Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial profiling
Racial Profiling In America
Racial Profiling In America
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Minorities and Policing: Unfairly Treated If we look at the past, we can see that there is no warm tradition of community cooperation between the African-American community and law enforcement. Minorities and Policing is an important topic because it deals with issues pertaining to how minorities are treated by the police. Racial profiling and social injustice are important areas when dealing with unfair treatment of minorities. 1. How minorities feel about police 2. Employing minorities 3. Unfair treatment of minorities within the legal system This review of the information on minorities and policing focuses on these three issues. How Minorities Feel About Police According to Dr. Carl S. Taylor, the relationship between minority groups and police in the United States has historically been strained. Some cities have a deep and bitter history of bias and prejudice interwoven in their past relationships. The feeling in many communities today is that the system pits law enforcement as an occupying army versus the neighborhood. Dr. Taylor wrote about easing tensions between police and minorities, but stated “If there is any good news in the current situation, it is that the history of this strain has found the 1990’s ripe for change. There is considerable evidence that minorities and police are not in agreement on many issues, and the blame is being shifted from all parties involved. The police feel that they are fair in their treatment of minorities, but the evidence in many instance prove otherwise. When we view articles on the arrests of minorities versus whites, you will notice a variation in how various nationalities are treated. When reading the newspaper, you will see the photograph of a minority with previous criminal history and other issues outlined. This to me is done to paint a picture that shows the accused is already known for violating the law.
Kitty Genovese case led to the development of the 911 emergency call system and inspired a long line of research led by psychologists Bibb Latané and John Darley around the time of 1970 into what circumstances lead bystanders to help someone in need. They discovered that, the more people available to help, the less likely any individual person would help—a phenomenon they called the “bystander effect.” If you are the only one around when an elderly person stumbles and falls, the responsibility to help is yours alone, but, with more people present, your obligation is less clear. Latané and Darley called this the “diffusion of responsibility” (CSI). A more recent case of the bystander effect was when assault victim Marques Gains laid motionless in the street due to by a hit-and-run; traffic whizzed past along with a few people stopped and seemed to stand over Gaines, who was crumpled near the curb on North State Street. No one tried to lift him from the pavement or block traffic. The lack of action by passers-by cost the hotel cocktail server his life after a cab turned the corner and drove over him. Experts says that a traumatic or odd event occurring in a public setting triggers an array of social and cultural cues and, combined with human nature, often leads to the lack of action by witnesses
In an emergency situation where the only the bystander is present, the bystander might fear for their safety but all of the pressure to intervene is focused on the bystander increasing the chances of intervention. In a similar situation but there are several observers present, the pressure to intervene is shared among all the observers. None of the witnesses feels solely responsible and this results in no action from the witnesses. In terms of blame, individual behavior is driven on consequences and this influences a bystander to act. In a group, blame cannot be assigned to a single individual resulting in inaction. In a case where observes are known to be present but their behavior cannot be observed, a bystander can assume the observers have intervened so the bystander’s intervention is unnecessary. The researchers began their experiment with the hypothesis that the more bystanders present at an emergency; the less likely any one bystander will
The conventional view of family therapy is a narrow one. According to this view, therapy treats an entire group - at least father, mother, and child - not just an individual patient. In the therapeutic situation, these family members present a major component of their everyday life.
Relationships are an important focus in the subject of bystander intervention, as interactions with others will influence the decision making of a person in terms of a decision to intervene, in part. The severity of a situation is related to this decision-making, and may lead to a person who will potentially intervene in forming a conclusion of if the event if an emergency. Additionally, both the previous and following studies involve undergraduate students as participants. This is helpful, as an undergraduate student is generally eager to express an honest opinion, which may lead to a more valid
Several years ago, I was getting out of my vehicle in the busy parking lot where I worked. I slipped on ice, my legs went in opposite directions and I fell hard on my right kneecap. While I was laying on the ice, a man walked up and asked “Are you okay? Do you need help?’ Through my tears, I said yes that I needed help and he just walked away. I eventually found my phone in my purse and called a co-worker who I knew was already inside. Luckily, I worked across the street from the hospital and a member of the rescue squad saw me laying in the parking lot and ran over to help. I was eventually transported to the hospital across the street and found out that I had broken my kneecap. “LaTane and Darley (1970) developed a five-step tree that describes how people decide whether to intervene in an emergency.” (Aronson, Wilson, Akert & Sommers, 2016). The five steps include: (1) Notice the event, (2) Interpret the event as an emergency, (3) Assume responsibility, (4) know appropriate form of assistance, (5) and Implement decision. (Aronson et al., 2016). It was obvious that the first man that asked if I needed assistance noticed me laying on the ground and interpreted the event as an emergency, but is appears that he did not want to assume responsibility. Even though he asked if I was okay and needed help, it seems that he never actually called
Fischer, P., Krueger, J., Greitemeyer, T., Kastenmüller, A., Vogrincic, C., Frey, D., Heene, M., Wicher, M., & Kainbacher, M. (2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 517-537.
On December 3, in full view of a number of witnesses standing within close proximity, Ki-Suck Han, a 58 year-old male entered into an altercation with Naeem Davis, a 30 year-old homeless male at the Times Square subway station. Han was pushed down into the tracks and then struggled and pleaded for help for what was reported to be a full 22 seconds, as witnesses watched, took pictures, and failed to come to his assistance (Petrecca & Eversley, 2012). The man was then hit by the approaching subway train as it dragged into the station. This is a sad example of the Bystander Effect which demonstrates that people are less likely to come to the assistance of another in an emergency situation when other bystanders are present and also perceived to be responsible and able to help (Schneider, Gruman, and Coutts, 2012). Moreover, we are most of the time influenced by Social Loafing. Social loafing is the diffusion of responsibility among a group of people. When a group of people are perceiving an emergency situation, all of them tend to think that others are available to help. Social influence explains that people always look to others to evaluate a situation as a real emergency. We assume that others may know something that we do not know and we measure their reactions before we decide how we will respond. If we noticed that those around us are acting as if it is an emergency, then we will view the situation in the same way and act accordingly. However, if those around us are acting calm, then we may not realize the immediacy of the situation and therefore fail to respond appropriately. Maybe this is the answer to why people did not help the homeless who was attacked by the 58 year- old man. They failed to see the situation as a real emergency, and as a result they did not act
If asked to picture a therapy session, what does your mind conjure up? If you are like most people you have probably depicted a scene where a therapist is sitting in a chair listening as a client rambles on about their problems, but what happens if the client is still learning how to form sentences and talk about their emotions? For children the “classic therapy session” might not always be possible, and because of this therapists began to look at therapy in new ways. As the saying goes, “actions speak louder than words,” and depending on the client, sometimes that is all the therapist has to go off of. That is why Hermine Hug-Hellmuth created a new form of therapy known as play therapy. Even though the guidelines for play therapy are continuing
However, that opposing argument can be found as hypocritical. If a person was getting robbed in an ally and they saw many witnesses taking no action they would likely be upset by the fact of no one is offering any assistance to them. Bystanders should put themselves into the shoes of the person in need and ask themselves how they would expect others to respond if they were the one in need. Often time’s bystanders take no intervention because of the diffusion of responsibility. “When there are four or more people who are bystanders to an emergency situation, the likelihood that at least one of them will help is just 31%” (Gaille). Another statistic shows that 85% of people who were bystanders would intervene if they knew or at least though they were the only person present in the situation. Often the only thing keeping people from intervening in bystander situations are other people. It is important for bystanders to understand the statistics of the people around them in order to create action because often times they do not realize that if they were to intervene other people would likely support them in the situation. Bystanders need to make it a personal responsibility to intervene in situations for the good of other. If people were to always take action the amount of bullying, sexual harassment, crime, and many other significant issues within a society would drastically
In 1968, 79-year-old Eleanor Bradley trips and breaks her leg while shopping on New York City’s Fifth Avenue. Dazed and shocked she calls for help, but the hurrying stream of people simply parts and flows past. Finally, after 40 minutes, a taxi driver stops and helps her to a doctor. The bystanders suffered from a common phenomena that happen when there are too many people around to witness a accident: the diffusion of responsibility. Furthermore, our society may think that someone will be the one to stand out and help that person that needs our help or would they be like everyone else and ignore the situation? What is bystander apathy? Bystander apathy is a social psychological phenomenon in which individuals are less likely to offer help
In fact, Research on Bystander effect partly suggests why the witnesses were unwilling to help. The reason is, too many people were present. The bystander effect is the
Even when a person is alone and the sole responsibility for helping a person falls unto them, if they are under time pressure they are far less likely to offer assistance. Darley and Batson (1973) told one group of students that they were late for their appointment in another building, while they told another group that they had plenty of time to make their way over. Those who believed they were needed urgently only stopped to help a man in obvious physical struggle 10 per cent of the time, while those who were not in a hurry stopped two thirds of the time. This suggests that even though a person may believe that they are responsible for helping in an emergency, they are far less likely to offer this assistance if they are under some amount of time
The Bystander Effect is a “social psychological aspect that refers to cases in which individuals do not offer any help to a victim when others are present” (Myers). Social psychology is a “branch of psychology that studies persons and their relationships with others and groups with society as a whole” (Myers). The Bystander Effect is possible because of the diffusion of responsibility. Diffusion of responsibility is the “reduction in sense of responsibility often felt by individuals in a group” (Myers). When more people share the responsibility to help, any single observer is less likely to help in that situation. This is important because the Bystander Effect occurs on a daily basis and can be easily prevented.
This is linked to audience inhibition that explains why individuals may be reluctant to intervene in an emergency. Cacioppo, Petty & Losch, (1986) found as the number of bystanders increased the individual became concerned about receiving negative appraisals in relation to their helping behaviour. Therefore, the cognitive interpretation is an important aspect of bystander intervention. One method to determine how bystanders will react in a tunnel explosion is to investigate the bystander effect in critical situations. Fischer et al., (2011) conducted a meta-analytic review of bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Overall, results showed the importance of emotionality that affects intervention. It was found that dangerous emergencies produced smaller bystander effects compared to non-dangerous emergencies (Fischer et al., 2011). Three processes were presented to explain the results a) dangerous situations are construed as clear-cut emergencies which increased arousal and helping responses, b) observers are seen as physical support that reduces fear of intervention and c) dangerous emergences can only be resolved by coordination with others (Fischer et al., 2011). These results are consistent with the arousal-cost-reward (ACR) model as dangerous emergencies were
The computer scientist designs the network and implements it, and meets the requirements of the company. Computer scientist are “critical parts of almost every organization” in developing the environment(Network and Computer Systems Administrator). The hours of a computer scientist vary job to job, but in general they work “about...more than 40 hours per week in 2014,” which is a full time job(Computer Network Architects). There are some instances of working part time, but in most instances the are full time. When the computer scientist has set up the network they are also ables to manage and maintain most of the network in good condition from home. This can be done with technology implemented into the network by the computer