Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The process of socialization
Write on processes of socialization
The process of socialisation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Anthropology 2260
Dr. Vincent Walsh
Holly Nadeau
2 June 2017
The Nurturing of Aggressive Behaviour
Nurture brings out the aggressive behaviour in humans. Mikal Gilmore’s book, Shot in the Heart, correlates with the aspect of aggressive behaviour nurture because of how he turned out unlike the other four, who did not have a this ability to kill. The nurture of a child into adulthood develops and creates the aggressive behaviour within the environment. The aggressive behaviour can be found in every human, but it is not until the cognitive development of a child that the aggressive behaviour can start to form and become overpowering. Though the basis of aggression is found in people it is not until a child is exposed to an aggressive
…show more content…
Though older, the aggressive behaviour adopts and becomes a part of a person’s life because of the environment. The aggressive behaviour Bessie sees and then added into her own marriage as she becomes just as aggressive; “later he told me it wasn’t the hitting that bothered him so much; it was Bessie’s screaming, her frantic craziness. She beat him until the noise of his crying brought her half-deaf mother outside”(Gilmore, 247). The frustration and anger that had filled Bessie ignited the aggressive behaviour that she was use to in her childhood and became that of nightmares for her children. The hostility and aggression Bessie displays in the novel compared to that of a child in earlier stages of life are similar because Bessie and a child both grew to nurture and apprehend that aggression that would eventually come out either earlier in life or later on, as Bessie shows in her marriage. The environment in which she lives in and the environment she lives in with Frank both show aggressive stigmas that cause the children to dawn that trait of aggression that both parents have developed in their past. The environment is what cause Bessie ti become what she was, it was what caused Frank Gilmore to become what he was and the same for Gary Gilmore. The aggression takes form and comes out when most vulnerable, …show more content…
Out of the four brothers, Mikal and Frank Jr. did not inherit aggressive behaviour from the family members unlike Gaylen and Gary Gilmore. The aggressive trait is seen as being a mode and inherently a learning tool for the brothers. If the aggressive behaviour was more natural, the aggressive behaviour may bee more predominant for all of them. The nurture and up bringing of each sibling was different. Using the knowledge and information of their childhood, the brothers obtained the ideals from the childhood and took it their adulthood. The mind set of Mikal and Frank Jr, showed that the aggressive behaviour was not normal, whereas Gary and Gaylen knew this information, but pushed it aside. By stating this, the mind set of these brothers prove that once nurture has set a child into an environment, it could go either way. The environment influences the aggression, but the actions towards the children one on one adds fuel to the fame of aggression. Mikal understood the aspect of the selective aggressive behaviour as he states “my father never hit me again. After that, he touched me only in love. I realized now I was the only one in the family that he saved that touch for, and to this day I still feel guilty for that singularity” (Gilmore, 1990, pg. 321). Unlike Frank Jr, who got multiple beatings. In the journal “Child-Rearing
...y. As the book showed ?dad yells and blames everyone, mom yells at the kids, the older children yell at the younger children, and the youngest child kicks the cat.? (Carceral, 2004, pp. 200). The youngest child is not able to understand what is really going on and feels worthless and not loved without conditions. This child will turn to where they will get attention. This can lead to undesirable associates and into crime. As the child grows older, and has children of this/her own the syndrome is passed on.
Many influences may push young people such as Lee Boyd Malvo to perform violent acts. Psychological, sociological and biological factors play a coexisting role in young adults life. Violence can be caused by disruptions, damage or undeveloped brain or can be brought on by something else such as economic difficulties or social or cultural difficulties. The nature vs. nurture question has been an ongoing debate. It can be argued that John lee Malvo born with predetermined genes or biological factors that played an integral part in creating his homicidal tendencies or that he become murderous through his surroundings partnered by the psychological influence that Mohammed had over him.
The children also argue with their mother often. The children think that their mother, with no doubt, will be perfect. They idealize their mothers as angel who will save them from all their problems, which the mothers actually never do. The children get angry at their false hopes and realize that their mothers aren’t going to...
...parents were much more successful in the working world encouraged him to complete many daily activities such as choir and piano lessons. His parents engaged him in conversations that promoted reasoning and negotiation and they showed interest in his daily life. Harold’s mother joked around with the children, simply asking them questions about television, but never engaged them in conversations that drew them out. She wasn’t aware of Harold’s education habits and was oblivious to his dropping grades because of his missing assignments. Instead of telling one of the children to seek help for a bullying problem she told them to simply beat up the child that was bothering them until they stopped. Alex’s parents on the other hand were very involved in his schooling and in turn he scored very well in his classes. Like Lareau suspected, growing up
It is known that our family is the most important influence on our socialization. As Butterfield explains throughout the first half of his book, the Boskets always dealt with non-promising circumstance and events. These events and circumstances led them to develop and pass down traditions of violence and a lack of trust. One example of this is found on page 143, "Worse it reinforced Willie's belief that the way to settle things was by getting physical." Another example of this is found in how "Laura never knew her father and thus when Butch, was in prison she felt that he had neglected her, similar to the way her father did" (135). Also, Willie's mother taught him to swear at a really young age; Butterfield notes that "he was swearing and committing deviant acts before he even entered school" (138). Through this action one not only sees the distrust passed down but the onset of Labeling theory and how it will haunt Willie his whole life.
From the beginning of the novel, Small presents various characteristics of his household structure that promoted dysfunctional relationships when he was a child. “From the book’s very first pages, he presents their home filled with a nervous potential violence.” (Pedler) Small begins the novel, being the age of six, by describing each family member’s non verbal vocabularies. He begins with his mother’s language which was slamming cupboard doors, than his father’s, punching a punching bag, next his brother’s, beating on a drum, and lastly himself, getting sick. The lack of verbal communication in the household can create tension within the family because there is no exchange of feelings or concerns. If someone is going through mental or physical pain, others in the family wouldn’t know about it because there is no communication of that sort within the household. Another household characteristic that prompted dysfunctional relationships was the amount and way the mother had input. For example, there is a
...ctly related to violence, may have attributed to frustration, which in turn could lead to anger and aggressive behavior. Also, lack of socialization leads to deviant behavior and juvenile delinquency.
Many experts do not accept that biology alone creates children who kill. They believe that violence is a learned behavior. Being abused or witnessing domestic violence is an environmental factor in ju...
The world has a problem with violence. It is not a new problem, and it not one that is likely to disappear soon. It is estimated that around 1.6 million people die of violence each year. Half of these deaths are attributed to suicide, while the other half are attributed to homicide, war and other conflicts combined. Historically, violence was seen as a social ill. Before the 1970’s, when genetic research began to take hold, most researchers believed that violence was caused by a number of social aspects. Even with our increased knowledge, there are still groups that view violence as a social ill. This is evident in the fact that there are groups like MAVAV, Mothers against Video Game Addiction and Violence, and Parents against Violence. These groups aim to reduce the amount of violence shown in video games and other media, in a hope that it will reduce the rate of violence. Technological advances have allowed researchers to delve into the causes behind violent acts and tendencies. Although genetics does not fully predict who will have violent urges, it does play a large role in the predisposition towards violent tendencies. Some of these causes are linked to hormones, like the amount of adolescent testosterone. Others are linked to brain activity, mainly in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and the orbitofrontal cortex. There is even some evidence that the MAOA enzyme can play a role in violent expression. Of course, not all causes are genetically based. Although genetics can help determine who will have a predisposition towards violence, there are other factors at play. The peer group that one associates with, the environment that they are raised in, and the home life that they experience all play a role in determining if the vi...
They might start by looking at the obstacles or problems that she has faced and could of have affected either physically or emotionally to come to the conclusion of why Ms. Smith could be experiencing all the behavior changes expressed by Ms. Smith and her sister. Bandura and Mischel might start looking into her personal life and the people she associate her self with. They might focus on the fact that she was in an abusive relationship. They might conclude that her behavior is being influenced by low self-esteem and the cause of her low self-esteem could be caused by the amount of verbal and physical abused that she received by her ex husband. Ms. Smith sister could be an important part to test Mischel idea that discriminations often are visible within the same person if closely observed over time and across satiations. In other words the sister input about Ms. Smith behavior can be very important to determine how drastically smith behavior has really
The statement suggests that those with no history of violence within their family and/or those who had a good upbringing will most likely not go on to commit violent crimes. At first this does seem like a reasonable suggestion to make. However, once we look deeper into this topic we uncover more complex explanations that are used to understand the phenomenon that is violent crime. Psychological perspectives are widely used throughout the world of criminology in order to help comprehend why crime is committed and the patterns that occur between the type of offender and type of crime. There perspectives are broken down into four main areas within psychology; Biological/Evolutionary, Social/Learning theory, Psychoanalytical/Psychodynamic and finally
There are hormones that play a part physiologically, as well as biological factors that may have an effect. Boys in Bandura’s study were more aggressive to begin with and if aggressive behavior was modeled by a male this increased the aggressive acts (McLeod). So boys may be more biologically predisposed to aggression than girls (however you can also see the nurture argument in the stronger emulation of the male role model). Thought processes as regards to learning and performing tasks can also have a bearing on aggression. Low ability to tolerate frustration can lead to aggression. Some people reroute easily, they have the attitude “it is fun to solve problems, let’s look for a new way.” Other people have a throw in the towel “oh well, it didn’t work” mentality and they give up. Then there is another group of people that have the attitude “this is supposed to work this way, and it should work like this, and I will make it work this way,” and they become increasingly frustrated when it doesn’t materialize in the way they wish. This can lead to aggression such as throwing the item or even in eventual success that doesn’t end up feeling like accomplishment. So thought processes can also play a part in aggressive behavior as well as biology, physiology, and modeled
Meaning it is part of our nature due to the activities we do daily. The book used certain examples to explain these cues by saying “hunters displayed a more pronounced “weapons effect”” (93). Meaning their reacted way faster to aggressive words due to their instincts in hunting. By doing these types of research they found out that the situational cue is based on a person’s past behavioral experience. Then while reading this passage if they were talking about hunters imagine what how the kid’s aggression cues will be developed. You see how kids today at a young age play more violent games such as Assassins Creed, Call of Duty, or even Grand Theft Auto all contribute to showing aggression one way or another. Kids growing up in that state of mind will be more prone to having aggressive
The narrator is jealous of her brother’s social status. She feels her brother steals the love, respect and space that should belong to her. As a result, she wants to injure her brother so her family members will favor her instead. However, this puts the happiness of her family at
Specifically the nurture side you can bring up children or even adults who look at things in the media or play games and become violent because of the things they see and because they want to do what they see. They are influenced by the violent acts they see which are bad because they continue the acts of violence. The things they see around them and see through the media turn them into the violent people we hear of in the world.