Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Role of Media in Globalization
The Role of Media in Globalization
Arguments about the bias of the media
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Role of Media in Globalization
Icke (1999: xi) states that "Ignorance is bliss, we say, and that is true-but only for a while. It may be bliss not to know a tornado is coming because you have no need to worry or take action. But while your head is in the sand your back is in the air, the tornado is still coming". If one looked up and faced the tornado, disaster could be avoided. When people give their minds and responsibility away, they give their lives away. This is why the few have always controlled the masses. The few are now manipulating the entire planet because of the globalisation of business, banking and communications. The foundation of that control has always been the same: "Keep the people in ignorance, fear and at war with themselves. Divide, rule, and …show more content…
conquer while keeping the most important knowledge to yourself"(Icke, ibid). Figure (4) Knowledge is in the hands of the few and the rest are kept ignorant.
The classical structure for manipulation and control borrowed from Icke (1999: xi). KNOWLEDGE Readers often notice biased stories when they read or watch news. In order to know if news stories are really biased, people should make sure that the story has at least one of several types of media bias. Ruschman (2006:50-51) quotes Baker's (1987) classification of the seven types of media bias as follows: 1. Bias by Omission This type of bias means to leave out or omit one side of an article that the media owners disagree with or does not fulfill their interests. 2. Bias by Selection of Sources This bias occurs when a reporter quotes more sources that support one view and does not quote sources that support the other. It also occurs when the reporter uses phrases such as 'experts believe', and 'observers say' (such sources are considered factual and accurate), while quoting non-experts or non-official sources to the situation that the reporter disagrees
with. 3. Bias by Story Selection This bias highlights news stories that agree with one side's agenda while ignoring stories that agree with the opposite side's agenda. 4. Bias by Placement This bias gives prominent placement to stories that support one point of view while "burying" stories that support the opposite one. 5. Bias by Labelling Bias by labelling occurs when a journalist refers and presents conservative politicians and groups with ultimate labels while leaving liberal politicians and groups unlabeled. 6. Bias by Commission This bias depends on the errors or false assumptions that support a particular view point. 7. Bias by Spin Bias by spin occurs when the story has only one interpretation of an event or policy, to the exclusion of the other. This bias emphasises aspects of a story favourable to one side without mentioning aspects favourable to another. Danesi (2009:40) states that the word 'bias' means "failure to cover the news in an impartial manner (intentionally or not)". The news media cover the news in terms of "stories" that must have a beginning, a middle, and an end, in other words, a story with antagonists and protagonists. The news media apply a narrative structure to ambiguous events suggesting that these events are easily understood by readers (as retrieved from: rhetorica.net/bias.htm). Ruschmann (2009: 49) states that Bozzell (2004: 36) insisted that the media are anything but objective and stated: "the media are partisan players. They see their role as journalists as not to inform, but to persuade. They aim to make society better and believe the great society is a society drained of its poisonous vestiges of conservatism".
For an example of the authors use of specific examples while describing what the media decides as news worthy the author writes, “The public rarely hears about the routine ceremonies at state dinners, but when President George Bush threw up all over the Japanese prime minister in 1992, the world’s media jumped on the story” (Edwards, Wattenberg, Lineberry, 2015, p. 398). This is an indication of how the media decides what is newsworthy. This quote demonstrates some of the strengths of the article because, not only does the quote support how the media decides what is news worthy, but it also shows no bias and is a factual, specific example. Another quote that demonstrates the strengths of the article is “Journalists and politicians have a symbiotic relationship, with politicians relying on journalists to get their message out and journalists relying on politicians to keep them in the know”. (p.400). this quote demonstrates the strengths of the article because, it shows how the media gets its news, how politicians gains their influence, and shows no bias. One last quote that emphasizes the strengths of this excerpt is “The media can even have a dramatic effect on how the public evaluates specific events by emphasizing one event over others. When during a 1976 presidential debate, President Ford incorrectly stated that the Soviet Union did
Bias is everywhere in the mainstream media whether it is political, celebrity, or worldwide news. Bias can misinform the public and most of the time leaves the whole story to suit their belief. Bias is when someone is presenting information or talking about a topic but being unfair and not showing the whole side of the story. Media keeps certain information to themselves to not make their belief seem bad but as a good thing. In everyday media there is some form of bias that can be small or big depending on the topic. Of course in today's society it seems that bias is okay and acceptable in the media. However people doing their job are bias and present the information to their beliefs. The public thinks they are getting the truth but media is
Let’s start by taking a look at the bias side of electronic media. Take for instance the difference between Fox News and CBS. Both are news stations, both are intended to bring us the news, yet the way in which each station presents its stories to their viewers could not be more different. Few would argue the fact that Fox news appeals to the conservative audience while a station such as CBS would tend to be more liberal. This creates bias. To illustrate my point, let us take a look at how these 2 news stations covered the very same story in completely different ways.
All pieces of information, unless hard fact, are biased. Bias may arise intentionally or not, but either way it is imperative that readers, watchers, and listeners are aware when they come in contact with media bias. Although it is unrealistic for the media to be completely objective in every issue they cover, media bias is a prevalent issue in the world today, and will continue on unless consumers of the media become truly educated about the world and its events. This is demonstrated in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, as all forms of media are controlled by the World State, in favor of the World State and the culture they have created.
After twenty-eight years working for CBS, Bernard Goldberg decided that he no longer wanted to work for a news station he didn’t admire. Thus, he resigned and began work on his book Bias; a book in which he merely draws attention to the media for reporting from a leftist perspective, preventing the audience from receiving an objective, unbiased view of what really goes on in our world. As an “old-fashioned liberal,” as he calls himself, he does not attempt to gain conservative support for accusing liberals of bias. Rather, he would prefer liberal support for acknowledging this problem in hopes of changing the face of news. He bases his book on his personal experience as a former news anchor for CBS. Despite popular belief, he meant no harm in his book (or in his editorials) to his previous employees. His only hope was to point out an alarmingly, already well-known fact; that reporters, even if unintentionally, at news stations like CBS, NBC, and ABC report the news from their liberal viewpoint, inhibiting their audiences’s right to an accurate portrayal of our news.
Today it seems almost impossible to get a straightforward answer on any major topic from the media. All sources of media have a specific audience that they are intending to hear or view the information that they have prepared, therefore they will cut bits and pieces out so that only the message they are trying to get across will be received. So indeed there is a media bias, and yes it more often than not slants towards the liberal view point, as many reporters and journalists have liberal views themselves.
Ever since the beginning of news, there have been minor alterations to the reports. Doing anything to get their ratings to increase, changes would have to be made, whether it’s simply bending the truth a little or labeling someone or something. In Michael Parenti’s “Methods of Misrepresentation”, Parenti uses his methods of political bias in the news. The news main goal is to grab our attention, no matter what effects it has on the viewers. This is how some mainstream reporters are politically and media biased. “Media plays an extensive role in an individual’s daily life. Right from the second you wake up till you go to bed after saying goodnight to your wife, kid, parents, siblings or friends, you are surrounded in a world built just for you by the media.” (Shafi). The News isn’t the only one influencing the world; no one really notices this but Advertisements play an important role in Media Brainwashing.
Newspapers intend to report both sides of the story but it is difficult to withdraw bias completely. Reporters are only human and bring about their own opinions into their work. This can even happen without any realization that the reporter is adding bias from their own perspective. It can be seen more in some works and less in others, depending on the topic. A reporter focusing on an account of the presidency is likely to take it on with a one sided judgment. The actions of President Obama are so controversial that it is hard not to express the news without a tilt in one direction or another. The New York Times tries to hide this unbalanced spectrum but it still can slip in some instances. President Obama is portrayed by the New York Times with viewpoints that express a negative impact for the United States.
Bennett (2011) felt that one of the biggest problems with bias in the American media was its “overwhelming tendency to downplay the big social, economic, or political picture in favor of the human trials, tragedies, and triumphs (177).” Shaiko (2008) alluded to the fact that the American news media is “accountable to the corporate conglomerates” and not “to the readers, listeners, and viewers (205).” Probably the most telling quotation of all can be found in Chapter 10 of The News Media: Communicating Pol...
Media Awareness Network, "How to Detect Bias in the News." Accessed May 11, 2012. http://www.media-awareness.ca/english/resources/educational/handouts/broadcast_news/bw_bias_in_the_news.cfm.
The instruction and degree of media bias in several states are widely disputed. Practical restrictions to media neutrality include the incapability of journalists to cover all available reports and facts, and the requirement that selected facts be tied into a logical story. No matter how much we may strain to dismiss it, human communication always takes home in a context, through a spiritualist, and among individuals and groups who are situated historically, politically, economically, and communally. This state of personal business is neither bad nor good. It just is. Bias is a small word that identifies the collective controls of the entire context of a message. Journalists, too, speak from political positions, but typically not openly so. The journalistic ethics of impartiality and fairness are strong influences on the vocation. But journalistic impartiality is not the pristine impartiality of philosophy. Alternatively, a journalist attempts to be objective by two methods: 1) fairness to those related with the news and 2) a professional process of information gathering that looks for fairness, completeness, and accuracy. As we all recognize, the ethical heights journalists set for themselves are not always achieved. But, all in all, like politics, it is an admirable profession skillful, for the most
My favorite topic that we have discussed during the scholar’s seminar was week 7 when we talked about perspective, context and media. The topic really interested me as many new stations and social media outlets have biases against one another and can possibly distort the news headlines. For example, in an article by The Washington Times named “Mainstream media maligned: 10 examples of blatant bias” written by Kelly Riddell talks about news stations who “blatantly” showed a bias in articles or their news. But it is ironic because the Washington Times isn’t mentioned at all showing a bias towards their own company, which makes sense. I took away that I must check to make sure sources are reliable and although may have a bias research more to
Critics of impartiality often start by saying that everyone has an opinion and objectivity does not exist in practice. Indeed, according to postmodern philosophical critique, facts and realities are socially constructed and politically negotiated, and therefore subjective rather than objective. The concept of objectivity itself is taken to be a tool of hegemonic discourse, and science is just politics by other means (J. Tim O’Meara, 2001). What is more, impartial journalism can be ruinous. For example, sometimes journalists try hard to balance their stories from different sides but while doing so they come to the lowest form of journalism, to so-called “he said she said journalism”. It is important to realize that this lazy approach of reporting may present lies equally with the truth, which is hardly different from lying. This was the case of reporting the ongoing conflict at the East of Ukraine. European journalists explained the armed conflict by both, the Russian propaganda point of view and Ukrainian actual viewpoint. The outcome of such superficially impartiality was that some people and even political leaders had not perceived Russia as an aggressor that must be banned with sanctions. To point out, the problem of balance is explained by Nick Davies, the author of the book on propaganda in journalism called "Flat Earth News”. Davies gives the eloquent allegory to what real reporting is about. Journalist can interview a man who says it will be sunny and a man who says it's going to rain. Davies describes that the real journalist does not simply write up two opposite opinions, but looks out of the window. (Davies,
But how can we be sure that the news is not biased? Are we receiving information accurately, with details being simple to understand? After further research on media framing, I’ve come to realize that it is not rare to be someone who is skeptical of the news. In decades before now, media did a better job serving the public interests inside their news stories (Callaghan, 2001, p.186). But now, journalists may mix up facts intentionally and build a different story (Callaghan, 2001, p.184). How can one feel safe after knowing the media changes stories to keep us interested? Boring stories may not keep someone excited or fully interested, but at least people would not be misinformed and can, in a way, better prepare for what they will face outside their
In the coming era of American politics, a concentration of news media into a handful of corporations could prove to be incredibly detrimental. News media outlets can report a story in a way that shapes how the viewer perceives the event. The way a story, or even a headline, is worded and depicted can cause the audience to begin reading the article with some sort of unconscious implicit bias. By using this power, the news media parent corporations can shift and change the view of the public