Minors Should Be Responsible For A Child's Crimes Essay

1070 Words3 Pages

Suppose you are a parent of a wonderful child that you have trained to use a gun in an emergency. One day you give them some chores and that once wonderful child causes some trouble. Fuming, you storm out of the house to cool down. Once you’ve calmed down, you walk back towards your house. Meanwhile, your child, angry for having to do some chores, remembers his training and grabs his gun. Just as you walk in the front door...Bang! Who is responsible? The child? The parents? This question is sweeping the nation. “Should minors be legally held responsible for their actions?” Since the early 2000’s, the US has been faced with the problem of whether or not minors should be responsible for their crimes. I believe they should. This is because adults and kids should be tried the same. Kids are old enough to know the consequences of a crime. Gun responsibility is a contributing reason to why kids should be held accountable for their actions. I truly believe that minors should be responsible for their crimes and know the consequences of the crimes committed. I hope you will too.

Many adults are treated unfairly compared to minors in sentencing for crime. An adult and a minor could …show more content…

But, I strongly disagree. According to The Association for Psychological Science, “Scientists have found that babies aged between 19 and 21 months understand fairness and can apply it in different situations...” The Association for Psychological Science also states that “Children know the difference between right and wrong before they reach the age of two…” This shows that we could be trying kids as young as two as adults. What it basically boils down to is that the brain may not be entirely mature until 25, but more importantly the brain can understand the difference between right and wrong at an early

Open Document