Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Lais of Marie de France analysis on love
The Lais of Marie de France analysis on love
Literary analysis: medieval romance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Lais of Marie de France analysis on love
Marie de France’s lais translate a multitude of different medieval ideologies/topics into text. One of the most prominent being the ideal of medieval love. In Marie de France’s lay “Bisclavret”, Marie explains to her readers, through a variety of symbols and messages, that medieval love is set in the truth beneath appearances- virtues like loyalty and modesty- whereas love based on appearances, as manifested by Bisclavret’s wife, is in fact a form of vanity.
Bisclavret turning into a werewolf is not the only form of bestiality in this lay, in fact it is far from it. Bisclavret and his wife, who is unnamed (possibly to make her seem more animalistic), share a love in the beginning of the story. However, the love is neither true nor just. Bisclavret
…show more content…
might believe that it is true, but his wife shows her true colors when she decides she no longer wants to “lie with him” after discovering what he turns into. She is so worried about his animalistic side that she herself feels like she has to resort to similar tactics in order to free herself. What I mean by saying “similar tactics” is that she uses her bestiality/animalistic side, which in this case is her sexuality, to attract her other suitor knight, offering him “her body and her love” in order for him to do her dirty work and grab Bisclavret’s cloths. Evidence of such betrayal is as follows “There was a knight of that region who had loved her for a long time, who begged for her love, and dedicated himself to serving her. She’d never loved him at all, nor pledged her love to him, but now she sent a messenger for him, and told him her intention. -----(break, lines 111-114) ---- “I offer you my love and my body; make me your mistress!” (Marie de France, 104-116). The previous statement supports the fact that the wife never loved the suitor knight, however, in order to get her way, she allures him with the enticement of her body. This is one of many forms of untrue love, the love of tangible fantasies. The move of stealing Bisclavret’s cloths, in itself, is very interesting. The fact that Bisclavret’s weakness/saving grace is clothing. This example can really help symbolize the false love in this lay. It represents the vanity of not only the wife and her lover in this tale, but perhaps the vanity Marie de France sees in the nobles of this time. People that are often times more concerned with their appearances and being perceived as “courtly”, then the real struggles happening in their land. Something that was very common during Marie de France’s era was arranged marriages, another form of superficial love. The only type of love valued in such marriages was the wealth and power the opposing family possessed, there was no loyalty or virtue associated between the bride and groom. Marie de France would have been well accustomed to these life styles since she was very likely of noble birth, due to her high education and lingual abilities. However, Bisclavret’s love for his wife is a true, and loyal love, proven by his devotion to tell her anything, even if he knows it will cause him harm. After the lady asks Bisclavret to reveal where he disappears to, he exclaims, “My dear, have mercy on me, for God’s sake! Harm will come to me if I tell you about this, because I’d lose your and even my very self” (Marie de France, 53-56). He is unselfish and true, two major characteristics of true and loyal love in medieval literature. Bisclavret tells his wife where he goes and what his weakness is, even though he knows it will cost him everything. He is willing, however, because he is a man that values virtue and loyalty above pain. This is directly opposite of his wife’s love, a love that is only focused on his topical appearance. Even though Bisclavret’s wife was in love with him, and Bisclavret never harmed her in anyway, prior to her learning out where he went for a few days per week. She abandons and betrays him in the most brutal fashion in order to protect her courtly appearance, not wanting to risk her image by being married to a werewolf, even though his love is true. The wife and her new husband are two selfish people that are irresponsible and unfaithful.
They are driven by their own sexual and bestial desires, except for the instances in which they are in control and using them for personal gain. “she kept asking him, coaxed and flattered him so much, that he finally told her what happened to him ---- he hid nothing from her” (Marie de France, 59-62). Often times in medieval texts the reader must read in between the lines, for example, in this case the wife’s flattering was likely implied to mean that she was using her body to seduce/convince Bisclavret. This point is reinforced later in the passage when Marie de France writes, “He tore the nose off her face. What worse thing could he have done to her?” (235-236). Bisclavrets revenge is so detrimental to his wife because he takes the trait most precious to her, the bestial ability to tempt men with her body. He gives her a taste of her own medicine by eternally forcing her to face her vanity. The wife and her suitor are not the only characters who have an animalistic side, however, and Bisclavret is literally trapped in the form of an animal for years. The way he handles himself, however, is in stark contrast when compared to his counterparts. (does this sentence sound weird?). Bisclavret is deeply ashamed of his animalistic side and has the decency to try and hide this side of himself, even from the people he loves most dearly. This is vastly different then the actions of his counterparts. Who, immediately caved to their sexual desires. Bisclavret is, in fact, so ashamed of his curse that when given the chance to turn back into a human, after years of torment, he waits for privacy as to not be unseemly in front of his loving king. “My lord, you’re not doing it right. This beast wouldn’t, under any circumstances, in order to get rid of his animal form, put on his clothes in front of you; you don’t understand what this means: he’s just too ashamed to do it here” (Marie de
France, 283-288). The previous quote reinforces the fact that Bisclavret is a virtuous man who would not risk losing the love of his king by shaming himself in his presence. Not all true medieval love has to exist between a man and a woman. One such type, that goes widely unacknowledged, is the love that ripens between men. Not specifically intimately or sexually, but emotionally instead. The love between men is based in loyalty and trust, not the vain concept of image. The strongest relationships are based in true love, the love between knights, otherwise known chivalry, is an example. The men develop a sense of trust and fealty to each other, a bond of brotherhood that surpasses any concept of image or beauty society might enforce. When the king realizes that Bisclavret is truly the knight he has mourned, and not a monster, he is overwhelmed with emotion, “The king ran to embrace him. He hugged and kissed him again and again. As soon as he had the chance, the king gave him back all his lands; he gave him more than I can tell” (Marie de France, 300-304). The king is so happy to have his bond with Bisclavret returned to him he showers him in love, a love that none can truly understand except for the party involved. Marie de France hints at this by including the lines “gave him more than I can tell”. Although the love between men is as true as any, it does not come without faults and is tainted in this lay by Bisclavrets animalistic need for revenge. In Emma Campbell’s article, Political Animals: Human/Animal Life in Bisclavret and Yonec, she writes, “The combined actions of both king and werewolf thus reduce the lady to a life considered less than human while not being entirely human.” The king and Bisclavret share a true love, yet are still overcome by their own animalistic desire to achieve their revenge by torturing and defacing the wife. Trapping her in a state of limbo between beast and human for the rest of her and her kin’s life, proving that even true love cannot always be perfect. In medieval text, true love is portrayed in many different ways. However, in Marie de France’s lay, Bisclavret, true love is represented by the truth beneath appearances. It is depicted by values such as loyalty and modesty. Whereas untrue love, such as the love Bisclavret’s wife shows him, is based on the vanities of appearance and selfishness.
In Bisclavret, the supernatural lord is, “a good knight, handsome, known to be / all that makes for nobility. / Prized, he was, much, by his liege lord; / and by his neighbors was adored.” (De France 17-20) His virtue is established before his mythical curse is revealed. His wife, “a worthy soul, / most elegant and beautiful” (21-22) is concerned that his is breaking his marriage vows and has taken a mistress. She pleads, “Tell me, dear husband; tell me, pray, / What do you do? Where do you stay? / It seems to me you've found another! / You wrong me, if you have a lover!” (48-52) In order to convince his wife that he is innocent, he tells her of his condition. Upon hearing his confession, “Terror, she felt, at this strange tale. / She thought what means she could avail / herself of how to leave this man. / She could not lie with him again.” (98-102) She is so disgusted by the concept that her loyal husband is not purely human, she agrees to be the lover of a chevalier if he will help her distance herself from the beast she imagines her h...
As is custom with Marie De France, her lai “Lanval” presents the idea of a romance in which the power of fairies and/or magic is present and works to aid or hurt the romance in question. In the case of “Lanval” magic and fairies come to the aid of our protagonist Lanval, and ultimately lead to the formation of a romantic relationship in his life. However, Lanval faces a dilemma as he talks of his love to the fairy woman while rejecting the Queen’s love, and thus realizes he will never be able to see his beloved again, as she had told him never to speak of their romance or he would lose her. Luck turns in his favor though, as even after having spoken of their love, his beloved returns and they leave together. Many may speculate as to why Marie
Love waxes timeless. It is passionate and forbidden, and a true head rush. Marriage, on the other hand, is practical and safe, a ride up the socioeconomic ladder. In "The Other Paris," Mavis Gallant weaves the tale of Carol and Howard, a fictional couple who stand on the verge of a loveless marriage, to symbolize the misguided actions of men and women in the reality of the 1950s, the story's setting. By employing stereotypical, ignorant, and uninteresting characters, Gallant highlights the distinction between reality and imagination.
...ve for these characters was fated to be unattainable and deceiving. The attempt to seek out such represents a temptation that is pointless to pursue because the simple variable of change is unavoidable. This patriarchal society's denial to this truth is a cruel deception that, in both poems, victimizes women. The deception is maintained in the fairy-tale folklores of romantic poetry that Goblin Market and The Prince's Progress imitate, both literally and suggestively. Rossetti’s narratives illustrate a complex of immediate gratification, especially with the incorporation of romantic ideas, and they highlight that the fulfillment of these delights, however brief, leads to certain betrayal and disappointment. In this way, Rossetti oddly criticizes the romantic ideas in traditional literature while presenting a review of the beliefs fundamental to those ideas.
Throughout the Lais of Marie de France there are several themes presented as central to the various stories. Some of these themes are present in all of the lais. One such example is that of courtly love and it’s implications. Courtly love being one of the more prominent themes in all of medieval literature, it is fittingly manifested in all of the lais as well. Another theme present in two of the lais is isolation. The theme of isolation plays a large role in the stories of Guigemar and Lanval. In each of these lais we see isolation as a factor in determining the fates of the central figures. Within each lai isolation is represented on several different occasions, each time having a direct impact on the outcome. These instances of isolation may be seen at times to be similar in nature and consequence, and different at other times. By sifting through both works these instances may be extrapolated and analyzed.
Marie de France’s “Lanval” is a Breton lai dominated by themes common to 12th century literature, which through its exploration of love, erotic desire, wealth, gender and community, tells the story of a young knight who finds himself caught between two worlds: his lover’s and his own. Forced to separate these societies by a warning in which his lover states, “do not let any man know about this…you would lose me for good if this love were known” (Lines 145-148), Lanval must keep his love a secret and exist apart from the Arthurian world into which he was born. Consequently, romantic love between Lanval and his fairie queen exists conditionally, that is upon Lanval’s physical and emotional isolation. This restriction suggests that romantic love, as described in terms of erotic desire and physical/emotional devotion throughout “Lanval,” is unsuited for existence in the mundanity of Arthurian society. Therefore, Lanval’s solitude is necessary for his maintaining his relationship with the fairie queen, a fact that suggests the incompatibility of romantic love with Arthurian society, as Marie depicts it.
Very different from traditional writings of the past was the new flourish of troubadour poetry. Troubadour poetry, derived of courtly romances, focused on the idea of unrequited love. “A young man of the knightly class loved a lady”, most often, “the lady was married to the young man’s lord”. The courtly lover would compose highly lyrical and erotic poems in honor of his lady, and the troubadour was filled with rapture even at the slightest kindness that the lady might offer him.3 This new literary artifice provides us clues to the cultural changes that took place in medieval Europe during this time.
In The Lais of Marie de France, the theme of love is conceivably of the utmost importance. Particularly in the story of Guigemar, the love between a knight and a queen brings them seemingly true happiness. The lovers commit to each other an endless devotion and timeless affection. They are tested by distance and are in turn utterly depressed set apart from their better halves. Prior to their coupling the knight established a belief to never have interest in romantic love while the queen was set in a marriage that left her trapped and unhappy. Guigemar is cursed to have a wound only cured by a woman’s love; he is then sent by an apparent fate to the queen of a city across the shores. The attraction between them sparks quickly and is purely based on desire, but desire within romantic love is the selfishness of it. True love rests on a foundation that is above mere desire for another person. In truth, the selfishness of desire is the
Bloch, R. Howard. Medieval Misogyny and the Invention of Western Romantic Love. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1991.
Medieval and Renaissance literature develops the concepts of love and marriage and records the evolution of the relation between them. In Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, Christian love clashes with courtly love, as men and women grapple with such issues as which partner should rule in marriage, the proper, acceptable role of sex in marriage, and the importance of love as a basis for a successful marriage. Works by earlier writers portray the medieval literary notion of courtly love, the sexual attraction between a chivalric knight and his lady, often the knight's lord's wife. The woman, who generally held mastery in these relationships based on physical desire and consummation, dictated the terms of the knight's duties and obligations, much like a feudal lord over a vassal. This microcosm of romance between man and woman was anchored by the macrocosm of the bonds among men and their fealty to their lord. The dominance of women and fealty to the leader in courtly love contrasts with the dominance ...
During the Middle Ages, Courtly love was a code which prescribed the conduct between a lady and her lover (Britannica). The relationship of courtly love was very much like the feudal relationship between a knight and his liege. The lover serves his beloved, in the manner a servant would. He owes his devotion and allegiance to her, and she inspires him to perform noble acts of valor (Schwartz). Capellanus writes, in The Art of Courtly Love, “A true lover considers nothing good except what he thinks will please his beloved”. The stories of Marie de France and Chrétien de Troyes illustrate the conventions of courtly love.
“The Wife of Bath’s Tale” is written in an entertaining and adventurous spirit, but serves a higher purpose by illustrating the century’s view of courtly love. Hundreds, if not thousands, of other pieces of literature written in the same century prevail to commemorate the coupling of breathtaking princesses with lionhearted knights after going through unimaginable adventures, but only a slight few examine the viability of such courtly love and the related dilemmas that always succeed. “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” shows that women desire most their husband’s love, Overall, “The Wife of Bath’s Tale” shows that the meaning of true love does not stay consistent, whether between singular or separate communities and remains timeless as the depictions of love from this 14th century tale still hold true today.
The tales of King Arthur and many of their numerous characters are well known in literature. The Arthurian world is one of the great myths of modern times. Those great pieces of literature have many common themes, one of them being courtly love “L’amour Courtois”. This paper talks of courtly love as seen in King Arthur’s world especially examining “Yvain or the Knight with the Lion” and “Lancelot: or the Knight of the Cart”. Furthermore, one of the goals is to show how that courtly love could be seen in today in our world.
The tale of Sleeping Beauty is influenced by oral folklore and various written versions. Today fairytales are told as a domain for the entertainment and teachings of children. In traditional storytelling, peasants transmitted folklore orally around campfires to audiences of mixed ages. However, during the 17th century, peasant tales, such as Sleeping Beauty, were altered by writers like Charles Perrault’s, to appeal to the courts of aristocracy. Thus the characters of Sleeping Beauty adorned a courtly air to appeal to the crown, such as Louis XIV of France. Throughout history, various cultural influences transformed the tale of Sleeping Beauty through the manipulation of various social forces to achieve better entertainment purposes and reflect Christian beliefs and customs. In addition, the moral of the tale conveys a message that women remain passive in hope to marry her true lov...
There are factors upon factors that make true love purer and more romantic than any other form of love, and they are not to be taken lightly. Simply stated, the young man and princess’ relationship was not true love, but experimentation and discovery. If the princess unconditionally loved this man, she would feel the need to intervene during his trial. She would not experience a desire, particularly a forceful desire, to be envious and suspicious on the young man’s behalf, but she was. “With all the intensity of the savage blood transmitted to her through long lines of wholly barbaric ancestors,” Stockton notes on p.17, “she hated the woman who blushed and trembled behind the silent door,” and the princess absolutely did, but she still attended the sadistic trial. The author further explains the princess’ harsh temperament on page 17, remarking that “had it not been for the moiety of barbarism in her nature it is probable that lady would not have been there.” Notwithstanding the ardor the King’s daughter felt around her lover, their relationship was merely a short-lived infatuation due to the statements above and