Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of clinical reasoning theory
Essay on clinical reasoning
Evaluation of clinical reasoning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Reasoning is a key component in understanding medicine. It impacts the decision-making strategies used by doctors in their chosen medical field daily, whether it be routine check-ups, surgeries or serious accidents. Decision making is influenced by how people get to grips with the decision that they are being faced with and how they seek advice to help in that decision. In clinical reasoning the deciding factor is making the best choice; the best treatment for a patient, finding out the correct diagnosis and so on. (Higgs, p.93, 2008) Whereas in diagnostic reasoning doctors much determine what the best diagnoses may be, what is the most like diagnoses based on the knowledge that has been provided by test results and a patient’s medical history. …show more content…
Their study found that three factors were involved in analysing medical diagnosis; firstly, the medical knowledge that is relative to disease and symptom complexes, secondly the symptoms that are presented by the patient and finally the complexes that are connected to decide on the final diagnosis. Doctors factor in the most likely diagnosis by calculating what conditions their patients are presenting and comparing these conditions under possible disease complexes. Similarly, to the research carried out by Ledley and Lusted (1959) Kassirer (1989) conducted a study proposing that there are three reasoning strategies used by medical professionals; probabilistic, causal and deterministic reasoning. Probabilistic reasoning relies on statistics where doctors would use the significance found in test results and clinical trials to distinguish which treatment is suitable for a patient. Casual reasoning is used when a doctor collects the health aspects such as diet, exercise, etc of a patient and uses the findings to verify a diagnosis. Deterministic reasoning takes a different approach, where a doctor would use a set of rules built from practice in their field such as recognising symptoms to assess a patient and recognize an accurate
The three of the medical values emotional detachment, mastering uncertainty and clinical experience are all connected to the article “What’s The Trouble” by Jerome Groopman. Emotional detachment can relate to the part of the article where Jerome was very upset at himself when he misdiagnosed Brad. “I was furious with myself. Because I liked Brad, I hadn’t wanted to add to his discomfort and had cut the examination short. Perhaps I hoped unconsciously that the cause of his fever was trivial and that I would not find evidence of an infection on his body” (Groopman). This shows how he had a connection with Brad because he liked him and when Brad came In with symptoms, Jerome had mis-diagnosed him because he did not emotionally detach himself. There wasn’t proof that it was definitely the reason but it would make sense when you look at the situation. The article also mentioned how Brads parents wanted to see Jerome, at first he did not want to see them because he was upset but that is when he pulled together and became strong and talked to them. The article is connected to mastering uncertainty because in the article it talks about the many mistakes they have made and how you have to learn how to deal with it. “When people are confronted with uncertainty-the situation of every doctor attempting to diagnose a patient-they are susceptible to unconscious emotions and personal biases, and are more likely to make cognitive errors” (Groopman). This description from the article connects emotions with mistakes. This connects the values of emotional detachment and mastering uncertainty. Mastering uncertainty is very important because you have to notice that you will make mistakes. The article talks about Croskerry and how he was surprised with the amount of errors that have been made. “Doctors typically begin to diagnose patients the moment they meet them” (Groopman). This shows that doctors often jump to conclusions and may not think about the issue. This can easily
With the high degree of variations in health care, patients can be under or over treated or even treated with the wrong treatment for their illness. These unwarranted care techniques can be categorized into three different situations. The first category of unwarranted care is the use of evidence or lack thereof, based on other medical care. The way to explain this category is that a care plan for a patient is proven effective without any proof as to why. The example given by Kongstvedt (2007) is the use of beta blockers post heart attack. Beta blockers prove to be effective in nearly one h...
Pearsosn, H. (2013). Science and Intuition: Do both have a Place in Clinical Decision Making?
As the field of healthcare has changed, new diseases and disorders have developed. It is impossible for one doctor to know how to recognize and treat every disease in the world. With evidence-based guidelines, they can come close. These guidelines may not have a perfect success rate, but they can make diagnosing illness easier.
Gong, Y. (2010). Case-based Medical reasoning. HMI 8571 Decision Support Systems in Healthcare. Feb 22, 2010. Retrieved on 2/22/10 https://hmi.missouri.edu/moodle/mod/resource/view.php?id=11201
Implementing the terms that encompass clinical reasoning will teach students to take all aspects of each patient into account and will follow the occupational therapy holistic approach. The elements that make up clinical reasoning as a whole are narrative reasoning, interactive reasoning, procedural reasoning, pragmatic reasoning, and conditional reasoning (Neistadt, 1996).
Sacristán, J. (2011, April 25). Exploratory trials, confirmatory observations: A new reasoning model in the era of patient-centered medicine. . Retrieved May 23, 2014, from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/57
Problem solving research was initially aimed at describing reasoning by physicians to improve instuctions and as a process of testing hypotheses. Solutions to difficult diagnostic problems were found in hypothesis early in the diagnostic process ad use them for further collection of data (Elstein & Schwarz, 2002). Problem solving consists of four strategies; hypothesis testing,pattern recognition, specific instances, and general prototypes. The choice of strategy for diagnostic problem solving depends on the perceived difficulty of the case and on knowledge of content as well as strategy (Elstein & Schwarz, 2002). Decision making involves many information typically perceived and evaluated in order to produce the best single choice (Wickens et al., 2013). Availability is when people tend to overestimate the frequency of vivid or easily recalled events and to underestimate the frequency of events that are either very ordinary or difficult to recall as it refers to the ease which instances or occurrences can be brought to mind (Wickens et al., 2013). Representativeness refers to estimating the probability of disease by judging how similar a case is to a diagnostic category or prototype (Elstein & Schwarz, 2002). Bias, of course plays a role as well, confirmation bias describes a tendency for people to see
Assuming without having all the facts, can lead to false conclusions. When assuming something, you are less likely to get all the facts needed, in order to provide the best possible quality care. When the best care is not provided, health can be compromised, possibly leading to serious consequences for both the patient and the
Decision making is part of our daily routine. We make decisions every day not just in our personal lives but also in our profession. As a healthcare professional, making a sound clinical decision is vital to accurately diagnosed a patient, and to establish an effective treatment intervention for them.
A misdiagnosis occurs when a doctor fails to recognize symptoms, instead they attribute them to another illness. Thus, the original illness may go untreated. This can cause the symptoms to worsen. While the patient is taking medicine that’s supposedly supposed to make them feel better, it can worsen the disease. By the time they find out that they are taking the wrong medication, it can be too late and the illness most likely will have gotten to the point where it may be too late to treat. For example, “A doctor in a hospital fails to recognize cardiac tamponade in a 63-year-old man, and the lack of diagnosis or treatment leads to his death” (Morgan & Morgan). A few months ago, my mother got into a car accident. She went to the doctor and complained of neck pain. The doctor told her that she just needed to rest and it was just a minor issue. A few weeks later, she returned to the hospital because the pain just seemed to worsen. After conducting a few tests, the doctor then found out that she had a compression fracture. As a result, she had to go to physical therapy. Doctors make mistakes and it’s up to the patient to let them know when they fear that something is bothering them. Per the United States National Practitioner Data Banks, the highest medical malpractice rate of 70% comes from physicians. While dentists carry 13% and nurses carry 9%. Malpractice in healthcare is a serious issue that should be taken seriously. According to the American Journal of Medicine, each year up to 15 percent of patients suffer needlessly as a result of wrong diagnoses, which include misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis.
Evidence-based decision-making entails the process when a practitioner integrates the best research evidence in combination with clinical expertise and patient values to enhance the treatment outcomes. The three fundamental components of evidence-based decision-making include individual clinical expertise, scientific evidence and patient values and preferences (Peterson, Becker, Treasure, Shafran, & Bryant-Waugh, 2016). Scientific evidence entails the adoption of clinically relevant research conducted applying acceptable methodology. Clinical expertise is about the clinician’s cumulated education, skills, and experience in execution of the tasks. Patient values or preferences regard the concerns and expectations
Clinical Reasoning is the process of improving and understanding patient situations. This essay will outline what Clinical Reasoning is, discussing its importance in nursing and midwifery practice, and highlighting the Clinical Reasoning Process.
Illness can occur in anyone at any time and may be accompanied by pain, such as cancer and arthritis. Many patients believe they can find cures in other types of medicine without the side-effects of chemotherapy and other medications. This type of medical treatment is known as Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM). Patients who believe in CAM may try various techniques from acupuncture, hypnosis, magnetic therapy, homeopathy, and even urine therapy. The main reason people start to use certain medications or therapies is because other people used them and experienced some kind of benefit. Since everyone is different, the effects may be different. Some therapies and medications work, and some are placebos.
The role of medical checkup is evident: Prevention is better than cure as the adage goes. For a medical practitioner, it is always better to take care of a patient in acute phase of disease; and much better when the discovered disease is not yet declared, than to manage a chronic case or worse, to take care of a case that has reached the severe stage. In the first scenario, the practitioner has on his side all the chances to restore the initial conditions of health, while in the second, he is in a dile...