Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ivan the terrible
Social and economic changes due to the russian revolution
Social and economic changes due to the russian revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ivan the terrible
INTRODUCTION:
• TOPIC: Military Reformation and Expansion.
• HISTORICAL QUESTION: What effect did military reforms have on the expansion of Muscovy from its inception under the rule of Ivan III through the reign of Feodor III (1462-1682)?
• THESIS: Military reforms caused a drastic cultural and social reform in the Muscovite era.
MAIN BODY:
• SUPPORTING POINT 1: Western Expansion and adoption. o TOPIC SENTENCE: Muscovite Russia expanded as a result of incorporating outside influences and adopting select ideals. o EVIDENCE 1: “The transmission and reception of military culture did not occur in a vacuum. As innovations spread outward to peripheral areas of Europe and across the globe, their reception across cultural lines was both facilitated
…show more content…
The universal uniform laws of development ensured Russia would eventually share Western Europe’s socio-economic and political structure, and as proof he noted that contemporary Russia’s economy was forcing the state to play less of a role and that social groups were becoming independent.”
CONCLUSION:
• RESTATE THESIS: Military reforms caused a drastic cultural and social reform in the Muscovite era which enabled significant national change through the years of Ivan III and Feodor.
• ADDRESS THE BROADER SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TOPIC: The significance of this shows how Russia got its prime state in the Muscovite era due to military reforms which resulted in social and political reformations. Without exapansion there would be no cultural adaptations or reforms which would have brought Russia in this era to its peak leaving them in their slowly developing state. They needed the help of their allies to prosper, without diplomacy and
With the coinciding of a revolution on the brink of eruption and the impacts of the First World War beginning to take hold of Russia, considered analysis of the factors that may have contributed to the fall of the Romanov Dynasty is imperative, as a combination of several factors were evidently lethal. With the final collapse of the 300 year old Romanov Dynasty in 1917, as well as the fall of Nicholas II, a key reality was apparent; the impact that WWI had on autocratic obliteration was undeniable. However, reflection of Russia’s critical decisions prior is essential in the assessment of the cause of the fall of the Romanov Dynasty.
Historically, Russia has always been a country of perplexing dualities. The reality of Dual Russia, the separation of the official culture from that of the common people, persisted after the Revolution of 1917 and the Civil War. The Czarist Russia was at once modernized and backward: St. Petersburg and Moscow stood as the highly developed industrial centers of the country and two of the capitals of Europe, yet the overwhelming majority of the population were subsistent farms who lived on mir; French was the official language and the elites were highly literate, yet 82% of the populati...
However, the political system also changed because there was an addition to the local villages. This was the zemstva and to a more national degree, the duma. However, the tsar still had supreme power over these structures. Despite Alexander II’s reforms, Russia still faced a number of problems. Alexander II’s
New York, Replika Press Pvt. Ltd. Deutscher, Isaac, Ed 1967. The Unfinished Revolution Russia1917-1967. U.S.A. Oxford University Press. Fitzpatrick, Sheila, Ed 1982.The Russian Revolution.
The Army’s history includes many unique global events such as World War I and II, the Vietnam War, the Korean conflict and most recently operations Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom. An in depth study of these historical events is beyond the scope of this paper however, the origin of the Army is relevant in discussing the Army’s overall culture.
While most of Europe had develop strong central governments and weakened the power of the nobles, Russia had lagged behind the times and still had serfs as late as 1861. The economic development that followed the emancipation of peasants in the rest of Europe created strong industrial and tax bases in those nations. Russian monarchs had attempted some level of reforms to address this inequality for almost a century before, and were indeed on their way to “economic maturity” (32) on par with the rest of Europe. But they overextended themselves and the crushing defeats of the Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and the First World War in 1917 lost them the necessary support from their subjects and created “high prices and scarcity” which were by far “the most obvious factors in the general tension”
Russia is a country with many large land masses that are greatly dependent on and helped shape the culture in Russia today. Russia is filled with rivers and mountains that protect them from invasions and help aid in trade. The Dnieper River and the Ural Mountains had a major impact on the development of Russia, as they impacted Russian both positively and negatively. For example, a positive effect of the Dnieper River is that it aided in trade with different civilizations, and the Ural Mountains protected Russia from being invaded by outside forces.
Prior to the Second World War the British and German militaries were studies in contrast. The British military was a small, professional army designed to win quick victories using mobility and technology...
Morcombe, M. and Fielding, M. 2014. The Spirit of Change: Russia In Revolution. New South Wales: McGraw-Hill.
Whiteside Limited, TO 1987 pp 294 12. Torchinsky, Oleg. Cultures of the World: RussiaNorth Bellmore: Marshall Cavendish Corp. 1994 pp 310 13. Troyat, Henri.
The need to modernise in Russia was a problem that the tsar had to face between the years, at the time in question, Russia was very backwards in the way that it farmed its lands, its economy was behind that of the rest of Europe, this meant that action had to be taken, in this area the tsar did have some successes.
Wood, A. (1986). The Russian Revolution. Seminar Studies in History. (2) Longman, p 1-98. ISBSN 0582355591, 9780582355590
"From Autocracy to Oligarchy." The Structure of Soviet History: Essays and Documents. Ed. Ronald Grigor. Suny. New York: Oxford UP, 2003. 340-50. Print.
Riasanovsky, Nicholas V., and Mark D. Steinberg. A History of Russia. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford, 2005. Print.
After their defeat in the Crimean war (1853-1856), Russia’s leaders realized they were falling behind much of Europe in terms of modernisation and industrialisation. Alexander II took control of the empire and made the first steps towards radically improving the country’s infrastructure. Transcontinental railways were built and the government strengthened Russia’s economy by promoting industrialisation with the construction of factory complexes throughout...