Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Book and film comparison
The film Max was almost exactly like the book Max. All of the major points in the book Max were portrayed in the movie perfectly. The parts in the movie Max that was not identical to the book were minor parts. For example, one of the parts in the book that was not accurately shown in the movie was at the very beginning when Justin was creating a video game disc for Chuy’s cousin in the book they were in Justin’s room and in the movie they were outside. But since that was not a major part of the book it did not matter that it was changed. Another thing that was altered from the book to the movie was how Justin found out his dad was going to try and kill Max. In the movie, Justin was home while his dad raced home from work and rushed to the backyard and attempted to force Max out of his cage into Justin’s Dad’s truck. In the book, Justin was at work with his father and overheard Tyler and his dad talking about how Kyle died and Justin had to race home after his dad to save Max. In the book, it emphasized how Justin would try to do the right thing for Max and the family. The main characters in Max are Justin, Tyler, Max, Justin’s Dad, and Carman. Justin is a round character and throughout the book Justin learns respect for his parents. When Justin’s brother died in Afghanistan, he left his MWD (Military War Dog) Max without a caretaker. Max was so close to …show more content…
This theme was shown in the film by Kyle dying when Justin couldn’t even say bye to him over video chat because he felt as though he was not important to his parents because they always were saying how Kyle is such a good kid. When Kyle died Justin realized how much he really cared about Kyle. The theme of Max was also shown when Max was taken from Justin’s house to be put down and Justin realizes how much he misses him and he was wrong to let animal control take him for something he didn’t
Have you ever read a book and watched its movie and thought that the movie was nothing like the book? The Giver’s story was not adapted well onto the big screen. There were many changes that were made, some of which completely altered the whole course of the storyline. For example, Fiona working at the Nurturing Center instead the House of the Old and the characters taking injections instead of pills also changed the way Jonas acted especially towards Fiona throughout the entire movie Some of the many trivial changes that were made did not affect the movie as much.
The books, A Wrinkle in Time and And Then There Were None, both have many differences in the movie versions. The directors of both movies change the plot to make the movie see fit to what they may have imaged the book to be, while still keeping the story line the same.
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
There are many differences and similarities in the short story of “A Sound of Thunder” and the movie.
The Major scene of the novel even changed in the movie. In the story, Kevin and Max become “Freak the Mighty” when they go to the fireworks together. How this started is just because of Maxwell lifting Kevin on his
His father kills his mother, then the father goes to jail and Max gets stuck with his grandparents. Max is lost, needs a friend desperately and needs help. He even admits it on the first page, “I never had a brain until Freak came along.” He always thought that his head was empty. “Not that I have any ideas. My brain is vacant” (6). He said he was brainless, stupid, couldn’t learn… He did not believe in himself and Freak came along to help him understand that there is an “...unlocked door just waiting for you to open it.” -Unknown
A Comparison A Sound of Thunder by Ray Bradbury and The Star by H.G. Wells
Max does not want to admit that he is not tough. ,for example, when the three boys were at the subway station on their way to go camping, Max hopped on a train and the doors closed. His buddies told him to wait at the next station. When his friends got there Max had streaks running down his face. Max claimed that there was a leak, when he was really crying. Another time was in paragraph 72 Max said “There might not be an end to the bridge.” His friends protested but Max truly was scared. Max tries to look as tough as he possibly can in front of his friends. In paragraph 3 Max said that he had been ready for years to go on this camping trip. But he wasn't ready from the start Of the camping trip. This proves that Max hadn’t been ready.
Scenes in the movie, Malcolm X, were relatively different than scenes from the book, The Autobiography of Malcolm X as Told by Alex Haley. Two scenes from the movie that particularly stood out were when Baines visited Malcolm in prison and when Malcolm was getting a perm before getting arrested. In the movie, while Malcolm was in prison, another prisoner named Baines came by to speak to Malcolm. Malcolm was a drug addict so Baines gave him nutmeg to soothe his addiction, but told him that that was the last time he would ever do drugs and started to educate Malcolm about the Muslim faith. In the book, this same scene happened except Baines did not give Malcolm the nutmeg and advice, another inmate named Bimbi did. Baines seems to not only have
It is evident that Max tries to escape his reality and get lost in a world where he can find freedom from his complex troubles, much like every other child in the world today whom does not know how to deal with such chaotic and complicated thoughts. Max, unknowingly comes face to face with all his emotions through the lives of others, helping him to come to an understanding in his escape. In the film “Where the Wild Things Are” Max’s sister ignores him, he feels his mothers new boyfriend is taking her from him and he is overall portrayed as a lonely, lost character. Max is told by his mother that he has gone out of control, which essentially is the last straw in initiating him to run away to where he eventually ends up where the wild things are. According to the article “Fantasy - Necessary for Sanity and Morality” in order for proper development, “A child needs to understand what is going on within his conscious self so that he can cope with that which goes on within his unconscious.” This can be attained by daydreaming through stories and scenarios to ...
Whedon's production of Much Ado About Nothing is a modern, black and white retelling of the famous Shakespeare play of the same name which tells the story of love and deceit between two couples: Hero and Claudio, and Beatrice and Benedick. While Hero and Claudio court and prepare to marry each other, Beatrice and Benedick steal the show away with their wit, humor, and constant bickering. Though they both insist that they hate each other, the flashback presented at the start of the film suggests that there is far more to the story than meets the eye. While the style of the film certainly enhances the story being told, making it a timeless classic entangled with modern society, it is the ensemble cast that work both individually and as a unit which make the film a true masterpiece, as well as the genius idea of a change in scenery that propels a sense of realism not often found in your average Shakespeare adaptation.
One thing that can make a book good is characters. In the book, there were many more animals in the farm. The movie did not show many animals except for the main animals. Even thought this is a small difference, it can be noticeable. In the book, Mollie was a character.
For a long time, when anyone thought of a war movie, they immediately thought of Darryl F. Zanuck’s, The Longest Day. Cornelius Ryan, who was the author of the book by the same name, and happened to be a D-day veteran himself, wrote the movie. The book meticulously recreates the events preceding and during the invasion. It is filled with detailed descriptions of multiple occurrences during the invasion. It explains everything from mass attacks on beaches and towns to humorous anecdotes. The book wasn’t exactly a story involving characters, and neither was the film. The Longest Day is more a story of tragedy, glory, and courage surrounding one very important day. And even though mainly American and English filmmakers produced the movie, the movie and book both portray the Germans fairly. But the film added so much to the story that the book could not. Without some of the stunning visuals that the five (Zanuck went unaccredited, but was said to have directed over half the movie) directors put in the film, it would have been impossible to comprehend the scale of it all.
Have you ever read a book and then watched the movie, hoping it will be exactly the same? Let me guess, you were probably disappointed. For my first quarter book report, I read and watched The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. I think the book was very detailed, interesting, and fun to read. However, I was unfortunately let down by this movie. The movie did not follow the storybook like I thought it would. Some of the characters had different names, and most importantly the events that happened in the book either were totally different in the movie, or did not happen at all. This movie did not follow the storyline of the book!
Charlie and the Chocolate factory is a remake of the children’s classic Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, although the acting, setting, and story may seem silly at times, the movie actually have a logical message hidden beneath it all. The emotional connection, credibility, logic, purpose, and setting of the movie are extremely valid, and when you get past the childish cover up, it is really a serious movie.