Maus: A Survivor I And II: Literary Analysis

2455 Words5 Pages

Although Art Spiegelman’s Maus: A Survivor I and II, achieved critical success when they were first published, some Holocaust survivors criticized Spiegelman for making a comic book out of their tragedy. In “Cultural Criticism,” Adorno implicates Maus by stating that art cannot provide a voice for suffering “without immediately being betrayed by it” and believes that to “write a poetry,” for instance, “after Auschwitz is barbaric” (Adorno 34). Conversely, Miné Okubo’s Citizen 13660, in spite of being published in the same medium, did not face as much backlash as Maus did given that it was the “first published memoir” of the Japanese American internment experience during World War II (Zhou 51). It seems that academics are still reluctant to accept graphic novels as a legitimate scholarly source …show more content…

Given her circumstances, the graphic memoir likewise serves as the best medium for Okubo to document the abject horror of the internment camps as she was able to effectively encapsulate the visceral living conditions through the interplay between the emotionally charged illustrations and dispassionate text. Through this particular methodology, Okubo initiated a discussion regarding the morality of the internment camps that may have contributed to shifting the American mindset from accepting the camps to perhaps deeming them as unethical. As cameras and other “modes of media technology endowed with evidentiary weight” were “not permitted in the camps,” there is very little documentation and records of the Japanese American internment from the actual evacuees themselves (Introduction VIII). Citizen 13660 serves as a recourse for Okubo, a self-appointed observer, reporter, and an actual intern of the camps, as the graphic memoir functions as an alternative method of

Open Document