Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Human rights violations in Syria refugees
Unfair justice system in america
Human rights violations in Syria refugees
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Human rights violations in Syria refugees
• Facts: In the year 1993, José Ernesto Medellin Rojas (Born March 4, 1975) a Mexican national was arrested in Texas, for being involved and performing a gang-rape and murdering two teenage girls. Medellin was a Mexican national but lived most of his life in the United States. Later, Medellin confessed to the murders and claimed to have informed the police officials that he was a Mexican national (“Medellin v. Texas,” 2015) To highlight all the facts: o June 24, 1993 Murders taken place o Confession of Medellin to taking part in the rape and murder of two teenage girls in Houston, Texas o Conviction – September 16, 1994 with death sentence on October 11, 1994 o Mexican Govt. April 29, 1997 came to know of the Medellin case and intervened …show more content…
Under the Vienna Convention, Medellin should be given his right to inform/report a consular personnel concerning his detention. According to Medellin, the State (Texas) had violated his rights, which is stated in the Vienna Convention. Medellin case came back to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals after his petition was declined by Supreme Court and that there were 50 other Mexican nationals deprived of their consular rights. The US had totally violated the rights of the Convention that states, the right to contact or inform his/hers consulate for any crime committed by him/her, who is a foreign national. The International Court of Justice (ICJ) wanted the US to reconsider this issue since the Mexican Government wanted legal action against the US in the ICJ (Hall & Sepulveda, 2007) Eventually the State Court had Medellin executed in 2008 and this raised even more issues. One of which being, the state law overrules/overwrites an International Treaty obligation of the US. The stir has created ripple effects through-out and countries being a part of the Vienna convention call it hypocrisy. Also, the question arises if the US Presidential power enables him to make a treaty that was disapproved by the senate (“Medellin v. Texas,”
Texas. Although Hernandez was undeniably guilty of his crime his conviction in the murder of Joe Espinosa was deemed unfair by the Mexican community based upon the enlistment of a partial jury of all whites. Texas authorities argued that Hernandez was legally considered white and had therefore been tried by a jury of his peers. A brilliant yet personally troubled Mexican American lawyer named Gustavo C. Garcia and equally talented Carlos Cadena took on Hernandez’s case, standing not on the claim of his innocence but on the notion that Mexican American were treated as a class apart from whites. Prior to Garcia and Cadena’s victory in the Hernandez vs. Texas case Mexican Americans had been denied protection under the 14th Amendment. The amendment was interpreted by the ruling class as a clause to protect black Americans, Mexican classification as white left them pigeon held in
Caren Campano was a 42 year old woman working a decent job, and married to a man 15 years younger than her. Chris, her husband, was a drug addict that did not have steady income. The night she disappeared they had a large argument, and according to Chris, they both left the house in separate directions to cool off. She left on foot, and he left in the truck to a bar. The next morning he called her job asking if she was at work and they said she never showed up. He called and made a missing person’s report. The investigators went to their house and stated the house was in good condition, and did not look like she left. There was no signs of a fight. However, they found a large brown stain that was still wet next to the bed. When they tested it, it was positive for blood, and when they pulled the carpet back, there was an even larger blood stain on the cushioning under the
As a result, the law enforcement officials have proven to have a lack of empathy and the poor connection to their county. Which has provoked many citizens to speak out against law enforcement and in view of the opinion of the newscasters it has “created a climate of fear” and has left the Latin community feeling intimidated and helpless. The government has precautionary reactions to this violence and have observed the organization of MS-13. The video then speaks of the gangs as “domestic terrorists” with the most threatening crimes, such as the piling unsolved homicide cases, which have led to many suspects. Government officials chose to state that these gang members would be eradicated from their community, by remaining fully committed to “finishing the job”.
Pilkington, Ed. "The Wrong Carlos: How Texas Sent an Innocent Man to His Death." TheGuardian. Guardian News and Media, 16 May 2012. Web. 30 Mar. 2014.
Carlos Deluna was an American man who was convicted of first degree murder. Carlos was executed by the state of Texas for the killing of a 24 year old woman at the Shamrock gas station. The victim Wanda Lopez was stabbed multiple times apparently from a buck knife. Wanda Lopez was the attendant of the gas station and the police was senseless and oblivious to the tape at the gas station and only saw when she was giving the murderer the money yelling “You want it? I’ll give it to you. I’m not going to do nothing to you. Please!!!” There were only four eyewitnesses that was nearby when Wanda Lopez was murdered.
In an article written by a Senior student they discuss a monumental moment in Mexican American history concerning equality in the South. The student’s paper revolves around the Pete Hernandez V. Texas case in which Hernandez receives a life in prison sentence by an all white jury. The essay further discusses how Mexican Americans are technically “white” americans because they do not fall into the Indian (Native American), or black categories and because of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo of 1848. The student’s paper proceeds to discuss the goals connecting the Hernandez V. Texas case which was to secure Mexican American’s right within the fourteenth amendment [1].
Juan Corona was an organized serial killer most commonly know as the, “The Machete Murderer.” Corona was convicted of 25 counts of first-degree murder in 1973 ((Vronsky, 2004). Corona was born in Mexico however, he migrated to the United States in 1950 to follow his brothers footsteps (Cray,1973). He was the 3rd of three children. All brothers worked in the farms and eventually Corona would get certified to be a contractor in order to hire people for fruit picking (Frank, 2013). Once in the States there was a storm that caused a flood, this event caused “strange” effects to Corona, according to his brother, Natividad. In 1956 Natividad, filed a petition to have Corona committed in a mental
In this article, a sixteen year old boy, Adrian Navarro-Canales, is accused of stabbing his mother and brother in Las Vegas, Nevada. Navarro-Canales is suspected to have killed his mother and brother with a butcher knife in their apartment. After the killing, Navarro-Canales took off out of town to get away because of his actions. After police discovered the bloody bodies in the apartment, they launched a manhunt to find Navarro-Canales that extended to the U.S. - Mexican border. About a week later, they found him in a strip mall nine miles from the apartment without him resisting arrest. Police believe that the killings happened on September 17 after they celebrated Navarro-Canales’s birthday a day before, and found the dead bodies on September 20.
“David” was a construction worker from El Salvador and although he was not an MS-13 member, he knew some members through a soccer league of young Central Americans. Actually, he knew one gang member since he had owed him money. David and the gang member made a cash transaction and then decided to have lunch together. However, they were surrounded by federal immigration that arrested them in an MS-13 gang crackdown. They had already arrested 15 member...
The first to be convicted were three men guilty of executing three people on March 13, 1982 during the Massacre of Rio Negro (“Guatemala hands down first sentences for civil war crimes”). The trial took place in a court in the central province of Baja Verapaz, which allowed for controversy to arise (“Guatemala hands down”). The people wanted justice and agreed with Aura Elena’s statement "We are not seeking vengeance, but rather that this massacre not go unpunished ... that is why we trust justice will be done," (“Guatemala hands down”). The trial resulted in a sentence to death by lethal injection for all three men (“Guatemala hands down”). Guilty military personnel continued to be convicted over the following
The US had the right to send troops if these terms were violated, and were also given a lease for a naval base at Guantanamo
...es’ constitutions, the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, according to Wright, “pressed for the acceptance of its rulings in Argentine courts” (166). Not only international efforts, but also domestic efforts, to apply international jurisprudence to local courts were on the rise. For example, in 1995, CELS launched its “program for the application of international law to human right in local courts” based on the amendments to the Argentine constitution (Wright 166). Just as well, human rights lawyers pushed “courts to embrace the international principle that crimes against humanity cannot be amnestied” (Wright, 167). In sum, the International human rights lobby wanted each country to mold its human rights jurisprudence around the rulings of international human rights law, and domestic actors adopted the same goal.
When you first enter the world, it’s easy for one to develop black and white vision. I’m not talking about actual eyesight. By black and white vision, I mean that people have a simple view of the world where one action is completely right and one action is completely wrong. I was one of those people during my early years. I thought I had a clear picture of who I was and what right from wrong was. My change in views is attributed to the first time I experienced an identity crisis and the ideas of altruism and consequentialism that followed.
Valdes, G., Mears, B. and Shoichet, C. (2014) Convicted Cop Killer Edgar Tamayo Arias Executed, [Online], Available: http://edition.cnn.com/2014/01/22/us/mexico-texas-tamayo-execution/ [Date Accessed: 25/01/2014].
...th 2001). Roth argues that the concept of international jurisdiction is not a new idea but was exercised by the US government in the 1970 after an aircraft hijacking. Also the war crime courts established after the end of World War II exercised international jurisdiction. In fact the Geneva Convention states that is a person regardless of their nationality should be brought before the court of any state in which that person has committed grave breaches of law and convention. Roth states that the concept of international jurisdiction is not a new one but that only in recent years have states been willing to act on universal jurisdiction and go after criminals of the international community regardless of their stating or power within the international community. Roth believes in the ability and authority of international organizations and institutions (Roth 2001).