Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Chapter 12 medical terminology vocab
Chapter 12 medical terminology vocab
Medical terminology chapter 14 vocabulary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Bloodletting & Miraculous Cures examines the connections between the complications of medicine and one’s humanity. The author Vincent Lam does this by crafting a story that explains the emotional and distancing consequences of practicing medicine. Firstly, he achieves this by employing complex medical terminology that readers are unfamiliar with. This creates a feeling of detachment, which is something doctors themselves experience in their profession. Similarly, Lam employs a creative formatting to further to capture this feeling. In the short story “Contract Tracing,” he delivers the plot through files, transcripts and notes. This paints the conflict, reveals details, and adds a much-needed sense of urgency. In “Contract Tracing” by Vincent …show more content…
Lam, distancing diction and a carefully chosen format develop the idea of the struggle to keep one’s humanity in the medical profession.
In “Contract Tracing,” Lam uses excessive medical terminology and detail to deliver a satisfying but somehow distancing story. In particular, many of the stories are littered with medical terminology and lengthy descriptions of medical procedures. There are sentences that are deliberately written to be difficult for a reader to fully understand. For example, Lam initially uses this technique to introduce the conflict of Fitzgerald suffering from SARS. Lam describes Fitzgerald as having “mild tachypnea” and “fine inspiratory crackles” (273). While the vocabulary immediately brings urgency into the situation, it also makes the severity of Fitzgerald’s illness unclear. Thus, it may influence readers to overlook Fitzgerald’s suffering. Afterwards, Lam also utilizes this same technique when updating Fitzgerald’s condition. Instead of simple explanations, Lam uses convoluted descriptions. As readers comb through the doctor's notes, they discover Fitzgerald’s X-ray shows “patchy densities and air bronchograms suggestive of widespread consolidation” (Lam 273). In this description, the language and tone used are objective and impersonal. Similar to the reader …show more content…
distancing themselves out of confusion, Fitzgerald’s doctor, Dr. Zenkie, also portrays a sense of detachment. He reports these results from a distant point of view. Consequently, it becomes easy for readers to lose focus of what Fitzgerald himself is feeling or experiencing. This distancing effect is a direct reflection of a doctor’s need to distance himself or herself from patients. Doctors do this to set emotional boundaries, or to avoid letting their feelings influence their judgement. However, this leaves room for frailties to emerge, where human connection and empathy can become lost. As a result, medicine and cures become the focus, at the expense of human empathy. Doctors become stripped of their humanity through their own detachment and lose the human ability to connect. Thus, Lam’s use of word choice allows readers to see that medicine can begin to deprive one’s humanity. The strategic word choice is effective in communicating the theme, but Lam also relies on format to establish tone and to further the theme. The majority of the story’s plot is told through medical notes, professional files, and transcripts. These memos, coupled with intense medical terminology, shove the reader into the fast environment of the situation. Similar to using complex terminology, the unique format also distances the reader from the story. An example of this formatting is when Lam uses a news clip to hastily mention that Fitzgerald had “collapsed within an isolation room” (304). By framing the incident as a news story of the past, it is portrayed as a distant memory instead of a pressing matter. Readers feel less emotion compared to when Lam employs first-person narrative in his other stories. In those stories, the reader is engrossed in the emotions of the character; whereas in “Contact Tracing”, it is easy to be unemotional. Likewise, this detachment also arises when the reader obtains crucial information “from the files of the World Health Organization” (Lam 269). The third-person narrative describes how “the majority of SARS cases occur in health care workers,” and this diverts attention away from the illness of the characters (Lam 283). For the desensitized reader, this is portrayed as yet another inevitable event that has happened. Furthermore, the story continues in such a quick pace that there is no time to reflect on these developments. By using a quick, third-person narrative that is often ambiguous, Lam conditions the reader to be desensitized and distant. Ultimately, these techniques are effective in pushing the reader away in order to show the reader the distance some doctors feel. Character actions are key pieces of evidence demonstrating the distancing of the doctors of Bloodletting & Miraculous Cures.
For example, there is a consultation report from Dr. Zenkie that initially seems professional and brief. However, the diction used can give insight into Dr. Zenkie’s personality. For example, his notes impersonally refer to Fitzgerald as a “timely and interesting case” (Lam 274). By using this distancing language, Fitzgerald is treated as if he were a puzzle to solve and not an actual human. Lam has purposely portrayed Dr. Zenkie as someone who has this mindset. However, Dr. Zenkie is not the only person who has this character flaw. Ironically, Fitzgerald himself confesses his own feeling of detachment in his job. He describes his job as “playing Mr. Doctor,” like an actor assuming a role (Lam 291). It is easy to see Fitzgerald is no longer the same person who had a love for medicine. Overall, these subtleties are how Lam shows that doctors are dehumanized because they treat patients as problems, rather than humans they must attach to and emphasize
with. Through the story “Contract Tracing,” we are given many insights on the role of medicine in shaping a person’s humanity. The author’s approach to literature delivers an insight into the human condition and presents realizations, even to readers. Lam takes readers onto this path by first creating distance between the reader and the story. As readers, we develop a detached feeling because of the complex medical terminology used. This mirrors the need for doctors to distance themselves from their patients. Furthermore, Lam uses certain formats to tell a distancing version of events. These connections are brought together with evidence to support the overarching theme of the book. It allows Lam to create an understanding that an individual can be victimized by the dehumanizing nature of medicine. An interesting extension to this close reading could be to analyze Dr. Sri and to hypothesize how medicine has shaped his humanity.
Dr. Atul Gawande, a Harvard Medical School graduate and writer for The New Yorker, phenomenally illustrates the unknown side of healthcare professions in his book, Complications: A Surgeon’s Notes on an Imperfect Science. By exploring the ethical and analytical aspects of medicine while entertaining readers with relatable anecdotes, Gawande impresses on his audience the importance of recognizing the wonders of the healthcare field, as well as the fallibility of those within it.
The main medical issues in this novel are related to the suspicious deaths of individuals in contact with Dr. Moe Mathis and medical malpractice cases. First of all, Casey, Mathis’s young and healthy colt died of a sudden death. As Dr. Mathis performed an autopsy on him, he found that the horse ingested blue pills. He identified the pills as Coumadin, a blood thinner. This would explain the animal’s death due to an extensive hemorrhage. Hence, his death would probably be a premediated murder. Moreover, Mr. Swensen, a patient of Dr. Mathis whom was diagnosed with stage IV prostate cancer, shortly died after surgery of a cause identified as pulmonary embolus. It was found that he was misdiagnosed and did not have any cancer at all. This showed a medical
Popular television paint a glorified image of doctors removing the seriousness of medical procedures. In the non-fiction short story, “The First Appendectomy,” William Nolen primarily aims to persuade the reader that real surgery is full of stress and high stakes decisions rather than this unrealistic view portrayed by movies.
“Hospitals today are growing into mighty edifices in brick, stone, glass and marble. Many of them maintain large staffs, they use the best equipment that science can devise, they utilize the most modern methods in devoting themselves to the noblest purpose of man, that of helping’s one’s stricken brother. But they do all this on a business basis, submitting invoices for services rendered.”
"Blood Work", by Holly Tucker is "A Tale of Medicine & Murder in the Scientific Revolution." The book is a story about Holly Tucker's adventure on trying to find out who actually murdered a madman from Paris hundreds of years ago. that goes by the name, Antoine Mauroy. Today, Mauroy's death interests Tucker and she wants to get to the bottom of this and see who is to blame for his unexpected death.
Bloodletting & Miraculous Cures is an ideal addition to the 4U English course. It relates course texts in an effort to give students the opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of all media covered in the curriculum. Furthermore, the author explores the duality of human nature through many of his characters and their actions throughout the novel, giving students the opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of one of the core course themes. There are also many situations and emotions present in the novel that grade twelve students may experience as they leave their secondary school. In conclusion, not only would this text provide teachers with plenty of opportunities for academic assessment, but it also gives students an insight into reacting and coping with whatever their future may bring, which is essential for teenagers who will grow to lead the world.
This essay will be evaluating the question: how did language and communication play a role in shaping what happened to Lia? Also, it will look at if Fadiman points out ways in which communication practices between doctors and patients could be improved. These were important in the book, The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down, because they shaped what would happen to Lia in the end. The evidence we will look at will include the facts that the doctors and the Lees couldn’t understand each other, the hospitals didn’t have enough interpreters for everyone, and that the Lees did not trust hospitals or doctors in the first place because of their culture.
The hospital release forms illustrate the white man’s way of making the narrator less than human by depriving him of his work at the company; the doctor will not let him work:
Many of the subject’s were twins, mostly identical. Twins when through the worst of the surgeries, including blood transfusions. Doctors drained one twin of his blood and inject it into the other twin to see what would happen. Blood would be drawn from each twin in large quantities about ten cubic centimeters were drawn daily. The twins who were very young suffered the worst of the blood drawing. They would be forced to have blood drawn from their necks a very painful method. Other methods included from their fingers for smaller amounts, and arms sometimes from both simultaneously. The doctors would sometimes see how much they could withdraw until the patient passed out or died.
Almost doctors and physicians in the world have worked at a hospital, so they must know many patients’ circumstances. They have to do many medical treatments when the patients come to the emergency room. It looks like horror films with many torture scenes, and the patients have to pay for their pains. The doctors have to give the decisions for every circumstance, so they are very stressful. They just want to die instead of suffering those medical treatments. In that time, the patients’ family just believes in the doctors and tells them to do whatever they can, but the doctors just do something that 's possible. Almost patients have died after that expensive medical treatments, but the doctors still do those medical procedures. That doctors did not have enough confidence to tell the truth to the patients’ families. Other doctors have more confidence, so they explain the health condition to the patients’ families. One time, the author could not save his patient, and the patient had found another doctor to help her. That doctor decided to cut her legs, but the patient still died in fourteen days
Perkins describes a rocky relationship between her narrator and her husband. John has a respectable social position as a doctor and is therefore put in a position of authority. This is made clear in the lines: “If a physician of high standing.assures friends and relatives that there is really nothing the matter with one but temporary nervous depression.what is one to do?” (Perkins 76) Perkins puts her narrator in a position in which she is surrounded by male authority figures who restrict her will and social nature.
As the story begins, the unnamed doctor is introduced as one who appears to be strictly professional. “Aas often, in such cases, they weren’t telling me more than they had to, it was up to me to tell them; that’s why they were spending three dollars on me.” (par. 3) The doctor leaves the first impression that he is one that keeps his attention about the job and nothing out of the ordinary besides stating his impressions on the mother, father and the patient, Mathilda. Though he does manage to note that Mathilda has a fever. The doctor takes what he considers a “trial shot” and “point of departure” by inquiring what he suspects is a sore throat (par. 6). This point in the story, nothing remains out of the ordinary or questionable about the doctor’s methods, until the story further develops.
As the story begins, the unnamed doctor is introduced as one who appears to be strictly professional. “Aas often, in such cases, they weren’t telling me more than they had to, it was up to me to tell them; that’s why they were spending three dollars on me.” (par. 3) The doctor leaves the first impression that he is one that keeps his attention about the job and nothing out of the ordinary besides stating his impressions on the mother, father and the patient, Mathilda. Though he does manage to note that Mathilda has a fever. The doctor takes what he considers a “trial shot” and “point of departure” by inquiring what he suspects is a sore throat (par. 6). This point in the story, nothing remains out of the ordinary or questionable about the doctor’s methods, until the story further develops.
It has recently come to my attention that you have been slandering my practices publicly. I’m not entirely sure what has inspired this criticism but I can assure you your claims are without proof and do not truly encapsulate the reason behind my techniques. You seem to believe that my practice of bloodletting is not a sensible treatment under any condition. However, I still hold my position that it is a useful technique, so in this letter I will argue why my belief in bloodletting is so strong as well as how I do not, in-fact, do so indiscriminately.
It is a movement that is meant rehumanize medicine: to be move, interpret and absorb stories of patient’s illnesses (Johna). Both the physician and the patient can benefit from storytelling. Patients find it thera-peutic as their words give shape to the chaos of their illness and physicians they benefit from the words of their patients by understanding their patients on a whole new level. Dr. Nuilla, who cur-rently teaches Medical Humanities at Baylor College of Medicine comments that, “Storytell-ing/writing in medical school, help become a more humanistic doctor," he adds that when he was in medical school he never took any humanities classes but he finds that it could’ve been benefi-cial for him in his early years as a doctor. As narrative medicine is becoming more popular, more healthcare professionals and patients are realizing the importance of telling stories of illness to each other (Charon). Now healthcare professionals recognize that the diagnosis of a patient isn’t only in the patient telling the symptoms of his/her disease but they can be made by understanding and hearing the person tell his narratives. In order to help physicians understand what they and their patients experience while going through a certain illness, medical educators are now paying attention to narrative competence or the