Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Now and then character analysis
Now and then character analysis
Into the wild character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Now and then character analysis
What makes a man? In V.S. Naipaul’s, Miguel Street, a fundamental question that is present throughout the book is, what makes a man? As he writes about the fortunes, misfortunes, and stories of all the people on Miguel Street, V.S. Naipaul continually raises the question of what is a man and how does he act. While most males succeed at being “manly” on Miguel Street, they all fail at doing the one thing that defines a man. While in contemporary society it is flipped.
The men of Miguel Street act manly. They smoke, they drink, they beat women, and they talk about sports, all things considered to be “manly” on Miguel Street. “Women and them like a good dose of blows, you know” (111). This quote is Nathaniel, a new man on the street, talking about beating his wife. Although it is later discovered that his wife beats him, he says this so the other men will think he’s manly. Another example of manliness is drinking. A man tells the narrator, “You must get over this. Drink it like medicine. Hold your nose and close your eyes” (215). He is referring
…show more content…
to the burning of the throat the narrator gets when he drinks, but he tells him to get over, because drinking is manly. The men do all these things to be manly, but the author provides us with only one definition of what a man really is, and they all fail at it. Hat, another man on Miguel Street, says that his mom once told him, “If a man want something, and he want it really bad, he does get it” (91).
This is the one thing that all men alike are supposed to have, and that is determination. However, all the men fail to keep theirs. Popo, a carpenter on the street, spent months trying to build the thing without a name, but he too fails. “ ‘Mr. Popo when you going to start making the thing without a anme again?’ he growled at me. ‘You too troublesome,’ he said. ‘Go away quick, before I lay my hand on you’ ” (25). This quote illustrates Popo’s loss of determination for building the thing without a name. There are many examples. B. Wordsworth fails to complete his poem, Elias fails to become a doctor, Man-Man lost the election and couldn’t carry out his crucifixion, and Big Foot failed at boxing. Miguel Street males act manly, but when it comes down to it, most of them aren’t real
men. Contemporary society is quite different. It isn’t manly to beat a woman, it is a crime, and it isn’t manly smoke and swear. However, in today’s society a defining trait of men seems to be determination and a go getting attitude, one of which many of the men on Miguel Street lacked. The same thing that is considered manly on Miguel Street is considered a problem in contemporary society. It seems today, most men succeed where Miguel Street failed. It can be argued that most of the men on Miguel Street failed at being a man. They lost their determination and their kindness and compassion went with it. Even though determination is a good thing, it needs to be taken in moderation, just like everything else. Too much determination can lead to bad choices and actions, but not enough can make one end up like the men of Miguel Street.
“A hero is no braver than an ordinary man, but he is braver five minutes longer.”-Ralph Waldo Emerson.That quote is my favorite because it shows you that everyone is the same ,but there is some people that stand out more than others like my hero Fernando Valenzuela.
In Gail Bederman’s Manliness and Civilization, she aims to describe the concepts of manliness and masculinity at the turn of the century. Bederman explains that the concept of what it means to be a man is ever changing as a result of the ideology of the time as well as the material actions of the men. During the Progressive Era, many forces were at work that put pressure on the supremacy of white, middle class men. Some of these forces included the growing move toward empowered women, the unionization of the working class, and the move from self-employment to big, corporate business. She delves into the way that both racism and sexism were used to build up the concept of masculinity and the turn of the century discourse on civilization.
In the essay, “The High Cost of Manliness,” writer Robert Jensen discusses the harmful effects of having male specific characteristics, such as masculinity. Jensen realizes that men’s actions and ways of living are judged based upon the characteristic of being manly. He argues that there is no valid reason to have characteristics associated with being male. Society has created the notion that masculinity is the characteristic that defines males as males.
The concept of masculinity is considered as the qualities and characteristics of a man, typical what is appropriate to a man. In this article, A Community Psychology of Men and Masculinity: Historical and Conceptual Review, The author Eric S. Mankowski and Kenneth I. Maton, analyze four main themes: "Men as gendered beings, the privilege and damage of being a masculine man, men as a privileged group, and men’s power and subjective powerlessness. The second and fourth themes are described as
“The Other Wes Moore” By Wes Moore, reveals how two men can develop differently in the same social environment, and yet and have different intrapersonal views. The two men grew up in the same impoverished city, yet both have different experiences and views of what it means to be a man. The other Wes Moore, living his whole life in a poverty-stricken society, believes that being a man means to be powerful and unforgiving. The author, Wes Moore, living in two different worlds, views himself as a man when he becomes an exceptional leader and responsible for others lives. These concepts both tie into the constructs of masculinity in the United States where men are supposed to be protectors of society. The two Wes’ notions of manhood derive from
John, the protagonist's husband, is a round character in Gilman's story who represents the prototype of manhood in the Victorian era. In a review of Michael Kimmel's book, "Manhood in America: A Cultural History," the author explores Kimmel's social and historical analysis of masculinity in the nineteenth century (Furumota). He identifies what Kimmel calls the Self-Made Man: a masculine ideal who originated out of a capitalist economic system and became the dominant ideal in that period. His identity derives, among other factors, from accumulated wealth and status, which defines the Self-Made Man as the personification of economic autonomy. According to Kimmel, his "success had to be earned and manhood had to be proved without end" (qtd. in Furumota). As a consequence, men competed among themselves in a society considered a white man's world. The Self-Made Man would do anything to protect his supremacy and to proof his manhood to other...
Sandra Cisneros’s coming of age novel The House on Mango Street, is a good example of an instance where the ‘macho man’ stereotype is extenuated. Esmerelda, the narrator, is growing up in a very traditional patriarchal culture. In this environment, the men are seen as the head of the family, often controlling what his wife and family can do. In the chapter, “Alice Who Sees Mice” Esmerelda tells about a girl, Alice, who was forced to take her mother’s role and care for her younger siblings and father. When she attempts to go to school to escape the life, her father berates her sections and tells her that her
Manhood had not always existed; it was created through culture. Depending on the era, masculinity claimed a different meaning. But in all of its wandering definitions, it consistently contains opposition to a set of “others,” meaning racial and sexual minorities. (pp.45) One of the first definitions was the Marketplace Man, where capitalism revolved around his success in power, wealth, and status. A man devoted himself to his work and family came second. Although this is one of the first standing definitions, it still finds its spot in today’s definition, where masculinity consists of having a high paying job, an attractive young wife, and
Examining different scenarios, such as toy proportions, outlook from inmates in jail, and the ideas portrayed of what the ideal man consist from the viewpoint of man, the movie depicts these things to show how pop culture, social constructs, and masculine identities influence their opinions. Consequently, men believe they can gain respect and admiration from others from their use of violence and threats. Katz asked inmates about their ideology of masculinity; they said that masculinity is about having power and respect. Furthermore, they showed concerned about what the other inmates thought of them and their masculinity. Boys and men have to carefully shape their persona to fit the ideal standard of masculinity, no matter the cost. Katz and Earp break down the social constructs of masculinity by looking at the ideas of the “ideal man,” violence leading to masculinity, and degradation of masculinity by attacking individuals with the notion that they are acting
Mosse, L George. The Image of Man: The Creation of Modern Masculinity. New York: Macmillan publishers, 1996.
He gives little credibility to the "not all men statement, addressing that while informative on an oppositional attitude, it does not do anything to address the sometimes toxic aspect of growing up as a man. The two stories are alike in the sense that people agree men can be, and sometimes are, violent. There are certain expectations placed upon a man as he grows and strives to be masculine. However, the stories diverge on a course of action.
When someone is thinking of a man, what do they think? Strong? Brave? That’s what most people think; in reality that is a very false image. In “Bros Before Hos: The Guy Code,” Michael Kimmel, talks about what it means to be a man and what it takes to be a man in today’s world. Men are pressured into what they “should” be. If they don’t follow certain unwritten rules, which include: not asking for directions, not giving up, not showing fear, or any signs of emotional weakness, such as tears; they are considered less than a man, a wimp. A real man must be aggressive and brave, he must defend his territory: status, family, possessions. Men blindly follow the Guy Code, they believe in order to fit in, they must comply and be part of the pack.
What is it that makes a man a man? Is it testes, firm handshakes, the ability grow facial hair, physical strength, and being sports-minded?Hegemonic masculinity can be defined as the social and cultural expectation of what a male should be and how their power and dominance is sustained over women. Aside from hegemonic femininity, this standard places the focus more on a patriarchal social order but does pertain some focus into what a man’s appearance should consist of (Connell,
Masculinity only exists in coherence with femininity. If a culture does not treat men and women as carrier of polarized character types, at least in principal, is not able to have a conception of masculinity, like it is found in contemporary European/American culture. Attention has to be brought to “historical specificity and historical change,” because it “illustrates the social construction of masculinity, the multiplicity of ways in which masculinities can be enacted or lived and the existence and potential of change” (42). A good basis to start discussing what masculinity and femininity constitute out of, is by investigating what men and women do (or how they behave). If gender is cultural, then men and women are able to step into and inhabit masculinity as well as femininity “as a ‘cultural space’, one with its own sets of behaviors” (43). These behaviors include a number of culturally defined characteristics. Male competiveness, aggression, and emotional inarticulateness are said to have their own place in the economic system and stand for masculinity. Still widely accepted is the view that men and women differ fundamentally and that men as well as women have a distinct set of fixed traits that characterizes one as male or
behaviors, and social conditions that we call masculinities are “hard-wired” into males through biology (see Thorhill & Palmer, 2000) and/or the heritability of human psyche (see Jung, 1959/1989; Bly, 1990). They view masculinity as static, transhistorical, cross-cultural, and cross-situational. From this perspective, gender change is either impossible, or it involves the use of powerful force to constrain what is seen as “naturally” male. (Masculine Self pg. 19)