Michael Gazzaniga Response To Universal Ethics Summary

1557 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethics and science

A Basis for Ethics In “Toward a Universal Ethics,” written by Michael Gazzaniga, a question is posed to coax his audience toward a science based ethics. “The question is, Do we have an innate moral sense as a species, and if so, can we recognize and accept it on it’s own terms? It is not a good idea to kill because it is not a good idea to kill, not because God or Allah or Buddha said it was not a good idea to kill.”(Gazzaniga, 420 para. 6). Gazzaniga answers the question for us, but he was wrong to assume that the brain’s systematic response to moral situations means that science should dictate ethics and morality. Instead, ethics and morality should be considered a part of humanity, which is influenced and balanced by many things including science, religion, and individual …show more content…

Gazzaniga claims that “it is hard to arrive at absolute rules to live by that we can all agree on. But knowing that morals are contextual and social, and based on neural mechanisms, can help us determine certain ways to deal with ethical issues.”(Gazzaniga, 430 para. 37). A universal ethics would mean that everyone was held to the same standard, which would help with all forms of equality, and it would mean that every county or city one went to the same ethical guidelines would apply. In addition, Gazzaniga’s theory is that, since his scientific ethics would be formed from the brain reactions, every person would be able to accept and conform to said universal ethics, because all of their brains work the same- with few exceptions. Moreover, this ethical theory could not be changes for one's benefit, as governments or authority figures would have no control over it, this ethics would be dispassionate, and it’s evidence and science base would make ethical decisions hard to argue, as it would ether go with or against the brain's natural

Show More
Related

  • Are Humans Ethical By Nature Essay

    1443 Words  | 3 Pages

    There has been a huge debate throughout the years of whether humans are ethical by nature or not. Despite Christian Keyser’s research evidence that humans are ethical by nature, the evidence from the Milgram experiment shows that we are not ethical by nature. Humans learn to be ethical through genetic disposition as well as environmental factors such as culture, socialization, and parenting. In order to understand if we are ethical or not, we need to understand the difference between being moral or ethical. Many people believe that being moral and ethical are the same thing, but these two terms are a bit different. “Morality is primarily about making correct choices, while ethics is about proper reasoning” (Philosopher, web). Morality is more

    Read More

  • My Ethical Framework: Bernard Lonergan And Robert Kegan

    1464 Words  | 3 Pages

    In everyday experience one is likely to encounter ethical dilemmas. This paper presents one framework for working through any given dilemma. I have chosen to integrate three theories from Ruggerio Vicent, Bernard Lonergan and Robert Kegan. When making a deceison you must collabrate different views to come to a one conclusion. Ruggerio factors in different aspects that will take effect. Depending on which order of conciousness you are in by Kegan we can closely compare this with Ruggerio's theories also. As I continue I will closely describe the three theories with Kegan and how this will compare with Lonerga's theory combining the three. While Family,

    Read More

  • Daniel Dennett's Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life

    1006 Words  | 3 Pages

    Science can give us as good a moral code as any religion. Or so Daniel Dennett claims in his book, Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. Dennett provides the tools to explain human morality, and inadvertently leads the way to the conclusion (which he does not share) that science can clarify how human morality came about, but not serve as a substitute or model for moral codes, religious and secular alike.

    Read More

  • Morality and Ethics in Vegetarianism

    717 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... i.e. for pragmatic reasons, the evolution of ethics had different roots - psychological, spiritual. It is based on the person’s ability for empathy, which is the basis of moral behavior of a person, his kindness and decency. It can be argued that the ability for empathy highlighted man from the world of animals. With the development of spirituality and feeling of compassion, people began to feel uncomfortable by the fact that their actions were constantly associated with the infliction of suffering to other beings and even their killing. Even in ancient times high minds have concluded that man as being rational and moral should not defile themselves with murder. The alternative is to live a more moral, more humane life, without killing animals. Humanity will then become higher in the spiritual sense and feel a beneficial effect of merciful attitude to the weakest.

    Read More

  • Code of Ethics

    1565 Words  | 4 Pages

    In a health care organization, it is important that the organization’s mission, philosophies, and ethics are followed through properly. . With the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), it is no different. . The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s “mission is to protect people’s health and to support the quality of life in humans by prevention and control of diseases, injuries, and disabilities” (About CDC, 2010, page or paragraph number with quotes). With the organization's mission, philosophies, and ethics it is important that everyone’s health is protected and proper prevention of diseases, illnesses, and disabilities are given to the public in a timely manner. In this paper, the members of Team A will “describe what are the organization’s goals, how are they tied to its ethical principles, and the role and importance of the corporation’s ethical values” (University of Phoenix, 2012, Week Three Supplement). Team A will also specify “what the relationship between the organization’s culture and ethical decision-making is and why is it important that the organization’s ethical values support Team A's ethical values” (University of Phoenix, 2012, Week Three Supplement, see above)? In addition, Team A will explain the social responsibility for the Center of Disease Control and Prevention in the community” (University of Phoenix, 2012, Week Three Supplement, see above). (Good introduction)

    Read More

  • Code of Ethics Paper

    1288 Words  | 3 Pages

    I have chosen the business profession topic of higher education administration. I am extremely familiar with this profession; as it is the job that I currently hold. There is a plethora of different activities and task that are dealt with on a daily basis within this profession. Some of these items consist of assisting both full and part time staff and faculty, maintaining order within budgets and finance, including all purchase orders and check requests, facilitating student awards, including scholarships, staffing and training within the department, as well as dealing with public policy and laws within the college. It is immensely obvious that this job would keep anyone busy. This alone is one of the reasons I love this profession so much. Each day brings something new, and important group of items to accomplish. Anyone who holds this job, would go into work everyday knowing that the tasks that they are about to perform, will create a difference to not only to the departments and its students, but will also make a difference within the entire college. This person alone has the responsibility of making ethical decisions every single day as well as watching out for others who may need help being pointed in the proper ethical direction based on their knowledge of the school’s ethics plans that have been put in place. If someone were unaware of the ethical standards in this profession, there is a lot of room for things to head in a corrupt direction rather quickly.

    Read More

  • Examples Of John Locke And Tacit Consent

    2354 Words  | 5 Pages

    Morality is not a science; it is an ever-changing view of what is right and wrong, good from bad throughout the course of human life. Science deals with facts, measures of values, where there are only “personal” opinions. Morality is subjective, where I don’t believe that there is such thing as moral facts. People disagree/ agree over ethical questions all the time, it is subjective matter. In a subjective matter, the speaker conveys feelings, where as in a scientific matter, the speaker would report facts (tested/proven). I feel that there are no moral facts for this exact reason, when we say something is wrong or right, we are expressing what our personal approval or disapproval may be, although their might be a common consensus,

    Read More

  • Ethical Relativism: A Critique: There Is A Universal Moral Standards?

    1035 Words  | 3 Pages

    Argument from moral variability, as we discuss in our philosophy class, it is an argument to support Ethical Relativism, this argument claims that since different people have different moral standards, so there is no universal moral standard. As Stace claimed in his essay “ Ethical Relativism: A Critique”, “For the absolutist there is a single universal moral standard. For the relativist there is no such standard. There are only local, ephemeral, and variable standards.”(Stace, para 7). What Stace indicated in his argument is: people form different moral standards based on their backgrounds, circumstances, and ages, one thing treated right for this group may be treated wrong for the other group. From a personal perspective, I don’t agree with

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Dr. Michael Shermer's The Moral Arc

    1967 Words  | 4 Pages

    Such a simple revelation of similarity between species powered multiple rights revolutions for beings that we originally thought to be “too different” or inferior to us. As Gay rights, Women’s rights, and Animal rights were born out of scientific logic and reasoning our moral arc began to increase. Shermer examines and defines the link between humanity and science by introducing the notion that we all come into this world with some sort of moral compass, inherently already knowing basic rights from wrongs. However, Shermer makes it clear that how we control our moral compass comes from how we are “nurtured”. The levels of guilt that we feel for violating certain social obligations can and will vary depending on the environment that we are raised in .This leads Shermer into introducing the most simple and effective way of measuring morality in an action. Shermer defines an action as being morally correct only if the action increases an individual’s chances of survival and flourishing. The idea is to stretch the boundaries of the moral sphere with the help of science and its tools of reason. He then goes on to state how we would not be as far as we are in the progression of morality today if

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Morality In The Stanford Prison Experiment

    1744 Words  | 4 Pages

    Psychology, the scientific study of the human mind and its functions, has been giving us information regarding human behavior and decision-making since the late 1800’s. The field itself is one of the most controversial in all of science, especially when it comes to the morality behind psychologist’s experiments. Morality is the distinction between what is considered to be right or wrong behavior. The famous psychology experiment known as the Stanford Prison Experiment is notorious for being considered an “immoral” trial; however, it was accepted by society because it was conducted in the name of science. This raises one question: should science trump morality even if it means putting some people at risk?

    Read More

  • What Is Cultural Relativism?

    1065 Words  | 3 Pages

    Every individual is taught what is right and what is wrong from a young age. It becomes innate of people to know how to react in situations of killings, injuries, sicknesses, and more. Humans have naturally developed a sense of morality, the “beliefs about right and wrong actions and good and bad persons or character,” (Vaughn 123). There are general issues such as genocide, which is deemed immoral by all; however, there are other issues as simple as etiquette, which are seen as right by one culture, but wrong and offense by another. Thus, morals and ethics can vary among regions and cultures known as cultural relativism.

    Read More

  • Ethics And Ethical Systems

    1378 Words  | 3 Pages

    As a function, ethics is a philosophical study of the moral value of human conduct, and of the rules and principles it should govern. As a system, ethics are a social, religious, or civil code of behavior considered correct by a particular group, profession, or individual. As an instrument, ethics provide perspective regarding the moral fitness of a decision, course of action, or potential outcomes. Ethical decision-making can include many types, including deontological (duty), consequentialism (including utilitarianism), and virtue ethics. Additionally, subsets of relativism, objectivism, and pluralism seek to understand the impact of moral diversity on a human level. Although distinct differences separate these ethical systems, organizations

    Read More

  • Seven Threats To Ethics In Simon Blackburn's Being Good By Simon Eeth

    719 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the book Being Good, Simon Blackburn provides an introduction to ethics by sharing the excuses used to undermine ethics, life’s big questions and how they relate to ethics, and the effects of ethics on foundations. Blackburn, with the use of past philosophers and ethicists, shares seven threats that endanger ethics. He explores some of the biggest ethical issues and principles humanity faces, including that of justice and rights, and finally ends with a critical exploration of ethical foundations. This essay will dissect Blackburn’s ideas and relate them to Student Affairs professionals.

    Read More

  • Relativism: The Tangible Theory

    1914 Words  | 4 Pages

    a set of universal morals would not be able to compensate for all the different

    Read More

  • What Is The Thought Of Human Nature Is Complex?

    1399 Words  | 3 Pages

    All humans in this world possess their own beliefs. Miraculously, some of these beliefs are shared among individuals, even individuals from different cultures. These beliefs are slowly changing, however, with new developments in technology. With new discoveries, previous thoughts about how certain elements of the world operate are changing. Traditional beliefs are beginning to collide with modern knowledge according to Michael Gazzangia. The element that he is concerned with is where humans obtain a sense of morals. Many have their own ideas and beliefs of where these morals originate from. As technology is advancing, however, these theories are being tested; a clearer understanding of morals is starting to surface. Examining the

    Read More

More about Michael Gazzaniga Response To Universal Ethics Summary

Open Document