalised in this structure with the evidence of constrained production means such as technology. In this part, the society applies subsistence economy that technically results in small margins of productivity such as hunter-gatherer society (Sahlins 1972:1) Undesired to do nature exploitation, Rostow viewed society at this stage as restrained from progress. The second phase following the previous stage is preconditions of take-off. Economic growth starting to take place and is essential to justify the means within good definition. The society begins to implement the manufacturing of products while at the same time foreign intervention by advanced societies such as through colonialism is needed to bring about change in one's society. The next step towards moder...
Walt Whitman Rostow is United Stated economist, and also a father of ecomonic theory and growth. In Rostow view through his Stages of Growth Model, there are five stages in the process of economic growth and development. The five stages are The traditional society, The precondition for take off. The take off, The drive to maturity and The age of mass consumption. In these stages Rostow point out that both of the precondition stage for take off and take off stages is very important for a country economy growth. Capital and Technology raising, is one of the most important factor for a country to achieve economic maturity for economic development. After the end of the take off stages, in general most of the economies experienced lower economic growth rates. Also at the end of the stages, the age of mass consumption, is only for country that the most people there already live in the prosperity. The country that already on these stage is mainly from West.
Modernization and industrialization, specifically in developing countries, drive urbanization (source 9). A major factor is the “Rural Exodus”, which describes the abandonment of rural areas and jobs by people who are migrating to more urban areas. The Movement for a World Agricultural Organization, run by Pierre Pagesse, says, “Fierce competition between increasingly competitive agricultures, price volatility, lack of modernization on the farms and deterioration of the environment have driven millions of poor peasant-farmers to the cities in the hope of finding better living conditions” (Source 10). Indeed the prospect of better job opportunities and higher incomes is appealing to most rural dwellers throughout the world, as well as a it cheaper access to resources (source 7).
The purpose of the article, Development Economics: From Classical to Critical Analysis by Susan Engel, is to explain the chronical development of economics as a sub-discipline. In economics, the neoclassical and the classical economics measure the increases in the domestic income better known as Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the inputs of production are labor, capital and land and the different measures for sectors such as agriculture, manufacture, and service sector. Nevertheless, Marxist and neo-Marxist approached the economy integrating aspects of psychoanalysis focusing on national income. Marxist, neo-Marxist, neo-classical and classical economics are part of the sub-disciplines of economics, each of these disciplines had different methods
The Problems of Defining Development Development is very difficult to define as it has a wide range of meanings and has therefore been used in a variety of ways, by different people or organizations at different times. For example, geographers will link development with improvements in human welfare. e.g. greater wealth, better education and health. Many geographers will measure development in terms of the countries HDI (Human). Development Index.
Cipolla calls it the first great economic revolution (Cipolla 18). The development of agriculture leads to the development of communities, city-states, civilizations, and other settlements. The social structure that formed around agriculture brought about the possibility of specialization within a society, since not everyone had to hunt and gather all the time. Instead of living in an ecologically sustainable manner like the hunter/gatherers, people started living in an economic manner (Southwick 128). Specialization enabled the development of social institutions such as religion and government, and agriculture necessitated the development of irrigation.
In order for any country to survive in comparison to another developed country they must be able to grow and sustain a healthy and flourishing economy. This paper is designed to give a detailed insight of economic growth and the sectors that influence economic growth. Economic growth in a country is essential to the reduction of poverty, without such reduction; poverty would continue to increase therefore economic growth is inevitable. Through economic growth, it is also an aid in the reduction of the unemployment rate and it also helps to reduce the budget deficit of the government. Economic growth can also encourage better living standards for all it is citizens because with economic growth there are improvements in the public sectors, educational and healthcare facilities. Through economic growth social spending can also be increased without an increase of taxes.
There are at least four different research perspectives about the relationship between development and economic growth. Firstly, economic growth is the basis for social development. Secondly, economic growth and social development are not necessarily linked. Thirdly, both economic growth and social development are not basic causes by each other, but they depend on interaction. Fourthly, social development is the prerequisite for economic growth (Mazumdar. 1...
Different states go through different types of political and economical systems through a life time. In this case, most of the agricultural society was largely supported by the feudal system social hierarchy. Karl Marx defined feudalism as the power of the ruling class based on the control of “arable land”, this in turn affected class society based on the exploitation of the peasants who farm these lands (Beitscher and Hunt, 2014). In the feudal system, most of the rights and privileges were given to the upper classes. In this hierarchical structure, the kings occupied the highest position, followed by barons, bishops, knights and peasants (History-world.org, 2014).Feudalism is considered to be the “medieval” form of government (Beitscher and Hunt, 2014). Before capitalism came around as an economic model most states were a feudalistic country. These systems had an affect on society due to the fact it impacts citizens by “controlling” how they live and interact. The peasants were required to work for the nobles in return for land. This hierarchy was fuelled by the religious assumptions of the time that stated kings, dukes and other nobles served by the will of God over everyone else lower down the social order (Beitscher and Hunt, 2014). As industrialism provided a much more technical understanding of the world, it challenged these religious assumptions for the social
It is natural to be misled by the idea that economic growth is the key