Rubens,
As if Medicare’s declining reimbursements was not a big enough deterrent to lengthier, more satisfying higher-quality visits, Medicare’s reimbursement system actually outright punishes doctors for spending more time with patients. As the length of visit increases, Medicare reimburses physicians marginally less. For example, in the D.C. metro area, Medicare reimburses physicians $47.53 for a 10-minute follow up visit (CPT 99212), but only $154.76 for a comparable 40-minute visit (CPT 99215). Financially, doctors are better off taking care of four established patients in a 40-minute block as opposed to seeing one patient for 40 minutes. This puts additional pressure on physicians to see more patients in less time, with job satisfaction
and quality of care suffering as a result (Fodeman, 2015).
Membership Services (MSD) at Kaiser Permanente used to be a modest department of sixty staff. However, over the past few years the department has doubled in size, creating minor departmental reorganization. In addition the increase of departmental staffing, several challenges became apparent. The changes included primary job function, as well as the introduction of new network system software which slowed down the processes of other departments. These departments included Claims (who pay the bills for service providers outside of the Kaiser Permanente network), and Patient Business Services (who send invoices to members for services received within Kaiser Permanente). Due to the unforeseen challenges created by the system upgrade, it was decided that MSD would process the calls for both of the affected departments. Unfortunately, this created a catastrophic event of MSD receiving numerous phone calls from upset members—who had received bills a year after the service had been provided. The average Monday call volume had risen from 1,800 to 2,600 calls per day. The average handling time for each phone call had risen as well—from an acceptable standard of 5.6 minutes to an unfavorable 7.2 minutes. The department continued to be kept inundated with these types of calls for the two years that these changes have been effect.
Lischko A. (2011). Physician payment reform: A review and update of the models. Massachusetts medical society.
With the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has initiated reimbursement based off of patient satisfaction scores (Murphy, 2014). In fact, “CMS plans to base 30% of hospitals ' scores under the value-based purchasing initiative on patient responses to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey, or HCAHPS, which measures patient satisfaction” (Daly, 2011, p. 30). Consequently, a hospital’s HCAHPS score could influence 1% of a Medicare’s hospital reimbursement, which could cost between $500,000 and $850,000, depending on the organization (Murphy, 2014).
There has been a shortage of physicians, lack of inpatient beds, problems with ambulatory services, as well as not having proper methods of dealing with patient overflow, all in the past 10 years (Cummings & francescutti, 2006, p.101). The area of concern that have been worse...
In Medicare's traditional fee-for-service payment system, doctors and hospitals generally are paid for each test and procedure. This drives up costs by rewarding providers for doing more, even when it’s not needed. ACOs continue to utilize fee for service by creating incentives to be more efficient by offering bonuses when providers keep ...
Pay-for-performance (P4P) is the compensation representation that compensates healthcare contributors for accomplishing pre-authorized objectives for the delivery of quality health care assistance by economic incentives. P4P is increasingly put into practice in the healthcare structure to support quality enhancements in healthcare systems. Thus, pay-for-performance can be seen as a means of attaching financial incentives to the main objectives of clinical care. However, reimbursement is a managed care payment by a third party to a beneficiary, hospital or other health care providers for services rendered to an insured or beneficiary. This paper discusses how reimbursement can be affected by the pay-for-performance approach and how system cost reductions impact the quality and efficiency of healthcare. In addition, it also addresses how pay-for-performance affects different healthcare providers and their customers. Finally, there will also be a discussion on the effects pay-for-performance will have on the future of healthcare.
Medicare is a social policy many of our seniors look to for their stability when they reach 65
Just as the economy travels through its cycles, from bear to bull and back again, so does the number of doctors in the country. In the 1960s, the government began an attempt to create more physicians using various methods. One such method was to reward medical schools for training a certain number of doctors (Bernstein 1013). This would give the medical schools an incentive to accept more students and to allow the students to fully graduate and go on to attend residency programs. Another such method was to give a monetary reward to residency programs for providing graduate medical education. This totaled approximately $7 billion, a sum large enough to “pay the tuition and living expenses of every medical student in the United States” with a large portion left over as well (Bernstein 1013). Because of these actions taken by the government, many more physicians were created, causing a physician surplus throughout the 1980s to the late 1990s, although this claim was based on ...
ACO is an organization that consists of doctors, suppliers of health care e.g hospitals, clinics, all health care services, and anyone involved in patient care to provide the best possible care for all Medicare patients. This model was adopted by the Affordable Care ACT with the number one goal of providing timely, accessible and appropriate care for all Medicare patients. Not only was the ACO supposed to provide the best care, but a very important aim was to reduce unnecessary hospitalization of patients, unnecessary medical emergency visits, and any other duplicated medical service. This was supposed to bring about big changes in the health care system as it number one aim was to reduce the health care cost for the government and everyone
Medicare is the nation’s largest health insurance program. Generally, you are eligible for Medicare if you or your spouse worked for at least ten years in Medicare-covered employment and you are 65 years old and a citizen or permanent resident of the United States. Medicare-covered services include hospital insurance, inpatient hospital care, skilled nursing facility care, home health care, hospice care, and medical insurance (Medicare U.S.) With such an encompassing effect on the health insurance field, Medicare provides a haven for older individuals, and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who require the best medical care for whatever possible reason. The only problem with this scenario is that doctors are turning many older patients away because they have Medicare. Why do doctors turn away Medicare patients? Is there a reason why certain doctors turn away certain patients?
In 2015, the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) released the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) which implements the final rule which offers financial incentives for Medicare clinicians to deliver high-quality patient centered care.5 Essentially, taking the time to learn the patient’s goals and treatment preferences allows for the patient to walk away from the medical treatment or service feeling understood and cared for by the provider.4 Thus, resulting in a better, more comprehensive plan of care. Policy makers are hopeful that the new incentive-based payment system will accelerate improvement efforts.
The purpose of this policy brief is to seek facts about Medicaid Expansion, and make a decisions if the state of Florida should expand their Medicaid. The policy brief describe the advantages of expanding Medicaid in all states, and the disadvantages of making it a requirement for every states in the United States. The state of Florida should expand Medicaid Coverage.
According to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, 55 million Americans received Medicare for a number of health services in 2015. From doctor visits and surgery to home health care and medical equipment, Medicare covers a wide range of products and services. Navigating the costs of the government-funded program is why clients continue to rely on Hurley Care Solutions, a Medicare counseling firm in Rochester, NY.
Medicare Part C is also known as Medicare Advantage. Medicare Part C allows Medicare recipients obtain a private health insurance plan. The plans the induvial enrolled in must be Medicare approved. These individuals must pay the Medicare Part B premium. Other health care packages such as vision, dental, hearing, and prescription coverage may be included. The same networking restrictions apply to the Medicare Advantage plan as it does to regular private insurance plans. If the individual wants to upgrade to Medicare Advantage they can only do so October 15th- December 7th. If the individual wants to go back to the Original Medicare they can only do so January 1st – February 14th. To qualify you must have both Medicare Parts A and Part B. There is one restriction on an individual cannot have end stage renal failure. Parts C and D are completely optional. The eligibility requirements are they must have Medicare Parts A and B and enroll during
In the United States, nearly one-fifth of patients discharged from the hospital are readmitted within thirty days, and most of those readmissions are considered to be preventable (Verhaegh et al., 2014). Many opportunities to reduce health care costs and prevent readmissions could save Medicare as much as $12 billion a year (Constantino, Frey, Hall & Painter, 2013). These numbers are significant from a financial standpoint, but do not consider the negative impact on the patient’s experience, the perception of poor care quality and inadequate transitional care. Hospital readmissions may be linked to ineffective discharge planning, lack of care coordination, lack of outpatient follow-up care, client’s non-compliance with treatment regimen, inadequate