Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relating feminism to film production
Essay on phases of feminism in relationship to movies
The impact of gender stereotypes on individuals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Relating feminism to film production
‘Male Sexuality’ can be defined as an inclusion of ‘sexual identity, sexual health, sexual expression and individual choice’ (first reference). In addition to these attributes, one would also define ‘male sexuality’ as the masculine traits that males acquire or inherit from different environments, attributes that are given to them from their sex (biological) alone, and ones that they achieve through their own norms and values. In film, and recent film in particular; male sexuality as different types of masculinity is presented to us in many different forms and ways, dependent on the narrative of the film. Men, unlike women, often shy away from their emotions in film; due to the nature of their sexuality and the environment they are in, thus …show more content…
In the opening scene of the film, the opening song displays the rhetoric for the narrative of the film; ‘It’s a Man’s, Man’s, Man’s World’ by James Brown; this alone perpetuates and initiates the male dominated, patriarchal narrative of the film. Nonetheless, Zeke (Romany Malco) is the typical hegemonic and hypermasculine male; he encapsulates the identity of ‘the player’ and is also known as ‘Zeke the Freak’ by his peers for his promiscuous and open sex life, thus encouraging his hegemonic masculinity and ‘subordination of women’. He often brags about sleeping with women and his disregard for them, as he is always on to the next one; which can be a problem for him. When each character label is being presented to the viewer at the beginning, in the case of Zeke, he exhibits Mulvey’s ‘male gaze’. This theory, introduced the idea that women in film are more than not often ‘objects of the gaze’ – which inherently refers to women being seen as objects Schroder (1998) “to gaze implies more than to look at – it signifies a psychological relationship of power, in which the gazer is superior to the object of the gaze.”. This is due to the audience viewing characters from a …show more content…
The two immediately do not share any common grounds and similarities as previously discussed. Brad purchases basketball tickets for the family including Dusty but he has deliberately purchased a seat that is away from his nuclear family. This does not portray any kind of homosocial or harmonious attitudes on Brad’s behalf and has been done to exclude Dusty, rather than make him feel welcome. However, there are occasions where homosociality can be seen and this is not through the direct relationship between Dusty and Brad, the main characters but through Dusty and Griff (Hannibal Buress) and somewhat between Brad and Leo Holt (Thomas Church). The male bond between Dusty and Brad become apparent in the final scene; the pair are able to put their difference aside and praise one another, whilst challenging bully to a dance off. This is a clear contrast in relation to Think Like a Man, as the two men transition into a friendship, opposed to the characters in Think Like a Man are already in a friendship
In Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema, Mulvey states that, “Traditionally, the woman displayed has functioned on two levels: as erotic object for the characters within the screen story, and as erotic object for the spectator within the auditorium, with a shifting tension between the looks on either side of the screen.” (Mulvey 40). A woman’s role in the narrative is bound to her sexuality or the way she
‘Lad flicks’ or ‘lad movies’ is a type of film genre that emerged in the late 1990s. They are defined as a “‘hybrid of “buddy movies”, romantic comedies and “chick flicks”, which centre on the trials and tribulations of a young man as he grows up to become a ‘real man’. ‘Lad flicks’ respond in part to the much-debated ‘crisis in masculinity’” (Benjamin A. Brabon 116). This genre of film explored what it meant to be a ‘real man’ in the twentieth century and in order to do so, they would have to grow up and leave their juvenile ways behind to enter the heterosexual world. Gender relations in ‘lad flicks’ portray masculinity as a troubled, anxious cultural category hiding behind a humorous façade and also rely greatly on a knowing gaze and irony. The two ‘lad flicks’ that will be analyzed are The 40-Year-Old Virgin (Judd Apatow 2005) and Role Models (David Wain 2008).
As a society there are a lot of qualities that men have been socialized to uphold when it comes to how they act or react, what they support, and what they suppress. This movie produces a harsh critique of male socialization early on and continues
Examining different scenarios, such as toy proportions, outlook from inmates in jail, and the ideas portrayed of what the ideal man consist from the viewpoint of man, the movie depicts these things to show how pop culture, social constructs, and masculine identities influence their opinions. Consequently, men believe they can gain respect and admiration from others from their use of violence and threats. Katz asked inmates about their ideology of masculinity; they said that masculinity is about having power and respect. Furthermore, they showed concerned about what the other inmates thought of them and their masculinity. Boys and men have to carefully shape their persona to fit the ideal standard of masculinity, no matter the cost. Katz and Earp break down the social constructs of masculinity by looking at the ideas of the “ideal man,” violence leading to masculinity, and degradation of masculinity by attacking individuals with the notion that they are acting
Smith, Jeff, and Chloe Beighley. "Normalizing Male Dominance: Gender Representation in 2012 Films." Grand Rapids Institute for Information Democracy. N.p., 12 Feb. 2013. Web. 1 Apr. 2014.
The scene described above sounds as if it should be found in a pornographic video displayed on the shelves of a sex shop located in the back alleys of Soho in London. However, this scene is taken from director David Fincher’s widely popular film Fight Club. Even though the scene has an intense air of the homoerotic, the characters in the film are actually fighting and not having sex. Steve Neale addresses this phenomenon in his article “Masculinity as Spectacle”. He upholds the view of feminist film theorist Laura Mulvey by maintaining that the spectatorial look in mainstream cinema is always male. A problem arises when the look of the spectator is forced upon an erotic shot of a male figure. The article states, “that in a heterosexual and patriarchal society, the male body cannot be marked explicitly as the erotic object of another male look: that look must be motivated in some other way, its erotic component repressed” (Neale 14). The erotic component is repressed with violence or with mutilation of the male body. This repression is often found in the action genre in such films as Gladiator and Fight Club where the female object of the spectator gaze is replaced with male figures.
According to Kimmel, the earliest embodiments of American manhood were landowners, independent artisans, shopkeepers, and farmers. During the first decade of the nineteenth century, the industrial revolution started to influence the way, American men thought of themselves. Manhood was now defined as through the man’s economic success. This was the origin of the “Self-Made Man” ideology and the new concept of manhood that was more exciting, and potentially more rewarding for men themselves. The image of the Self-Made Man has far reaching effects on the notion of masculinity in America. Thus, the emergence of the Self-Made Man put men under pressure. As Kimmel states,
For the purpose of this study, I will critically examine the representation of homosexuality in Hollywood cinema. I will specifically analyse films from the early 90’s to mid 2000’s from ‘Philadelphia’ to ‘Brokeback Mountain’. This dissertation will argue that over the space of 12 years homosexuality has become an acceptable part of cinema. I will look at early Hollywood’s representation of homosexuality depicting how aesthetically so much has changed. The current paper will predominantly focus on the two films ‘Philadelphia’ and ‘Brokeback Mountain’, by critically analysing the aesthetic differences between each film as well as their overall importance to gay culture.
Laura Mulveys argues that the perspective presented by Hollywood narrative cinema is largely a heterosexual
Rendering Cinema as visual equipment being perfected to satisfy and provoke male desires. (Smelik, 1999)
an also kept very private. Since feminists and adult film has come together over the past couple of years , many adults films has not been the same. Feminist bring a middle ground of the fantasy world and some social problems together. They bring about ways that stop inequality , from the color of your skins to your sexual orientation. Society see adult films as woman being degraded , but feminist see it as woman being empowered and coming in tune with one self. So in this paper we will discuss how many people see adult films as a social problem and others question why should it be a social problem.
In Velvet Goldmine we see, quite explicitly, how characters like Brian Slade (Jonathan Rhys Meyers) and Arthur Stuart (Christian Bale) actively adopt queer characteristics and mannerisms in an attempt to define themselves. This is done a few ways within the film such as through costuming, makeup, movement and so forth. These techniques come together to contextualise concepts of queerness and become a means by which audiences can track the trajectory of the story and the characters’ evolution into an identity in which they feel most comfortable. Velvet Goldmine maintains a steady spotlight on the spectacle and performance of the human body, particularly that of the cultural icon, which is no surprise as Todd Haynes’s films have often concerned themselves with the difficult relationship between the young body, the adult body and the cinematic body.
In her article, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema” (1975), Laura Mulvey approaches the fascination with looking through a psychoanalytic lens. She begins by commenting on the concept of phallocentrism, which “depends on the image of the castrated woman to give order and meaning to its world.” Mulvey further explains that, “the function of woman in forming the patriarchal unconscious is twofold: she first symbolizes the castration threat by her real absence of a penis and second thereby raises her child into the symbolic.” Through this view, the woman cannot exist without castration. Therefore, Mulvey’s belief is that woman “stands in patriarchal culture ...
Visual pleasure, more formally known as “scopophillia”, is all about gaining pleasure from visual stimulus. Laura Mulvey has written many essays on this idea, especially on how it pertains to film. She argues that there is a problem with the way genders are presented in most films. That all too often men are the narrative driving protagonists of film, and women are merely sexual objects for the hero and the audience to gaze upon. She calls this the “male gaze” theory.
Masculinity and femininity are two terms, which have been interpreted differently throughout history. Both the males and the females have responsibilities and duties but these duties differ based on one’s gender. Gender has played a prodigious role in the economy, politics, and the society. Everyone starts making interpretations of the strengths and weaknesses based on one’s gender. These interpretations are not always based on his or her ability but is usually based on his or her gender. Males tend to be judged as extremely strong and unfashionable in terms of appearance. Whereas, females are judged as expensive and very fashionable. Males and females both differ in their abilities and their enjoyments. Fashion, entertainment, and strength are three topics, which are used to define masculinity and femininity in the 21st century.