The authors of the books, Survival in Auschwitz, All But My Life, and Maus II, tell their heart-wrenching, brutal, and hopeful journey of their lives throughout the Holocaust. Though, the stories are written regarding the same historical event, their paths lead to strikingly different outcomes. Primo Levi, an Italian Jew, was sent to Auschwitz where he endured years of the Nazi’s brutality and the horrific images that followed. Art Spiegelman’s Maus II tells the story of how his father, Vladek Spiegelman, survived the war. While Gerda Weissmann Klein describes her own journey in which World War II had taken her. Though these three authors describe very horrific, disgusting, and heartbreaking scenes from their experiences, their books end similarly, …show more content…
with their liberation by the Allied forces. Primo Levi’s story is particularly gruesome as he wrote it soon after he was liberated, allowing him to recollect a great amount of the details to his experience. Levi’s last few months of the war are easily the most disturbing of the whole experience. He is quite fortunate because he holds a good job in a laboratory, where it is warm, sheltered, and free of beatings. However, on January 11, Levi had come down with scarlet fever and was admitted to Ka-Be. He was sent to a room occupied by twelve others whom were also suffering from severe illnesses such as scarlet fever, typhus, and diphtheria. Levi was thankful, even as he writhed with sickness, because he had a bunk to himself and still felt strong enough to pass selections and not to fear the consequences of scarlet fever. On Levi’s fifth day in Ka-be, the barber had come to shave the sick. When it was his turn, Levi asked him in Italian if there was any news, “he stopped shaving me, winked in a serious and allusive manner, pointed to the window with his chin, and then made a sweeping gesture with his hand toward the west.” Levi did not want to react to this news, as he did not want to get his hopes up only to be disappointed. However, this news proved to be true only a few days later. The Germans began to evacuate the prisoners on January 18th, 1945, leaving behind the sick and dying, including Levi. On January 18, it became clear that the war front had drawn closer to the camp. “Two huts were burning fiercely, another two had been pulverized, but they were all empty. Dozens of patients arrived, naked and wretched, from a hut threatened by fire: they asked for shelter.” As the camp was desolate from the dead, or the bombings, Levi and his companions in Ka-be were left to fend for themselves. They set out about the camp in search of food and a way to supply warmth in order to stay healthy and living. On January 25, Levi sat with Charles and Arthur around the stove and spoke of their lives with each other, Levi states, “In the evening, around the stove, Charles, Arthur, and I felt ourselves become men once again. We could speak of everything.” Finally, came liberation for Levi, on January 27, 1945 , the Russians arrived to the camp to liberate Levi and his comrades, who had survived the horrific scenes of Auschwitz. Vladek Spiegelman’s liberation experience differs very dramatically from Levi’s.
In the months leading up to liberation, Spiegelman continued to work in the camp to the best of his ability. However, as the Russian front edged closer to Auschwitz, many of the German officials ran off in fear they would be killed and rumors spread to the prisoners that the Germans were planning on taking the prisoners back to camps inside Germany. Vladek, along with a few other prisoners, plotted to hide in an abandoned room inside the camp to escape the officials and their brutality. However, while hiding they heard that the camp would be bombed, so they decided to march alongside the rest of the prisoners, where their fate would soon be decided. Throughout the march those who were tired, or could not walk fast were shot. They marched from Auschwitz, in Poland, to Gross-Rosen, in Germany. Gross-Rosen was a small camp with thousands of prisoners being pushed back into Germany. The next morning, however, the Germans marched them out once more to trains made for shipping animals. In this train, they pushed as many people as they could into one car. Vladek used the blanket they had given him to create a sort of hammock to rest on and provide some space for himself. “This saved me. Maybe 25 people came out from this car of 200.” Finally, the train had begun to make its way to Dachau, where Vladek’s troubles truly began. In Dachau, he experienced lice and with lice came typhus. In order for the prisoners to receive their ration of soup, they must show their shirt, if you had no lice you would receive your ration of food. However, it deemed impossible to be free of lice, as lice lived in the straw where they slept. After Vladek spent some time in the infirmary, he happened to meet a Frenchman interested in speaking English with him. Each day the Frenchman found Vladek to share his Red Cross package with him, this is yet another gesture in which Vladek claims to have saved his life. A
few weeks later, Vladek became very ill with typhus and was too sick to eat. As his fever began to fall, an order arrived from the Germans: “Everyone strong enough to travel, line up outside you will be exchanged as war prisoners at the Swiss border” Vladek exchanged his bread to have two men help him walk outside to the gates. “Here was a train not for cows and horses, but a real train to take passengers—a train for people!” On his travels toward liberation, Vladek ran into a friend from Sosnowiec, Shivek. Throughout this night, the prisoners thought for sure they’d be killed after being captured again by the Gestapo, however in the morning everyone was still alive. Shivek and Vladek, eventually come across a vacant house with a barn, and they decided to hide there and wait out the war. They saw villagers running away, and shortly after bombs went off nearby causing part of the barn to fall apart. Once things calmed down, Vladek went into the house and brought back milk, chickens, and clothes for himself and Shivek. “There! I’m starting to feel human again!” Vladek states once he’s dressed in real clothes. Finally, the Americans came and rescued them. At last Vladek was a free man, and human once again. Vladek experiences liberation with a breath of relief as the Americans give them food to eat and talk to them like humans. Vladek feels very happy when the Americans show they like him and give him gifts, this makes him feel like he is living again. Similarly to Levi and Spiegelman, Gerda Weissmann Klein’s experience in the camps grew worse as the Allied forces drew closer in on Germany. As the Allies invaded Germany, Grunberg’s population increased by about 4,000, as young women were arrived from other camps. Shortly after, the Germans began to march the women to a new concentration camp. Only after a few days of marching, girls had died of starvation or from the cold. They marched for weeks through Zwickau, Reichenbach, and Plauen, until they finally arrived at Helmbrechts. Gerda states, “We were two hundred and fifty kilometers or more beyond Dresden, more than five hundred from Grunberg.” Helmbrechts was completely surrounded by fences topped with electrified wire and the food was meager. The conditions in Helmbrechts were particularly horrible as the women all became ill with diarrhea and were given little food. Gerda begins to discuss the deaths she witnessed in Helmbrechts and says, “It was strange: some days hardly anyone died, other days we lost many.” Helmbrechts’ barracks were infested with lice and they were not given blankets or bunks to sleep in. Gerda describes the dreaded nights, “Without bunks or blankets, we had nothing but the earthen floor to lie on. Shivering, our bones aching, we huddled in groups and we waited for the dawn.” Only after one month at Helmbrechts, they began to march to cross the Czechoslovakian border. Conditions only grew worse for the women on the march, “We slept outside that night. It was very cold, and the evidence could be seen in the morning in the many stiff bodies on the ground.” Ilse, Gerda’s childhood friend, died on the march, “I held her hand tightly, and we both fell asleep again. When I woke, it was getting light. Ilse’s hand was cold. Her eyes were half open. She no longer breathed.” Gerda continues with Suse and Liesel. Eventually, the women arrive to a town in Czechoslovakia named Volary , where they are locked inside a factory where the Germans leave a bomb outside. Throughout the night, the women hear the bomb ticking with nothing to do about it. In the morning, some Czech people broke open the door and told them to run because the SS will be back to kill them. Gerda, Suse, and Liesel hid in a long metal cylinder laying on the ground, where they waited for hours as the shooting in the distance drew closer. Finally, they come out when they hear a Czech man shouting: “If someone is inside, come out. The war is over!” The Czechs took the girls to a makeshift hospital built by the American soldiers and the Red Cross, and from a window Gerda sees, “The white flag of peace waved gently from its steeple.” American soldiers liberate Gerda in September 1945. Following liberation, Gerda meets Kurt Klein, an American soldier who visits her everyday she is in the hospital. Gerda eventually moves to Buffalo, New York with Kurt and marries him. In conclusion, though the people and their experiences can differ, the stories of liberation seem to be relieving and joyous. These three recollections of experiences in the Holocaust are strikingly different in many aspects, however the messages and purposes these have been written prove to be very similar, if not the same. From Levi’s solitary survival, to Spiegelman’s lucky escape, to Klein’s “fairy-tale” liberation, these three authors proved to tell a story of survival, and heroism. Without hope and faith, these survivors may have not survived.
Christopher McCandless and Adam Shepard both did some similar targets in their lives, at the end it lead them to unexpected situations. Christopher McCandless was a young man who didn't believe in society and he chose to get away from that and left everything he had, including his family. He developed important relationships with key people that helped him on his journey into the wild. Similarly Adam Shepard was a young man who left with only $25 and a sleeping bag to go prove his point that the american dream does exist and to see if he can achieve it in a couple of months. Overall comparing McCandless and Shepard, Christopher McCandless had a greater impact in people, motivated many, and was selfish in plenty of good ways.
The Silber Medal winning biography, “Surviving Hitler," written by Andrea Warren paints picture of life for teenagers during the Holocaust, mainly by telling the story of Jack Mandelbaum. Avoiding the use of historical analysis, Warren, along with Mandelbaum’s experiences, explains how Jack, along with a few other Jewish and non-Jewish people survived.
Using his quick thinking and adaptability, Vladek Spiegelman is able to endure the war and make a life for himself. While in the camps, Vladek Spiegelman must adjust to the situation and quickly learn how to survive, not just physically but mentally as well. He immediately grasps that in order to withstand the camps, he must ration his food. Telling Artie Spiegelman about his consumption habits, Vladek
Art Spiegelman's Maus II is a book that tells more than the story of one family's struggle to live thought the Holocaust. It gives us a look into the psyche of a survivor's child and how the Holocaust affected him and many other generations of people who were never there at all. Maus II gives the reader a peek into the psyche of Art Spiegelman and the affects of having two parents that survived the Holocaust had on him. Spiegelman demonstrates the affects of being a survivor's child in many ways throughout the book. Examining some of these will give us a better understanding of what it was like to be a part of the Holocaust.
By means of comic illustration and parody, Art Spiegelman wrote a graphic novel about the lives of his parents, Vladek and Anja, before and during the Holocaust. Spiegelman’s Maus Volumes I and II delves into the emotional struggle he faced as a result of his father’s failure to recover from the trauma he suffered during the Holocaust. In the novel, Vladek’s inability to cope with the horrors he faced while imprisoned, along with his wife’s tragic death, causes him to become emotionally detached from his son, Art. Consequently, Vladek hinders Art’s emotional growth. However, Art overcomes the emotional trauma his father instilled in him through his writing.
What if you were a holocaust survivor and asked to describe your catastrophic experience? What part of the event would you begin with, the struggle, the death of innocent Jews, or the cruel witnessed? When survivors are questioned about their experience they shiver from head to toe, recalling what they have been through. Therefore, they use substitutes such as books and diaries to expose these catastrophic events internationally. Books such as Maus, A survivor’s tale by Art Spiegelman, and Anne Frank by Ann Kramer. Spiegelman presents Maus in a comical format; he integrated the significance of Holocaust while maintaining the comic frame structure format, whereas comic books are theoretically supposed to be entertaining. Also, Maus uses a brilliant technique of integrating real life people as animal figures in the book. Individually, both stories involve conflicts among relationships with parents. Furthermore, Maus jumps back and forth in time. Although, Anne Frank by Ann Kramer, uses a completely different technique. Comparatively, both the books have a lot in common, but each book has their own distinctive alterations.
The Holocaust is one of the most horrific and gruesome events in world history. It took a great toll on millions of lives in one way or another. One person in particular is Vladek Spiegelman, a Holocaust survivor. Maus, by Art Spiegelman, consists of two main narratives. One narrative occurs during World War II in Poland, and the other begins in the late 1970s in New York. In relation to each other these two narratives portray the past and present.Throughout the novel, we often see Art Spiegelman questioning why his father acts the way he does. Although the war is over, the events of the Holocaust continue to influence the life of Vladek. Why do we allow the past to effect the present? Vladek's personality is largely influenced by his Holocaust experience. In Maus I and II, Vladek was stubborn, selfish, and cheap because of his experiences in the Holocaust.
The comic implies that surviving the holocaust affects Vladek’s life and wrecks his relationship with his son and his wife. In some parts of the story, Vladek rides a stationary bike while narrating his story (I, 81, panel 7-9). Given the fact that it is a stationary bike, it stays immobile: no matter how hard Vladek pedals, he cannot move forward. The immobility of the bike symbolizes how survivor’s guilt will never let him escape his past. Vladek can never really move past the holocaust: he cannot even fall asleep without shouting from the nightmares (II, 74, panel 4-5). Moreover, throughout the story, the two narrators depict Vladek before, during and after the war. Before the war, Vladek is characterized as a pragmatic and resourceful man. He is resourceful as he is able to continue his black business and make money even under the strengthened control of the Nazi right before the war (I, 77 panel 1-7). However, after surviving the holocaust, Vladek feels an obligation to prove to himself and to others that his survival was not simply by mere luck, but because h...
Some people think that if they could only change one aspect of their lives, it would be perfect. They do not realize that anything that is changed could come with unintended consequences. “The Monkey’s Paw” by W.W. Jacobs and “The Third Wish” by Joan Aiken both illustrate this theme. They demonstrate this by granting the main character three wishes, but with each wish that is granted, brings undesirable consequences. The main idea of this essay is to compare and contrast “The Monkey’s Paw” and “The Third Wish.” Although the “The Monkey’s Paw” and “The Third Wish” are both fantasies and have similar themes, they have different main characters, wishes, and resolutions.
In Art Spiegelman’s Maus, the audience is led through a very emotional story of a Holocaust survivor’s life and the present day consequences that the event has placed on his relationship with the author, who is his son, and his wife. Throughout this novel, the audience constantly is reminded of how horrific the Holocaust was to the Jewish people. Nevertheless, the novel finds very effective ways to insert forms of humor in the inner story and outer story of Maus. Although the Holocaust has a heart wrenching effect on the novel as a whole, the effective use of humor allows for the story to become slightly less severe and a more tolerable read.
The books Maus I and Maus II, written by Art Spiegelman over a thirteen-year period from 1978-1991, are books that on the surface are written about the Holocaust. The books specifically relate to the author’s father’s experiences pre and post-war as well as his experiences in Auschwitz. The book also explores the author’s very complex relationship between himself and his father, and how the Holocaust further complicates this relationship. On a deeper level the book also dances around the idea of victims, perpetrators, and bystanders. The two books are presented in a very interesting way; they are shown in comic form, which provides the ability for Spiegelman to incorporate numerous ideas and complexities to his work.
Both articles concern the highly contentious subject of the British strategic bombing campaign in Germany during the Second World War. This subject focuses around the historical debate that the British government knowingly targeted civilian cities in Germany, killing hundreds of thousands of non combatants while also gravely misinforming the British public as to the purpose and results of their strategic bombing campaigns. In the years after the war the debate had come to light due to the renewed interest in the strategic bombing campaign. The articles by Mark Connelly and Alex Bellamy are products of this renewed interest. This essay seeks to compare and contrast the articles on three grounds: the different methods hat each historian uses
When reading a traditional book, it is up to the reader to imagine the faces and landscapes that are described within. A well written story will describe the images clearly so that you can easily picture the details. In Art Spiegelman’s The Complete Maus, the use of the animals in place of the humans offers a rather comical view in its simplistic relation to the subject and at the same time develops a cryptic mood within the story. His drawings of living conditions in Auschwitz; expressions on the faces of people enduring torture, starvation, and despair; his experience with the mental institution and his mother’s suicide; and occasional snapshots of certain individuals, create a new dynamic between book and reader. By using the form of the graphic novel, Art Spiegelman created a narrative accompanied by pictures instead of needing to use immense worded detail.
Primo Levi: Survival in Auschwitz: The Nazi Assault on Humanity (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996) [first published as If This Is a Man], p. 86.
Primo Levi was an Italian Jewish Anti-fascist who was arrested in 1943, during the Second World War. The memoir, “If this is a Man”, written immediately after Levi’s release from the Auschwitz concentration camp, not only provides the readers with Levi’s personal testimony of his experience in Auschwitz, but also invites the readers to consider the implications of life in the concentration camp for our understanding of human identity. In Levi’s own words, the memoir was written to provide “documentation for a quiet study of certain aspects of the human mind”. The lack of emotive words and the use of distant tone in Levi’s first person narration enable the readers to visualize the cold, harsh reality in Auschwitz without taking away the historical credibility. Levi’s use of poetic and literary devices such as listing, repetition, and symbolism in the removal of one’s personal identification; the use of rhetorical questions and the inclusion of foreign languages in the denial of basic human rights; the use of bestial metaphors and choice of vocabulary which directly compares the prisoner of Auschwitz to animals; and the use of extended metaphor and symbolism in the character Null Achtzehn all reveal the concept of dehumanization that was acted upon Jews and other minorities.