Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The conditions of the peasants in Russia 1917
Living conditions in Russia before the Russian revolution
The conditions of the peasants in Russia 1917
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The conditions of the peasants in Russia 1917
Each of the social classes in pre-revolutionary Russia all endured extremely different lifestyles, some living prosperously and contently, but a majority living in horrible circumstances, deprived of basic human rights. For this reason, the proposition “Hardship and misery prevailed in pre-revolutionary societies” is accurate to a high extent, as prior to the revolution, most of the population, particularly the peasants and urban workers, suffered immensely due to the embedded inequality of the autocratic system. The peasants and urban workers often lived in inhumane conditions where food was limited, work was difficult and laborious, and taxes were extremely high. The comparison of peasants and urban workers to the nobility, a very small portion of the entire population, further exposes the inequality of most Russian citizens under Tsarism, showing that despite a small amount of the population living with less hardship and misery, overall these aspects prevailed throughout pre-revolutionary Russia.
Despite living an often lavish life free from hardship and misery, the nobility and aristocracy accounted for only 2% of the population (Fiehn,1996, pg. 6), so cannot be used to accurately determine whether hardship and misery prevailed in pre-revolutionary Russian society. The peasants however, accounted for the largest portion of the population, and lived in horrible conditions where misery and hardship were extremely prevalent. Peasants often had little to eat, especially when harvests were bad, as the only way they could afford to farm at all was to engage in strip farming. Each family usually had around 20 to 30 strips, (Fiehn, 1996, pg. 6) which costed so much that they could usually not afford proper tools or animals to plou...
... middle of paper ...
...://www.allrussias.com/tsarist_russia/between_7.asp [Accessed: 27 Feb 2014].
Dowler, W. 2004. Russian Heritage: Land, People and Culture. [online] Available at: https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/citd/RussianHeritage/5.NOB/5.L/5.XII.16.html [Accessed: 23 Feb 2014].
Encyclopedia Britannica. 2014. Stolypin land reform (Russian agricultural history). [online] Available at: http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/567072/Stolypin-land-reform [Accessed: 23 Feb 2014].
Fiehn, T. 2014. Russia & The USSR 1905-1941. London: John Murray.
Libcom.org. 2007. 1912: The Lena massacre. [online] Available at: https://libcom.org/history/1912-lena-massacre [Accessed: 3 Mar 2014].
Malone, R. 2014. Analysing the Russian Revolution. Port Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Morcombe, M. and Fielding, M. 2014. The Spirit of Change: Russia In Revolution. New South Wales: McGraw-Hill.
Through these decrees we see how Russian social class is very stratified and there are more high official roles but more people in poverty. Russia still had to serfs until 1861. Also the state of the Russian economy was probably very limited to do the fact that there was no manufacturing company to provide for the empire. The Russian economy was very isolated and they go to areas where they can trade. With Russia’s subsistence economy, they were not able to specialize in other areas.
In 1900, Russia was an autocracy led by a Tsar who had a total control over the country. The Tsar was Nicholas II. Along with his family and all other nobles, he was very wealthy and lived in luxury. Other wealthy groups of people were: Ÿ Upper class- Church leaders and lesser nobles. Ÿ Commercial class- Bankers, factory workers all known as capitalists.
"The Species of the World." Not by Bread Alone: Subsistence Riots in Russia during World War I*. The Journal of Modern History, 69(4), pp. 696-721. Horne, C., 2014.
In the years leading up to World War I, social unrest among the Russian people was spreading rapidly. There was a huge social gulf between the peasants who were former serfs and the landowners. The peasants regarded anyone who did not work as a parasite. They had always regarded as all land belonging to them. They regarded any land retained by the landowners at the time serfs were freed as stolen and only force could prevent them from taking it back. By the time Russia entered the war, one peasant rebellion had already been suppressed and several socialist revolutionary movements were developing.
After the emancipation of the Russian Peasantry, land was given to the peasants. This was between 1861 and 1866, but because the nobility had lost their land when the peasants were given land, the peasants had to pay a tax until 1905. As the years passed, the land allotted to each person decreased from 13.8 acres to 7.3 acres as the population increased. Due to this increase in population and decrease in land, a series of famines struck the rural areas. As the peasants mainly occupied the rural areas, they were perceived to be living in poor conditions by the Russian people, and as response to their conditions, peasants started taking a stand, and voicing their opinions; change was proposed in the end when peasants were given more freedom,
While most of Europe had develop strong central governments and weakened the power of the nobles, Russia had lagged behind the times and still had serfs as late as 1861. The economic development that followed the emancipation of peasants in the rest of Europe created strong industrial and tax bases in those nations. Russian monarchs had attempted some level of reforms to address this inequality for almost a century before, and were indeed on their way to “economic maturity” (32) on par with the rest of Europe. But they overextended themselves and the crushing defeats of the Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and the First World War in 1917 lost them the necessary support from their subjects and created “high prices and scarcity” which were by far “the most obvious factors in the general tension”
Platt, Kevin M. F. and David Brandenberger, eds. Epic Revisionism: Russian History and Literature as Stalinist Propaganda. Madison: U of Wisconsin P, 2006.
Viola, Lynne. 1996. Peasant Rebels under Stalin : Collectivization and the Culture of Peasant Resistance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The abolition of serfdom in Russia was an aided that transformed Russia from a predominantly agricultural society to a more industrial. The industrial revolution was the transition to manufacturing processes, which led to the modern capitalist economy. During this time railroad was a success, the mileage of railroad double. The newly freed peasants looked toward the cities for jobs, which led to Urbanization. According to Cracraft, “industrialization was clearly the most important of the major economic economic and social development occurring the last decades of the Imperial regime in Russia” (Cracraft, 441). So industrialization encouraged urbanization and the growth of new social classes-- an industrial proletariat and a new class of
Wood, A. (1986). The Russian Revolution. Seminar Studies in History. (2) Longman, p 1-98. ISBSN 0582355591, 9780582355590
The Extent to Which Sources Agree that Russian Government Policy on Agriculture Constantly Fails and Peasants Resisted it Under the Tsarist
18 Mar. 2014. Кудрявцев, Сергей. " Историко-революционный трагифарс с элементами фантастики." 3500 рецензий. Москва: Печатный двор, n.d. N. pag.
Riasanovsky, Nicholas V., and Mark D. Steinberg. A History of Russia. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford, 2005. Print.
Russia had been defeated in all except the war with Turkey and its government and economy had the scars to prove it. A severe lack of food and poor living conditions amongst the peasant population led firstly to strikes and quickly escalated to violent riots. Tsar Nicholas II ruled Russia with an iron hand while much of Europe was moving away from the monarchical system of rule. All lands were owned by the Tsar’s family and Nobel land lords, while the factories and industrial complexes were owned by the capitalists’. There were no unions or labour laws and the justice system had made almost all other laws in favour of the ruling elite.