Memi And Sabu Comparison

713 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Egypt monumental architecture

Statues have been around in our world all through the ages, they are used to depict animals or human figures and often tend to be life size or larger than the depicted figure. This essay will focus on two which are the Statue of Memi and Sabu as well as the Statue of Gudea. It is evident that both sculptures share some similarities with regards to the overall form and external makeup of the statues. However, it is important to grasp the intended function of these statues from a historical viewpoint as well as draw comparisons and differences of how such effect has on the appearance of the sculptures.
The Statue of Royal Acquaintances Memi and Sabu dated to be from a period around 2575 -2465 BC was from the Fourth Dynasty of the Egyptian nonroyal …show more content…

The difference in color is also another striking contrast that is evident in both statues. The Statue of Gudea is a diorite sculpture in comparison to the Statue of Memi and Sabu which is limestone thus the difference in color (The Museum of Metropolitan Art, 2018). Gudea was one of the local kings in Mesopotamia and the city of Lagash where he rebuilt many temples, it is believed that small carved statues of himself were put in the rebuilt temples (The Museum of Metropolitan Art, 2018). Here we have a king asserting his authority and need for reverence from his subjects, an extract from the inscription on the statue gives a clear example of the authority and power in which Gudea exuded “Let the life of Gudea, who built the house, belong” (The Museum of Metropolitan Art, 2018).
The dimensions of both statues provide us with another area to analyze in order to draw on what the size signifies. Firstly, both statues are relatively small in size in comparison to other statues from the ancient times. The dimension of the Statue of Gudea is 44 x 21.5 x 29.5 centimeters whereas that of the Statue of Memi and Sabu are 62 x 24.5 x 15.2 centimeters. It is obvious that dimensions of the Statue of Gudea are different the reason being that Gudea is seated on his throne in the sculpture which

Show More
Related

  • Similarities Between Portrait Of Augustus As General And Khafre Enthroned

    1205 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this paper I am exploring “Portrait of Augustus as general” and “Khafre enthroned”. From exploring and getting to know the Statues in my Art History Book I have compared these statues (Kleiner, 2013). The first and most obvious similarity between the two is in the artists’ idealization and immortalization of their subjects. Both Khafre and Augustus are portrayed in an idealized manner, designed to give the impression of nobility, timelessness, and divinity. The two statues were the political advertisements of their times that showed the public images of reliable leaders who one

    Read More

  • Kroisos vs Doryphoros

    556 Words  | 2 Pages

    The difference between an archaic statue such as Kroisos (fig. 5-11) and a classical statue such as Doryphoros (fig. 5-42) may not seem very great in a single glance. In fact, you may not notice any differences in that one glance. Yet, if you were to look at them closely, you can see that these two statues actually have very little in common.

    Read More

  • Statue Of Nykara Analysis

    643 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Ancient Egyptian sculpture, “Statue of Nykara and His Family”, was sculpted during the late fifth dynasty. The sculpture is a depiction of Nykara, his wife, Nubkau, and son, Ankhma-Re. The statue is in poor condition with pieces of limestone missing and chips on the three subject’s faces and bodies. The painted limestone shows the conventional colors for the male and female subjects. There is a clear discoloration among Nykara and his son’s bodies. The brownish red color they once were has eroded to a light yellowish color, which resembles the purposeful color of Nykara’s wife. The hieroglyphs on Nykara’s seat insinuate that the sculpture is meant to be viewed from the front view. This is also evident by the way the three subjects are facing forward in frontal view. There are hieroglyphs on both the chair and base of the statue near Nykara’s wife and son’s feet.

    Read More

  • The Large Kneeling Statue of Hatshesput

    534 Words  | 2 Pages

    A key focus of the piece is the jars. Two round jars held in each hand. As well, the ceremonial headdress and beard catch the eye quickly too. If detail was still as pronounced as it was during the peak time period of the statues creation, there would probably be more to the detail on the headdress and face, as well as the skirt. On the side of the headdress, and along the length of the leg are lines traveling the length of the subject. They appear more pronounced on the legs (skirt).

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Monumental Statue Of The Pharaoh Ramesses II

    856 Words  | 2 Pages

    The medium is Granodiorite and the technique used was sunken relief, which is a technique were the sculptor chisels deep outlines below the stone’s surface. The sculpture does not seem to be originally painted. The Egyptians created coloristic effects through contrasting shadows and highlights. They used natural pigments to color some sculptures, however this was not the case. There are deeply cut areas in the back of the statue that create deep shadows and the use of natural light helps to bring up the highlights. The granodiorite has natural colors that helped the sculptor show more of those shadows and highlights. The statue is mostly in a warm hue and it may be caused because of the lighting inside the museum. These warm colors make the details stand out more. At a closer look of the structure there are different colors that can be easily identified, such as white, yellow, brown, black, gray and small spots of orange. The statues seems to be carved in one piece. There are no signs indicating it

    Read More

  • The Statue of Kouros

    782 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Statue of a kouros and the Portrait statue of a boy both depict similar subjects, however are greatly different in how they accomplish this task. Through detail, or lack there of, the Greeks and Romans are able to display a certain value they have in its members. These two statues were made about 500 years apart and approach the sculpting process quit differently. The Greek statue seems to use geometric exaggerated lines to form the body while the Romans use a more realistic approach and sculpt the body with a more rounded finish. Statue of a kouros, from about 590 B.C and Portrait of a boy, from about the first century, do not share any great technical aspects and are basically nothing alike.

    Read More

  • Comparison Essay

    703 Words  | 2 Pages

    The pieces of sculpture are both carved using the subtractive method of sculpting from stone. However, the types of stone used were very different. The sculpture of Mycerinus and Kha-merer-nebty II was carved from a stone called greywacke, a dark colored, very hard stone the Egyptians prized for sculpture despite the fact t...

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Greek Art And American Art

    811 Words  | 2 Pages

    And just like the Greek the statue are both big and almost human size. A great example of this is the “Augustus of Primaporta, 1st century C.E. (Vatican Museums).” It truly shows the evolution of art sculpting. It is a full size very detailed sculpture of Augustus. It very detailed from his hair showing every curl and split to the small details in his armor that also depicts a story as well is shows the god of the sky looking down on him and the goddess of the earth looking up towards him as they watch the Parthians surrender to him and returning the standards shows the great power that Augustus has, and not just that but also the sculpture itself is a symbol for how Augustus wanted everyone to see him as, as god like. And it even has a little small cupid on the side which is also detailed which shows that Augusts is decedent from a

    Read More

  • The Portrayal of Ancient Rulers

    1855 Words  | 4 Pages

    King Menkaure and Queen Khamerenebty ruled during the Fourth Dynasty of the Old Kingdom in ancient Egypt, circa 2533-2515 BCE. The 4th Dynasty is associated with the Great Pyramids of Giza. The increasing wealth of the ruling families of the period is reflected in their large, elaborate royal portraits. The statue of King Menkaure and his wife, standing 4’8” high, was found in the Valley Temple of the pyramid of Menkaure at Giza. It is a good example of Old Kingdom royal tomb sculpture, although it is the first known work depicting a couple. The pair statue of Menkaure and Khamerenebty exemplifies both dignity and marital affection.

    Read More

  • Man And Centaur Analysis

    1212 Words  | 3 Pages

    I chose this sculpture because I was intrigued by the position of the man and the centaur. I was able to witness that the centaur is trying to invade the personal space of the man. The sculpture showed me that there is a strong relationship between man and creature. The quality of the sculpture made me realize that animals play a big part of a human’s life and can be seen as threatening to humans. It was interesting to see that both the man and centaur were created to have almost of the same structures. This statue has a metallic brown and green, bronze tone and appeared undersized. It has a height of four and a half feet, and six inches. It has long, thin, legs with calf muscles, and bulging thighs. The sculpture evolved from Olympia, Greece. The man and centaur sculpture was created in 750 BCE during an orderly time period. The colors used for this sculpture, proved that it has a longer lasting mold for statues. On the left side of the sculpture, the man has a wrap on his head, that can symbolize, he is some form of a god. On the right side, the centaur has the same head piece as the man, but the body of a horse. It can be seen that the man and

    Read More

  • King Khafre Seated

    1079 Words  | 3 Pages

    The statue of King Khafre Seated , from the fourth dynasty of the Old Kingdom, 2520 - 2492 BCE, was created by an unknown artist in the smooth permanence of graywacke stone. Although the statue is currently at the Metropolitan Museum of Art as number 56 in the Special Egyptian Exhibition, its true home is at the Egyptian Museum, in Cairo. The man being portrayed, King Khafre, ruled Egypt for approximately thirty years, during which he commissioned the single most recognizable monuments of Egypt, the a fore mentioned Pyramids at Giza and the Sphinx. These monuments of symmetry and solidity characterize the focus of popular architecture and sculpture from the Old Kingdom in Egypt.

    Read More

  • Nebamun Hunting in the Marshes

    1110 Words  | 3 Pages

    Teeter, E. Egyptian Art. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1 Ancient Art at The Art Institute of Chicago (1994), pp. 14-31

    Read More

  • The Visit Of The Metropolitan Museum

    902 Words  | 2 Pages

    Let’s begin with what was going on during the time period for each sculpture. During the 2458-2446 BCE. Userkaf was thriving over his brother Sahure, and he became the new ruler of Egypt. In the start of 2446 BCE, Neferirkare beings his dominant over Egypt. King Sahure and Nome God is a high relief it is still attached to a surface of a stone. The Pharaoh sitting on his thorn wearing a Nemes headdress (it is usually blue and gold striped), fake beard. The king has an emotionless facial expression. It was made for a decoration for the king pyramid complex. The symbol behind this statue could be the gathering of the Nome gods form Upper and Lower Egypt around t...

    Read More

  • Art Analysis

    965 Words  | 2 Pages

    Both of these pieces of art have much in common. Their functions are almost identical. Both were used to mark burial sites and to honor the deceased buried there. The body language of both the pieces’ figures are similar, with one seated and several others standing around them. Neither has color, but unlike the grave stele, the funerary banquet does show some degree of emotion. The figures in the banquet scene have slight smiles. These pieces played an important role in their times, honoring those who had passed on to the afterlife. For both of these people, it was important to memorialize them very similar to our practices today.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Laocoon And His Two Sons

    957 Words  | 2 Pages

    We find that, in conclusion, that these pieces are very similar in many ways. They are both originally created in the same style and time period. They are Hellenistic and dramatic, although in their own, individualistic way. Each sculpture was created in different mediums and have different stories. These are both very individualistic pieces of Greco/Roman sculpture that has influenced many artists throughout time and will

    Read More

More about Memi And Sabu Comparison

Open Document