Mers Case Study

1424 Words3 Pages

The average American does not know what Mers is, and what purpose it holds in their life. Mers is a corporation who was created by financial institutions such as Fannie and Freddie Mac, in 1995 to told title to a mortgage that would allow electronic reassignment of profitable owners to the mortgage. Mers’s database is a substitute for the county land record so recording fees can be bypassed and the change of ownership to title can be input electronically. Homeowners don’t know who they are paying their mortgages to because the ownership would frequently change lenders. MersCorp shouldn’t be able to track change of ownership because they have no obligation to do so. Also, Mers shouldn’t be allowed to exist, because it’s replacing the county …show more content…

Mers eliminates a county’s recording fee which is an average of $35. According to ThisMatter.com, Mers’s records contain 50% to 60% of the residential mortgages in the United States. However, companies who affiliates with Mers pays Merscorp membership fees and per transaction fees for access to the Mers database. Consumers should be careful with their mortgages, promissory notes, and know who or what rightfully has their title. Mers has a webpage for homeowners or anyone who may have questions about the mortgage. It provides series of actions for disputing any information in a Mers record. Although, Mers is vague on how a borrower would have knowledge on what was in their record. Mers is leaving borrowers clueless on who to talk to when they are having problems with their loan. Furthermore, Mers hurt many consumers financially because it was a major influence on the foreclosure crisis. Merscorp were allowing the original loan holders to pass their credit default risk to investors of securitized loans. Lenders were lending to risky borrowers, however, borrowers were being told that they can afford this loan when in reality they could not. As, a consumer it is important to know when a product seems too good to be true, because it usually is and be alert when a company says no down payment until a certain date. On top of that the mortgage companies and banks were not getting back their …show more content…

Bill Beckman, the president of MersCorp should close down the business and hand or over to HUD or the FHA. These government officials would be able to overlook, the misguided use of Mers and turn it into a more suitable business that handles the use of mortgages. Consumers are affected by Mers when they can are in default and when they face foreclosure. Mers wasn’t a legit interest holder in a homeowner or investors real property so, courts could not foreclose on the house. Consumers were in a mist when they wanted answers to their questions about their mortgage. Mers is just a scam, that anyone who pay taxes should look out

More about Mers Case Study

Open Document