Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of CAGE questionnaire on alcoholism diagnosis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of CAGE questionnaire on alcoholism diagnosis
CAGE Questionnaire Critique of Screening Instrument
Schvon Bussey
Valdosta State University
NURS 7250 Theoretical Foundations for Advanced Psychiatric/
Mental Health Nursing Practice
Abstract
This paper looks the validity and reliability of the CAGE questionnaire. The paper will look at the strengths and weakness of the CAGE questionnaire and the implication used in different research studies. CAGE Critique of Screening Instrument
The CAGE questionnaire is one of the most popular screening tools for alcoholism and was developed by John Ewing in 1984. The questionnaire consists of four basic questions regarding a person drinking habits. This questionnaire is for the use of screening for alcohol dependence only. CAGE questionnaire
…show more content…
The answer of “Yes” accounts for one point and the answer of “No” accounts for zero point. The higher the score the greater suggestion of alcohol problems. If the patient scores a total of 2 points, he/she is considered clinically significant for alcoholism. (Williams, 2014). On the CAGE questionnaire, the final question regarding using alcohol as an eye-opener is considered the most important question. This question indicates that the patient is undergoing withdrawals in the mornings. The questionnaire may work better in a primary care setting versus a certain population that consists of heavy drinkers and college students. (Williams, 2014). The wording of the CAGE questionnaire could be a negative connation to patients. One of the negative aspects of the questionnaire is that words that may cause the patients to elicit false-positive responses. It is best to ask if the patient had symptoms within the last year. (Pilowsky & Wu, …show more content…
“It is reported to have a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 76% for the identification of excessive, i.e. problem, drinking and a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 77% for the identification of alcoholism” (Williams, 2014). One study was done in a Belgium primary care setting. The study looked at the comparison of the CAGE questionnaire with other blood parameters that may indicate alcoholism. The questionnaire had a sensitivity range between 68% to 93% of men that were studied. However, the women did not have a high sensitivity range and did not show a correlation (Williams, 2014). The CAGE questionnaire has also been compared to other alcohol screening questionnaires: FAST (Fast Alcohol Screening Test) and AUDIT (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test).
A study was done in the United Kingdom with a sample size of 2185 patients and found that the CAGE questionnaire had a sensitivity of 40% and a specificity of 98% compared to the AUDIT questionnaire. This study was done in the emergency room setting, which looked at hazardous drinkers instead of alcohol dependence (Williams, 2014). Another study was done on ten primary care looking at the sensitivity and specificity of the CAGE questionnaire in regards to alcohol abuse and dependence. The results yield a sensitivity of 0.87 in inpatients and in primary care patients a 0.71 sensitivity (Pilowsky & Wu,
The aim of this essay is to discuss the values and beliefs, which underpin contemporary mental health nursing in Scotland. It will also express why these values and beliefs underpinned by Scottish government policy and legislation are significance in reinforcing contemporary mental health nursing in Scotland. The three main themes of discussion in this essay are:
In response to the question set, I will go into detail of the study, consisting of the background, main hypotheses, as well the aims, procedure and results gathered from the study; explaining the four research methods chosen to investigate, furthering into the three methods actually tested.
Some people only drink on the weekend, or just not at work. Some people attempt to hide their alcohol abuse while others demand company, or anything in between these various elements. Alcohol abuse or addiction is defined as an individual who a) needs to use alcohol every day to function, b) makes attempts to limit use to specific time with periods of sobriety between incidents of heavy drinking, c) have “binges” of continuous use for long periods of time interspersed with the aforementioned periods of abstinence, d) use in excess of the medical and social norms (Doweiko, 2015). To be diagnosed with an AUD requires the individual to meet 2 of eleven criteria laid out by the DSM-5 within a year, then severity is assessed on the basis of how many criteria are met (NIMH, n.d.). Severity is assessed as mild meeting 2-3 criteria, moderate meeting 4 to 5, and severe meaning meeting 6 or more criteria. These eleven criteria include factors such as having drank longer than intended, reduced interest in activities, increased risk behavior, and other factors that look at how drinking has affected you socially (NIAA,
Most alcoholics proceed to a stage where their brains or their bodies have been so harmed by alcohol that the effects persist even when they are not drinking. This stage may be reached...
...ove, R., Mewton, L., … Haber, P. (2010). Prevalence and correlates of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in Australia: findings of the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing: 2007 Australian NSMHWB: DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence. Addiction, 105(12), 2085–2094. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03096.x
A psychological assessment is defined as “the gathering and integration of psychology-related data for the purpose of making a psychological evaluation that is accomplished through the use of tools such as tests, interviews, case studies, behavioral observation, and specially designed apparatuses and measurement procedures” (Cohen, Swerdlik, &Sturman, 2013). Although examiners strive toward the assessment being good enough to be useful, they sometimes have to make decisions about what type of error is acceptable. There are many psychological assessments that have been used in the study of addictions, but we will take a look at the Addiction Severity Index.
The Addition Severity Index is a well-known and widely used tool for use in treating alcoholics and other addicts. It is an approximately 45 to 60 minute long interview comprised of questions about the patient’s life. The interview covers eight subscales focusing on many different parts of a person’s life which helps to provide a comprehensive understanding of their life. The severity is scored on a ten point scale ranging from no problem or treatment indicated to extreme problem, treatment absolutely necessary. The scale helps the interviewer determine the seriousness of a client’s problem and to plan an effective course of treatment. The ASI can also be found in a self-administered paper-and-pencil form and an interactive CD-ROM multimedia version for the computer (Maleka, 2004). This test has been found to be reliable by most but some others do not agree. It is difficult to say whether or not the test is a reliable and valid measure of treatment due to the complexity of the questions. Once a client’s psychosocial needs are identified it is easier to find treatment suitable for that client. There are some problems with the test such as it is not properly designed to cover such a wide population (Maleka, 2004). Other problems include irrelevant questions for alcoholics and other drug users, difficulty remembering relevant information, and lying and exaggerating information for the best interest of the patient (Maleka, 2004). Use of the ASI can be found to be particularly problematic when used with the homeless or double-diagnosis patients. The ASI can be used in a wide range of treatment settings including clinical, research, and administrative. This comprehensive evaluation is a useful tool that helps professionals understand the
“Ultimately, diagnosis of a substance use disorder or PTSD relies on clinical assessment using DSM criteria. Screening instruments exist that can help uncover or point the way toward a potential diagnosis. For alcohol use disorders, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and the AUDIT-Consumption (AUDIT-C) have been widely validated as self-report screening measures. A single-item screening measure was recently validated for drug use disorders consisting of the single question, “How many times in the past year have you used an illegal drug or used a prescription medication for nonmedical reasons?” A response of 1 time or more yields a positive screen.” -Returning Veterans With Addictions. (2011, July 11). Psychiatric Times. Retrieved Februa...
“Beyond Hangovers: Understanding Alcohol's Impact Your Health.” Bethesda, MD: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2010. Print.
As illustrated the model of drug abuse and the theories behind addiction are varied. There is no concrete reason for one person who drinks to become alcohol dependent versus the person who does not. Several factors contribute to why a person begins drinking and why they continue to do so despite reasons to stop. The case history exhibits a client with many risk factors associated with alcohol use and dependence.
Alcohol is the most commonly used addictive substance in the US. One in every 12 adults suffers from alcohol abuse. Alcohol addiction is very common in modern ...
During my time in the ward, I recently had a patient with alcohol dependency in my care. My patient, Mr Grey was a 51 year old male patient who was admitted with a fractured neck of femur and consistent hypertension. Mr Grey required a vast amount of medical treatment for his injuries. As well as Mr Grey’s physiological problems he also had poor mental health problems such as depression and anxiety. We later discovered my patient had some social issues and that he was homeless.
Nobody denies that every client and situation is unique, but there is a general layout out of a treatment plan that can be used thought out the facility to ensure success for the client. The first step in the treatment plan is to screen clients to determine if he/she meets the criteria of the facilities drug, or alcohol program. The facility will use the standard CAGE, of the Substance Abuse Subtitle Screening Inventory questioner as a screening tool. These two screening tools are consist of few questions and require only short answers to determine (American Society of Addiction Medicine, 2012). These tools are easy to use and can be done by any qualified staff according to the ASAM. If more through information is needed then the client will go under an assessment.
The ingestion of alcoholic beverages for their enjoyable effects is a custom which has been around for thousands of years, and alcohol continues to be a popular drug because of its short-term effects (Coleman, Butcher & Carson, 1984). An enormous amount of damage can be attributed directly to alcohol abuse as a result of lost jobs, accidents caused by drunk drivers, and so forth (Maltzman, 2000). Alcohol also compounds other problems--an estimated 25% to 40% of hospital patients have problems caused by, or recovery delayed by alcohol abuse (Maltzman, 2000). Clinical psychologists spend about one-fourth of their time dealing with people who are suffering in part from alcohol or other substance problems (Vaillant, 1995). Although alcohol problems have been around for so long, it is only recently that these problems have begun to be associated with medical or psychological difficulties.
The authors of this article have outlined the purpose, aims, and objectives of the study. It also provides the methods used which is quantitative approach to collect the data, the results, conclusion of the study. It is important that the author should present the essential components of the study in the abstract because the abstract may be the only section that is read by readers to decide if the study is useful or not or to continue reading (Coughlan, Cronin, and Ryan, 2007; Ingham-Broomfield, 2008 p.104; Stockhausen and Conrick, 2002; Nieswiadomy, 2008 p.380).