Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Positive and negative impacts of migration
Positive and negative impact of migration
Positive and negative impacts of migration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Positive and negative impacts of migration
ESSAY TITTLE INTRODUCTION In today society there are many job opportunities around the world, these jobs are unwanted by the people of the countries due to the jobs not having high wages or require too much physical labour. This is where migrant workers come and take the jobs; they are people who come from countries such as India, the Philippians, Middle Easter and African countries. They are being exploited of their labour by being paid low wages, slave contracts where they must stay for the contracted period of time, causing there freedom to be taken away and there passports, because there are seen by institutions as saving money that cane be spend somewhere else, when in reality migrant workers are the backbones of many countries, by them …show more content…
In Canada there is an exploitation of migrant worker of only working for one employer which can lead abuse, low wages and horrible work condition, because the worker cannot leave there employer due to being “forced to accept the conditions offered by employers or face deportations” (pg,109). This causes a cycle to happen of how workers are brought to Canada, work jobs that Canadian do not want and are sent back to there countries where the working opportunities are worse. The article argues that there needs to be changes of how workers should be able to move between jobs, make the transition of tied work permits to open work permit, remove the 4 years limit of the work permit and let them have permanent citizenship. The way workers are being treated is a social inequality, due to that migrant workers pay taxes, but they never receive many social benefits, such as the health care. The author of the article is taking account of the social structure needs to be changed, of how workers need rights and should be in-titled to work for who they want. There are many example throughout of article of how migrate workers want more rights, but there nothing on the employer who employs the workers, there should how company do not follow the laws of giving migrate workers a safe …show more content…
Migrant workers are the backbone of the pam oil industry, where they work in harsh environments and where the pay is very low. Again there are the same issues seen in Canada where the workers are given no freedom of who to work for and there is no regulation for their safety. The most important factor from this article is that the social problem of migrate worker is not as important of as the environment. The deforestation and the impact of the production of palm oil is more important and they neglect the labour rights that are being broken by the government and the palm oil companies that are allowing this exploitation to happens, because they are gaining a large profit of selling the essential item of palm oil. The reason why the environment seems to be the issues that is the bigger problem, is due to the factor of how the environment can affect and change how a person lives, for example, there can be more rain or drought in areas, it is a subject that everyone can relate to, while migrate workers are but in the background. The author of the article limits is that the article is only about the exploitation in palm oil, when in reality
Considering the ideas that both authors have brought to the table, I have concluded that in order to make progress in solving the problem of undocumented immigrants, we as a country must decide what’s best for our country. We either look at undocumented immigrants as an asset or a parasite. America is the ‘land of opportunity’ where millions of people want to live there and pursue the ‘American Dream’. We should not let people stop from achieving their dreams. But on the other hand, a quantity of immigrants leave their country because it does not have “stable democracies and free markets” that “ensure economic growth, rising standards of living and thus, lots of jobs”, because the countries of these immigrants “birth rates and native populations fall”.
Over five years after the 2008 economic crisis, the Canadian economy is still in rough waters. Annual Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth has been lagging below 2% and falling short of economists’ predictions (Hodgson, 2014), with no small part due to the stunted American and European recoveries. Tied into this is the country’s unemployment rate, which has hovered around 7% for over a year, while the rate for those aged 15-24 is nearly double, at 13.6% (Statistics Canada, 2014). Clearly, there is a need for more jobs in the country. At the same time, however, Canadian companies have been bringing in Temporary Foreign Workers (TFW) to fill what they call a “jobs gap”: that there are places in the country where the labour supply is nonexistent, and outside help is needed to fill certain roles. This has set off a firestorm of controversy, both in the commercial and political realms, with accusations of corporate greed and government apathy abounding, as unemployed Canadians are seemingly passed-over for available jobs. This paper will explore how TFWs are filling a necessary role in the economy, and are not “taking jobs” from Canadians, and will then analyze what governments and businesses can do to change the program, how immigration reform can play a role in filling jobs and lowering unemployment, and what risks a focus on a “skills gap” instead of a “jobs gap” can have on the economy.
The migrants experienced the xenophobia in Ontario. Many people were prejudiced, ultimately deciding that these workers were here from a foreign land to steal their jobs and they grew uncomfortable. One worker stated he thinks that slavery still existed in the world, and that he experienced it daily. Conditions for the workers were indicative of that. They worked on holidays, overtime, and did not receive extra payment for their efforts.
One of the other reasons as to why people would work for cash, below minimum wage, is because of their inability to work legally in Canada. The importance of closed social and ethnic networks is significant in providing informal labour to any industrial society and should not be undermined (Catanzarite and Aguilera 2002). The reason as to why many immigrants are employed as informal low-wage-earning workers in Canada is because of their inability to acquire jobs through legal methods due to their illegal status (Catanzarite and Aguilera 2002).
CTV News shared breaking news on October, 23, 2013 that four Romanian women were found being victimized to human trafficking in Montreal. These women were lured to Canada hoping that they would find a better future but instead were forced into prostitution (2013). Human trafficking is an issue that is rarely acknowledged by Canadians. Most people are either unaware of the problem or do not recognize it as something that is happening in their own backyard. Although Canadians are exposed to the severity of human trafficking in other countries, Canadian citizens are unaware of the fact that Canada is not only a transit point for the United States but also a destination country. Information from the Ottawa Rape Crisis Centre states “The RCMP estimates that 600-800 persons are trafficked into Canada annually, predominantly for sexual purposes, also additional 1,500-2,200 people are trafficked through Canada and into the United states” (2010). Canada is a source of transit and destination for human trafficking, some of the victims being as young as twelve years old (Human trafficking, 2010). The definition of what human trafficking is focusing on who the victims are and who the traffickers, the increase in trafficking due to globalization, and the role Canada plays in preventing it will all be explained further.
They live in substandard conditions and are often mistreated. Immigration needs to be kept under control and have constant upgrades in security. Foreigners’ can complement our workforce, but now they are taking American jobs and lower pay. This paper will discuss the arguments for and against immigration within the United States, addressing topics related to employment, healthcare, increased poverty and increased country revenue. I am against immigration because I believe it is out of control and its hurting the economy instead of helping it....
Legislation in Ontario affects human resources. Some can be bad well others can be beneficial to the workplace. My paper will be focusing on the federal legislations in Ontario and how it is improving various non-unionized workplaces. At the end of my report I will be summarizing the concept of family status related to the 11 prohibited grounds in a case study regarding a single mom and how she almost lost her job with CN Rail.
Canada has continuously served as a home to immigrants and refugees from decade to decade harbouring people from a variety of cultural and ethnic backgrounds. The first set of immigrants to settle in the country came from Britain, the United States and from other nationalities mostly including immigrants from Europe who were either desperate to escape from religious or political turmoil or were simply attracted to Canada’s economic promise. Soon after the Canadian confederation in 1867, immigrants from Irish and Chinese backgrounds who occupied most of the country were used as workers and the demand for labourers to develop the country increased rapidly as more Chinese descents were imported to build the Canadian Pacific Railway. Although, Canada opened its doors to immigrants, but the country also intended to gain human resources for work in the farms, in the forests, factories and mines but not everyone was equally welcomed in Canada.
Every year, over 250,000 people make Canada their new home. Attracted by its education system, economy and universal healthcare system, there are few other places in the world like it. All Canadians are guaranteed equality before the law and equality of opportunity, regardless of where they are from. However, some might argue that Canadian policy has not been put into practice as well as it should be. Is the concept of true equality a far-fetched idea? It seems that Canada has taken great measures to promote the integration of immigrants socially, but can the same be said for their integration economically? Politically? To judge whether or not Canada has been successful at promoting the integration of immigrants in these realms, a deeper understanding of Canadian policy must be considered.
Canada, being recognized as one of the best destinations for immigrants, has been and will be attracting more residents through immigration. Meanwhile, with its accelerated development, an increasing number of Chinese residents decide to move to Canada to experience a completely new way of living. Along with these immigrants are the dependent children that are bought Canada by their parents. New immigrants face challenges from all aspects, such as English being the new language, different culture and traditions, and an unfamiliar way of living (Pottie et al., 2008). To help immigrants through this difficult transition period, the government offers free English lessons to adult immigrants and many communities and organizations offer help with administrative tasks such as applying for health care and registering in local clubs and community centre. From the tremendous amount of effort by different organizations and sectors, it is easy to see how difficult it is to face the impact for adult new comers can be.
Currently, the immigration and refugee protection act of 2002 is the one that guides immigration in Canada. According to the act, immigration to Canada has three primary objectives which are to unite families, for economic growth and development and to protect refugees. According to Citizenship and Immigration Canada, The number of people moving into Canada has averaged at 257,957 every year since 2006 (CIC, 2015, p. 3). The information represents 0.7% of the population. In other words, every year the 0.7% of the population growth in Canada comes from Immigrants. The implication here is that this is a significantly high number of people, and it has resulted in concerns among the Canadian-born Citizens of Canada. One primary concern is that these immigrants lead to displacements of natives in the labor market and that such a heavy flow people into Canada create an excess supply of labor which translates to reduced growth of wages and increased unemployment. According to (IWC, 2016), immigration to Canada has led to unlimited supply of labor in the markets but on the other, suppressed wages in the country. There are also Several Studies which show a negative relationship between immigration and wages. Some of these studies include (McNichol & Health and Welfare Canada, 1991) and (Elrick & Lightman, 2014). However other studies like (Jiong, 2008) found a positive relationship between wages and
Canada's immigration policies changed many times after the end of WWII. Before WWII the immigration policies were "picky" on the people who wanted to come to Canada, but after, it was fair and equal to everyone. Canada's immigration policies changed drastically from being discriminative to being fair and equal to everyone, every country and race after WWII. This act to eliminating discrimination was successful because of; the introduction of the Point System, the introduction of New Immigration acts/policies, and finally the changes made in accepting Refugees. These action completely changed the immigration policies.
Many companies have turned to sustainable palm oil, palm oil that is produced on plantations that reuse the land for their agricultural purposes, thus supplying more palm oil without the destruction of natural forests. Some choose to boycott palm oil entirely, but this alternative will not significantly change the demand for palm oil. Vegetable oil is used abundantly and oil palm trees are the quickest producing oil crops, concluding them necessary to satisfy the demand for edible oils. Not only is palm oil versatile for its uses and quick to produce, but it is a major component to the economy in Indonesia and Malaysia. Many people living in these countries struggle with poverty, and agriculture of sustainable palm oil is how a great deal of people support themselves and their families. If the boycott of palm oil were successful, a considerable population of people would be unemployed and
In the film As Friend and Foe, one can learn about the tense history of the Canadian Labour Movement. The title of the film is very fitting for it describes the complicated relationship that the government shared with its workers. On one hand the government can be a friend, providing benefits and support in times of need. On the other hand, it can also be a unions greatest enemy, causing opposition to even the most basic needs of workers. This is expressively shown in the events that took place during Winnipeg General Strike, one of the main subjects of this film.
No matter what kind of jobs they do, they all compose the Indonesian migrant worker workforce. In this particular short story, Sorrita speaks out on equality among Indonesian migrant workers, be it domestic, construction or skilled workers. Sorrita, to some degree, sends a message not to look down at migrant workers in general no matter what their occupations are. Reality Hurts: Narratives of IDWs in Hong Kong and the Issues in the Global Domestic