Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on aristotle's political theory
Aristotle's politics essay
Political issues and aristotle politics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on aristotle's political theory
What is the best and most practicable constitution? Who should have the authority under such a constitution? Should it be one person, or should it be the people? In either case, why is that better? These are a few of the questions Aristotle tries to answer in the Politics. As opposed to Plato, Aristotle is much more pragmatic in his political theory and therefore tries to answer these questions in a way that will create, in his mind, the best practical constitution that will produce the best life for the majority of men. For Aristotle, this a constitution ran by a large middle class. He bases his argument on the idea that virtue is a mean between two extremes. The best practical constitution then must lie between the two extremes of a democracy (rule by the poor) and an oligarchy (rule by the rich) (Reeve 1279b40-1280b5). He calls this form of government a polity and claims that, while it is not the best unqualifiedly, it would be the most stable and long lasting form of applicable government (Reeve 1296a10-15)(Klosko 127). The problem with Aristotle’s theory, while sound economically, is that it inconsistently attributes virtuous characteristics to the middle class assuming that they are free of envy and desire to rule.
Before we get into the rule of the middle class we must first analyze whether or not it is better for the many to have authority rather than one. Aristotle concludes that it is just for the many to have the authority over important matters. He argues that since courts, councils, and assemblies, consist of multiple individuals, and these things are considered just, it is therefore just for a multitude to have the authority rather than one person (Reeve 1282b1-5). Plato contends that each individual alone is only ...
... middle of paper ...
...tic. Aristotle makes a strikingly intelligent and well informed point by arguing that economic problems create the downfalls of governments. Where he is mistaken is in ascribing virtue to people based on economic status. While under certain circumstances it seems possible for the middle class ruling would be stable, it still has many flaws that could quickly morph it into an oligarchy and lead to its destruction. In the end rule by the middle class, while potentially more stable, can fall apart just as quickly as any other.
Works Cited
Grube, G. M. A., and C. D. C. Reeve. Republic. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub. Co., 1992. Print.
Reeve, C. D. C. Politics. Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Pub., 1998. Print.
Klosko, George. History of political theory: an introduction. Vol.1, Ancient and medieval political theory. Fort Worth: Harcourt, Brace College Publishers, 1993. Print.
Eds. R.V. Cassill and Richard Bausch. Shorter Sixth Edition. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2000. 923 - 932.
Ed. Maynard Mack. 5th edition. New York: Norton 1987. 549-560.
The essay “RIP the Middle Class: 1946-2013” was written by Edward McClelland. Edward McClelland is an American journalist. In this essay, McClelland is trying to prove a point that at some point there wouldn’t be the middle class and there would only be the rich and the poor, unless the government intervenes to balance out the economy.
Examining the texts of Aristotle’s “Nicomachean Ethics” and “Politics” side by side, one is bound to find parallels between his reasoning with regard to the individual and to the state. In “Nicomachean Ethics” Aristotle discusses happiness, virtue, and the good life on an individual level and lays out necessary provisions for the good life of a person. He maintains that virtue is a necessary element of happiness: a man will be happy if he has virtues of justice, courage, and temperance, each constituting a balance between the extremes. But this requirement of virtue for the happy life goes beyond the individual level, as we see it in “Politics”. There, Aristotle claims that man is by nature a “political animal” , and for that reason he can only achieve the above-mentioned virtues as part of a state. And since the city is formed by many individuals, the virtue of the state is constituted by the individual virtues of its citizens. It is therefore clear that fulfillment of requirements for the happy life of an individual, namely being virtuous and self-sufficient, is equally necessary for the state as a whole in order to be happy. We thus see that the virtue of a state is directly linked to the virtue of an individual, and that therefore the means of achieving the former will run parallel with those of the latter.
The realtion of social class to power, is a belief about equality of opportunity that seems to be ignore by former upper social mobility. According to Domhoff's statement about the relation of social class to power, "No group or class had power in America, but only influence". In other words, the upper class are more noticeable and accesible because they share a commmon viewpoint on issues on important new foreign and domestic policies. This leads to the corporate rich who developed to institute the policies they favor like, the Collective power that pursue common goals in community or nation and Distributive power that is the ability of a group or social class within a community or nation to be successful in conflict on issues of concern to it. Social class is mainly based on income, occupation, and education. For example,the educational system of the upper class is different from the majority of public schools the population attend to, because the upper class "receives a distinctive education to prepare them for future leaders of America" (pg 46). This shows how the upper class have more advantage over any other class because they have more opportunities to study in these schools to become part of governmental leaders. Members of the upper class have power based on their wealth.
Seventh ed. Vol. 2. New York, NY: W.W. Norton &, 2008. 985-93. Print. 1866 to the Present.
Plato. Cooper, J. M., & Hutchinson, D. S. (1997). Complete works. Indianapolis, Ind: Hackett Pub.
Thesis: We were all born into a place with income inequality, but we have the power to make sure our children aren't.
The American middle class is defined as a social class in the United States. It is the class of people in the middle of a social hierarchy. There are people in the United States middle class as well as other countries and this class of people has specific issues and interests that they are concerned with. Issues such as the health care reform, the financial reform, making college affordable, and housing. By dealing with these specific issues, the middle class has to vote, making them the middle class voters. In the middle class, there are four sections and all three make up the middle class. And in that middle class are the middle class voters, a small chuck of it. The middle class has been considered as homogenous, but with that different
Greenblatt and M. H. Abrams. 8th ed. Vol. 2. New York: W.W. Norton, 2006. 1891
11 Mar. 2012. Virtus: Moral Limitations of the Political Sphere in the Middle Ages. Thesis. Bielefeld
...on. Vol. 34. Georgia State University, 2001. 39-53. H. W. Wilson Web. 22 Mar. 2004.
Ed. Lee A. Jacobus, Ph.D. 3rd ed. of the year. Boston: Bedford Books, 1996. 672-709. 2.
Consequently, if indeed there are several kinds of constitution, it is clear that there cannot be a single virtue that is the virtue-of a good citizen. But the good man, we say, does express a single virtue: the complete one. Evidently, then, it is possible for someone to be a good citizen without having acquired the virtue expressed by a good man" (1276b). What Aristotle doesn't tell us is who is better off. Is it sufficient to be the good citizen or is it definitely more satisfying to be the good man? The good man is recognizably superior to the good citizen. The good man possesses everything that is good. He does what is just and what is just is beneficial to himself and to those around him. His soul is completely well-ordered and, therefore, cannot allow for his desires to take over and commit evil or injustice of any kind.
Wisdom, courage, moderation and justice are four essential virtues the ideal state must be built upon, as explained by Socrates in Plato’s Republic. Throughout the eight books of Socratic dialogue the ideal state and ideas of justice are debated, on both individual and state levels. The guidelines for a perfect state and how it will come about are thoroughly described. Socrates covers every aspect of political life and how it should work stating that “until power and philosophy entirely coincide… cities will have no rest form evils” . In Plato’s Republic Socrates emphasizes the superiority of the philosopher and their abilities to rule as kings above others. He believes that they are best suited to rule as a result of their pure souls and lust for knowledge, the desire for truth over opinions and things that are tangible. The philosopher is best able to fulfill the four essential virtues of the state and thus must be the king. He evokes the idea of a cave, a parallel to the effects of education on the soul and a metaphor for human perceptions, to describe how humans will act and show distinctions between groups of people. This conception of the ideal state has been heavily criticized by his successors, but when applied according to how Plato perceived the state and human capacity, in theory the idea of the philosopher-king is extremely convincing. According to Socrates the soul is made up of three parts, and each person is governed primarily by a different one. Which aspect of the soul occupies a person affects their access to the four virtues deemed ultimate. The appetitive part of the soul is at the bottom of the divided line; it controls the unnecessary desires and is undesirable to be governed by. The spirited element of the s...