Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mergers and Acquisitions Question 2 quizlet
Mergers and acquisitions in progress
Mergers and acquisitions research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mergers and Acquisitions Question 2 quizlet
Nowadays mergers and acquisitions are regarded as a key strategic option for the organisations all over the world. According to Huang and Kleiner (2004) mergers and acquisitions have become the principal means by which companies have the opportunity to grow revenues due to factors such as gloabalisation, rapid technological changes, a long-term bull market and strategic barriers to growth. Porter and Singh (2010) admit that mergers and acquisitions play an important role in reallocation of resources in an economy. Despite the huge increase of corporate mergers and acquisitions during the last decades many surveys show that the majority of them fail (Nguyen and Kleiner 2003).The purpose of this essay is to give a brief overview of mergers and acquisitions by providing the main key drivers behind this trend, the basic reasons why they fail and some recommendations for better results at the future.
Firstly it must be mentioned that despite the fact that mergers and acquisitions are regarded as the same process, they are not exactly the same. Shcraeder and Self (2003) argue that mergers are the consolidation of two organisations into one; while acquisitions are the purchase of one organization from another where the acquirer maintains control. Porter and Singh (2010) state that synergy, agency and hubris are the main motives of mergers and acquisitions. Seth et al (2000) argue that the synergy motive suggests that the object of the acquisition is to create a firm greater than the sum of the value of the individual firms. Both the managers of target and acquirer firms act in the best interest of their respective shareholders, with the basic principle to maximize their wealth via economic gains. The agency motive proposes that the mana...
... middle of paper ...
...akeovers in Australia?”, International Journal of Business and Economics, vol. 9(2), pp.87-103.
Ragozzino, R. and Reuer, J. J. (2010). “The opportunities and challenges of the entrepreneurial acquisitions”, European Management Review, vol. 7, pp. 80-90.
Roll, R. (1986). “The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers”, Journal of Business, vol.59, pp. 197-216.
Schraeder, M. and Self, R. D. (2003). “Enhancing the success of mergers and acquisitions: an organizational cultural perspective”, Management Decision, vol. 41(5), pp. 511-522.
Seth, A., Song, K. and Pettit, R. (2000). “Synergy, Managerialism or Hubris? An Empirical Examination of Motives for Foreign Acquisitions of U.S. Firms”, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 31(3), pp. 387-405.
Stallworthy, E. A. and Kharbanda, O. P. (1988). TAKEOVERS, ACQUISITIONS AND MERGERS. London: Kogan Page Limited.
fail (Cheng, 2012). Mergers and acquisitions are much common in these days and only a few of them are end up in successes. Even though mergers and acquisitions are not result much successes rate, many organizations are still preferring it because, it is used as a cooperative strategy but nowadays it is used for cooperative development. The cultural differences and merger integration can be considered as an important factor for the failure rate but this study mainly focused
Chang, S. Suk, D. Failed takeovers, methods of payment, and bidder returns, Financial Review. 33 (2), May 1998.
Gaughan, P. A., 2002. Mergers, Acquisitions, and Corporate restructuring. 3rd ed.New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
The purpose of this paper is to attempt to recompile information about the merger of two corporations; one of many taking places i...
Ashkenas, R. (1998). Making the Deal Real: How GE Capital Integrates Acquisitions. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/1998/01/making-the-deal-real-how-ge-capital-integrates-acquisitions/ar/1
The soft factors can make or break a successful change process, since new structures and strategies are difficult to build upon inappropriate cultures and values. These problems often come up in the dissatisfying results of spectacular mega-mergers. The lack of success and synergies in such mergers is often based in a clash of completely different cultures, values, and styles, which make it difficult to establish effective common systems and structuresBased on the case study, extensive research and annual reports of AT&T the writer has mapped AT&T in the different domains. AT&T should strive to attain a perfect circle as close to the centre as possible, which indicates total synergy, order and equilibrium. Where the circle is skewed drastic change is needed as it moves closer to the outer ring of chaos:
Jharkharia, S. (2012). Supply chain issues in mergers and acquisitions: A case from Indian aviation industry. International Journal of Aviation Management,1(4), 293-303.
As the business, people put it, to maximize the wealth of shareholders (Peavler, 2016). This could be done by pursuing more of an immediate reason that will realize the shareholders wealth maximization goal. However, this main reason may fail to be realized as most mergers depict negative results.
Companies merge and acquire other companies for a lot of strategic reasons with different degree of success. The success of a merger is measured by whether the value of the acquiring firm is enhanced by it. The impact of mergers and acquisitions on organization can be small and big in other cases.
Gilpin discussed the MNC’s evolution through the lenses of a number of business economic theories. Using Raymond Vernon’s Product Cycle Theory, the overseas expansion of American companies until the 1960s was shown as a means of preempting foreign competition and preserving monopoly positions, which was possible then because of the wealth and technology gaps that existed between the US and the rest of the world (282-83). Following the closing of such gaps, Dunning and the Reading School’s Eclectic Theory explained the next stage of the MNC’s evolution as propelled by the great leaps made in technology and communication, which made internationalized management both possible and viable (283). Michael Porter’s Strategy Theory, meanwhile, asserted that the MNC is now in the era of strategic management, wherein activities and capabilities spanning borders allow it to “tap into the value chain” in the most advantageous positions (285-85). Gilpin made an interesting point, however, that MNCs are oftentimes the result of market imperfections and unique corporate situations. In many instances, the decision to expand a firm’s operations in another country was a means of circumventing protectionist measures and trade barriers, or simply to curry favor with governments, as practiced by IBM (280...
When two companies decide to combine forces and become one bigger, richer mega company, it is called merging. This process forms a new company, combining the money and ideas of what used to be two different entities into one. This, however, is not the only thing that results from merging two different companies, and since we will be discussing the merging of two companies in the pharmaceutical industry, the impact will be incredible. Of course, the merging of two companies will not only have positive impacts but it will have many negative side effects as well. Furthermore, depending on the size of the merging companies and the goals of the people leading these companies there will always be contradictions according to the long-term goals or short-term goals depending on what both parties’ interests are. Our company, Verduga Inc. is contemplating to merge with Coronado-Salinas Inc., so before we rush into such a merger we must contemplate the positive and negative aspects of such a move. When it comes to mergers there are always many possible positive and negative impacts due to the effects of merging; these effects more widely impact the fields on research and development, on employment and management, stocks and shareholders, monopolization, and ingenuity.
Mergers and acquisitions immediately impact organizations with changes in ownership, in ideology, and eventually, in practice. There are multiple reasons, motives, economic forces and institutional factors that can, taken together or in isolation, influence corporate decisions to engage in mergers or acquisitions. The financial risks of merging with or acquiring an organization in another country and how those risks can be mitigated are important issues for corporations to conduct research on. This paper will examine the sensible and dubious reasons for mergers and acquisitions and the benefits and costs of the cash and stock transactions.
When entrepreneurs plan their business future they will consider how they can increase their business size or profit in a short period. Entrepreneurs may consider growing their business or company by using a merger or an acquisition. These methods can be a speed up tool and a short cut to enlarge their business. (Burns, 2011) Also they can reduce competition, make it easier for entrepreneurs to think about the market and product development and risk reduction. Furthermore, some lesser – known companies can improve their firm’s image and market power by using merger and acquisition with larger firms. However, there may be risks associated with merger and acquisition related to lack of finance and time. (Burns, 2011) This essay will discuss more deeply the advantages and disadvantages of using mergers and acquisitions, showing how it can affect firms and market with the case study.
Chaurasiya, K. and Profile, V. 2010. Advantages and disadvantages of acquisition | business management strategy. [online] Available at: http://businessofaccouting.blogspot.co.uk/2010/04/advantages-and-disadvantages-of.html [Accessed: 8 Mar 2014].
The largest acquisition of Covidien is obviously a complementary strategy of MDT on medical technology especially in the surgical field. Figure 3 demonstrates the MDT’s acquisitions and the geographical distances to the acquired company. The acquisitions of Covidien and Sophono Inc increased not only the MDT’s industry position in size, but also it increased the MDT’s ability for resource transfer and capabilities, since these two firms have a greater multinational scope with their distribution and R&D environment (Anand, Capron and Mitchell, 2005). According to Vermeulen and Barkema, acquisitions have benefits of achieving greater market power, overcoming entry barriers, acquiring new knowledge and resources, however it involves high risks of the cost for acquiring firms and the cost of integrating the acquired companies (2001). Through the acquisition of Covidien, MDT acquired partially new surgical domain, and related domains such as vascular, which is preferable condition for acquisition (Vermeulen and Barkema, 2001). Although acquisition in high-tech sector is not recommended by Hagedoorn and Duysters (2002) since the degree of flexibility and learning might be limited, however Vermeulen and Barkema (2001) support the acquisitions in a way that acquisition broaden the company’s knowledge from external input which can break inertia that stimulates the development of integrating skills for combining new and existing domains. Nevertheless, MDT should be very careful with the port-M&A performance in innovation. Since the empirical theory expects the gain from the innovative performance of acquiring firm, thus from Covidien and other M&A firms, will be maximized in the first years, and it tends to drop (Cloodt, Hagendoorn and Van Kranenburg,